Is hitting creatures with Steelwind Strike considered “using” a weapon?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Steelwind Strike's spell description states:




You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then vanish to strike like the wind. Choose up to five creatures you can see within range. Make a melee spell attack against each target. On a hit, a target takes 6d10 force damage.




Now, we know that Steelwind Strike isn't a melee weapon attack. Attacks can either be a melee or a ranged attack and they can either be a spell or a weapon attack (so 4 types total). Sometimes it matters, but for the purposes of this question, I wanted to get that out of the way. Jeremy Crawford confirms this.



My question is in regards to Great Weapon Fighting and Great Weapon Master, both of which have similar wording.



Great Weapon Fighting is described as follows (emphasis mine)




When you roll a 1 or 2 on a damage die for an Attack you make with a melee weapon that you are wielding with two hands, you can reroll the die and must use the new roll, even if the new roll is a 1 or a 2. The weapon must have the Two-Handed or Versatile property for you to gain this benefit.




Great Weapon Master is described as follows (emphasis mine)




  • On your turn, when you score a critical hit with a melee weapon or reduce a creature to 0 hit points with one, you can make one melee weapon attack as a bonus action.

  • Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.



In my mind, this all hinges on whether or not Steelwind Strike is considered to be using your weapon or not. All other requirements are satisfied. You are making a melee attack (weapon attack is not specified) with Steelwind Strike's melee spell attack, which satisfies Great Weapon Master. You are obviously making an attack, so Great Weapon Fighting is satisfied. This leads me to conclude that if I am using that weapon, I can take a penalty for +10 damage on the spell effect, I can reroll 1s and 2s for the damage dice rolled, and if I kill something I can make a single melee weapon attack as a bonus action.



The question is: Are you making these attacks with a weapon?









share



















  • 1




    Thank you for the clarification on the wording of the spell!
    – Premier Bromanov
    1 hour ago














up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Steelwind Strike's spell description states:




You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then vanish to strike like the wind. Choose up to five creatures you can see within range. Make a melee spell attack against each target. On a hit, a target takes 6d10 force damage.




Now, we know that Steelwind Strike isn't a melee weapon attack. Attacks can either be a melee or a ranged attack and they can either be a spell or a weapon attack (so 4 types total). Sometimes it matters, but for the purposes of this question, I wanted to get that out of the way. Jeremy Crawford confirms this.



My question is in regards to Great Weapon Fighting and Great Weapon Master, both of which have similar wording.



Great Weapon Fighting is described as follows (emphasis mine)




When you roll a 1 or 2 on a damage die for an Attack you make with a melee weapon that you are wielding with two hands, you can reroll the die and must use the new roll, even if the new roll is a 1 or a 2. The weapon must have the Two-Handed or Versatile property for you to gain this benefit.




Great Weapon Master is described as follows (emphasis mine)




  • On your turn, when you score a critical hit with a melee weapon or reduce a creature to 0 hit points with one, you can make one melee weapon attack as a bonus action.

  • Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.



In my mind, this all hinges on whether or not Steelwind Strike is considered to be using your weapon or not. All other requirements are satisfied. You are making a melee attack (weapon attack is not specified) with Steelwind Strike's melee spell attack, which satisfies Great Weapon Master. You are obviously making an attack, so Great Weapon Fighting is satisfied. This leads me to conclude that if I am using that weapon, I can take a penalty for +10 damage on the spell effect, I can reroll 1s and 2s for the damage dice rolled, and if I kill something I can make a single melee weapon attack as a bonus action.



The question is: Are you making these attacks with a weapon?









share



















  • 1




    Thank you for the clarification on the wording of the spell!
    – Premier Bromanov
    1 hour ago












up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











Steelwind Strike's spell description states:




You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then vanish to strike like the wind. Choose up to five creatures you can see within range. Make a melee spell attack against each target. On a hit, a target takes 6d10 force damage.




Now, we know that Steelwind Strike isn't a melee weapon attack. Attacks can either be a melee or a ranged attack and they can either be a spell or a weapon attack (so 4 types total). Sometimes it matters, but for the purposes of this question, I wanted to get that out of the way. Jeremy Crawford confirms this.



My question is in regards to Great Weapon Fighting and Great Weapon Master, both of which have similar wording.



Great Weapon Fighting is described as follows (emphasis mine)




When you roll a 1 or 2 on a damage die for an Attack you make with a melee weapon that you are wielding with two hands, you can reroll the die and must use the new roll, even if the new roll is a 1 or a 2. The weapon must have the Two-Handed or Versatile property for you to gain this benefit.




Great Weapon Master is described as follows (emphasis mine)




  • On your turn, when you score a critical hit with a melee weapon or reduce a creature to 0 hit points with one, you can make one melee weapon attack as a bonus action.

  • Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.



In my mind, this all hinges on whether or not Steelwind Strike is considered to be using your weapon or not. All other requirements are satisfied. You are making a melee attack (weapon attack is not specified) with Steelwind Strike's melee spell attack, which satisfies Great Weapon Master. You are obviously making an attack, so Great Weapon Fighting is satisfied. This leads me to conclude that if I am using that weapon, I can take a penalty for +10 damage on the spell effect, I can reroll 1s and 2s for the damage dice rolled, and if I kill something I can make a single melee weapon attack as a bonus action.



The question is: Are you making these attacks with a weapon?









share















Steelwind Strike's spell description states:




You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then vanish to strike like the wind. Choose up to five creatures you can see within range. Make a melee spell attack against each target. On a hit, a target takes 6d10 force damage.




Now, we know that Steelwind Strike isn't a melee weapon attack. Attacks can either be a melee or a ranged attack and they can either be a spell or a weapon attack (so 4 types total). Sometimes it matters, but for the purposes of this question, I wanted to get that out of the way. Jeremy Crawford confirms this.



My question is in regards to Great Weapon Fighting and Great Weapon Master, both of which have similar wording.



Great Weapon Fighting is described as follows (emphasis mine)




When you roll a 1 or 2 on a damage die for an Attack you make with a melee weapon that you are wielding with two hands, you can reroll the die and must use the new roll, even if the new roll is a 1 or a 2. The weapon must have the Two-Handed or Versatile property for you to gain this benefit.




Great Weapon Master is described as follows (emphasis mine)




  • On your turn, when you score a critical hit with a melee weapon or reduce a creature to 0 hit points with one, you can make one melee weapon attack as a bonus action.

  • Before you make a melee attack with a heavy weapon that you are proficient with, you can choose to take a -5 penalty to the attack roll. If the attack hits, you add +10 to the attack's damage.



In my mind, this all hinges on whether or not Steelwind Strike is considered to be using your weapon or not. All other requirements are satisfied. You are making a melee attack (weapon attack is not specified) with Steelwind Strike's melee spell attack, which satisfies Great Weapon Master. You are obviously making an attack, so Great Weapon Fighting is satisfied. This leads me to conclude that if I am using that weapon, I can take a penalty for +10 damage on the spell effect, I can reroll 1s and 2s for the damage dice rolled, and if I kill something I can make a single melee weapon attack as a bonus action.



The question is: Are you making these attacks with a weapon?







dnd-5e spells





share














share












share



share








edited 44 mins ago









Rubiksmoose

41.2k5204312




41.2k5204312










asked 1 hour ago









Premier Bromanov

11.2k539104




11.2k539104







  • 1




    Thank you for the clarification on the wording of the spell!
    – Premier Bromanov
    1 hour ago












  • 1




    Thank you for the clarification on the wording of the spell!
    – Premier Bromanov
    1 hour ago







1




1




Thank you for the clarification on the wording of the spell!
– Premier Bromanov
1 hour ago




Thank you for the clarification on the wording of the spell!
– Premier Bromanov
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
7
down vote













You aren't using the weapon in the attack



The melee spell attacks are part of the spell's effect while the weapon used is a material component (part of the casting):




Components: S, M (a melee weapon worth at least 1 sp)




You don't use material components to make the attacks, the components of the spell are part of the casting, which results in the spell effect (emphasis mine):




Each spell description begins with a block of information, including the spell's name, level, school of magic, casting time, range, components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the spell's effect.



[...]



Material (M)



Casting some spells requires particular objects...




Material components and other elements of casting are completely separate from the spell effect (which includes the attacks). As such, you are not using the weapon to make any attack and features like Great Weapon Fighting will not apply.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I think I need more to back this up. Why does being a material component make it not "used"?
    – Premier Bromanov
    39 mins ago










  • @PrimierBromanov it is used as part of the casting, but a spell attack doesn't care what you use to cast since it is a spell effect. I'll add more context
    – David Coffron
    37 mins ago










  • Totally agree. You're not throwing a greatsword at 5 targets to make force damage.
    – BlueMoon93
    35 mins ago










  • "then vanish to strike like the wind". Who or what vanish? Does the "strike like the wind" means the caster "vanish, then strikes all the enemies"? Or "the weapon vanish, then strikes all the enemies"?
    – Vylix
    3 mins ago










  • @Vylix based on the grammar, you (the subject) are vanishing (it is a compound sentence)
    – David Coffron
    1 min ago

















up vote
1
down vote













No, I would say it is not. The word "with" in this case is not interchangeable with "involving in any fashion", it means using that weapon to make a melee weapon attack, but one that doesn't necessarily have to be the Attack action.



The question is really asking, to my mind, is SWS a gish spell? Well, let's take a look at some of the classic 5e gish spells, ones we know have interactions with things like GWF and GWM:




Booming Blade



As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell's range, otherwise the spell fails. (SCAG p.143)




Green-Flame Blade uses the same language.



We could even take a look at a Xanathar's spell, though it's drastically different:




Shadow Blade



You weave together threads of shadow to create a sword of solidified gloom in your hand. This magic sword lasts until the spell ends. It counts as a simple melee weapon
with which you are proficient. It deals 2d8 psychic damage on a hit and has the finesse, light, and thrown properties (range 20/60). (XGtE p.164)




Now, none of these things really sound very much like "You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then..." To my mind, this would suggest that 'flourish' and 'weapon used in the casting' language is much more of a flavor cue and not meant to suggest that the spell will have interactions with GWF and GWM any more than any other melee spell attack would, whether or not you're casting a melee attack spell while holding a greatsword.





share








New contributor




theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134968%2fis-hitting-creatures-with-steelwind-strike-considered-using-a-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    7
    down vote













    You aren't using the weapon in the attack



    The melee spell attacks are part of the spell's effect while the weapon used is a material component (part of the casting):




    Components: S, M (a melee weapon worth at least 1 sp)




    You don't use material components to make the attacks, the components of the spell are part of the casting, which results in the spell effect (emphasis mine):




    Each spell description begins with a block of information, including the spell's name, level, school of magic, casting time, range, components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the spell's effect.



    [...]



    Material (M)



    Casting some spells requires particular objects...




    Material components and other elements of casting are completely separate from the spell effect (which includes the attacks). As such, you are not using the weapon to make any attack and features like Great Weapon Fighting will not apply.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      I think I need more to back this up. Why does being a material component make it not "used"?
      – Premier Bromanov
      39 mins ago










    • @PrimierBromanov it is used as part of the casting, but a spell attack doesn't care what you use to cast since it is a spell effect. I'll add more context
      – David Coffron
      37 mins ago










    • Totally agree. You're not throwing a greatsword at 5 targets to make force damage.
      – BlueMoon93
      35 mins ago










    • "then vanish to strike like the wind". Who or what vanish? Does the "strike like the wind" means the caster "vanish, then strikes all the enemies"? Or "the weapon vanish, then strikes all the enemies"?
      – Vylix
      3 mins ago










    • @Vylix based on the grammar, you (the subject) are vanishing (it is a compound sentence)
      – David Coffron
      1 min ago














    up vote
    7
    down vote













    You aren't using the weapon in the attack



    The melee spell attacks are part of the spell's effect while the weapon used is a material component (part of the casting):




    Components: S, M (a melee weapon worth at least 1 sp)




    You don't use material components to make the attacks, the components of the spell are part of the casting, which results in the spell effect (emphasis mine):




    Each spell description begins with a block of information, including the spell's name, level, school of magic, casting time, range, components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the spell's effect.



    [...]



    Material (M)



    Casting some spells requires particular objects...




    Material components and other elements of casting are completely separate from the spell effect (which includes the attacks). As such, you are not using the weapon to make any attack and features like Great Weapon Fighting will not apply.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      I think I need more to back this up. Why does being a material component make it not "used"?
      – Premier Bromanov
      39 mins ago










    • @PrimierBromanov it is used as part of the casting, but a spell attack doesn't care what you use to cast since it is a spell effect. I'll add more context
      – David Coffron
      37 mins ago










    • Totally agree. You're not throwing a greatsword at 5 targets to make force damage.
      – BlueMoon93
      35 mins ago










    • "then vanish to strike like the wind". Who or what vanish? Does the "strike like the wind" means the caster "vanish, then strikes all the enemies"? Or "the weapon vanish, then strikes all the enemies"?
      – Vylix
      3 mins ago










    • @Vylix based on the grammar, you (the subject) are vanishing (it is a compound sentence)
      – David Coffron
      1 min ago












    up vote
    7
    down vote










    up vote
    7
    down vote









    You aren't using the weapon in the attack



    The melee spell attacks are part of the spell's effect while the weapon used is a material component (part of the casting):




    Components: S, M (a melee weapon worth at least 1 sp)




    You don't use material components to make the attacks, the components of the spell are part of the casting, which results in the spell effect (emphasis mine):




    Each spell description begins with a block of information, including the spell's name, level, school of magic, casting time, range, components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the spell's effect.



    [...]



    Material (M)



    Casting some spells requires particular objects...




    Material components and other elements of casting are completely separate from the spell effect (which includes the attacks). As such, you are not using the weapon to make any attack and features like Great Weapon Fighting will not apply.






    share|improve this answer














    You aren't using the weapon in the attack



    The melee spell attacks are part of the spell's effect while the weapon used is a material component (part of the casting):




    Components: S, M (a melee weapon worth at least 1 sp)




    You don't use material components to make the attacks, the components of the spell are part of the casting, which results in the spell effect (emphasis mine):




    Each spell description begins with a block of information, including the spell's name, level, school of magic, casting time, range, components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the spell's effect.



    [...]



    Material (M)



    Casting some spells requires particular objects...




    Material components and other elements of casting are completely separate from the spell effect (which includes the attacks). As such, you are not using the weapon to make any attack and features like Great Weapon Fighting will not apply.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 30 mins ago

























    answered 1 hour ago









    David Coffron

    30.3k2104209




    30.3k2104209







    • 1




      I think I need more to back this up. Why does being a material component make it not "used"?
      – Premier Bromanov
      39 mins ago










    • @PrimierBromanov it is used as part of the casting, but a spell attack doesn't care what you use to cast since it is a spell effect. I'll add more context
      – David Coffron
      37 mins ago










    • Totally agree. You're not throwing a greatsword at 5 targets to make force damage.
      – BlueMoon93
      35 mins ago










    • "then vanish to strike like the wind". Who or what vanish? Does the "strike like the wind" means the caster "vanish, then strikes all the enemies"? Or "the weapon vanish, then strikes all the enemies"?
      – Vylix
      3 mins ago










    • @Vylix based on the grammar, you (the subject) are vanishing (it is a compound sentence)
      – David Coffron
      1 min ago












    • 1




      I think I need more to back this up. Why does being a material component make it not "used"?
      – Premier Bromanov
      39 mins ago










    • @PrimierBromanov it is used as part of the casting, but a spell attack doesn't care what you use to cast since it is a spell effect. I'll add more context
      – David Coffron
      37 mins ago










    • Totally agree. You're not throwing a greatsword at 5 targets to make force damage.
      – BlueMoon93
      35 mins ago










    • "then vanish to strike like the wind". Who or what vanish? Does the "strike like the wind" means the caster "vanish, then strikes all the enemies"? Or "the weapon vanish, then strikes all the enemies"?
      – Vylix
      3 mins ago










    • @Vylix based on the grammar, you (the subject) are vanishing (it is a compound sentence)
      – David Coffron
      1 min ago







    1




    1




    I think I need more to back this up. Why does being a material component make it not "used"?
    – Premier Bromanov
    39 mins ago




    I think I need more to back this up. Why does being a material component make it not "used"?
    – Premier Bromanov
    39 mins ago












    @PrimierBromanov it is used as part of the casting, but a spell attack doesn't care what you use to cast since it is a spell effect. I'll add more context
    – David Coffron
    37 mins ago




    @PrimierBromanov it is used as part of the casting, but a spell attack doesn't care what you use to cast since it is a spell effect. I'll add more context
    – David Coffron
    37 mins ago












    Totally agree. You're not throwing a greatsword at 5 targets to make force damage.
    – BlueMoon93
    35 mins ago




    Totally agree. You're not throwing a greatsword at 5 targets to make force damage.
    – BlueMoon93
    35 mins ago












    "then vanish to strike like the wind". Who or what vanish? Does the "strike like the wind" means the caster "vanish, then strikes all the enemies"? Or "the weapon vanish, then strikes all the enemies"?
    – Vylix
    3 mins ago




    "then vanish to strike like the wind". Who or what vanish? Does the "strike like the wind" means the caster "vanish, then strikes all the enemies"? Or "the weapon vanish, then strikes all the enemies"?
    – Vylix
    3 mins ago












    @Vylix based on the grammar, you (the subject) are vanishing (it is a compound sentence)
    – David Coffron
    1 min ago




    @Vylix based on the grammar, you (the subject) are vanishing (it is a compound sentence)
    – David Coffron
    1 min ago












    up vote
    1
    down vote













    No, I would say it is not. The word "with" in this case is not interchangeable with "involving in any fashion", it means using that weapon to make a melee weapon attack, but one that doesn't necessarily have to be the Attack action.



    The question is really asking, to my mind, is SWS a gish spell? Well, let's take a look at some of the classic 5e gish spells, ones we know have interactions with things like GWF and GWM:




    Booming Blade



    As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell's range, otherwise the spell fails. (SCAG p.143)




    Green-Flame Blade uses the same language.



    We could even take a look at a Xanathar's spell, though it's drastically different:




    Shadow Blade



    You weave together threads of shadow to create a sword of solidified gloom in your hand. This magic sword lasts until the spell ends. It counts as a simple melee weapon
    with which you are proficient. It deals 2d8 psychic damage on a hit and has the finesse, light, and thrown properties (range 20/60). (XGtE p.164)




    Now, none of these things really sound very much like "You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then..." To my mind, this would suggest that 'flourish' and 'weapon used in the casting' language is much more of a flavor cue and not meant to suggest that the spell will have interactions with GWF and GWM any more than any other melee spell attack would, whether or not you're casting a melee attack spell while holding a greatsword.





    share








    New contributor




    theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      1
      down vote













      No, I would say it is not. The word "with" in this case is not interchangeable with "involving in any fashion", it means using that weapon to make a melee weapon attack, but one that doesn't necessarily have to be the Attack action.



      The question is really asking, to my mind, is SWS a gish spell? Well, let's take a look at some of the classic 5e gish spells, ones we know have interactions with things like GWF and GWM:




      Booming Blade



      As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell's range, otherwise the spell fails. (SCAG p.143)




      Green-Flame Blade uses the same language.



      We could even take a look at a Xanathar's spell, though it's drastically different:




      Shadow Blade



      You weave together threads of shadow to create a sword of solidified gloom in your hand. This magic sword lasts until the spell ends. It counts as a simple melee weapon
      with which you are proficient. It deals 2d8 psychic damage on a hit and has the finesse, light, and thrown properties (range 20/60). (XGtE p.164)




      Now, none of these things really sound very much like "You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then..." To my mind, this would suggest that 'flourish' and 'weapon used in the casting' language is much more of a flavor cue and not meant to suggest that the spell will have interactions with GWF and GWM any more than any other melee spell attack would, whether or not you're casting a melee attack spell while holding a greatsword.





      share








      New contributor




      theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.



















        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        No, I would say it is not. The word "with" in this case is not interchangeable with "involving in any fashion", it means using that weapon to make a melee weapon attack, but one that doesn't necessarily have to be the Attack action.



        The question is really asking, to my mind, is SWS a gish spell? Well, let's take a look at some of the classic 5e gish spells, ones we know have interactions with things like GWF and GWM:




        Booming Blade



        As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell's range, otherwise the spell fails. (SCAG p.143)




        Green-Flame Blade uses the same language.



        We could even take a look at a Xanathar's spell, though it's drastically different:




        Shadow Blade



        You weave together threads of shadow to create a sword of solidified gloom in your hand. This magic sword lasts until the spell ends. It counts as a simple melee weapon
        with which you are proficient. It deals 2d8 psychic damage on a hit and has the finesse, light, and thrown properties (range 20/60). (XGtE p.164)




        Now, none of these things really sound very much like "You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then..." To my mind, this would suggest that 'flourish' and 'weapon used in the casting' language is much more of a flavor cue and not meant to suggest that the spell will have interactions with GWF and GWM any more than any other melee spell attack would, whether or not you're casting a melee attack spell while holding a greatsword.





        share








        New contributor




        theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        No, I would say it is not. The word "with" in this case is not interchangeable with "involving in any fashion", it means using that weapon to make a melee weapon attack, but one that doesn't necessarily have to be the Attack action.



        The question is really asking, to my mind, is SWS a gish spell? Well, let's take a look at some of the classic 5e gish spells, ones we know have interactions with things like GWF and GWM:




        Booming Blade



        As part of the action used to cast this spell, you must make a melee attack with a weapon against one creature within the spell's range, otherwise the spell fails. (SCAG p.143)




        Green-Flame Blade uses the same language.



        We could even take a look at a Xanathar's spell, though it's drastically different:




        Shadow Blade



        You weave together threads of shadow to create a sword of solidified gloom in your hand. This magic sword lasts until the spell ends. It counts as a simple melee weapon
        with which you are proficient. It deals 2d8 psychic damage on a hit and has the finesse, light, and thrown properties (range 20/60). (XGtE p.164)




        Now, none of these things really sound very much like "You flourish the weapon used in the casting and then..." To my mind, this would suggest that 'flourish' and 'weapon used in the casting' language is much more of a flavor cue and not meant to suggest that the spell will have interactions with GWF and GWM any more than any other melee spell attack would, whether or not you're casting a melee attack spell while holding a greatsword.






        share








        New contributor




        theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        share


        share






        New contributor




        theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 6 mins ago









        theCrazing

        2368




        2368




        New contributor




        theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        theCrazing is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.



























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f134968%2fis-hitting-creatures-with-steelwind-strike-considered-using-a-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            Peggy Mitchell

            Palaiologos

            The Forum (Inglewood, California)