Style identification: Low-poly or what
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
New contributor
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
New contributor
I've seen this art style over multiple websites in the past, but just can't seem to identify an underlying style/category for it. It seems to be some geometry based low-poly, but searches don't really match it. Is it maybe a subset of low-poly?
A couple examples:
Source
style-identification
style-identification
New contributor
New contributor
edited Nov 20 at 14:03
WELZ
5,82151658
5,82151658
New contributor
asked Nov 20 at 13:45
gfxnoob
411
411
New contributor
New contributor
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
add a comment |
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
5
down vote
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
I think it's a kind of evolution of characters illustration. Adding the word "character" at the end of each of the following styles, Google shows several results.
- Pixel Art Characters
- Isometric Pixel Art Characters
- Block Isometric Characters
- Isometric Low Poly Characters
- Low Poly Characters
- 3D Low Poly Characters
Vectorstock
CreativeMarket
Freepick
Shutterstock
ShutterStock
Behance
edited Nov 20 at 15:03
answered Nov 20 at 14:16
Danielillo
18.2k12666
18.2k12666
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
Yes, I would say that it is in fact low poly art, though it's a cleaner and more contemporary look than traditional low poly art.
I'm sure it has a particular name, can't find it at the moment.
Compare it with other low poly images: (Google Search)
answered Nov 20 at 14:14
WELZ
5,82151658
5,82151658
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
1
1
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
This tomato and elephant seem to be in a rather different style to the examples in the question. Your examples are definitely 3D, whereas the ones in the question are a sort of hybrid 2D-3D -- for example their heads are definitely 3D but their limbs are just 2D.
– David Richerby
Nov 20 at 16:15
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
@DavidRicherby that's what I was trying to point out, Danielillo's answer summed it up excellently.
– WELZ
Nov 20 at 16:41
1
1
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
FWIW "Low poly papercraft" is what I'd call it, and the result I get from Google image search appear to agree.
– MikeTheLiar
Nov 20 at 19:09
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
It is flat shaded low-poly: each polygon is a single, solid color.
answered Nov 21 at 0:01
Russell Borogove
31016
31016
add a comment |
add a comment |
gfxnoob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gfxnoob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gfxnoob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gfxnoob is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgraphicdesign.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f117317%2fstyle-identification-low-poly-or-what%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
After seeing this question I'm wondering why they only used white people...
– WELZ
Nov 21 at 15:46