Linux Routing Question, more specific route still using default route [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1















Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route







share|improve this question













closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57
















1















Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route







share|improve this question













closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57














1












1








1








Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route







share|improve this question














Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route




linux route






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 4 at 21:05









BrianBrian

112




112




closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57


















  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57

















Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

– roaima
Feb 4 at 21:33






Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

– roaima
Feb 4 at 21:33














All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

– Brian
Feb 4 at 22:57






All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

– Brian
Feb 4 at 22:57











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






share|improve this answer





























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



    I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



      I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



        I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






        share|improve this answer













        There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



        I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 5 at 0:16









        roaimaroaima

        45.1k756122




        45.1k756122












            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
            Read more

            Bahrain

            Image
            For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
            Read more

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
            Read more