Deleting subdirectories without remove their content? [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • How to move all files inside present subfolders up here

    4 answers



I have a directory called music who have many albums and separate tracks. Some of them are in subdirectories. What I want is remove this folders and mix all tracks in the music directory without separations.



Will be hard do this manually, so I am looking for some bash command.







share|improve this question














marked as duplicate by muru, G-Man, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, Satō Katsura Feb 27 at 7:54


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


















    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite













    This question already has an answer here:



    • How to move all files inside present subfolders up here

      4 answers



    I have a directory called music who have many albums and separate tracks. Some of them are in subdirectories. What I want is remove this folders and mix all tracks in the music directory without separations.



    Will be hard do this manually, so I am looking for some bash command.







    share|improve this question














    marked as duplicate by muru, G-Man, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, Satō Katsura Feb 27 at 7:54


    This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite












      This question already has an answer here:



      • How to move all files inside present subfolders up here

        4 answers



      I have a directory called music who have many albums and separate tracks. Some of them are in subdirectories. What I want is remove this folders and mix all tracks in the music directory without separations.



      Will be hard do this manually, so I am looking for some bash command.







      share|improve this question















      This question already has an answer here:



      • How to move all files inside present subfolders up here

        4 answers



      I have a directory called music who have many albums and separate tracks. Some of them are in subdirectories. What I want is remove this folders and mix all tracks in the music directory without separations.



      Will be hard do this manually, so I am looking for some bash command.





      This question already has an answer here:



      • How to move all files inside present subfolders up here

        4 answers









      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 26 at 22:14









      Gilles Quenot

      15.3k13448




      15.3k13448










      asked Feb 26 at 22:00







      user224753











      marked as duplicate by muru, G-Man, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, Satō Katsura Feb 27 at 7:54


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






      marked as duplicate by muru, G-Man, Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, Satō Katsura Feb 27 at 7:54


      This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Without find



          shopt -s globstar
          mv -nv **/*.mp3 /path/to/common/directory





          share|improve this answer



























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            find . -mindepth 1 -type f -exec mv -i "" /common/path ;
            find . -mindepth 1 -d -type d -exec rmdir "" ;


            This will move all your music from the current directory to /common/path and the second one will delete all directories. Then you can move all your stuff back to the original directory.



            Also, this will prompt you if you want to overwrite files with the same name.






            share|improve this answer






















            • Can't I sent the subdirectories files to the music directory directly?
              – user224753
              Feb 26 at 22:57










            • Not with this method. This will throw an error when you try to move the files from the top level of the structure(trying to move the same file on itself). You could however, use -mindepth 2 in the first command and replace /common/path with ., however, this is opening up for another set of issues(llike having a directory with a name of a file you are moving). It's a bit safer to use a different path(empty one) and handle files with the same name. You may as well use cp instead of mv, review and delete the original structure.
              – man0v
              Feb 26 at 23:05


















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            find /path/to/music/ -type f -execdir mv -n "" /path/to/sharedmusic/ ;


            Files with duplicate names will not be moved, but rather left in their original location.






            share|improve this answer




















            • If you find yourself with a copy of awesome tune.ogg, would you rather see mv path/to/awesome tune.ogg /path/to/sharedmusic or mv "path/to/awesome tune.ogg" /path/to/sharedmusic?
              – DopeGhoti
              Feb 26 at 22:10






            • 1




              is that a reference to the quotes around ? find doesn't run the command through a shell, so that's not an issue there. (find doesn't even see the quotes, it just sees as an argument.) If you had find -exec sh -c 'somecmd "$1"' sh ;, then the quotes inside the shell scriptlet would be an issue
              – ilkkachu
              Feb 26 at 22:13


















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            You could complete a find for all the files in the sub-directories then have that find command execute move to current directory.



            an example of this is found in this answer below.
            https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22388480/how-to-pipe-the-results-of-find-to-mv-in-linux



            Quoted Answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22388545/879882




            xargs is commonly used for this, and mv has a -t option to facilitate that.



            find ./ -name '*article*' | xargs mv -t ../backup


            If your find supports -exec ... + you could equivalently do



            find ./ -name '*article*' -exec mv -t ../backup +


            The -t option is probably a GNU extension. It's of course possible to roll your own, maybe something like



            find ./ -name '*article*' -exec sh -c 'mv "$@" "$0"' ../backup +


            where we shamelessly abuse the convenient fact that the first argument after sh -c 'commands' ends up as the "script name" parameter in $0 so that we don't even need to shift it.







            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              @Theophrastus we don't know this is for a Linux system with GNU tools. It could be Mac or Solaris. And the point was that mv -t is not POSIX standard
              – roaima
              Feb 26 at 22:14











            • I was pointing to an existing answer to a similar question over on stack overflow and only quoted a section of the answer. if you go to the stack overflow question, its has more explanation then what i put here.
              – thebtm
              Feb 26 at 22:15






            • 1




              We're not on stackoverflow
              – roaima
              Feb 26 at 22:15










            • @roaima I understand this is not Stack Overflow but stack overflow is a stack exchange site like this site, its why I quoted the answer instead of submitting the question as a duplicate question.
              – thebtm
              Feb 26 at 22:18

















            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Without find



            shopt -s globstar
            mv -nv **/*.mp3 /path/to/common/directory





            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Without find



              shopt -s globstar
              mv -nv **/*.mp3 /path/to/common/directory





              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                Without find



                shopt -s globstar
                mv -nv **/*.mp3 /path/to/common/directory





                share|improve this answer












                Without find



                shopt -s globstar
                mv -nv **/*.mp3 /path/to/common/directory






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 27 at 0:10









                xenoid

                1,6751620




                1,6751620






















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    find . -mindepth 1 -type f -exec mv -i "" /common/path ;
                    find . -mindepth 1 -d -type d -exec rmdir "" ;


                    This will move all your music from the current directory to /common/path and the second one will delete all directories. Then you can move all your stuff back to the original directory.



                    Also, this will prompt you if you want to overwrite files with the same name.






                    share|improve this answer






















                    • Can't I sent the subdirectories files to the music directory directly?
                      – user224753
                      Feb 26 at 22:57










                    • Not with this method. This will throw an error when you try to move the files from the top level of the structure(trying to move the same file on itself). You could however, use -mindepth 2 in the first command and replace /common/path with ., however, this is opening up for another set of issues(llike having a directory with a name of a file you are moving). It's a bit safer to use a different path(empty one) and handle files with the same name. You may as well use cp instead of mv, review and delete the original structure.
                      – man0v
                      Feb 26 at 23:05















                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote













                    find . -mindepth 1 -type f -exec mv -i "" /common/path ;
                    find . -mindepth 1 -d -type d -exec rmdir "" ;


                    This will move all your music from the current directory to /common/path and the second one will delete all directories. Then you can move all your stuff back to the original directory.



                    Also, this will prompt you if you want to overwrite files with the same name.






                    share|improve this answer






















                    • Can't I sent the subdirectories files to the music directory directly?
                      – user224753
                      Feb 26 at 22:57










                    • Not with this method. This will throw an error when you try to move the files from the top level of the structure(trying to move the same file on itself). You could however, use -mindepth 2 in the first command and replace /common/path with ., however, this is opening up for another set of issues(llike having a directory with a name of a file you are moving). It's a bit safer to use a different path(empty one) and handle files with the same name. You may as well use cp instead of mv, review and delete the original structure.
                      – man0v
                      Feb 26 at 23:05













                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    1
                    down vote









                    find . -mindepth 1 -type f -exec mv -i "" /common/path ;
                    find . -mindepth 1 -d -type d -exec rmdir "" ;


                    This will move all your music from the current directory to /common/path and the second one will delete all directories. Then you can move all your stuff back to the original directory.



                    Also, this will prompt you if you want to overwrite files with the same name.






                    share|improve this answer














                    find . -mindepth 1 -type f -exec mv -i "" /common/path ;
                    find . -mindepth 1 -d -type d -exec rmdir "" ;


                    This will move all your music from the current directory to /common/path and the second one will delete all directories. Then you can move all your stuff back to the original directory.



                    Also, this will prompt you if you want to overwrite files with the same name.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Feb 26 at 22:21

























                    answered Feb 26 at 22:11









                    man0v

                    30917




                    30917











                    • Can't I sent the subdirectories files to the music directory directly?
                      – user224753
                      Feb 26 at 22:57










                    • Not with this method. This will throw an error when you try to move the files from the top level of the structure(trying to move the same file on itself). You could however, use -mindepth 2 in the first command and replace /common/path with ., however, this is opening up for another set of issues(llike having a directory with a name of a file you are moving). It's a bit safer to use a different path(empty one) and handle files with the same name. You may as well use cp instead of mv, review and delete the original structure.
                      – man0v
                      Feb 26 at 23:05

















                    • Can't I sent the subdirectories files to the music directory directly?
                      – user224753
                      Feb 26 at 22:57










                    • Not with this method. This will throw an error when you try to move the files from the top level of the structure(trying to move the same file on itself). You could however, use -mindepth 2 in the first command and replace /common/path with ., however, this is opening up for another set of issues(llike having a directory with a name of a file you are moving). It's a bit safer to use a different path(empty one) and handle files with the same name. You may as well use cp instead of mv, review and delete the original structure.
                      – man0v
                      Feb 26 at 23:05
















                    Can't I sent the subdirectories files to the music directory directly?
                    – user224753
                    Feb 26 at 22:57




                    Can't I sent the subdirectories files to the music directory directly?
                    – user224753
                    Feb 26 at 22:57












                    Not with this method. This will throw an error when you try to move the files from the top level of the structure(trying to move the same file on itself). You could however, use -mindepth 2 in the first command and replace /common/path with ., however, this is opening up for another set of issues(llike having a directory with a name of a file you are moving). It's a bit safer to use a different path(empty one) and handle files with the same name. You may as well use cp instead of mv, review and delete the original structure.
                    – man0v
                    Feb 26 at 23:05





                    Not with this method. This will throw an error when you try to move the files from the top level of the structure(trying to move the same file on itself). You could however, use -mindepth 2 in the first command and replace /common/path with ., however, this is opening up for another set of issues(llike having a directory with a name of a file you are moving). It's a bit safer to use a different path(empty one) and handle files with the same name. You may as well use cp instead of mv, review and delete the original structure.
                    – man0v
                    Feb 26 at 23:05











                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    find /path/to/music/ -type f -execdir mv -n "" /path/to/sharedmusic/ ;


                    Files with duplicate names will not be moved, but rather left in their original location.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • If you find yourself with a copy of awesome tune.ogg, would you rather see mv path/to/awesome tune.ogg /path/to/sharedmusic or mv "path/to/awesome tune.ogg" /path/to/sharedmusic?
                      – DopeGhoti
                      Feb 26 at 22:10






                    • 1




                      is that a reference to the quotes around ? find doesn't run the command through a shell, so that's not an issue there. (find doesn't even see the quotes, it just sees as an argument.) If you had find -exec sh -c 'somecmd "$1"' sh ;, then the quotes inside the shell scriptlet would be an issue
                      – ilkkachu
                      Feb 26 at 22:13















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    find /path/to/music/ -type f -execdir mv -n "" /path/to/sharedmusic/ ;


                    Files with duplicate names will not be moved, but rather left in their original location.






                    share|improve this answer




















                    • If you find yourself with a copy of awesome tune.ogg, would you rather see mv path/to/awesome tune.ogg /path/to/sharedmusic or mv "path/to/awesome tune.ogg" /path/to/sharedmusic?
                      – DopeGhoti
                      Feb 26 at 22:10






                    • 1




                      is that a reference to the quotes around ? find doesn't run the command through a shell, so that's not an issue there. (find doesn't even see the quotes, it just sees as an argument.) If you had find -exec sh -c 'somecmd "$1"' sh ;, then the quotes inside the shell scriptlet would be an issue
                      – ilkkachu
                      Feb 26 at 22:13













                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    find /path/to/music/ -type f -execdir mv -n "" /path/to/sharedmusic/ ;


                    Files with duplicate names will not be moved, but rather left in their original location.






                    share|improve this answer












                    find /path/to/music/ -type f -execdir mv -n "" /path/to/sharedmusic/ ;


                    Files with duplicate names will not be moved, but rather left in their original location.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Feb 26 at 22:05









                    DopeGhoti

                    40.2k54779




                    40.2k54779











                    • If you find yourself with a copy of awesome tune.ogg, would you rather see mv path/to/awesome tune.ogg /path/to/sharedmusic or mv "path/to/awesome tune.ogg" /path/to/sharedmusic?
                      – DopeGhoti
                      Feb 26 at 22:10






                    • 1




                      is that a reference to the quotes around ? find doesn't run the command through a shell, so that's not an issue there. (find doesn't even see the quotes, it just sees as an argument.) If you had find -exec sh -c 'somecmd "$1"' sh ;, then the quotes inside the shell scriptlet would be an issue
                      – ilkkachu
                      Feb 26 at 22:13

















                    • If you find yourself with a copy of awesome tune.ogg, would you rather see mv path/to/awesome tune.ogg /path/to/sharedmusic or mv "path/to/awesome tune.ogg" /path/to/sharedmusic?
                      – DopeGhoti
                      Feb 26 at 22:10






                    • 1




                      is that a reference to the quotes around ? find doesn't run the command through a shell, so that's not an issue there. (find doesn't even see the quotes, it just sees as an argument.) If you had find -exec sh -c 'somecmd "$1"' sh ;, then the quotes inside the shell scriptlet would be an issue
                      – ilkkachu
                      Feb 26 at 22:13
















                    If you find yourself with a copy of awesome tune.ogg, would you rather see mv path/to/awesome tune.ogg /path/to/sharedmusic or mv "path/to/awesome tune.ogg" /path/to/sharedmusic?
                    – DopeGhoti
                    Feb 26 at 22:10




                    If you find yourself with a copy of awesome tune.ogg, would you rather see mv path/to/awesome tune.ogg /path/to/sharedmusic or mv "path/to/awesome tune.ogg" /path/to/sharedmusic?
                    – DopeGhoti
                    Feb 26 at 22:10




                    1




                    1




                    is that a reference to the quotes around ? find doesn't run the command through a shell, so that's not an issue there. (find doesn't even see the quotes, it just sees as an argument.) If you had find -exec sh -c 'somecmd "$1"' sh ;, then the quotes inside the shell scriptlet would be an issue
                    – ilkkachu
                    Feb 26 at 22:13





                    is that a reference to the quotes around ? find doesn't run the command through a shell, so that's not an issue there. (find doesn't even see the quotes, it just sees as an argument.) If you had find -exec sh -c 'somecmd "$1"' sh ;, then the quotes inside the shell scriptlet would be an issue
                    – ilkkachu
                    Feb 26 at 22:13











                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    You could complete a find for all the files in the sub-directories then have that find command execute move to current directory.



                    an example of this is found in this answer below.
                    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22388480/how-to-pipe-the-results-of-find-to-mv-in-linux



                    Quoted Answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22388545/879882




                    xargs is commonly used for this, and mv has a -t option to facilitate that.



                    find ./ -name '*article*' | xargs mv -t ../backup


                    If your find supports -exec ... + you could equivalently do



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec mv -t ../backup +


                    The -t option is probably a GNU extension. It's of course possible to roll your own, maybe something like



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec sh -c 'mv "$@" "$0"' ../backup +


                    where we shamelessly abuse the convenient fact that the first argument after sh -c 'commands' ends up as the "script name" parameter in $0 so that we don't even need to shift it.







                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 1




                      @Theophrastus we don't know this is for a Linux system with GNU tools. It could be Mac or Solaris. And the point was that mv -t is not POSIX standard
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:14











                    • I was pointing to an existing answer to a similar question over on stack overflow and only quoted a section of the answer. if you go to the stack overflow question, its has more explanation then what i put here.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:15






                    • 1




                      We're not on stackoverflow
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:15










                    • @roaima I understand this is not Stack Overflow but stack overflow is a stack exchange site like this site, its why I quoted the answer instead of submitting the question as a duplicate question.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:18















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote













                    You could complete a find for all the files in the sub-directories then have that find command execute move to current directory.



                    an example of this is found in this answer below.
                    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22388480/how-to-pipe-the-results-of-find-to-mv-in-linux



                    Quoted Answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22388545/879882




                    xargs is commonly used for this, and mv has a -t option to facilitate that.



                    find ./ -name '*article*' | xargs mv -t ../backup


                    If your find supports -exec ... + you could equivalently do



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec mv -t ../backup +


                    The -t option is probably a GNU extension. It's of course possible to roll your own, maybe something like



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec sh -c 'mv "$@" "$0"' ../backup +


                    where we shamelessly abuse the convenient fact that the first argument after sh -c 'commands' ends up as the "script name" parameter in $0 so that we don't even need to shift it.







                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 1




                      @Theophrastus we don't know this is for a Linux system with GNU tools. It could be Mac or Solaris. And the point was that mv -t is not POSIX standard
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:14











                    • I was pointing to an existing answer to a similar question over on stack overflow and only quoted a section of the answer. if you go to the stack overflow question, its has more explanation then what i put here.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:15






                    • 1




                      We're not on stackoverflow
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:15










                    • @roaima I understand this is not Stack Overflow but stack overflow is a stack exchange site like this site, its why I quoted the answer instead of submitting the question as a duplicate question.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:18













                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    You could complete a find for all the files in the sub-directories then have that find command execute move to current directory.



                    an example of this is found in this answer below.
                    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22388480/how-to-pipe-the-results-of-find-to-mv-in-linux



                    Quoted Answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22388545/879882




                    xargs is commonly used for this, and mv has a -t option to facilitate that.



                    find ./ -name '*article*' | xargs mv -t ../backup


                    If your find supports -exec ... + you could equivalently do



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec mv -t ../backup +


                    The -t option is probably a GNU extension. It's of course possible to roll your own, maybe something like



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec sh -c 'mv "$@" "$0"' ../backup +


                    where we shamelessly abuse the convenient fact that the first argument after sh -c 'commands' ends up as the "script name" parameter in $0 so that we don't even need to shift it.







                    share|improve this answer














                    You could complete a find for all the files in the sub-directories then have that find command execute move to current directory.



                    an example of this is found in this answer below.
                    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22388480/how-to-pipe-the-results-of-find-to-mv-in-linux



                    Quoted Answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22388545/879882




                    xargs is commonly used for this, and mv has a -t option to facilitate that.



                    find ./ -name '*article*' | xargs mv -t ../backup


                    If your find supports -exec ... + you could equivalently do



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec mv -t ../backup +


                    The -t option is probably a GNU extension. It's of course possible to roll your own, maybe something like



                    find ./ -name '*article*' -exec sh -c 'mv "$@" "$0"' ../backup +


                    where we shamelessly abuse the convenient fact that the first argument after sh -c 'commands' ends up as the "script name" parameter in $0 so that we don't even need to shift it.








                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Feb 26 at 22:17

























                    answered Feb 26 at 22:07









                    thebtm

                    645411




                    645411







                    • 1




                      @Theophrastus we don't know this is for a Linux system with GNU tools. It could be Mac or Solaris. And the point was that mv -t is not POSIX standard
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:14











                    • I was pointing to an existing answer to a similar question over on stack overflow and only quoted a section of the answer. if you go to the stack overflow question, its has more explanation then what i put here.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:15






                    • 1




                      We're not on stackoverflow
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:15










                    • @roaima I understand this is not Stack Overflow but stack overflow is a stack exchange site like this site, its why I quoted the answer instead of submitting the question as a duplicate question.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:18













                    • 1




                      @Theophrastus we don't know this is for a Linux system with GNU tools. It could be Mac or Solaris. And the point was that mv -t is not POSIX standard
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:14











                    • I was pointing to an existing answer to a similar question over on stack overflow and only quoted a section of the answer. if you go to the stack overflow question, its has more explanation then what i put here.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:15






                    • 1




                      We're not on stackoverflow
                      – roaima
                      Feb 26 at 22:15










                    • @roaima I understand this is not Stack Overflow but stack overflow is a stack exchange site like this site, its why I quoted the answer instead of submitting the question as a duplicate question.
                      – thebtm
                      Feb 26 at 22:18








                    1




                    1




                    @Theophrastus we don't know this is for a Linux system with GNU tools. It could be Mac or Solaris. And the point was that mv -t is not POSIX standard
                    – roaima
                    Feb 26 at 22:14





                    @Theophrastus we don't know this is for a Linux system with GNU tools. It could be Mac or Solaris. And the point was that mv -t is not POSIX standard
                    – roaima
                    Feb 26 at 22:14













                    I was pointing to an existing answer to a similar question over on stack overflow and only quoted a section of the answer. if you go to the stack overflow question, its has more explanation then what i put here.
                    – thebtm
                    Feb 26 at 22:15




                    I was pointing to an existing answer to a similar question over on stack overflow and only quoted a section of the answer. if you go to the stack overflow question, its has more explanation then what i put here.
                    – thebtm
                    Feb 26 at 22:15




                    1




                    1




                    We're not on stackoverflow
                    – roaima
                    Feb 26 at 22:15




                    We're not on stackoverflow
                    – roaima
                    Feb 26 at 22:15












                    @roaima I understand this is not Stack Overflow but stack overflow is a stack exchange site like this site, its why I quoted the answer instead of submitting the question as a duplicate question.
                    – thebtm
                    Feb 26 at 22:18





                    @roaima I understand this is not Stack Overflow but stack overflow is a stack exchange site like this site, its why I quoted the answer instead of submitting the question as a duplicate question.
                    – thebtm
                    Feb 26 at 22:18



                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Bahrain

                    Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay