What is the DFT of DFT of discrete signal [duplicate]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How do you interpret FFT of an FFT of a discrete signal?
2 answers
What is the discrete fourier transform of the discrete fourier transform of any discrete time signal. Is result same signal? How?
discrete-signals fourier-transform dft
marked as duplicate by Dilip Sarwate, MBaz, Matt L., lennon310, A_A Dec 11 at 13:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How do you interpret FFT of an FFT of a discrete signal?
2 answers
What is the discrete fourier transform of the discrete fourier transform of any discrete time signal. Is result same signal? How?
discrete-signals fourier-transform dft
marked as duplicate by Dilip Sarwate, MBaz, Matt L., lennon310, A_A Dec 11 at 13:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
This question already has an answer here:
How do you interpret FFT of an FFT of a discrete signal?
2 answers
What is the discrete fourier transform of the discrete fourier transform of any discrete time signal. Is result same signal? How?
discrete-signals fourier-transform dft
This question already has an answer here:
How do you interpret FFT of an FFT of a discrete signal?
2 answers
What is the discrete fourier transform of the discrete fourier transform of any discrete time signal. Is result same signal? How?
This question already has an answer here:
How do you interpret FFT of an FFT of a discrete signal?
2 answers
discrete-signals fourier-transform dft
discrete-signals fourier-transform dft
asked Dec 6 at 19:49
Mert Ege
153
153
marked as duplicate by Dilip Sarwate, MBaz, Matt L., lennon310, A_A Dec 11 at 13:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Dilip Sarwate, MBaz, Matt L., lennon310, A_A Dec 11 at 13:02
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
let
$$beginalign
X[k] &= mathcalDFT Big x[n] Big \
&triangleq sumlimits_n=0^N-1 x[n] , e^-j2pi nk/N
endalign $$
and
$$ y[n] triangleq X[n] $$
(note the substitution of $n$ in for $k$.) then
$$ Y[k] = mathcalDFT Big y[n] Big $$
then, if the DFT is defined the most common way (as above):
$$ Y[n] = N cdot x[-n] $$
where periodicity is implied: $x[n+N]=x[n]$ for all $n$.
Thanks for the clarification but can we use any property of DFT to find this solution?
– Mert Ege
Dec 8 at 21:13
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Depends on how the DFT implementation or equation is scaled and indexed. The result of dft(dft(x)) is to circularly reverse the array x (of length N) around its first element, possibly with a scale factor of N, 1/N, or 1/sqrt(N).
Computationally, there may also be added numerical or quantization noise (for instance, to the imaginary components if they were originally all zero for strictly real input).
1
shouldn't matter how it's indexed (as best as i can understand it). you're certainly correct about the scaling, hot.
– robert bristow-johnson
Dec 6 at 20:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
let
$$beginalign
X[k] &= mathcalDFT Big x[n] Big \
&triangleq sumlimits_n=0^N-1 x[n] , e^-j2pi nk/N
endalign $$
and
$$ y[n] triangleq X[n] $$
(note the substitution of $n$ in for $k$.) then
$$ Y[k] = mathcalDFT Big y[n] Big $$
then, if the DFT is defined the most common way (as above):
$$ Y[n] = N cdot x[-n] $$
where periodicity is implied: $x[n+N]=x[n]$ for all $n$.
Thanks for the clarification but can we use any property of DFT to find this solution?
– Mert Ege
Dec 8 at 21:13
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
let
$$beginalign
X[k] &= mathcalDFT Big x[n] Big \
&triangleq sumlimits_n=0^N-1 x[n] , e^-j2pi nk/N
endalign $$
and
$$ y[n] triangleq X[n] $$
(note the substitution of $n$ in for $k$.) then
$$ Y[k] = mathcalDFT Big y[n] Big $$
then, if the DFT is defined the most common way (as above):
$$ Y[n] = N cdot x[-n] $$
where periodicity is implied: $x[n+N]=x[n]$ for all $n$.
Thanks for the clarification but can we use any property of DFT to find this solution?
– Mert Ege
Dec 8 at 21:13
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
let
$$beginalign
X[k] &= mathcalDFT Big x[n] Big \
&triangleq sumlimits_n=0^N-1 x[n] , e^-j2pi nk/N
endalign $$
and
$$ y[n] triangleq X[n] $$
(note the substitution of $n$ in for $k$.) then
$$ Y[k] = mathcalDFT Big y[n] Big $$
then, if the DFT is defined the most common way (as above):
$$ Y[n] = N cdot x[-n] $$
where periodicity is implied: $x[n+N]=x[n]$ for all $n$.
let
$$beginalign
X[k] &= mathcalDFT Big x[n] Big \
&triangleq sumlimits_n=0^N-1 x[n] , e^-j2pi nk/N
endalign $$
and
$$ y[n] triangleq X[n] $$
(note the substitution of $n$ in for $k$.) then
$$ Y[k] = mathcalDFT Big y[n] Big $$
then, if the DFT is defined the most common way (as above):
$$ Y[n] = N cdot x[-n] $$
where periodicity is implied: $x[n+N]=x[n]$ for all $n$.
answered Dec 6 at 20:04
robert bristow-johnson
10.5k31448
10.5k31448
Thanks for the clarification but can we use any property of DFT to find this solution?
– Mert Ege
Dec 8 at 21:13
add a comment |
Thanks for the clarification but can we use any property of DFT to find this solution?
– Mert Ege
Dec 8 at 21:13
Thanks for the clarification but can we use any property of DFT to find this solution?
– Mert Ege
Dec 8 at 21:13
Thanks for the clarification but can we use any property of DFT to find this solution?
– Mert Ege
Dec 8 at 21:13
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Depends on how the DFT implementation or equation is scaled and indexed. The result of dft(dft(x)) is to circularly reverse the array x (of length N) around its first element, possibly with a scale factor of N, 1/N, or 1/sqrt(N).
Computationally, there may also be added numerical or quantization noise (for instance, to the imaginary components if they were originally all zero for strictly real input).
1
shouldn't matter how it's indexed (as best as i can understand it). you're certainly correct about the scaling, hot.
– robert bristow-johnson
Dec 6 at 20:05
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Depends on how the DFT implementation or equation is scaled and indexed. The result of dft(dft(x)) is to circularly reverse the array x (of length N) around its first element, possibly with a scale factor of N, 1/N, or 1/sqrt(N).
Computationally, there may also be added numerical or quantization noise (for instance, to the imaginary components if they were originally all zero for strictly real input).
1
shouldn't matter how it's indexed (as best as i can understand it). you're certainly correct about the scaling, hot.
– robert bristow-johnson
Dec 6 at 20:05
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Depends on how the DFT implementation or equation is scaled and indexed. The result of dft(dft(x)) is to circularly reverse the array x (of length N) around its first element, possibly with a scale factor of N, 1/N, or 1/sqrt(N).
Computationally, there may also be added numerical or quantization noise (for instance, to the imaginary components if they were originally all zero for strictly real input).
Depends on how the DFT implementation or equation is scaled and indexed. The result of dft(dft(x)) is to circularly reverse the array x (of length N) around its first element, possibly with a scale factor of N, 1/N, or 1/sqrt(N).
Computationally, there may also be added numerical or quantization noise (for instance, to the imaginary components if they were originally all zero for strictly real input).
edited Dec 6 at 20:13
answered Dec 6 at 20:04
hotpaw2
25.5k53472
25.5k53472
1
shouldn't matter how it's indexed (as best as i can understand it). you're certainly correct about the scaling, hot.
– robert bristow-johnson
Dec 6 at 20:05
add a comment |
1
shouldn't matter how it's indexed (as best as i can understand it). you're certainly correct about the scaling, hot.
– robert bristow-johnson
Dec 6 at 20:05
1
1
shouldn't matter how it's indexed (as best as i can understand it). you're certainly correct about the scaling, hot.
– robert bristow-johnson
Dec 6 at 20:05
shouldn't matter how it's indexed (as best as i can understand it). you're certainly correct about the scaling, hot.
– robert bristow-johnson
Dec 6 at 20:05
add a comment |