Quotient ring local if Ring is local

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.
We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^times = rin R , $ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.
I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.
abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.
We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^times = rin R , $ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.
I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.
abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Jan 5 at 21:21
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.
We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^times = rin R , $ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.
I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.
abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings
$endgroup$
I want to show: If $R$ is local and $Ineq R$ an ideal, then $R/I$ is also local.
We already know: A Ring $R$ is local if and only if $R-R^times = rin R , $ is an ideal. We also know that if $I$ is an maximal Ideal, $R/I$ is a field.
I have no idea how to show that other than using the above Lemma.
abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings
abstract-algebra ring-theory factoring quotient-group local-rings
asked Jan 5 at 21:10
KingDingelingKingDingeling
1366
1366
2
$begingroup$
This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Jan 5 at 21:21
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Jan 5 at 21:21
2
2
$begingroup$
This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Jan 5 at 21:21
$begingroup$
This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Jan 5 at 21:21
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^-1(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you a lot, that really helped.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@King You're welcome.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 21:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrakm.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.
Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrakm$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrakm$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrakm)$. $widetildemathfrakm=pi(mathfrakm)$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.
So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrakm)$ and hence is local.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Not a problem. Good luck
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 5 at 21:37
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063196%2fquotient-ring-local-if-ring-is-local%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^-1(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you a lot, that really helped.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@King You're welcome.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 21:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^-1(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you a lot, that really helped.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@King You're welcome.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 21:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^-1(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.
$endgroup$
The easiest characterization of local rings here is that a ring is local if and only if it has exactly one maximal ideal. Let $M$ be the maximal ideal of $R$ and $f:Rto R/I$ the surjection. If $R/I$ has a maximal ideal $M'neq f(M) $, then $f^-1(M')neq M$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, which is a contradiction.
answered Jan 5 at 21:22
Matt SamuelMatt Samuel
37.7k63665
37.7k63665
$begingroup$
Thank you a lot, that really helped.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@King You're welcome.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 21:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you a lot, that really helped.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@King You're welcome.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Thank you a lot, that really helped.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:26
$begingroup$
Thank you a lot, that really helped.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:26
$begingroup$
@King You're welcome.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
@King You're welcome.
$endgroup$
– Matt Samuel
Jan 5 at 21:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrakm.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.
Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrakm$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrakm$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrakm)$. $widetildemathfrakm=pi(mathfrakm)$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.
So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrakm)$ and hence is local.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Not a problem. Good luck
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 5 at 21:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrakm.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.
Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrakm$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrakm$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrakm)$. $widetildemathfrakm=pi(mathfrakm)$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.
So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrakm)$ and hence is local.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Not a problem. Good luck
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 5 at 21:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrakm.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.
Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrakm$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrakm$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrakm)$. $widetildemathfrakm=pi(mathfrakm)$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.
So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrakm)$ and hence is local.
$endgroup$
By definition, $R$ is a local ring if and only if it has a unique maximal ideal $mathfrakm.$ The lattice isomorphism theorem for commutative rings states that the quotient homomorphism $pi:Rto R/I$ induces an inclusion preserving correspondence between ideals of $R$ containing $I$ and ideals of $R/I$.
Every ideal $Isubseteq R$ is contained in a (unique) maximal ideal. $R$ is local so that the only maximal ideal is $mathfrakm$. So, $Isubseteq mathfrakm$. The lattice isomorphism tells us that the ideals of $R/I$ are all contained in $pi(mathfrakm)$. $widetildemathfrakm=pi(mathfrakm)$ is a maximal ideal in $R/I$ (check this) so that it is also the unique maximal ideal in $R/I$ since any other maximal ideal is contained in it by the lattice isomorphism theorem.
So, $R/I$ has unique maximal ideal $pi(mathfrakm)$ and hence is local.
answered Jan 5 at 21:19
Antonios-Alexandros RobotisAntonios-Alexandros Robotis
9,75241640
9,75241640
$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Not a problem. Good luck
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 5 at 21:37
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Not a problem. Good luck
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 5 at 21:37
$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Thanks for taking the time and helping me out, appreciate it.
$endgroup$
– KingDingeling
Jan 5 at 21:27
$begingroup$
Not a problem. Good luck
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 5 at 21:37
$begingroup$
Not a problem. Good luck
$endgroup$
– Antonios-Alexandros Robotis
Jan 5 at 21:37
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063196%2fquotient-ring-local-if-ring-is-local%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
This follows trivially from the ideal correspondence theorem for quotient rings.
$endgroup$
– rschwieb
Jan 5 at 21:21