A problem when integrate Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x] [duplicate]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
How to force correct answers for Integrals of Cos[mx]*Cos[nx]? [duplicate]
2 answers
When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code
sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], x, -Pi, Pi,
Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
.
k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2)
And then use the Simplify function,
Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[Pi, n == k, 0, n != k]
instead?
calculus-and-analysis
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Daniel Lichtblau, m_goldberg, march, Henrik Schumacher, MarcoB Jan 29 at 6:34
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
How to force correct answers for Integrals of Cos[mx]*Cos[nx]? [duplicate]
2 answers
When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code
sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], x, -Pi, Pi,
Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
.
k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2)
And then use the Simplify function,
Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[Pi, n == k, 0, n != k]
instead?
calculus-and-analysis
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Daniel Lichtblau, m_goldberg, march, Henrik Schumacher, MarcoB Jan 29 at 6:34
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
How to force correct answers for Integrals of Cos[mx]*Cos[nx]? [duplicate]
2 answers
When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code
sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], x, -Pi, Pi,
Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
.
k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2)
And then use the Simplify function,
Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[Pi, n == k, 0, n != k]
instead?
calculus-and-analysis
$endgroup$
This question already has an answer here:
How to force correct answers for Integrals of Cos[mx]*Cos[nx]? [duplicate]
2 answers
When integrate the indefinite integral Cos[nx]Cos[kx] about x, where both k and n are positive integer, the result is Pi when n equals to k and 0 when n is unequal to k. However, the code
sol = Integrate[Cos[n*x]*Cos[k*x], x, -Pi, Pi,
Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result (k Sin[π k + π n] - n Sin[π k + π n] +
.
k Sin[π k - π n] + n Sin[π k - π n])/(k^2 - n^2)
And then use the Simplify function,
Simplify[sol, Assumptions -> n ∈ Integers && k ∈ Integers && n > 0 && k > 0]
gives the result 0. Shouldn't that Integrate returns a Piecewise function like Piecewise[Pi, n == k, 0, n != k]
instead?
This question already has an answer here:
How to force correct answers for Integrals of Cos[mx]*Cos[nx]? [duplicate]
2 answers
calculus-and-analysis
calculus-and-analysis
edited Jan 24 at 3:42
Mr.Wizard♦
231k294761046
231k294761046
asked Jan 24 at 2:05
shelure21shelure21
184
184
marked as duplicate by Daniel Lichtblau, m_goldberg, march, Henrik Schumacher, MarcoB Jan 29 at 6:34
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Daniel Lichtblau, m_goldberg, march, Henrik Schumacher, MarcoB Jan 29 at 6:34
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is well know issue. One way to handle it is
Simplify[ sol,
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
(* 0 *)
And
Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n],
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
(* Pi *)
See
should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand
And
What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality
And
should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral
And
proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints
And
usage-of-assuming-for-integration
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can shorten theLimit
toLimit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Jan 24 at 5:41
$begingroup$
@BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Jan 24 at 5:56
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This is well know issue. One way to handle it is
Simplify[ sol,
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
(* 0 *)
And
Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n],
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
(* Pi *)
See
should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand
And
What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality
And
should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral
And
proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints
And
usage-of-assuming-for-integration
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can shorten theLimit
toLimit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Jan 24 at 5:41
$begingroup$
@BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Jan 24 at 5:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is well know issue. One way to handle it is
Simplify[ sol,
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
(* 0 *)
And
Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n],
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
(* Pi *)
See
should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand
And
What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality
And
should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral
And
proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints
And
usage-of-assuming-for-integration
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
You can shorten theLimit
toLimit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Jan 24 at 5:41
$begingroup$
@BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Jan 24 at 5:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is well know issue. One way to handle it is
Simplify[ sol,
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
(* 0 *)
And
Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n],
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
(* Pi *)
See
should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand
And
What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality
And
should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral
And
proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints
And
usage-of-assuming-for-integration
$endgroup$
This is well know issue. One way to handle it is
Simplify[ sol,
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k != n]
(* 0 *)
And
Simplify[ Limit[sol, k -> n],
Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers] && Element[k, Integers] && n > 0 && k > 0 && k == n ]
(* Pi *)
See
should-integrate-detect-orthogonality-of-functions-in-the-integrand
And
What assumptions to use to check for orthogonality
And
should-integrate-have-given-zero-for-this-integral
And
proper-way-to-simplify-integral-result-in-mathematica-given-integer-constraints
And
usage-of-assuming-for-integration
answered Jan 24 at 2:25
NasserNasser
57.8k488205
57.8k488205
$begingroup$
You can shorten theLimit
toLimit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Jan 24 at 5:41
$begingroup$
@BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Jan 24 at 5:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
You can shorten theLimit
toLimit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Jan 24 at 5:41
$begingroup$
@BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Jan 24 at 5:56
$begingroup$
You can shorten the
Limit
to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Jan 24 at 5:41
$begingroup$
You can shorten the
Limit
to Limit[sol, k -> n, Assumptions -> Element[n, Integers]]
$endgroup$
– Bob Hanlon
Jan 24 at 5:41
$begingroup$
@BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Jan 24 at 5:56
$begingroup$
@BobHanlon thanks. I am sure you are right. I was only copying what the OP had in there. But good point.
$endgroup$
– Nasser
Jan 24 at 5:56
add a comment |