How can SSH work with an if condition?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












I have an if statement to calculate files and delete all except the latest three files. But I want to run this command remotely. How can I combine ssh with an if condition?



I tried this but no success.



#!/bin/bash

ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
then
echo "Less"
else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]
echo "deleted"
fi"


The error I got:




ls: cannot access *.tgz: No such file or directory











share|improve this question























  • Then how can I customize this?
    – Janith
    Dec 3 at 5:30










  • @user68186 Why's that? The command is in quotes.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Dec 3 at 11:12






  • 2




    The $( ) part of the command is executed by the local shell before it even starts the ssh command. That's true both when $( ) stands alone as well as when it is enclosed by "s. However if $( ) was inside 's it would not be executed by the local shell.
    – kasperd
    Dec 3 at 16:07














up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2












I have an if statement to calculate files and delete all except the latest three files. But I want to run this command remotely. How can I combine ssh with an if condition?



I tried this but no success.



#!/bin/bash

ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
then
echo "Less"
else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]
echo "deleted"
fi"


The error I got:




ls: cannot access *.tgz: No such file or directory











share|improve this question























  • Then how can I customize this?
    – Janith
    Dec 3 at 5:30










  • @user68186 Why's that? The command is in quotes.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Dec 3 at 11:12






  • 2




    The $( ) part of the command is executed by the local shell before it even starts the ssh command. That's true both when $( ) stands alone as well as when it is enclosed by "s. However if $( ) was inside 's it would not be executed by the local shell.
    – kasperd
    Dec 3 at 16:07












up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
8
down vote

favorite
2






2





I have an if statement to calculate files and delete all except the latest three files. But I want to run this command remotely. How can I combine ssh with an if condition?



I tried this but no success.



#!/bin/bash

ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
then
echo "Less"
else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]
echo "deleted"
fi"


The error I got:




ls: cannot access *.tgz: No such file or directory











share|improve this question















I have an if statement to calculate files and delete all except the latest three files. But I want to run this command remotely. How can I combine ssh with an if condition?



I tried this but no success.



#!/bin/bash

ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
then
echo "Less"
else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]
echo "deleted"
fi"


The error I got:




ls: cannot access *.tgz: No such file or directory








command-line bash ssh






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 3 at 10:02









pa4080

13.2k52461




13.2k52461










asked Dec 3 at 3:37









Janith

577




577











  • Then how can I customize this?
    – Janith
    Dec 3 at 5:30










  • @user68186 Why's that? The command is in quotes.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Dec 3 at 11:12






  • 2




    The $( ) part of the command is executed by the local shell before it even starts the ssh command. That's true both when $( ) stands alone as well as when it is enclosed by "s. However if $( ) was inside 's it would not be executed by the local shell.
    – kasperd
    Dec 3 at 16:07
















  • Then how can I customize this?
    – Janith
    Dec 3 at 5:30










  • @user68186 Why's that? The command is in quotes.
    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Dec 3 at 11:12






  • 2




    The $( ) part of the command is executed by the local shell before it even starts the ssh command. That's true both when $( ) stands alone as well as when it is enclosed by "s. However if $( ) was inside 's it would not be executed by the local shell.
    – kasperd
    Dec 3 at 16:07















Then how can I customize this?
– Janith
Dec 3 at 5:30




Then how can I customize this?
– Janith
Dec 3 at 5:30












@user68186 Why's that? The command is in quotes.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 3 at 11:12




@user68186 Why's that? The command is in quotes.
– Lightness Races in Orbit
Dec 3 at 11:12




2




2




The $( ) part of the command is executed by the local shell before it even starts the ssh command. That's true both when $( ) stands alone as well as when it is enclosed by "s. However if $( ) was inside 's it would not be executed by the local shell.
– kasperd
Dec 3 at 16:07




The $( ) part of the command is executed by the local shell before it even starts the ssh command. That's true both when $( ) stands alone as well as when it is enclosed by "s. However if $( ) was inside 's it would not be executed by the local shell.
– kasperd
Dec 3 at 16:07










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










NOTE: there are in fact two layers to the question here. One is 'I want to execute a non-trivial task on a remote server accessible via SSH'. The other is 'I'm trying to pass a complex string to a command, and the argument ends up being different from what I intended.' I'm answering the low-level question without discussing whether the approach used is "right" (convenient, non-error-prone, secure etc.) for solving the high-level one. As indicated by the other answers and comments, it quite possibly isn't.



Your command line is mostly right; you only have to change the quoting a bit.



The main problem is that double-quoted strings are expanded by your local shell, and so the $(...) parts will be evaluated on your local system. To pass them over to the remote system, you have to enclose the script in single quotes.



You also have some embedded quotation marks. In your original script, there are the arguments for the two echos; if you change the outer quotation to single quotes, it will be the awk script. These effecitvely result in the quotation marks being omitted, which doesn't bother the echos, but it will mess up the awk script, as the greater-than sign will become output redirection. So after you change the outer quotation marks to single quotes, change those to double quotes.



This is your script with the quoting fixed. The script may have other issues, I just fixed the syntax.



#!/bin/bash

ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 'cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
then
echo "Less"
else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk "NR >3"|xargs rm -f) ]
echo "deleted"
fi'





share|improve this answer






















  • This works for me. thanks a lot
    – Janith
    Dec 4 at 2:26











  • I want to assign /var/www/test.com/backup into a variable called "BACKUPDEST" and cd $BACKUPDEST Can you tell me how to do this?
    – Janith
    Dec 4 at 2:48







  • 1




    Where do you assign the value to BACKUPDEST? If that happens on the remote side, just include it in the script normally. If you want to set it locally (e.g. calculate it in the local script, or pass it in as a command line argument), you can change the first line to e.g. "cd $BACKUPDEST"' ; - the shell expands the double-quoted part, keeps the single-quoted part intact, concatenates the two and passes the result as the last argument to ssh.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:34










  • Uh, make that "cd '$BACKUPDEST'"' ; in case the path in that variable contains some weirdness (e.g. a space). Again: just saying that it can be done this way, not that it should be done this way.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:46

















up vote
10
down vote













Yes you can exexute complex scripts via ssh



#!/bin/bash -e

ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
echo "less"
elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
echo "deleted"
else
echo "something else"
fi
EOF
)"

ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "$ssh_cmd"


This example uses a bash here document to generate the command string. In any case, passing scripts via ssh is error prone, because the quoting and escaping of variables is difficult (mind the backslash before the commands). If the script gets too complex, it is better to copy it via scp and then execute it on the target host.



I did not try to fix your script, but here is an example on how counting and deleting on a remote host could work:



#!/bin/bash -e

tmp_dir="$(mktemp -d)"

ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
cd "$tmp_dir"

cnt_tgz=($(find . -type f -name "*.tgz"))
if [[ $#cnt_tgz[@] -lt 3 ]]; then
echo "less"
else
rm "$cnt_tgz[@]"
echo "deleted"
fi
EOF
)"

touch "$tmp_dir/1.tgz"
ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"
touch "$tmp_dir/2.tgz" "$tmp_dir/3.tgz"
ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"


The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system. Also using ls for counting files is not a good idea, since it also returns entries like ., .. and directories.






share|improve this answer






















  • I got some errors. syntax error near unexpected token elif', elif [ $(ls -t |awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then'
    – Janith
    Dec 3 at 8:33











  • There was a ; missing in the fist if-statement. But I did not fix you script! There are many more issues e.g. the ls *.tgz
    – Simon Sudler
    Dec 3 at 9:17






  • 1




    @DevSolar: thanks
    – Simon Sudler
    Dec 3 at 9:47






  • 1




    "The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system." - it will happen on the remote system if you escape it properly. The original version had naked $(...) inside a double-quoted string, so the local shell evaluated it. Escaping it as $(...) as you showed in the first example, or using single quotes around the whole script, prevents the local shell from expanding it, so it gets sent over to the remote system, it is expanded by the remote shell, and the script works as intended.
    – pt314
    Dec 3 at 12:46










  • This is the kind of situation where I would highly recommend using single quotes instead of a here document. Even if you have some variables you want to insert, you're better off using a single-quoted string and printf to expand variables -- that's still going to be easier to manage than trying to escape all the shell variables throughout. Also, it would avoid needing to use cat just to capture the here document into a variable!
    – Daniel Pryden
    Dec 3 at 12:56


















up vote
4
down vote













I think this whole complicated quoting stuff is proof enough to not
use it but use a script instead. If you want to avoid multiple
ssh connections, pipe the script over to the other host and
let it run there in one command:



Local file, say myscript.sh:



cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
echo "less"
elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
echo "deleted"
else
echo "something else"
fi


Then:



cat myscript.sh | 
ssh -t test@192.168.94.139
"cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"


Or (avoiding a useless use of cat):



ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 
"cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"
< myscript.sh


This pipes the local script myscript.sh to the remote side where it
is redirected to a (temporary) file /tmp/ms.sh, executed, and finally
removed.



Note: I didn't check the original script for errors but just wanted to
show the idea. No error prone quoting is necessary and all commands in
the script are executed on the remote side.






share|improve this answer




















  • No need to save the script into a temporary file either, just pipe it into a suitable shell, i.e. ssh user@host bash <myscript.sh.
    – pt314
    Dec 3 at 14:17







  • 2




    Keep in mind, though, that redirection only works when the script itself does not try to read from standard input.
    – chepner
    Dec 3 at 18:19










  • @pt314 Yes, but see Pipe a script into bash?
    – PerlDuck
    Dec 3 at 19:04











  • Yes, redirection has its limitations. It also avoids a bunch of security issues associated with writing (and then executing) a predictably-named temporary file. If you do use a temporary script (whether by choice or necessity), create it using mktemp or something similarly safe.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:52

















up vote
3
down vote













I would prefer to place the script on the remote instance and just execute it through ssh, but here is my suggestion how this could be done in the way you want:



#!/bin/bash

HOST='test@192.168.94.139'
REMOTE_PATH='/var/www/test.com/backup'

COMMAND1="ssh "$HOST" 'ls "$REMOTE_PATH" | wc -l'"
COMMAND2="ssh "$HOST" 'ls -t "$REMOTE_PATH"/*.tgz'"
COMMAND3="xargs ssh "$HOST" rm -rf"

if [[ $(eval "$COMMAND1") -le 3 ]]
then
echo "Less"
else
eval "$COMMAND2" | awk 'NR > 3' | eval "$COMMAND3" && echo "Deleted"
fi


Notes:



  • The conditional expression -lt is replaced by -le.


  • eval - construct command by concatenating arguments.

  • I'm not sure do we really need these extra quotations " within the $COMMAND1..3 expression, but I decide to add them.





share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "89"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1098053%2fhow-can-ssh-work-with-an-if-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    NOTE: there are in fact two layers to the question here. One is 'I want to execute a non-trivial task on a remote server accessible via SSH'. The other is 'I'm trying to pass a complex string to a command, and the argument ends up being different from what I intended.' I'm answering the low-level question without discussing whether the approach used is "right" (convenient, non-error-prone, secure etc.) for solving the high-level one. As indicated by the other answers and comments, it quite possibly isn't.



    Your command line is mostly right; you only have to change the quoting a bit.



    The main problem is that double-quoted strings are expanded by your local shell, and so the $(...) parts will be evaluated on your local system. To pass them over to the remote system, you have to enclose the script in single quotes.



    You also have some embedded quotation marks. In your original script, there are the arguments for the two echos; if you change the outer quotation to single quotes, it will be the awk script. These effecitvely result in the quotation marks being omitted, which doesn't bother the echos, but it will mess up the awk script, as the greater-than sign will become output redirection. So after you change the outer quotation marks to single quotes, change those to double quotes.



    This is your script with the quoting fixed. The script may have other issues, I just fixed the syntax.



    #!/bin/bash

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 'cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
    then
    echo "Less"
    else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk "NR >3"|xargs rm -f) ]
    echo "deleted"
    fi'





    share|improve this answer






















    • This works for me. thanks a lot
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:26











    • I want to assign /var/www/test.com/backup into a variable called "BACKUPDEST" and cd $BACKUPDEST Can you tell me how to do this?
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:48







    • 1




      Where do you assign the value to BACKUPDEST? If that happens on the remote side, just include it in the script normally. If you want to set it locally (e.g. calculate it in the local script, or pass it in as a command line argument), you can change the first line to e.g. "cd $BACKUPDEST"' ; - the shell expands the double-quoted part, keeps the single-quoted part intact, concatenates the two and passes the result as the last argument to ssh.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:34










    • Uh, make that "cd '$BACKUPDEST'"' ; in case the path in that variable contains some weirdness (e.g. a space). Again: just saying that it can be done this way, not that it should be done this way.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:46














    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    NOTE: there are in fact two layers to the question here. One is 'I want to execute a non-trivial task on a remote server accessible via SSH'. The other is 'I'm trying to pass a complex string to a command, and the argument ends up being different from what I intended.' I'm answering the low-level question without discussing whether the approach used is "right" (convenient, non-error-prone, secure etc.) for solving the high-level one. As indicated by the other answers and comments, it quite possibly isn't.



    Your command line is mostly right; you only have to change the quoting a bit.



    The main problem is that double-quoted strings are expanded by your local shell, and so the $(...) parts will be evaluated on your local system. To pass them over to the remote system, you have to enclose the script in single quotes.



    You also have some embedded quotation marks. In your original script, there are the arguments for the two echos; if you change the outer quotation to single quotes, it will be the awk script. These effecitvely result in the quotation marks being omitted, which doesn't bother the echos, but it will mess up the awk script, as the greater-than sign will become output redirection. So after you change the outer quotation marks to single quotes, change those to double quotes.



    This is your script with the quoting fixed. The script may have other issues, I just fixed the syntax.



    #!/bin/bash

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 'cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
    then
    echo "Less"
    else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk "NR >3"|xargs rm -f) ]
    echo "deleted"
    fi'





    share|improve this answer






















    • This works for me. thanks a lot
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:26











    • I want to assign /var/www/test.com/backup into a variable called "BACKUPDEST" and cd $BACKUPDEST Can you tell me how to do this?
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:48







    • 1




      Where do you assign the value to BACKUPDEST? If that happens on the remote side, just include it in the script normally. If you want to set it locally (e.g. calculate it in the local script, or pass it in as a command line argument), you can change the first line to e.g. "cd $BACKUPDEST"' ; - the shell expands the double-quoted part, keeps the single-quoted part intact, concatenates the two and passes the result as the last argument to ssh.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:34










    • Uh, make that "cd '$BACKUPDEST'"' ; in case the path in that variable contains some weirdness (e.g. a space). Again: just saying that it can be done this way, not that it should be done this way.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:46












    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    NOTE: there are in fact two layers to the question here. One is 'I want to execute a non-trivial task on a remote server accessible via SSH'. The other is 'I'm trying to pass a complex string to a command, and the argument ends up being different from what I intended.' I'm answering the low-level question without discussing whether the approach used is "right" (convenient, non-error-prone, secure etc.) for solving the high-level one. As indicated by the other answers and comments, it quite possibly isn't.



    Your command line is mostly right; you only have to change the quoting a bit.



    The main problem is that double-quoted strings are expanded by your local shell, and so the $(...) parts will be evaluated on your local system. To pass them over to the remote system, you have to enclose the script in single quotes.



    You also have some embedded quotation marks. In your original script, there are the arguments for the two echos; if you change the outer quotation to single quotes, it will be the awk script. These effecitvely result in the quotation marks being omitted, which doesn't bother the echos, but it will mess up the awk script, as the greater-than sign will become output redirection. So after you change the outer quotation marks to single quotes, change those to double quotes.



    This is your script with the quoting fixed. The script may have other issues, I just fixed the syntax.



    #!/bin/bash

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 'cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
    then
    echo "Less"
    else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk "NR >3"|xargs rm -f) ]
    echo "deleted"
    fi'





    share|improve this answer














    NOTE: there are in fact two layers to the question here. One is 'I want to execute a non-trivial task on a remote server accessible via SSH'. The other is 'I'm trying to pass a complex string to a command, and the argument ends up being different from what I intended.' I'm answering the low-level question without discussing whether the approach used is "right" (convenient, non-error-prone, secure etc.) for solving the high-level one. As indicated by the other answers and comments, it quite possibly isn't.



    Your command line is mostly right; you only have to change the quoting a bit.



    The main problem is that double-quoted strings are expanded by your local shell, and so the $(...) parts will be evaluated on your local system. To pass them over to the remote system, you have to enclose the script in single quotes.



    You also have some embedded quotation marks. In your original script, there are the arguments for the two echos; if you change the outer quotation to single quotes, it will be the awk script. These effecitvely result in the quotation marks being omitted, which doesn't bother the echos, but it will mess up the awk script, as the greater-than sign will become output redirection. So after you change the outer quotation marks to single quotes, change those to double quotes.



    This is your script with the quoting fixed. The script may have other issues, I just fixed the syntax.



    #!/bin/bash

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 'cd /var/www/test.com/backup ;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]
    then
    echo "Less"
    else [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk "NR >3"|xargs rm -f) ]
    echo "deleted"
    fi'






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Dec 4 at 9:40

























    answered Dec 3 at 13:19









    pt314

    1464




    1464











    • This works for me. thanks a lot
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:26











    • I want to assign /var/www/test.com/backup into a variable called "BACKUPDEST" and cd $BACKUPDEST Can you tell me how to do this?
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:48







    • 1




      Where do you assign the value to BACKUPDEST? If that happens on the remote side, just include it in the script normally. If you want to set it locally (e.g. calculate it in the local script, or pass it in as a command line argument), you can change the first line to e.g. "cd $BACKUPDEST"' ; - the shell expands the double-quoted part, keeps the single-quoted part intact, concatenates the two and passes the result as the last argument to ssh.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:34










    • Uh, make that "cd '$BACKUPDEST'"' ; in case the path in that variable contains some weirdness (e.g. a space). Again: just saying that it can be done this way, not that it should be done this way.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:46
















    • This works for me. thanks a lot
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:26











    • I want to assign /var/www/test.com/backup into a variable called "BACKUPDEST" and cd $BACKUPDEST Can you tell me how to do this?
      – Janith
      Dec 4 at 2:48







    • 1




      Where do you assign the value to BACKUPDEST? If that happens on the remote side, just include it in the script normally. If you want to set it locally (e.g. calculate it in the local script, or pass it in as a command line argument), you can change the first line to e.g. "cd $BACKUPDEST"' ; - the shell expands the double-quoted part, keeps the single-quoted part intact, concatenates the two and passes the result as the last argument to ssh.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:34










    • Uh, make that "cd '$BACKUPDEST'"' ; in case the path in that variable contains some weirdness (e.g. a space). Again: just saying that it can be done this way, not that it should be done this way.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:46















    This works for me. thanks a lot
    – Janith
    Dec 4 at 2:26





    This works for me. thanks a lot
    – Janith
    Dec 4 at 2:26













    I want to assign /var/www/test.com/backup into a variable called "BACKUPDEST" and cd $BACKUPDEST Can you tell me how to do this?
    – Janith
    Dec 4 at 2:48





    I want to assign /var/www/test.com/backup into a variable called "BACKUPDEST" and cd $BACKUPDEST Can you tell me how to do this?
    – Janith
    Dec 4 at 2:48





    1




    1




    Where do you assign the value to BACKUPDEST? If that happens on the remote side, just include it in the script normally. If you want to set it locally (e.g. calculate it in the local script, or pass it in as a command line argument), you can change the first line to e.g. "cd $BACKUPDEST"' ; - the shell expands the double-quoted part, keeps the single-quoted part intact, concatenates the two and passes the result as the last argument to ssh.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:34




    Where do you assign the value to BACKUPDEST? If that happens on the remote side, just include it in the script normally. If you want to set it locally (e.g. calculate it in the local script, or pass it in as a command line argument), you can change the first line to e.g. "cd $BACKUPDEST"' ; - the shell expands the double-quoted part, keeps the single-quoted part intact, concatenates the two and passes the result as the last argument to ssh.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:34












    Uh, make that "cd '$BACKUPDEST'"' ; in case the path in that variable contains some weirdness (e.g. a space). Again: just saying that it can be done this way, not that it should be done this way.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:46




    Uh, make that "cd '$BACKUPDEST'"' ; in case the path in that variable contains some weirdness (e.g. a space). Again: just saying that it can be done this way, not that it should be done this way.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:46












    up vote
    10
    down vote













    Yes you can exexute complex scripts via ssh



    #!/bin/bash -e

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "$ssh_cmd"


    This example uses a bash here document to generate the command string. In any case, passing scripts via ssh is error prone, because the quoting and escaping of variables is difficult (mind the backslash before the commands). If the script gets too complex, it is better to copy it via scp and then execute it on the target host.



    I did not try to fix your script, but here is an example on how counting and deleting on a remote host could work:



    #!/bin/bash -e

    tmp_dir="$(mktemp -d)"

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd "$tmp_dir"

    cnt_tgz=($(find . -type f -name "*.tgz"))
    if [[ $#cnt_tgz[@] -lt 3 ]]; then
    echo "less"
    else
    rm "$cnt_tgz[@]"
    echo "deleted"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    touch "$tmp_dir/1.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"
    touch "$tmp_dir/2.tgz" "$tmp_dir/3.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"


    The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system. Also using ls for counting files is not a good idea, since it also returns entries like ., .. and directories.






    share|improve this answer






















    • I got some errors. syntax error near unexpected token elif', elif [ $(ls -t |awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then'
      – Janith
      Dec 3 at 8:33











    • There was a ; missing in the fist if-statement. But I did not fix you script! There are many more issues e.g. the ls *.tgz
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:17






    • 1




      @DevSolar: thanks
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:47






    • 1




      "The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system." - it will happen on the remote system if you escape it properly. The original version had naked $(...) inside a double-quoted string, so the local shell evaluated it. Escaping it as $(...) as you showed in the first example, or using single quotes around the whole script, prevents the local shell from expanding it, so it gets sent over to the remote system, it is expanded by the remote shell, and the script works as intended.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 12:46










    • This is the kind of situation where I would highly recommend using single quotes instead of a here document. Even if you have some variables you want to insert, you're better off using a single-quoted string and printf to expand variables -- that's still going to be easier to manage than trying to escape all the shell variables throughout. Also, it would avoid needing to use cat just to capture the here document into a variable!
      – Daniel Pryden
      Dec 3 at 12:56















    up vote
    10
    down vote













    Yes you can exexute complex scripts via ssh



    #!/bin/bash -e

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "$ssh_cmd"


    This example uses a bash here document to generate the command string. In any case, passing scripts via ssh is error prone, because the quoting and escaping of variables is difficult (mind the backslash before the commands). If the script gets too complex, it is better to copy it via scp and then execute it on the target host.



    I did not try to fix your script, but here is an example on how counting and deleting on a remote host could work:



    #!/bin/bash -e

    tmp_dir="$(mktemp -d)"

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd "$tmp_dir"

    cnt_tgz=($(find . -type f -name "*.tgz"))
    if [[ $#cnt_tgz[@] -lt 3 ]]; then
    echo "less"
    else
    rm "$cnt_tgz[@]"
    echo "deleted"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    touch "$tmp_dir/1.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"
    touch "$tmp_dir/2.tgz" "$tmp_dir/3.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"


    The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system. Also using ls for counting files is not a good idea, since it also returns entries like ., .. and directories.






    share|improve this answer






















    • I got some errors. syntax error near unexpected token elif', elif [ $(ls -t |awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then'
      – Janith
      Dec 3 at 8:33











    • There was a ; missing in the fist if-statement. But I did not fix you script! There are many more issues e.g. the ls *.tgz
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:17






    • 1




      @DevSolar: thanks
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:47






    • 1




      "The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system." - it will happen on the remote system if you escape it properly. The original version had naked $(...) inside a double-quoted string, so the local shell evaluated it. Escaping it as $(...) as you showed in the first example, or using single quotes around the whole script, prevents the local shell from expanding it, so it gets sent over to the remote system, it is expanded by the remote shell, and the script works as intended.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 12:46










    • This is the kind of situation where I would highly recommend using single quotes instead of a here document. Even if you have some variables you want to insert, you're better off using a single-quoted string and printf to expand variables -- that's still going to be easier to manage than trying to escape all the shell variables throughout. Also, it would avoid needing to use cat just to capture the here document into a variable!
      – Daniel Pryden
      Dec 3 at 12:56













    up vote
    10
    down vote










    up vote
    10
    down vote









    Yes you can exexute complex scripts via ssh



    #!/bin/bash -e

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "$ssh_cmd"


    This example uses a bash here document to generate the command string. In any case, passing scripts via ssh is error prone, because the quoting and escaping of variables is difficult (mind the backslash before the commands). If the script gets too complex, it is better to copy it via scp and then execute it on the target host.



    I did not try to fix your script, but here is an example on how counting and deleting on a remote host could work:



    #!/bin/bash -e

    tmp_dir="$(mktemp -d)"

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd "$tmp_dir"

    cnt_tgz=($(find . -type f -name "*.tgz"))
    if [[ $#cnt_tgz[@] -lt 3 ]]; then
    echo "less"
    else
    rm "$cnt_tgz[@]"
    echo "deleted"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    touch "$tmp_dir/1.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"
    touch "$tmp_dir/2.tgz" "$tmp_dir/3.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"


    The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system. Also using ls for counting files is not a good idea, since it also returns entries like ., .. and directories.






    share|improve this answer














    Yes you can exexute complex scripts via ssh



    #!/bin/bash -e

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 "$ssh_cmd"


    This example uses a bash here document to generate the command string. In any case, passing scripts via ssh is error prone, because the quoting and escaping of variables is difficult (mind the backslash before the commands). If the script gets too complex, it is better to copy it via scp and then execute it on the target host.



    I did not try to fix your script, but here is an example on how counting and deleting on a remote host could work:



    #!/bin/bash -e

    tmp_dir="$(mktemp -d)"

    ssh_cmd="$(cat <<-EOF
    cd "$tmp_dir"

    cnt_tgz=($(find . -type f -name "*.tgz"))
    if [[ $#cnt_tgz[@] -lt 3 ]]; then
    echo "less"
    else
    rm "$cnt_tgz[@]"
    echo "deleted"
    fi
    EOF
    )"

    touch "$tmp_dir/1.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"
    touch "$tmp_dir/2.tgz" "$tmp_dir/3.tgz"
    ssh -t localhost "$ssh_cmd"


    The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system. Also using ls for counting files is not a good idea, since it also returns entries like ., .. and directories.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Dec 3 at 9:46









    DevSolar

    1436




    1436










    answered Dec 3 at 8:11









    Simon Sudler

    1,333213




    1,333213











    • I got some errors. syntax error near unexpected token elif', elif [ $(ls -t |awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then'
      – Janith
      Dec 3 at 8:33











    • There was a ; missing in the fist if-statement. But I did not fix you script! There are many more issues e.g. the ls *.tgz
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:17






    • 1




      @DevSolar: thanks
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:47






    • 1




      "The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system." - it will happen on the remote system if you escape it properly. The original version had naked $(...) inside a double-quoted string, so the local shell evaluated it. Escaping it as $(...) as you showed in the first example, or using single quotes around the whole script, prevents the local shell from expanding it, so it gets sent over to the remote system, it is expanded by the remote shell, and the script works as intended.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 12:46










    • This is the kind of situation where I would highly recommend using single quotes instead of a here document. Even if you have some variables you want to insert, you're better off using a single-quoted string and printf to expand variables -- that's still going to be easier to manage than trying to escape all the shell variables throughout. Also, it would avoid needing to use cat just to capture the here document into a variable!
      – Daniel Pryden
      Dec 3 at 12:56

















    • I got some errors. syntax error near unexpected token elif', elif [ $(ls -t |awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then'
      – Janith
      Dec 3 at 8:33











    • There was a ; missing in the fist if-statement. But I did not fix you script! There are many more issues e.g. the ls *.tgz
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:17






    • 1




      @DevSolar: thanks
      – Simon Sudler
      Dec 3 at 9:47






    • 1




      "The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system." - it will happen on the remote system if you escape it properly. The original version had naked $(...) inside a double-quoted string, so the local shell evaluated it. Escaping it as $(...) as you showed in the first example, or using single quotes around the whole script, prevents the local shell from expanding it, so it gets sent over to the remote system, it is expanded by the remote shell, and the script works as intended.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 12:46










    • This is the kind of situation where I would highly recommend using single quotes instead of a here document. Even if you have some variables you want to insert, you're better off using a single-quoted string and printf to expand variables -- that's still going to be easier to manage than trying to escape all the shell variables throughout. Also, it would avoid needing to use cat just to capture the here document into a variable!
      – Daniel Pryden
      Dec 3 at 12:56
















    I got some errors. syntax error near unexpected token elif', elif [ $(ls -t |awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then'
    – Janith
    Dec 3 at 8:33





    I got some errors. syntax error near unexpected token elif', elif [ $(ls -t |awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then'
    – Janith
    Dec 3 at 8:33













    There was a ; missing in the fist if-statement. But I did not fix you script! There are many more issues e.g. the ls *.tgz
    – Simon Sudler
    Dec 3 at 9:17




    There was a ; missing in the fist if-statement. But I did not fix you script! There are many more issues e.g. the ls *.tgz
    – Simon Sudler
    Dec 3 at 9:17




    1




    1




    @DevSolar: thanks
    – Simon Sudler
    Dec 3 at 9:47




    @DevSolar: thanks
    – Simon Sudler
    Dec 3 at 9:47




    1




    1




    "The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system." - it will happen on the remote system if you escape it properly. The original version had naked $(...) inside a double-quoted string, so the local shell evaluated it. Escaping it as $(...) as you showed in the first example, or using single quotes around the whole script, prevents the local shell from expanding it, so it gets sent over to the remote system, it is expanded by the remote shell, and the script works as intended.
    – pt314
    Dec 3 at 12:46




    "The ls -t *.tgz will not work, since the globbing is only happening on the local system." - it will happen on the remote system if you escape it properly. The original version had naked $(...) inside a double-quoted string, so the local shell evaluated it. Escaping it as $(...) as you showed in the first example, or using single quotes around the whole script, prevents the local shell from expanding it, so it gets sent over to the remote system, it is expanded by the remote shell, and the script works as intended.
    – pt314
    Dec 3 at 12:46












    This is the kind of situation where I would highly recommend using single quotes instead of a here document. Even if you have some variables you want to insert, you're better off using a single-quoted string and printf to expand variables -- that's still going to be easier to manage than trying to escape all the shell variables throughout. Also, it would avoid needing to use cat just to capture the here document into a variable!
    – Daniel Pryden
    Dec 3 at 12:56





    This is the kind of situation where I would highly recommend using single quotes instead of a here document. Even if you have some variables you want to insert, you're better off using a single-quoted string and printf to expand variables -- that's still going to be easier to manage than trying to escape all the shell variables throughout. Also, it would avoid needing to use cat just to capture the here document into a variable!
    – Daniel Pryden
    Dec 3 at 12:56











    up vote
    4
    down vote













    I think this whole complicated quoting stuff is proof enough to not
    use it but use a script instead. If you want to avoid multiple
    ssh connections, pipe the script over to the other host and
    let it run there in one command:



    Local file, say myscript.sh:



    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi


    Then:



    cat myscript.sh | 
    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"


    Or (avoiding a useless use of cat):



    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"
    < myscript.sh


    This pipes the local script myscript.sh to the remote side where it
    is redirected to a (temporary) file /tmp/ms.sh, executed, and finally
    removed.



    Note: I didn't check the original script for errors but just wanted to
    show the idea. No error prone quoting is necessary and all commands in
    the script are executed on the remote side.






    share|improve this answer




















    • No need to save the script into a temporary file either, just pipe it into a suitable shell, i.e. ssh user@host bash <myscript.sh.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 14:17







    • 2




      Keep in mind, though, that redirection only works when the script itself does not try to read from standard input.
      – chepner
      Dec 3 at 18:19










    • @pt314 Yes, but see Pipe a script into bash?
      – PerlDuck
      Dec 3 at 19:04











    • Yes, redirection has its limitations. It also avoids a bunch of security issues associated with writing (and then executing) a predictably-named temporary file. If you do use a temporary script (whether by choice or necessity), create it using mktemp or something similarly safe.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:52














    up vote
    4
    down vote













    I think this whole complicated quoting stuff is proof enough to not
    use it but use a script instead. If you want to avoid multiple
    ssh connections, pipe the script over to the other host and
    let it run there in one command:



    Local file, say myscript.sh:



    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi


    Then:



    cat myscript.sh | 
    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"


    Or (avoiding a useless use of cat):



    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"
    < myscript.sh


    This pipes the local script myscript.sh to the remote side where it
    is redirected to a (temporary) file /tmp/ms.sh, executed, and finally
    removed.



    Note: I didn't check the original script for errors but just wanted to
    show the idea. No error prone quoting is necessary and all commands in
    the script are executed on the remote side.






    share|improve this answer




















    • No need to save the script into a temporary file either, just pipe it into a suitable shell, i.e. ssh user@host bash <myscript.sh.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 14:17







    • 2




      Keep in mind, though, that redirection only works when the script itself does not try to read from standard input.
      – chepner
      Dec 3 at 18:19










    • @pt314 Yes, but see Pipe a script into bash?
      – PerlDuck
      Dec 3 at 19:04











    • Yes, redirection has its limitations. It also avoids a bunch of security issues associated with writing (and then executing) a predictably-named temporary file. If you do use a temporary script (whether by choice or necessity), create it using mktemp or something similarly safe.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:52












    up vote
    4
    down vote










    up vote
    4
    down vote









    I think this whole complicated quoting stuff is proof enough to not
    use it but use a script instead. If you want to avoid multiple
    ssh connections, pipe the script over to the other host and
    let it run there in one command:



    Local file, say myscript.sh:



    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi


    Then:



    cat myscript.sh | 
    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"


    Or (avoiding a useless use of cat):



    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"
    < myscript.sh


    This pipes the local script myscript.sh to the remote side where it
    is redirected to a (temporary) file /tmp/ms.sh, executed, and finally
    removed.



    Note: I didn't check the original script for errors but just wanted to
    show the idea. No error prone quoting is necessary and all commands in
    the script are executed on the remote side.






    share|improve this answer












    I think this whole complicated quoting stuff is proof enough to not
    use it but use a script instead. If you want to avoid multiple
    ssh connections, pipe the script over to the other host and
    let it run there in one command:



    Local file, say myscript.sh:



    cd /var/www/test.com/backup;

    if [ $(ls | wc -l) -lt 3 ]; then
    echo "less"
    elif [ $(ls -t *.tgz|awk 'NR >3'|xargs rm -f) ]; then
    echo "deleted"
    else
    echo "something else"
    fi


    Then:



    cat myscript.sh | 
    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"


    Or (avoiding a useless use of cat):



    ssh -t test@192.168.94.139 
    "cat - > /tmp/ms.sh && sh /tmp/ms.sh && rm /tmp/ms.sh"
    < myscript.sh


    This pipes the local script myscript.sh to the remote side where it
    is redirected to a (temporary) file /tmp/ms.sh, executed, and finally
    removed.



    Note: I didn't check the original script for errors but just wanted to
    show the idea. No error prone quoting is necessary and all commands in
    the script are executed on the remote side.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Dec 3 at 13:44









    PerlDuck

    5,06911230




    5,06911230











    • No need to save the script into a temporary file either, just pipe it into a suitable shell, i.e. ssh user@host bash <myscript.sh.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 14:17







    • 2




      Keep in mind, though, that redirection only works when the script itself does not try to read from standard input.
      – chepner
      Dec 3 at 18:19










    • @pt314 Yes, but see Pipe a script into bash?
      – PerlDuck
      Dec 3 at 19:04











    • Yes, redirection has its limitations. It also avoids a bunch of security issues associated with writing (and then executing) a predictably-named temporary file. If you do use a temporary script (whether by choice or necessity), create it using mktemp or something similarly safe.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:52
















    • No need to save the script into a temporary file either, just pipe it into a suitable shell, i.e. ssh user@host bash <myscript.sh.
      – pt314
      Dec 3 at 14:17







    • 2




      Keep in mind, though, that redirection only works when the script itself does not try to read from standard input.
      – chepner
      Dec 3 at 18:19










    • @pt314 Yes, but see Pipe a script into bash?
      – PerlDuck
      Dec 3 at 19:04











    • Yes, redirection has its limitations. It also avoids a bunch of security issues associated with writing (and then executing) a predictably-named temporary file. If you do use a temporary script (whether by choice or necessity), create it using mktemp or something similarly safe.
      – pt314
      Dec 4 at 9:52















    No need to save the script into a temporary file either, just pipe it into a suitable shell, i.e. ssh user@host bash <myscript.sh.
    – pt314
    Dec 3 at 14:17





    No need to save the script into a temporary file either, just pipe it into a suitable shell, i.e. ssh user@host bash <myscript.sh.
    – pt314
    Dec 3 at 14:17





    2




    2




    Keep in mind, though, that redirection only works when the script itself does not try to read from standard input.
    – chepner
    Dec 3 at 18:19




    Keep in mind, though, that redirection only works when the script itself does not try to read from standard input.
    – chepner
    Dec 3 at 18:19












    @pt314 Yes, but see Pipe a script into bash?
    – PerlDuck
    Dec 3 at 19:04





    @pt314 Yes, but see Pipe a script into bash?
    – PerlDuck
    Dec 3 at 19:04













    Yes, redirection has its limitations. It also avoids a bunch of security issues associated with writing (and then executing) a predictably-named temporary file. If you do use a temporary script (whether by choice or necessity), create it using mktemp or something similarly safe.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:52




    Yes, redirection has its limitations. It also avoids a bunch of security issues associated with writing (and then executing) a predictably-named temporary file. If you do use a temporary script (whether by choice or necessity), create it using mktemp or something similarly safe.
    – pt314
    Dec 4 at 9:52










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I would prefer to place the script on the remote instance and just execute it through ssh, but here is my suggestion how this could be done in the way you want:



    #!/bin/bash

    HOST='test@192.168.94.139'
    REMOTE_PATH='/var/www/test.com/backup'

    COMMAND1="ssh "$HOST" 'ls "$REMOTE_PATH" | wc -l'"
    COMMAND2="ssh "$HOST" 'ls -t "$REMOTE_PATH"/*.tgz'"
    COMMAND3="xargs ssh "$HOST" rm -rf"

    if [[ $(eval "$COMMAND1") -le 3 ]]
    then
    echo "Less"
    else
    eval "$COMMAND2" | awk 'NR > 3' | eval "$COMMAND3" && echo "Deleted"
    fi


    Notes:



    • The conditional expression -lt is replaced by -le.


    • eval - construct command by concatenating arguments.

    • I'm not sure do we really need these extra quotations " within the $COMMAND1..3 expression, but I decide to add them.





    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      3
      down vote













      I would prefer to place the script on the remote instance and just execute it through ssh, but here is my suggestion how this could be done in the way you want:



      #!/bin/bash

      HOST='test@192.168.94.139'
      REMOTE_PATH='/var/www/test.com/backup'

      COMMAND1="ssh "$HOST" 'ls "$REMOTE_PATH" | wc -l'"
      COMMAND2="ssh "$HOST" 'ls -t "$REMOTE_PATH"/*.tgz'"
      COMMAND3="xargs ssh "$HOST" rm -rf"

      if [[ $(eval "$COMMAND1") -le 3 ]]
      then
      echo "Less"
      else
      eval "$COMMAND2" | awk 'NR > 3' | eval "$COMMAND3" && echo "Deleted"
      fi


      Notes:



      • The conditional expression -lt is replaced by -le.


      • eval - construct command by concatenating arguments.

      • I'm not sure do we really need these extra quotations " within the $COMMAND1..3 expression, but I decide to add them.





      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        3
        down vote










        up vote
        3
        down vote









        I would prefer to place the script on the remote instance and just execute it through ssh, but here is my suggestion how this could be done in the way you want:



        #!/bin/bash

        HOST='test@192.168.94.139'
        REMOTE_PATH='/var/www/test.com/backup'

        COMMAND1="ssh "$HOST" 'ls "$REMOTE_PATH" | wc -l'"
        COMMAND2="ssh "$HOST" 'ls -t "$REMOTE_PATH"/*.tgz'"
        COMMAND3="xargs ssh "$HOST" rm -rf"

        if [[ $(eval "$COMMAND1") -le 3 ]]
        then
        echo "Less"
        else
        eval "$COMMAND2" | awk 'NR > 3' | eval "$COMMAND3" && echo "Deleted"
        fi


        Notes:



        • The conditional expression -lt is replaced by -le.


        • eval - construct command by concatenating arguments.

        • I'm not sure do we really need these extra quotations " within the $COMMAND1..3 expression, but I decide to add them.





        share|improve this answer














        I would prefer to place the script on the remote instance and just execute it through ssh, but here is my suggestion how this could be done in the way you want:



        #!/bin/bash

        HOST='test@192.168.94.139'
        REMOTE_PATH='/var/www/test.com/backup'

        COMMAND1="ssh "$HOST" 'ls "$REMOTE_PATH" | wc -l'"
        COMMAND2="ssh "$HOST" 'ls -t "$REMOTE_PATH"/*.tgz'"
        COMMAND3="xargs ssh "$HOST" rm -rf"

        if [[ $(eval "$COMMAND1") -le 3 ]]
        then
        echo "Less"
        else
        eval "$COMMAND2" | awk 'NR > 3' | eval "$COMMAND3" && echo "Deleted"
        fi


        Notes:



        • The conditional expression -lt is replaced by -le.


        • eval - construct command by concatenating arguments.

        • I'm not sure do we really need these extra quotations " within the $COMMAND1..3 expression, but I decide to add them.






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Dec 3 at 10:14

























        answered Dec 3 at 9:51









        pa4080

        13.2k52461




        13.2k52461



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1098053%2fhow-can-ssh-work-with-an-if-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay