How to split files with numeric names?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1















I'm trying to split text file into files of 1024 lines, so I ran split with the -d switch:



split -d -l 300 ./list.lst


I get some weird names: they start with x and the file names jump from x89 to x9000. I want the files to be named like that:



1.lst
2.lst
3.lst
...


Thanks.










share|improve this question




























    1















    I'm trying to split text file into files of 1024 lines, so I ran split with the -d switch:



    split -d -l 300 ./list.lst


    I get some weird names: they start with x and the file names jump from x89 to x9000. I want the files to be named like that:



    1.lst
    2.lst
    3.lst
    ...


    Thanks.










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      I'm trying to split text file into files of 1024 lines, so I ran split with the -d switch:



      split -d -l 300 ./list.lst


      I get some weird names: they start with x and the file names jump from x89 to x9000. I want the files to be named like that:



      1.lst
      2.lst
      3.lst
      ...


      Thanks.










      share|improve this question
















      I'm trying to split text file into files of 1024 lines, so I ran split with the -d switch:



      split -d -l 300 ./list.lst


      I get some weird names: they start with x and the file names jump from x89 to x9000. I want the files to be named like that:



      1.lst
      2.lst
      3.lst
      ...


      Thanks.







      linux split words






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 6 at 1:09







      Adel M.

















      asked Jan 6 at 1:01









      Adel M.Adel M.

      112




      112




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          At least with the GNU Coreutils version of split, you can do it as follows:



          split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" file ""


          Note the use of "" to specify an empty prefix (the xa part of the default filename) and the use of --numeric-suffixes in place of -d (which always starts from 0).



          Note also that this assumes that the file to be split contains no more than 9 x 300 lines - otherwise split will complain that output file suffixes exhausted



          Ex.



          $ split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" --verbose file ""
          creating file '1.lst'
          creating file '2.lst'
          creating file '3.lst'
          creating file '4.lst'





          share|improve this answer























          • With --suffix-length=1 it is only possible to create 9 parts (1-9). The user is creating more than 89 parts (because he reports filenames as x9000). So, length should be at least 3 (or more).

            – Isaac
            Jan 6 at 5:52


















          0














          Try this:



           split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''



          The reason for the jump to 9000 (for more than 89 parts) is that the default numeric length is 2.



          Change with the -a option. To make sure the file numbering stay numeric (and is monotonic (always increase)) use a length that is longer than the maximum value that the possible number of splits.



           $ split -a 3 -d -l1024 ./list.lst

          $ ls
          list.lst x009 x019 x029 x039 x049 x059 x069 x079 x089 x099 x109 x119
          x000 x010 x020 x030 x040 x050 x060 x070 x080 x090 x100 x110 x120
          x001 x011 x021 x031 x041 x051 x061 x071 x081 x091 x101 x111 x121
          x002 x012 x022 x032 x042 x052 x062 x072 x082 x092 x102 x112 x122
          x003 x013 x023 x033 x043 x053 x063 x073 x083 x093 x103 x113 x123
          x004 x014 x024 x034 x044 x054 x064 x074 x084 x094 x104 x114 x124
          x005 x015 x025 x035 x045 x055 x065 x075 x085 x095 x105 x115 x125
          x006 x016 x026 x036 x046 x056 x066 x076 x086 x096 x106 x116 x126
          x007 x017 x027 x037 x047 x057 x067 x077 x087 x097 x107 x117 x127
          x008 x018 x028 x038 x048 x058 x068 x078 x088 x098 x108 x118


          To change the x, just change the PREFFIX (default x) (after the file name):



           split -a 3 -d -l 1024 list.lst ''


          Which will name the files 000. To get a trailing .lst, add the --additional-suffix='.lst' option, in short, use this:



           split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


          If you need the start numeric value to be 001, use this:



           split --additional-suffix='.lst' --numeric-suffixes=1 -a 3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


          But no, there is no way to get the numeric values like 1,2,3,...,21,..,107 without renaming.



          The renaming could resolve all issues in two steps with a simple loop:



           split -l 1024 -d -a 8 list.lst
          for f in x[0-9]*; do
          mv "$f" "$((10#$f#x+1)).lst"
          done





          share|improve this answer
























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492732%2fhow-to-split-files-with-numeric-names%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            At least with the GNU Coreutils version of split, you can do it as follows:



            split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" file ""


            Note the use of "" to specify an empty prefix (the xa part of the default filename) and the use of --numeric-suffixes in place of -d (which always starts from 0).



            Note also that this assumes that the file to be split contains no more than 9 x 300 lines - otherwise split will complain that output file suffixes exhausted



            Ex.



            $ split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" --verbose file ""
            creating file '1.lst'
            creating file '2.lst'
            creating file '3.lst'
            creating file '4.lst'





            share|improve this answer























            • With --suffix-length=1 it is only possible to create 9 parts (1-9). The user is creating more than 89 parts (because he reports filenames as x9000). So, length should be at least 3 (or more).

              – Isaac
              Jan 6 at 5:52















            1














            At least with the GNU Coreutils version of split, you can do it as follows:



            split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" file ""


            Note the use of "" to specify an empty prefix (the xa part of the default filename) and the use of --numeric-suffixes in place of -d (which always starts from 0).



            Note also that this assumes that the file to be split contains no more than 9 x 300 lines - otherwise split will complain that output file suffixes exhausted



            Ex.



            $ split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" --verbose file ""
            creating file '1.lst'
            creating file '2.lst'
            creating file '3.lst'
            creating file '4.lst'





            share|improve this answer























            • With --suffix-length=1 it is only possible to create 9 parts (1-9). The user is creating more than 89 parts (because he reports filenames as x9000). So, length should be at least 3 (or more).

              – Isaac
              Jan 6 at 5:52













            1












            1








            1







            At least with the GNU Coreutils version of split, you can do it as follows:



            split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" file ""


            Note the use of "" to specify an empty prefix (the xa part of the default filename) and the use of --numeric-suffixes in place of -d (which always starts from 0).



            Note also that this assumes that the file to be split contains no more than 9 x 300 lines - otherwise split will complain that output file suffixes exhausted



            Ex.



            $ split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" --verbose file ""
            creating file '1.lst'
            creating file '2.lst'
            creating file '3.lst'
            creating file '4.lst'





            share|improve this answer













            At least with the GNU Coreutils version of split, you can do it as follows:



            split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" file ""


            Note the use of "" to specify an empty prefix (the xa part of the default filename) and the use of --numeric-suffixes in place of -d (which always starts from 0).



            Note also that this assumes that the file to be split contains no more than 9 x 300 lines - otherwise split will complain that output file suffixes exhausted



            Ex.



            $ split -l300 --numeric-suffixes=1 --suffix-length=1 --additional-suffix=".lst" --verbose file ""
            creating file '1.lst'
            creating file '2.lst'
            creating file '3.lst'
            creating file '4.lst'






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jan 6 at 1:19









            steeldriversteeldriver

            35.6k35286




            35.6k35286












            • With --suffix-length=1 it is only possible to create 9 parts (1-9). The user is creating more than 89 parts (because he reports filenames as x9000). So, length should be at least 3 (or more).

              – Isaac
              Jan 6 at 5:52

















            • With --suffix-length=1 it is only possible to create 9 parts (1-9). The user is creating more than 89 parts (because he reports filenames as x9000). So, length should be at least 3 (or more).

              – Isaac
              Jan 6 at 5:52
















            With --suffix-length=1 it is only possible to create 9 parts (1-9). The user is creating more than 89 parts (because he reports filenames as x9000). So, length should be at least 3 (or more).

            – Isaac
            Jan 6 at 5:52





            With --suffix-length=1 it is only possible to create 9 parts (1-9). The user is creating more than 89 parts (because he reports filenames as x9000). So, length should be at least 3 (or more).

            – Isaac
            Jan 6 at 5:52













            0














            Try this:



             split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''



            The reason for the jump to 9000 (for more than 89 parts) is that the default numeric length is 2.



            Change with the -a option. To make sure the file numbering stay numeric (and is monotonic (always increase)) use a length that is longer than the maximum value that the possible number of splits.



             $ split -a 3 -d -l1024 ./list.lst

            $ ls
            list.lst x009 x019 x029 x039 x049 x059 x069 x079 x089 x099 x109 x119
            x000 x010 x020 x030 x040 x050 x060 x070 x080 x090 x100 x110 x120
            x001 x011 x021 x031 x041 x051 x061 x071 x081 x091 x101 x111 x121
            x002 x012 x022 x032 x042 x052 x062 x072 x082 x092 x102 x112 x122
            x003 x013 x023 x033 x043 x053 x063 x073 x083 x093 x103 x113 x123
            x004 x014 x024 x034 x044 x054 x064 x074 x084 x094 x104 x114 x124
            x005 x015 x025 x035 x045 x055 x065 x075 x085 x095 x105 x115 x125
            x006 x016 x026 x036 x046 x056 x066 x076 x086 x096 x106 x116 x126
            x007 x017 x027 x037 x047 x057 x067 x077 x087 x097 x107 x117 x127
            x008 x018 x028 x038 x048 x058 x068 x078 x088 x098 x108 x118


            To change the x, just change the PREFFIX (default x) (after the file name):



             split -a 3 -d -l 1024 list.lst ''


            Which will name the files 000. To get a trailing .lst, add the --additional-suffix='.lst' option, in short, use this:



             split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


            If you need the start numeric value to be 001, use this:



             split --additional-suffix='.lst' --numeric-suffixes=1 -a 3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


            But no, there is no way to get the numeric values like 1,2,3,...,21,..,107 without renaming.



            The renaming could resolve all issues in two steps with a simple loop:



             split -l 1024 -d -a 8 list.lst
            for f in x[0-9]*; do
            mv "$f" "$((10#$f#x+1)).lst"
            done





            share|improve this answer





























              0














              Try this:



               split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''



              The reason for the jump to 9000 (for more than 89 parts) is that the default numeric length is 2.



              Change with the -a option. To make sure the file numbering stay numeric (and is monotonic (always increase)) use a length that is longer than the maximum value that the possible number of splits.



               $ split -a 3 -d -l1024 ./list.lst

              $ ls
              list.lst x009 x019 x029 x039 x049 x059 x069 x079 x089 x099 x109 x119
              x000 x010 x020 x030 x040 x050 x060 x070 x080 x090 x100 x110 x120
              x001 x011 x021 x031 x041 x051 x061 x071 x081 x091 x101 x111 x121
              x002 x012 x022 x032 x042 x052 x062 x072 x082 x092 x102 x112 x122
              x003 x013 x023 x033 x043 x053 x063 x073 x083 x093 x103 x113 x123
              x004 x014 x024 x034 x044 x054 x064 x074 x084 x094 x104 x114 x124
              x005 x015 x025 x035 x045 x055 x065 x075 x085 x095 x105 x115 x125
              x006 x016 x026 x036 x046 x056 x066 x076 x086 x096 x106 x116 x126
              x007 x017 x027 x037 x047 x057 x067 x077 x087 x097 x107 x117 x127
              x008 x018 x028 x038 x048 x058 x068 x078 x088 x098 x108 x118


              To change the x, just change the PREFFIX (default x) (after the file name):



               split -a 3 -d -l 1024 list.lst ''


              Which will name the files 000. To get a trailing .lst, add the --additional-suffix='.lst' option, in short, use this:



               split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


              If you need the start numeric value to be 001, use this:



               split --additional-suffix='.lst' --numeric-suffixes=1 -a 3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


              But no, there is no way to get the numeric values like 1,2,3,...,21,..,107 without renaming.



              The renaming could resolve all issues in two steps with a simple loop:



               split -l 1024 -d -a 8 list.lst
              for f in x[0-9]*; do
              mv "$f" "$((10#$f#x+1)).lst"
              done





              share|improve this answer



























                0












                0








                0







                Try this:



                 split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''



                The reason for the jump to 9000 (for more than 89 parts) is that the default numeric length is 2.



                Change with the -a option. To make sure the file numbering stay numeric (and is monotonic (always increase)) use a length that is longer than the maximum value that the possible number of splits.



                 $ split -a 3 -d -l1024 ./list.lst

                $ ls
                list.lst x009 x019 x029 x039 x049 x059 x069 x079 x089 x099 x109 x119
                x000 x010 x020 x030 x040 x050 x060 x070 x080 x090 x100 x110 x120
                x001 x011 x021 x031 x041 x051 x061 x071 x081 x091 x101 x111 x121
                x002 x012 x022 x032 x042 x052 x062 x072 x082 x092 x102 x112 x122
                x003 x013 x023 x033 x043 x053 x063 x073 x083 x093 x103 x113 x123
                x004 x014 x024 x034 x044 x054 x064 x074 x084 x094 x104 x114 x124
                x005 x015 x025 x035 x045 x055 x065 x075 x085 x095 x105 x115 x125
                x006 x016 x026 x036 x046 x056 x066 x076 x086 x096 x106 x116 x126
                x007 x017 x027 x037 x047 x057 x067 x077 x087 x097 x107 x117 x127
                x008 x018 x028 x038 x048 x058 x068 x078 x088 x098 x108 x118


                To change the x, just change the PREFFIX (default x) (after the file name):



                 split -a 3 -d -l 1024 list.lst ''


                Which will name the files 000. To get a trailing .lst, add the --additional-suffix='.lst' option, in short, use this:



                 split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


                If you need the start numeric value to be 001, use this:



                 split --additional-suffix='.lst' --numeric-suffixes=1 -a 3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


                But no, there is no way to get the numeric values like 1,2,3,...,21,..,107 without renaming.



                The renaming could resolve all issues in two steps with a simple loop:



                 split -l 1024 -d -a 8 list.lst
                for f in x[0-9]*; do
                mv "$f" "$((10#$f#x+1)).lst"
                done





                share|improve this answer















                Try this:



                 split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''



                The reason for the jump to 9000 (for more than 89 parts) is that the default numeric length is 2.



                Change with the -a option. To make sure the file numbering stay numeric (and is monotonic (always increase)) use a length that is longer than the maximum value that the possible number of splits.



                 $ split -a 3 -d -l1024 ./list.lst

                $ ls
                list.lst x009 x019 x029 x039 x049 x059 x069 x079 x089 x099 x109 x119
                x000 x010 x020 x030 x040 x050 x060 x070 x080 x090 x100 x110 x120
                x001 x011 x021 x031 x041 x051 x061 x071 x081 x091 x101 x111 x121
                x002 x012 x022 x032 x042 x052 x062 x072 x082 x092 x102 x112 x122
                x003 x013 x023 x033 x043 x053 x063 x073 x083 x093 x103 x113 x123
                x004 x014 x024 x034 x044 x054 x064 x074 x084 x094 x104 x114 x124
                x005 x015 x025 x035 x045 x055 x065 x075 x085 x095 x105 x115 x125
                x006 x016 x026 x036 x046 x056 x066 x076 x086 x096 x106 x116 x126
                x007 x017 x027 x037 x047 x057 x067 x077 x087 x097 x107 x117 x127
                x008 x018 x028 x038 x048 x058 x068 x078 x088 x098 x108 x118


                To change the x, just change the PREFFIX (default x) (after the file name):



                 split -a 3 -d -l 1024 list.lst ''


                Which will name the files 000. To get a trailing .lst, add the --additional-suffix='.lst' option, in short, use this:



                 split --additional-suffix='.lst' -da3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


                If you need the start numeric value to be 001, use this:



                 split --additional-suffix='.lst' --numeric-suffixes=1 -a 3 -l 1024 list.lst ''


                But no, there is no way to get the numeric values like 1,2,3,...,21,..,107 without renaming.



                The renaming could resolve all issues in two steps with a simple loop:



                 split -l 1024 -d -a 8 list.lst
                for f in x[0-9]*; do
                mv "$f" "$((10#$f#x+1)).lst"
                done






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Jan 6 at 6:04

























                answered Jan 6 at 5:47









                IsaacIsaac

                11.5k11652




                11.5k11652



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492732%2fhow-to-split-files-with-numeric-names%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown






                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                    How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?