What is the exact technical word to describe the relationship between a verb and noun with the same root?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
13
down vote

favorite
2












I'm editing a paper and the sentence I need to fix is, "Thus, the word and its_________ appear seven times in the chapter."



The word in question is a Hebrew word meaning to "rejoice" but the noun form, with an almost identical root meaning "gladness," is part of the seven occurrences. I thought of using "cognate" but that seems to be emphasizing a word "descended from the same language" which is not the emphasis here. I need a word that describes the relationship between a verb and its noun form, e.g., "to fly" and "flight."










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    13
    down vote

    favorite
    2












    I'm editing a paper and the sentence I need to fix is, "Thus, the word and its_________ appear seven times in the chapter."



    The word in question is a Hebrew word meaning to "rejoice" but the noun form, with an almost identical root meaning "gladness," is part of the seven occurrences. I thought of using "cognate" but that seems to be emphasizing a word "descended from the same language" which is not the emphasis here. I need a word that describes the relationship between a verb and its noun form, e.g., "to fly" and "flight."










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      13
      down vote

      favorite
      2









      up vote
      13
      down vote

      favorite
      2






      2





      I'm editing a paper and the sentence I need to fix is, "Thus, the word and its_________ appear seven times in the chapter."



      The word in question is a Hebrew word meaning to "rejoice" but the noun form, with an almost identical root meaning "gladness," is part of the seven occurrences. I thought of using "cognate" but that seems to be emphasizing a word "descended from the same language" which is not the emphasis here. I need a word that describes the relationship between a verb and its noun form, e.g., "to fly" and "flight."










      share|improve this question













      I'm editing a paper and the sentence I need to fix is, "Thus, the word and its_________ appear seven times in the chapter."



      The word in question is a Hebrew word meaning to "rejoice" but the noun form, with an almost identical root meaning "gladness," is part of the seven occurrences. I thought of using "cognate" but that seems to be emphasizing a word "descended from the same language" which is not the emphasis here. I need a word that describes the relationship between a verb and its noun form, e.g., "to fly" and "flight."







      terminology






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Dec 6 at 23:30









      Joseph O.

      745




      745




















          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          16
          down vote













          Derivative:




          (specialized language) a form of something, such as a word, made or developed from another form:



          • "Detestable" is a derivative of "detest”.



          (Cambridge Dictionary)






          share|improve this answer
















          • 6




            +1 This. Here's a reasonably authoritative linguistics site.
            – StoneyB
            Dec 7 at 0:26






          • 3




            This isn't a direct answer to the question asked - as I read it, the word described by the blank isn't actually a derivative of the other, but rather both words are derived from the same root. OP: if you use "derivative", keep in mind that it implies an order.
            – SirTechSpec
            Dec 7 at 15:33

















          up vote
          15
          down vote













          A cognate accusative/object is a figure of speech in which the verb and object are etymologically related:




          He slept a troubled sleep.
          Dance a dance.
          Die a peaceful death.




          So there shouldn't be any problem writing:




          verb x and its cognate noun




          Since you're dealing with a language based on consonantal roots, “noun [derived] from the same root” would also work.



          The problem with derivation alone is that it assumes that, say, the verb is historically prior to the noun, which may or may not have been the case.






          share|improve this answer



























            up vote
            7
            down vote













            You could use: nominal form, nounal form or, as you yourself suggest, noun form.



            These three phrases have the required emphasis on a related-but-different-parts-of-speech link between the words, rather than one of descent or derivation.



            Merriam-Webster give the following definitions:




            nominal adjective ...



            of, relating to, or being a noun or a word or expression taking a noun construction




            nounal adjective ...



            of, relating to, or of the
            nature, function, or quality of a noun




            And noun can itself be used adjectivally, as it is in the linguistics terms noun phrase and noun class.




            A cursory glace through Google Books search results suggests nominal form gets extensive use in linguistics texts. Two relevant examples follow:




            Early Indo-European languages present a wide range of nominal constructions that convey verbal action and combine a noun and a nominal form of the verb...



            Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin, Brigitte Bauer (2011)




            The nominal form of a transitive verb that has only the prefix mang... does not differ from the stem-word, or the word to be regarded as such...



            A Grammar of Toba Batak, Herman Neubronner van der van der Tuuk (2013)




            Nounal form seems to be seen more in non-linguistics texts, though it is also used in linguistics too; it may be more dated as a phrase.




            Similarly, "knowledge" is a nounal form rooted in verbs: OE "cnawan" meaning "to know," and OE "-cennan" meaning "To make known."



            Libri, vol. 38, Jean Anker (1988)




            In these the Latin gerund is reproduced in 17 cases by a nounal form; 10 cases by a participle; 2 cases by an infinitive. The Gospels have little to teach: only one Latin gerund in the ablative has an object; this construction is paraphrased.



            Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1900)




            Noun form seems to get the most general use. It's favoured in ESL circles and is also commonly used in linguistics as well.




            Noun form of verb (gerund)



            [For example] Rotting: When looking after food, it is important to minimise rotting.



            Advanced Grammar: For Academic Writing, Richard Stevenson (2010)




            You pronounce the noun form of affect differently from the verb form. With the noun form, you stress the first syllable, and the a sounds like it would if you were saying “at.”



            Grammar Essentials For Dummies, Geraldine Woods (2010)




            Even though the intrusion error in (11) is also homophonous with the target verb form, it is not itself a verb form but a noun form.



            Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. Harald Baayen, ‎Robert Schreuder (2011)




            According to Google Ngram viewer, noun form also seems to be the most common of the three, with nominal form also well established and nounal form comparatively rare:
            Ngrams comparing "noun form", "nominal form", "nounal form"



            Both noun form and nominal form seem current and readily understandable, though neither is specific in describing the verb-noun relationship you require - they are, of course, more general phrases with other uses. However, your context makes the intended meaning very clear.



            For what it's worth, to my mind, noun form is the nicest - it's simple and straightforward. It's also exactly the words that came to your own mind when trying to find a term!



            Absent a more specific term for Semitic languages in general or Hebrew in particular (ask on Linguistics, perhaps, if that's what you want), I'd go for noun form.



            To clarify the link you're trying to make, I'd also use verb rather than word, and state which noun form you are referring to, as there are possibly several different nouns related to the verb. Thus, your sentence would read:




            Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.





            I also doubt there is a specific technical term for what you're asking for because it's not that well defined an idea, as you can see when you generalise it beyond the case at hand.



            I'm not sure that the relationship between fly and flight is fundamentally the same as that between enjoy and joy, gladden and gladness, or fish (the verb) and fish (the noun) - or fishing, for that matter.



            Also with enjoy, for instance, putting enjoyment and joy aside, we can conjugate two verbal nouns, enjoying and to enjoy, the to-infinitive form and the gerund: while it is Hebrew rather than English in your example, I assume there are equivalent regularly-formed verbal nouns of some sort: should they be be excluded from the term you seek? (Apologies for the laborious explanation! I'm just trying to illustrate that it's not a simple, straightforward category you seek a label for, at least as I see it.)






            share|improve this answer





























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              I minored in linguistics and I'm not aware of a single word that means "a word that shares a root with another word".



              As I read the question, neither of the two words you want to describe is itself the root (if Hebrew roots work like Arabic roots and they aren't words you can say by themselves, this makes sense). So if you want to use "derivative", you would have to get a little wordier and say "Thus, these two derivatives of [root] appear seven times in the chapter."



              Or just take the casual approach and say "thus, rejoice and the related word joy appear seven times", if the exact relationship between the two isn't important. I'm not sure "related word" has a formal definition as a phrase, but it sounds perfectly natural to me just based on the meaning of "related" and "word" put together.



              I also like tmgr's suggestion:




              Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.







              share|improve this answer




















              • That is helpful. My Hebrew is limited but I do remember the expression "triliteral root" as applying to the three consonants most Hebrew words are built from. Because the verb "samach" is triliteral and the noun "simchah" had a fourth consonant I assumed that the noun was derivative of the verb. That could be a wrong assumption. Perhaps someone with a better grasp of Semitic languages can help us out.
                – Joseph O.
                Dec 8 at 0:05










              • +1 Taking a step back and going to the root of the words (and the problem!) is a neat way to deal with this. Keeping it very general also works well too.
                – tmgr
                Dec 8 at 20:12

















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              You have the "stem", "root", or "morpheme", or "radical", partly depending on what area of linguistics you are in [radix= latin word for (plant) root]. From one word you get a "derivative" word, and its reverse is the "primitive" form.



              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_stem



              But what you are considering are inflections of a stem, https://quirkycase.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/linguistics-for-laypeople-inflection-vs-derivation/ .






              share|improve this answer








              New contributor




              user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                up vote
                0
                down vote













                deverbal noun

                (e.g. destruction, container, growth and adjustment are deverbal nouns that derive from destroy, contain grow and adjust respectively)

                (also, deverbal nouns are a specific subclass of derivatives, a term correctly suggested by @user240918)



                Some useful references:

                - Wikipedia article (general overview)

                - Chomsky, Noam (1970) Remarks on Nominalization (classic discussion of the topic in Generative Grammar)

                - Gurevich, Olga et al. (2008) Deverbal Nouns in Knowledge Representation (state-of-the art computational treatment of deverbal nouns)

                - Grimshaw, Jane (1990) Argument Structure (chapter 4 on arguments of "event nominals")

                - Marantz, Alex (1990) No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon (on deverbal nouns in a framework called "Distributed Morphology")






                share|improve this answer








                New contributor




                Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.

















                  Your Answer








                  StackExchange.ready(function()
                  var channelOptions =
                  tags: "".split(" "),
                  id: "97"
                  ;
                  initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                  StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                  // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                  if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                  StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                  createEditor();
                  );

                  else
                  createEditor();

                  );

                  function createEditor()
                  StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                  heartbeatType: 'answer',
                  convertImagesToLinks: false,
                  noModals: true,
                  showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                  reputationToPostImages: null,
                  bindNavPrevention: true,
                  postfix: "",
                  imageUploader:
                  brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                  contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                  allowUrls: true
                  ,
                  noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                  discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                  ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                  );



                  );













                  draft saved

                  draft discarded


















                  StackExchange.ready(
                  function ()
                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475920%2fwhat-is-the-exact-technical-word-to-describe-the-relationship-between-a-verb-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                  );

                  Post as a guest















                  Required, but never shown

























                  6 Answers
                  6






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  6 Answers
                  6






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes









                  active

                  oldest

                  votes






                  active

                  oldest

                  votes








                  up vote
                  16
                  down vote













                  Derivative:




                  (specialized language) a form of something, such as a word, made or developed from another form:



                  • "Detestable" is a derivative of "detest”.



                  (Cambridge Dictionary)






                  share|improve this answer
















                  • 6




                    +1 This. Here's a reasonably authoritative linguistics site.
                    – StoneyB
                    Dec 7 at 0:26






                  • 3




                    This isn't a direct answer to the question asked - as I read it, the word described by the blank isn't actually a derivative of the other, but rather both words are derived from the same root. OP: if you use "derivative", keep in mind that it implies an order.
                    – SirTechSpec
                    Dec 7 at 15:33














                  up vote
                  16
                  down vote













                  Derivative:




                  (specialized language) a form of something, such as a word, made or developed from another form:



                  • "Detestable" is a derivative of "detest”.



                  (Cambridge Dictionary)






                  share|improve this answer
















                  • 6




                    +1 This. Here's a reasonably authoritative linguistics site.
                    – StoneyB
                    Dec 7 at 0:26






                  • 3




                    This isn't a direct answer to the question asked - as I read it, the word described by the blank isn't actually a derivative of the other, but rather both words are derived from the same root. OP: if you use "derivative", keep in mind that it implies an order.
                    – SirTechSpec
                    Dec 7 at 15:33












                  up vote
                  16
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  16
                  down vote









                  Derivative:




                  (specialized language) a form of something, such as a word, made or developed from another form:



                  • "Detestable" is a derivative of "detest”.



                  (Cambridge Dictionary)






                  share|improve this answer












                  Derivative:




                  (specialized language) a form of something, such as a word, made or developed from another form:



                  • "Detestable" is a derivative of "detest”.



                  (Cambridge Dictionary)







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 6 at 23:45









                  user240918

                  24.7k1068148




                  24.7k1068148







                  • 6




                    +1 This. Here's a reasonably authoritative linguistics site.
                    – StoneyB
                    Dec 7 at 0:26






                  • 3




                    This isn't a direct answer to the question asked - as I read it, the word described by the blank isn't actually a derivative of the other, but rather both words are derived from the same root. OP: if you use "derivative", keep in mind that it implies an order.
                    – SirTechSpec
                    Dec 7 at 15:33












                  • 6




                    +1 This. Here's a reasonably authoritative linguistics site.
                    – StoneyB
                    Dec 7 at 0:26






                  • 3




                    This isn't a direct answer to the question asked - as I read it, the word described by the blank isn't actually a derivative of the other, but rather both words are derived from the same root. OP: if you use "derivative", keep in mind that it implies an order.
                    – SirTechSpec
                    Dec 7 at 15:33







                  6




                  6




                  +1 This. Here's a reasonably authoritative linguistics site.
                  – StoneyB
                  Dec 7 at 0:26




                  +1 This. Here's a reasonably authoritative linguistics site.
                  – StoneyB
                  Dec 7 at 0:26




                  3




                  3




                  This isn't a direct answer to the question asked - as I read it, the word described by the blank isn't actually a derivative of the other, but rather both words are derived from the same root. OP: if you use "derivative", keep in mind that it implies an order.
                  – SirTechSpec
                  Dec 7 at 15:33




                  This isn't a direct answer to the question asked - as I read it, the word described by the blank isn't actually a derivative of the other, but rather both words are derived from the same root. OP: if you use "derivative", keep in mind that it implies an order.
                  – SirTechSpec
                  Dec 7 at 15:33












                  up vote
                  15
                  down vote













                  A cognate accusative/object is a figure of speech in which the verb and object are etymologically related:




                  He slept a troubled sleep.
                  Dance a dance.
                  Die a peaceful death.




                  So there shouldn't be any problem writing:




                  verb x and its cognate noun




                  Since you're dealing with a language based on consonantal roots, “noun [derived] from the same root” would also work.



                  The problem with derivation alone is that it assumes that, say, the verb is historically prior to the noun, which may or may not have been the case.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    up vote
                    15
                    down vote













                    A cognate accusative/object is a figure of speech in which the verb and object are etymologically related:




                    He slept a troubled sleep.
                    Dance a dance.
                    Die a peaceful death.




                    So there shouldn't be any problem writing:




                    verb x and its cognate noun




                    Since you're dealing with a language based on consonantal roots, “noun [derived] from the same root” would also work.



                    The problem with derivation alone is that it assumes that, say, the verb is historically prior to the noun, which may or may not have been the case.






                    share|improve this answer






















                      up vote
                      15
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      15
                      down vote









                      A cognate accusative/object is a figure of speech in which the verb and object are etymologically related:




                      He slept a troubled sleep.
                      Dance a dance.
                      Die a peaceful death.




                      So there shouldn't be any problem writing:




                      verb x and its cognate noun




                      Since you're dealing with a language based on consonantal roots, “noun [derived] from the same root” would also work.



                      The problem with derivation alone is that it assumes that, say, the verb is historically prior to the noun, which may or may not have been the case.






                      share|improve this answer












                      A cognate accusative/object is a figure of speech in which the verb and object are etymologically related:




                      He slept a troubled sleep.
                      Dance a dance.
                      Die a peaceful death.




                      So there shouldn't be any problem writing:




                      verb x and its cognate noun




                      Since you're dealing with a language based on consonantal roots, “noun [derived] from the same root” would also work.



                      The problem with derivation alone is that it assumes that, say, the verb is historically prior to the noun, which may or may not have been the case.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Dec 7 at 3:31









                      KarlG

                      18.9k52754




                      18.9k52754




















                          up vote
                          7
                          down vote













                          You could use: nominal form, nounal form or, as you yourself suggest, noun form.



                          These three phrases have the required emphasis on a related-but-different-parts-of-speech link between the words, rather than one of descent or derivation.



                          Merriam-Webster give the following definitions:




                          nominal adjective ...



                          of, relating to, or being a noun or a word or expression taking a noun construction




                          nounal adjective ...



                          of, relating to, or of the
                          nature, function, or quality of a noun




                          And noun can itself be used adjectivally, as it is in the linguistics terms noun phrase and noun class.




                          A cursory glace through Google Books search results suggests nominal form gets extensive use in linguistics texts. Two relevant examples follow:




                          Early Indo-European languages present a wide range of nominal constructions that convey verbal action and combine a noun and a nominal form of the verb...



                          Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin, Brigitte Bauer (2011)




                          The nominal form of a transitive verb that has only the prefix mang... does not differ from the stem-word, or the word to be regarded as such...



                          A Grammar of Toba Batak, Herman Neubronner van der van der Tuuk (2013)




                          Nounal form seems to be seen more in non-linguistics texts, though it is also used in linguistics too; it may be more dated as a phrase.




                          Similarly, "knowledge" is a nounal form rooted in verbs: OE "cnawan" meaning "to know," and OE "-cennan" meaning "To make known."



                          Libri, vol. 38, Jean Anker (1988)




                          In these the Latin gerund is reproduced in 17 cases by a nounal form; 10 cases by a participle; 2 cases by an infinitive. The Gospels have little to teach: only one Latin gerund in the ablative has an object; this construction is paraphrased.



                          Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1900)




                          Noun form seems to get the most general use. It's favoured in ESL circles and is also commonly used in linguistics as well.




                          Noun form of verb (gerund)



                          [For example] Rotting: When looking after food, it is important to minimise rotting.



                          Advanced Grammar: For Academic Writing, Richard Stevenson (2010)




                          You pronounce the noun form of affect differently from the verb form. With the noun form, you stress the first syllable, and the a sounds like it would if you were saying “at.”



                          Grammar Essentials For Dummies, Geraldine Woods (2010)




                          Even though the intrusion error in (11) is also homophonous with the target verb form, it is not itself a verb form but a noun form.



                          Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. Harald Baayen, ‎Robert Schreuder (2011)




                          According to Google Ngram viewer, noun form also seems to be the most common of the three, with nominal form also well established and nounal form comparatively rare:
                          Ngrams comparing "noun form", "nominal form", "nounal form"



                          Both noun form and nominal form seem current and readily understandable, though neither is specific in describing the verb-noun relationship you require - they are, of course, more general phrases with other uses. However, your context makes the intended meaning very clear.



                          For what it's worth, to my mind, noun form is the nicest - it's simple and straightforward. It's also exactly the words that came to your own mind when trying to find a term!



                          Absent a more specific term for Semitic languages in general or Hebrew in particular (ask on Linguistics, perhaps, if that's what you want), I'd go for noun form.



                          To clarify the link you're trying to make, I'd also use verb rather than word, and state which noun form you are referring to, as there are possibly several different nouns related to the verb. Thus, your sentence would read:




                          Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.





                          I also doubt there is a specific technical term for what you're asking for because it's not that well defined an idea, as you can see when you generalise it beyond the case at hand.



                          I'm not sure that the relationship between fly and flight is fundamentally the same as that between enjoy and joy, gladden and gladness, or fish (the verb) and fish (the noun) - or fishing, for that matter.



                          Also with enjoy, for instance, putting enjoyment and joy aside, we can conjugate two verbal nouns, enjoying and to enjoy, the to-infinitive form and the gerund: while it is Hebrew rather than English in your example, I assume there are equivalent regularly-formed verbal nouns of some sort: should they be be excluded from the term you seek? (Apologies for the laborious explanation! I'm just trying to illustrate that it's not a simple, straightforward category you seek a label for, at least as I see it.)






                          share|improve this answer


























                            up vote
                            7
                            down vote













                            You could use: nominal form, nounal form or, as you yourself suggest, noun form.



                            These three phrases have the required emphasis on a related-but-different-parts-of-speech link between the words, rather than one of descent or derivation.



                            Merriam-Webster give the following definitions:




                            nominal adjective ...



                            of, relating to, or being a noun or a word or expression taking a noun construction




                            nounal adjective ...



                            of, relating to, or of the
                            nature, function, or quality of a noun




                            And noun can itself be used adjectivally, as it is in the linguistics terms noun phrase and noun class.




                            A cursory glace through Google Books search results suggests nominal form gets extensive use in linguistics texts. Two relevant examples follow:




                            Early Indo-European languages present a wide range of nominal constructions that convey verbal action and combine a noun and a nominal form of the verb...



                            Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin, Brigitte Bauer (2011)




                            The nominal form of a transitive verb that has only the prefix mang... does not differ from the stem-word, or the word to be regarded as such...



                            A Grammar of Toba Batak, Herman Neubronner van der van der Tuuk (2013)




                            Nounal form seems to be seen more in non-linguistics texts, though it is also used in linguistics too; it may be more dated as a phrase.




                            Similarly, "knowledge" is a nounal form rooted in verbs: OE "cnawan" meaning "to know," and OE "-cennan" meaning "To make known."



                            Libri, vol. 38, Jean Anker (1988)




                            In these the Latin gerund is reproduced in 17 cases by a nounal form; 10 cases by a participle; 2 cases by an infinitive. The Gospels have little to teach: only one Latin gerund in the ablative has an object; this construction is paraphrased.



                            Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1900)




                            Noun form seems to get the most general use. It's favoured in ESL circles and is also commonly used in linguistics as well.




                            Noun form of verb (gerund)



                            [For example] Rotting: When looking after food, it is important to minimise rotting.



                            Advanced Grammar: For Academic Writing, Richard Stevenson (2010)




                            You pronounce the noun form of affect differently from the verb form. With the noun form, you stress the first syllable, and the a sounds like it would if you were saying “at.”



                            Grammar Essentials For Dummies, Geraldine Woods (2010)




                            Even though the intrusion error in (11) is also homophonous with the target verb form, it is not itself a verb form but a noun form.



                            Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. Harald Baayen, ‎Robert Schreuder (2011)




                            According to Google Ngram viewer, noun form also seems to be the most common of the three, with nominal form also well established and nounal form comparatively rare:
                            Ngrams comparing "noun form", "nominal form", "nounal form"



                            Both noun form and nominal form seem current and readily understandable, though neither is specific in describing the verb-noun relationship you require - they are, of course, more general phrases with other uses. However, your context makes the intended meaning very clear.



                            For what it's worth, to my mind, noun form is the nicest - it's simple and straightforward. It's also exactly the words that came to your own mind when trying to find a term!



                            Absent a more specific term for Semitic languages in general or Hebrew in particular (ask on Linguistics, perhaps, if that's what you want), I'd go for noun form.



                            To clarify the link you're trying to make, I'd also use verb rather than word, and state which noun form you are referring to, as there are possibly several different nouns related to the verb. Thus, your sentence would read:




                            Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.





                            I also doubt there is a specific technical term for what you're asking for because it's not that well defined an idea, as you can see when you generalise it beyond the case at hand.



                            I'm not sure that the relationship between fly and flight is fundamentally the same as that between enjoy and joy, gladden and gladness, or fish (the verb) and fish (the noun) - or fishing, for that matter.



                            Also with enjoy, for instance, putting enjoyment and joy aside, we can conjugate two verbal nouns, enjoying and to enjoy, the to-infinitive form and the gerund: while it is Hebrew rather than English in your example, I assume there are equivalent regularly-formed verbal nouns of some sort: should they be be excluded from the term you seek? (Apologies for the laborious explanation! I'm just trying to illustrate that it's not a simple, straightforward category you seek a label for, at least as I see it.)






                            share|improve this answer
























                              up vote
                              7
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              7
                              down vote









                              You could use: nominal form, nounal form or, as you yourself suggest, noun form.



                              These three phrases have the required emphasis on a related-but-different-parts-of-speech link between the words, rather than one of descent or derivation.



                              Merriam-Webster give the following definitions:




                              nominal adjective ...



                              of, relating to, or being a noun or a word or expression taking a noun construction




                              nounal adjective ...



                              of, relating to, or of the
                              nature, function, or quality of a noun




                              And noun can itself be used adjectivally, as it is in the linguistics terms noun phrase and noun class.




                              A cursory glace through Google Books search results suggests nominal form gets extensive use in linguistics texts. Two relevant examples follow:




                              Early Indo-European languages present a wide range of nominal constructions that convey verbal action and combine a noun and a nominal form of the verb...



                              Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin, Brigitte Bauer (2011)




                              The nominal form of a transitive verb that has only the prefix mang... does not differ from the stem-word, or the word to be regarded as such...



                              A Grammar of Toba Batak, Herman Neubronner van der van der Tuuk (2013)




                              Nounal form seems to be seen more in non-linguistics texts, though it is also used in linguistics too; it may be more dated as a phrase.




                              Similarly, "knowledge" is a nounal form rooted in verbs: OE "cnawan" meaning "to know," and OE "-cennan" meaning "To make known."



                              Libri, vol. 38, Jean Anker (1988)




                              In these the Latin gerund is reproduced in 17 cases by a nounal form; 10 cases by a participle; 2 cases by an infinitive. The Gospels have little to teach: only one Latin gerund in the ablative has an object; this construction is paraphrased.



                              Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1900)




                              Noun form seems to get the most general use. It's favoured in ESL circles and is also commonly used in linguistics as well.




                              Noun form of verb (gerund)



                              [For example] Rotting: When looking after food, it is important to minimise rotting.



                              Advanced Grammar: For Academic Writing, Richard Stevenson (2010)




                              You pronounce the noun form of affect differently from the verb form. With the noun form, you stress the first syllable, and the a sounds like it would if you were saying “at.”



                              Grammar Essentials For Dummies, Geraldine Woods (2010)




                              Even though the intrusion error in (11) is also homophonous with the target verb form, it is not itself a verb form but a noun form.



                              Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. Harald Baayen, ‎Robert Schreuder (2011)




                              According to Google Ngram viewer, noun form also seems to be the most common of the three, with nominal form also well established and nounal form comparatively rare:
                              Ngrams comparing "noun form", "nominal form", "nounal form"



                              Both noun form and nominal form seem current and readily understandable, though neither is specific in describing the verb-noun relationship you require - they are, of course, more general phrases with other uses. However, your context makes the intended meaning very clear.



                              For what it's worth, to my mind, noun form is the nicest - it's simple and straightforward. It's also exactly the words that came to your own mind when trying to find a term!



                              Absent a more specific term for Semitic languages in general or Hebrew in particular (ask on Linguistics, perhaps, if that's what you want), I'd go for noun form.



                              To clarify the link you're trying to make, I'd also use verb rather than word, and state which noun form you are referring to, as there are possibly several different nouns related to the verb. Thus, your sentence would read:




                              Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.





                              I also doubt there is a specific technical term for what you're asking for because it's not that well defined an idea, as you can see when you generalise it beyond the case at hand.



                              I'm not sure that the relationship between fly and flight is fundamentally the same as that between enjoy and joy, gladden and gladness, or fish (the verb) and fish (the noun) - or fishing, for that matter.



                              Also with enjoy, for instance, putting enjoyment and joy aside, we can conjugate two verbal nouns, enjoying and to enjoy, the to-infinitive form and the gerund: while it is Hebrew rather than English in your example, I assume there are equivalent regularly-formed verbal nouns of some sort: should they be be excluded from the term you seek? (Apologies for the laborious explanation! I'm just trying to illustrate that it's not a simple, straightforward category you seek a label for, at least as I see it.)






                              share|improve this answer














                              You could use: nominal form, nounal form or, as you yourself suggest, noun form.



                              These three phrases have the required emphasis on a related-but-different-parts-of-speech link between the words, rather than one of descent or derivation.



                              Merriam-Webster give the following definitions:




                              nominal adjective ...



                              of, relating to, or being a noun or a word or expression taking a noun construction




                              nounal adjective ...



                              of, relating to, or of the
                              nature, function, or quality of a noun




                              And noun can itself be used adjectivally, as it is in the linguistics terms noun phrase and noun class.




                              A cursory glace through Google Books search results suggests nominal form gets extensive use in linguistics texts. Two relevant examples follow:




                              Early Indo-European languages present a wide range of nominal constructions that convey verbal action and combine a noun and a nominal form of the verb...



                              Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin, Brigitte Bauer (2011)




                              The nominal form of a transitive verb that has only the prefix mang... does not differ from the stem-word, or the word to be regarded as such...



                              A Grammar of Toba Batak, Herman Neubronner van der van der Tuuk (2013)




                              Nounal form seems to be seen more in non-linguistics texts, though it is also used in linguistics too; it may be more dated as a phrase.




                              Similarly, "knowledge" is a nounal form rooted in verbs: OE "cnawan" meaning "to know," and OE "-cennan" meaning "To make known."



                              Libri, vol. 38, Jean Anker (1988)




                              In these the Latin gerund is reproduced in 17 cases by a nounal form; 10 cases by a participle; 2 cases by an infinitive. The Gospels have little to teach: only one Latin gerund in the ablative has an object; this construction is paraphrased.



                              Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (1900)




                              Noun form seems to get the most general use. It's favoured in ESL circles and is also commonly used in linguistics as well.




                              Noun form of verb (gerund)



                              [For example] Rotting: When looking after food, it is important to minimise rotting.



                              Advanced Grammar: For Academic Writing, Richard Stevenson (2010)




                              You pronounce the noun form of affect differently from the verb form. With the noun form, you stress the first syllable, and the a sounds like it would if you were saying “at.”



                              Grammar Essentials For Dummies, Geraldine Woods (2010)




                              Even though the intrusion error in (11) is also homophonous with the target verb form, it is not itself a verb form but a noun form.



                              Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. Harald Baayen, ‎Robert Schreuder (2011)




                              According to Google Ngram viewer, noun form also seems to be the most common of the three, with nominal form also well established and nounal form comparatively rare:
                              Ngrams comparing "noun form", "nominal form", "nounal form"



                              Both noun form and nominal form seem current and readily understandable, though neither is specific in describing the verb-noun relationship you require - they are, of course, more general phrases with other uses. However, your context makes the intended meaning very clear.



                              For what it's worth, to my mind, noun form is the nicest - it's simple and straightforward. It's also exactly the words that came to your own mind when trying to find a term!



                              Absent a more specific term for Semitic languages in general or Hebrew in particular (ask on Linguistics, perhaps, if that's what you want), I'd go for noun form.



                              To clarify the link you're trying to make, I'd also use verb rather than word, and state which noun form you are referring to, as there are possibly several different nouns related to the verb. Thus, your sentence would read:




                              Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.





                              I also doubt there is a specific technical term for what you're asking for because it's not that well defined an idea, as you can see when you generalise it beyond the case at hand.



                              I'm not sure that the relationship between fly and flight is fundamentally the same as that between enjoy and joy, gladden and gladness, or fish (the verb) and fish (the noun) - or fishing, for that matter.



                              Also with enjoy, for instance, putting enjoyment and joy aside, we can conjugate two verbal nouns, enjoying and to enjoy, the to-infinitive form and the gerund: while it is Hebrew rather than English in your example, I assume there are equivalent regularly-formed verbal nouns of some sort: should they be be excluded from the term you seek? (Apologies for the laborious explanation! I'm just trying to illustrate that it's not a simple, straightforward category you seek a label for, at least as I see it.)







                              share|improve this answer














                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer








                              edited Dec 11 at 15:32

























                              answered Dec 7 at 0:18









                              tmgr

                              2,4711821




                              2,4711821




















                                  up vote
                                  3
                                  down vote













                                  I minored in linguistics and I'm not aware of a single word that means "a word that shares a root with another word".



                                  As I read the question, neither of the two words you want to describe is itself the root (if Hebrew roots work like Arabic roots and they aren't words you can say by themselves, this makes sense). So if you want to use "derivative", you would have to get a little wordier and say "Thus, these two derivatives of [root] appear seven times in the chapter."



                                  Or just take the casual approach and say "thus, rejoice and the related word joy appear seven times", if the exact relationship between the two isn't important. I'm not sure "related word" has a formal definition as a phrase, but it sounds perfectly natural to me just based on the meaning of "related" and "word" put together.



                                  I also like tmgr's suggestion:




                                  Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.







                                  share|improve this answer




















                                  • That is helpful. My Hebrew is limited but I do remember the expression "triliteral root" as applying to the three consonants most Hebrew words are built from. Because the verb "samach" is triliteral and the noun "simchah" had a fourth consonant I assumed that the noun was derivative of the verb. That could be a wrong assumption. Perhaps someone with a better grasp of Semitic languages can help us out.
                                    – Joseph O.
                                    Dec 8 at 0:05










                                  • +1 Taking a step back and going to the root of the words (and the problem!) is a neat way to deal with this. Keeping it very general also works well too.
                                    – tmgr
                                    Dec 8 at 20:12














                                  up vote
                                  3
                                  down vote













                                  I minored in linguistics and I'm not aware of a single word that means "a word that shares a root with another word".



                                  As I read the question, neither of the two words you want to describe is itself the root (if Hebrew roots work like Arabic roots and they aren't words you can say by themselves, this makes sense). So if you want to use "derivative", you would have to get a little wordier and say "Thus, these two derivatives of [root] appear seven times in the chapter."



                                  Or just take the casual approach and say "thus, rejoice and the related word joy appear seven times", if the exact relationship between the two isn't important. I'm not sure "related word" has a formal definition as a phrase, but it sounds perfectly natural to me just based on the meaning of "related" and "word" put together.



                                  I also like tmgr's suggestion:




                                  Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.







                                  share|improve this answer




















                                  • That is helpful. My Hebrew is limited but I do remember the expression "triliteral root" as applying to the three consonants most Hebrew words are built from. Because the verb "samach" is triliteral and the noun "simchah" had a fourth consonant I assumed that the noun was derivative of the verb. That could be a wrong assumption. Perhaps someone with a better grasp of Semitic languages can help us out.
                                    – Joseph O.
                                    Dec 8 at 0:05










                                  • +1 Taking a step back and going to the root of the words (and the problem!) is a neat way to deal with this. Keeping it very general also works well too.
                                    – tmgr
                                    Dec 8 at 20:12












                                  up vote
                                  3
                                  down vote










                                  up vote
                                  3
                                  down vote









                                  I minored in linguistics and I'm not aware of a single word that means "a word that shares a root with another word".



                                  As I read the question, neither of the two words you want to describe is itself the root (if Hebrew roots work like Arabic roots and they aren't words you can say by themselves, this makes sense). So if you want to use "derivative", you would have to get a little wordier and say "Thus, these two derivatives of [root] appear seven times in the chapter."



                                  Or just take the casual approach and say "thus, rejoice and the related word joy appear seven times", if the exact relationship between the two isn't important. I'm not sure "related word" has a formal definition as a phrase, but it sounds perfectly natural to me just based on the meaning of "related" and "word" put together.



                                  I also like tmgr's suggestion:




                                  Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.







                                  share|improve this answer












                                  I minored in linguistics and I'm not aware of a single word that means "a word that shares a root with another word".



                                  As I read the question, neither of the two words you want to describe is itself the root (if Hebrew roots work like Arabic roots and they aren't words you can say by themselves, this makes sense). So if you want to use "derivative", you would have to get a little wordier and say "Thus, these two derivatives of [root] appear seven times in the chapter."



                                  Or just take the casual approach and say "thus, rejoice and the related word joy appear seven times", if the exact relationship between the two isn't important. I'm not sure "related word" has a formal definition as a phrase, but it sounds perfectly natural to me just based on the meaning of "related" and "word" put together.



                                  I also like tmgr's suggestion:




                                  Thus, the verb and its noun form, X, appear seven times in the chapter.








                                  share|improve this answer












                                  share|improve this answer



                                  share|improve this answer










                                  answered Dec 7 at 15:40









                                  SirTechSpec

                                  638137




                                  638137











                                  • That is helpful. My Hebrew is limited but I do remember the expression "triliteral root" as applying to the three consonants most Hebrew words are built from. Because the verb "samach" is triliteral and the noun "simchah" had a fourth consonant I assumed that the noun was derivative of the verb. That could be a wrong assumption. Perhaps someone with a better grasp of Semitic languages can help us out.
                                    – Joseph O.
                                    Dec 8 at 0:05










                                  • +1 Taking a step back and going to the root of the words (and the problem!) is a neat way to deal with this. Keeping it very general also works well too.
                                    – tmgr
                                    Dec 8 at 20:12
















                                  • That is helpful. My Hebrew is limited but I do remember the expression "triliteral root" as applying to the three consonants most Hebrew words are built from. Because the verb "samach" is triliteral and the noun "simchah" had a fourth consonant I assumed that the noun was derivative of the verb. That could be a wrong assumption. Perhaps someone with a better grasp of Semitic languages can help us out.
                                    – Joseph O.
                                    Dec 8 at 0:05










                                  • +1 Taking a step back and going to the root of the words (and the problem!) is a neat way to deal with this. Keeping it very general also works well too.
                                    – tmgr
                                    Dec 8 at 20:12















                                  That is helpful. My Hebrew is limited but I do remember the expression "triliteral root" as applying to the three consonants most Hebrew words are built from. Because the verb "samach" is triliteral and the noun "simchah" had a fourth consonant I assumed that the noun was derivative of the verb. That could be a wrong assumption. Perhaps someone with a better grasp of Semitic languages can help us out.
                                  – Joseph O.
                                  Dec 8 at 0:05




                                  That is helpful. My Hebrew is limited but I do remember the expression "triliteral root" as applying to the three consonants most Hebrew words are built from. Because the verb "samach" is triliteral and the noun "simchah" had a fourth consonant I assumed that the noun was derivative of the verb. That could be a wrong assumption. Perhaps someone with a better grasp of Semitic languages can help us out.
                                  – Joseph O.
                                  Dec 8 at 0:05












                                  +1 Taking a step back and going to the root of the words (and the problem!) is a neat way to deal with this. Keeping it very general also works well too.
                                  – tmgr
                                  Dec 8 at 20:12




                                  +1 Taking a step back and going to the root of the words (and the problem!) is a neat way to deal with this. Keeping it very general also works well too.
                                  – tmgr
                                  Dec 8 at 20:12










                                  up vote
                                  1
                                  down vote













                                  You have the "stem", "root", or "morpheme", or "radical", partly depending on what area of linguistics you are in [radix= latin word for (plant) root]. From one word you get a "derivative" word, and its reverse is the "primitive" form.



                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_stem



                                  But what you are considering are inflections of a stem, https://quirkycase.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/linguistics-for-laypeople-inflection-vs-derivation/ .






                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor




                                  user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                    up vote
                                    1
                                    down vote













                                    You have the "stem", "root", or "morpheme", or "radical", partly depending on what area of linguistics you are in [radix= latin word for (plant) root]. From one word you get a "derivative" word, and its reverse is the "primitive" form.



                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_stem



                                    But what you are considering are inflections of a stem, https://quirkycase.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/linguistics-for-laypeople-inflection-vs-derivation/ .






                                    share|improve this answer








                                    New contributor




                                    user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                                      up vote
                                      1
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      1
                                      down vote









                                      You have the "stem", "root", or "morpheme", or "radical", partly depending on what area of linguistics you are in [radix= latin word for (plant) root]. From one word you get a "derivative" word, and its reverse is the "primitive" form.



                                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_stem



                                      But what you are considering are inflections of a stem, https://quirkycase.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/linguistics-for-laypeople-inflection-vs-derivation/ .






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      You have the "stem", "root", or "morpheme", or "radical", partly depending on what area of linguistics you are in [radix= latin word for (plant) root]. From one word you get a "derivative" word, and its reverse is the "primitive" form.



                                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_stem



                                      But what you are considering are inflections of a stem, https://quirkycase.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/linguistics-for-laypeople-inflection-vs-derivation/ .







                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor




                                      user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer






                                      New contributor




                                      user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered Dec 10 at 11:22









                                      user3445853

                                      1111




                                      1111




                                      New contributor




                                      user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      user3445853 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                                          up vote
                                          0
                                          down vote













                                          deverbal noun

                                          (e.g. destruction, container, growth and adjustment are deverbal nouns that derive from destroy, contain grow and adjust respectively)

                                          (also, deverbal nouns are a specific subclass of derivatives, a term correctly suggested by @user240918)



                                          Some useful references:

                                          - Wikipedia article (general overview)

                                          - Chomsky, Noam (1970) Remarks on Nominalization (classic discussion of the topic in Generative Grammar)

                                          - Gurevich, Olga et al. (2008) Deverbal Nouns in Knowledge Representation (state-of-the art computational treatment of deverbal nouns)

                                          - Grimshaw, Jane (1990) Argument Structure (chapter 4 on arguments of "event nominals")

                                          - Marantz, Alex (1990) No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon (on deverbal nouns in a framework called "Distributed Morphology")






                                          share|improve this answer








                                          New contributor




                                          Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                                            up vote
                                            0
                                            down vote













                                            deverbal noun

                                            (e.g. destruction, container, growth and adjustment are deverbal nouns that derive from destroy, contain grow and adjust respectively)

                                            (also, deverbal nouns are a specific subclass of derivatives, a term correctly suggested by @user240918)



                                            Some useful references:

                                            - Wikipedia article (general overview)

                                            - Chomsky, Noam (1970) Remarks on Nominalization (classic discussion of the topic in Generative Grammar)

                                            - Gurevich, Olga et al. (2008) Deverbal Nouns in Knowledge Representation (state-of-the art computational treatment of deverbal nouns)

                                            - Grimshaw, Jane (1990) Argument Structure (chapter 4 on arguments of "event nominals")

                                            - Marantz, Alex (1990) No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon (on deverbal nouns in a framework called "Distributed Morphology")






                                            share|improve this answer








                                            New contributor




                                            Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                            Check out our Code of Conduct.



















                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote










                                              up vote
                                              0
                                              down vote









                                              deverbal noun

                                              (e.g. destruction, container, growth and adjustment are deverbal nouns that derive from destroy, contain grow and adjust respectively)

                                              (also, deverbal nouns are a specific subclass of derivatives, a term correctly suggested by @user240918)



                                              Some useful references:

                                              - Wikipedia article (general overview)

                                              - Chomsky, Noam (1970) Remarks on Nominalization (classic discussion of the topic in Generative Grammar)

                                              - Gurevich, Olga et al. (2008) Deverbal Nouns in Knowledge Representation (state-of-the art computational treatment of deverbal nouns)

                                              - Grimshaw, Jane (1990) Argument Structure (chapter 4 on arguments of "event nominals")

                                              - Marantz, Alex (1990) No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon (on deverbal nouns in a framework called "Distributed Morphology")






                                              share|improve this answer








                                              New contributor




                                              Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                              deverbal noun

                                              (e.g. destruction, container, growth and adjustment are deverbal nouns that derive from destroy, contain grow and adjust respectively)

                                              (also, deverbal nouns are a specific subclass of derivatives, a term correctly suggested by @user240918)



                                              Some useful references:

                                              - Wikipedia article (general overview)

                                              - Chomsky, Noam (1970) Remarks on Nominalization (classic discussion of the topic in Generative Grammar)

                                              - Gurevich, Olga et al. (2008) Deverbal Nouns in Knowledge Representation (state-of-the art computational treatment of deverbal nouns)

                                              - Grimshaw, Jane (1990) Argument Structure (chapter 4 on arguments of "event nominals")

                                              - Marantz, Alex (1990) No Escape from Syntax: Don't Try Morphological Analysis in the Privacy of Your Own Lexicon (on deverbal nouns in a framework called "Distributed Morphology")







                                              share|improve this answer








                                              New contributor




                                              Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                              share|improve this answer



                                              share|improve this answer






                                              New contributor




                                              Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                              answered Dec 10 at 13:16









                                              Richard Z

                                              2768




                                              2768




                                              New contributor




                                              Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                              New contributor





                                              Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                              Richard Z is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                              Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                                                  draft saved

                                                  draft discarded
















































                                                  Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid


                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                                  Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                                  Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                                  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                  But avoid


                                                  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                  To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                  draft saved


                                                  draft discarded














                                                  StackExchange.ready(
                                                  function ()
                                                  StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f475920%2fwhat-is-the-exact-technical-word-to-describe-the-relationship-between-a-verb-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                  );

                                                  Post as a guest















                                                  Required, but never shown





















































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown

































                                                  Required, but never shown














                                                  Required, but never shown












                                                  Required, but never shown







                                                  Required, but never shown






                                                  Popular posts from this blog

                                                  How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                                  Bahrain

                                                  Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay