Linux Routing Question, more specific route still using default route [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1















Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route







share|improve this question













closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57
















1















Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route







share|improve this question













closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57














1












1








1








Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route







share|improve this question














Trying to route NNN.130.0.0 via NNN.NNN.206.254 however it appears to still be using the default gateway. What am I missing here?



root@xxxxxx ~ # route add -net NNN.130.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw NNN.NNN.206.254 eth0
root@xxxxxx ~ # route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
NNN.130.0.0 NNN.NNN.206.254 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.240.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.248.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.254.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.21.124.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
172.20.124.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.252.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.64.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.128.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.160.0 NNN.NNN.193.1 255.255.248.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.NNN.192.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
NNN.9.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.240.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1002 0 0 eth0
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1003 0 0 eth1
0.0.0.0 NNN.NNN.192.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0

root@xxxxxx ~ # ip route get NNN.130.20.35
NNN.130.20.35 via NNN.NNN.192.1 dev eth0 src NNN.NNN.192.62





linux route




linux route






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 4 at 21:05









BrianBrian

112




112




closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as unclear what you're asking by Rui F Ribeiro, roaima, Mr Shunz, Christopher, Jeff Schaller Feb 5 at 16:59


Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57


















  • Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

    – roaima
    Feb 4 at 21:33












  • All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

    – Brian
    Feb 4 at 22:57

















Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

– roaima
Feb 4 at 21:33






Are all those NNN exactly the same? If not, please go back and add a set of self-consistent values. So N might be 192 everywhere, and M might be 172 everywhere, and so on, but each letter will never represent anything other than one value.

– roaima
Feb 4 at 21:33














All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

– Brian
Feb 4 at 22:57






All values are the same. You can replace with 222. so 222.222.206.254 would be valid for NNN.NNN.206.254.

– Brian
Feb 4 at 22:57











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






share|improve this answer





























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



    I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



      I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



        I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.






        share|improve this answer













        There is no explicit route for the address NNN.130.20.35 so it takes the default.



        I wonder if you're muddling NNN.130.20.35 with the unrelated subnet NNN.130.0.0/24.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Feb 5 at 0:16









        roaimaroaima

        45.1k756122




        45.1k756122












            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
            Read more

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
            Read more

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
            Read more