Does hiding a truth constitute lying?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am expected to tell the truth if asked. But sometimes I hide the truth. For example once , although I have diabetes, I ate sweet in a shop and then I withdrew money from atm. My wife called me and asked me what am I doing outside ? I said I am withdrawing money from ATM. I deliberately did not tell her that I primarily came out to eat sweets.



If a person hides a truth for his profit then does it constitute lying ?










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I am expected to tell the truth if asked. But sometimes I hide the truth. For example once , although I have diabetes, I ate sweet in a shop and then I withdrew money from atm. My wife called me and asked me what am I doing outside ? I said I am withdrawing money from ATM. I deliberately did not tell her that I primarily came out to eat sweets.



    If a person hides a truth for his profit then does it constitute lying ?










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I am expected to tell the truth if asked. But sometimes I hide the truth. For example once , although I have diabetes, I ate sweet in a shop and then I withdrew money from atm. My wife called me and asked me what am I doing outside ? I said I am withdrawing money from ATM. I deliberately did not tell her that I primarily came out to eat sweets.



      If a person hides a truth for his profit then does it constitute lying ?










      share|improve this question













      I am expected to tell the truth if asked. But sometimes I hide the truth. For example once , although I have diabetes, I ate sweet in a shop and then I withdrew money from atm. My wife called me and asked me what am I doing outside ? I said I am withdrawing money from ATM. I deliberately did not tell her that I primarily came out to eat sweets.



      If a person hides a truth for his profit then does it constitute lying ?







      ethics






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 5 hours ago









      Dheeraj Verma

      508412




      508412




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          Since that was to your wife it was equivalent you saying a lie. But it wouldn't be so if that was to a person who has no responsibility in maintaining your health.



          You may compare this with an incident in the Mahabharatha: Aswathama Hatha. Though it was a part of maintainance of Dharma, it was for cheating and so it was a lie.



          https://mounica1398.wordpress.com/2017/11/12/the-fall-of-drona-aswathama-hatha-iti-narova-kunjarova/






          share|improve this answer





























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Lying is a communication intended to deceive or mislead. Lies of omission, and of misdirection, are lies.



            The best analysis of lying I have seen was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              It might be good to add references. This strengthens the answer and provides the reader a place to go for more information. However, I do agree with your answer.
              – Frank Hubeny
              4 hours ago










            • Agreed -- but this is not a conclusion I have drawn based on reading or references, it is simply a life experience -- IE the sort of wisdom that is philosophizing.
              – Dcleve
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              If that is the case then this answer doesn't fall under the guidelines of how to write a good answer and is merely a comment.
              – Not_Here
              1 hour ago











            • So we can't provide reasoned answers, but must only cite the reasoning of others? The best analysis of lying I recall seeing was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all. This was decades ago. I can try to find an online reference.
              – Dcleve
              1 hour ago







            • 1




              It does not even have to be referenced all the time and especially not in academic style. But it does not hurt if some namedropping is involved either. The main problem with this answer is that one-liners are generally discouraged. Even if you only had added the last comment as part of the answer, it would have improved it a lot.
              – Philip Klöcking♦
              1 hour ago

















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            From "The Gulag Archipelago" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, part 1 chapter 3 "The Interrogation" (bracketed clarifications added):




            N. Stolyarova recalls an old woman who was her neighbor on the Butyrki bunks [in lockup] in 1937. They kept on interrogating her every night. Two years earlier, a former Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church, [equiv to a bishop or perhaps archbishop] who had escaped from exile, had spent a night at her home on his way through Moscow.



            LADY: "But he wasn't the former Metropolitan, he was the Metropolitan! Truly I was worthy of receiving him."



            INTERROGATOR: "All right then. To whom did he go when he left Moscow?"



            LADY: "I know, but I won't tell you!"




            Did the old lady lie to the interrogators? Was she morally obligated to answer their question as it was stated? I believe that the answer to both questions is "no".






            share|improve this answer




















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "265"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56836%2fdoes-hiding-a-truth-constitute-lying%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              2
              down vote













              Since that was to your wife it was equivalent you saying a lie. But it wouldn't be so if that was to a person who has no responsibility in maintaining your health.



              You may compare this with an incident in the Mahabharatha: Aswathama Hatha. Though it was a part of maintainance of Dharma, it was for cheating and so it was a lie.



              https://mounica1398.wordpress.com/2017/11/12/the-fall-of-drona-aswathama-hatha-iti-narova-kunjarova/






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Since that was to your wife it was equivalent you saying a lie. But it wouldn't be so if that was to a person who has no responsibility in maintaining your health.



                You may compare this with an incident in the Mahabharatha: Aswathama Hatha. Though it was a part of maintainance of Dharma, it was for cheating and so it was a lie.



                https://mounica1398.wordpress.com/2017/11/12/the-fall-of-drona-aswathama-hatha-iti-narova-kunjarova/






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote









                  Since that was to your wife it was equivalent you saying a lie. But it wouldn't be so if that was to a person who has no responsibility in maintaining your health.



                  You may compare this with an incident in the Mahabharatha: Aswathama Hatha. Though it was a part of maintainance of Dharma, it was for cheating and so it was a lie.



                  https://mounica1398.wordpress.com/2017/11/12/the-fall-of-drona-aswathama-hatha-iti-narova-kunjarova/






                  share|improve this answer














                  Since that was to your wife it was equivalent you saying a lie. But it wouldn't be so if that was to a person who has no responsibility in maintaining your health.



                  You may compare this with an incident in the Mahabharatha: Aswathama Hatha. Though it was a part of maintainance of Dharma, it was for cheating and so it was a lie.



                  https://mounica1398.wordpress.com/2017/11/12/the-fall-of-drona-aswathama-hatha-iti-narova-kunjarova/







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 3 hours ago

























                  answered 4 hours ago









                  SonOfThought

                  1,22639




                  1,22639




















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Lying is a communication intended to deceive or mislead. Lies of omission, and of misdirection, are lies.



                      The best analysis of lying I have seen was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all.






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1




                        It might be good to add references. This strengthens the answer and provides the reader a place to go for more information. However, I do agree with your answer.
                        – Frank Hubeny
                        4 hours ago










                      • Agreed -- but this is not a conclusion I have drawn based on reading or references, it is simply a life experience -- IE the sort of wisdom that is philosophizing.
                        – Dcleve
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1




                        If that is the case then this answer doesn't fall under the guidelines of how to write a good answer and is merely a comment.
                        – Not_Here
                        1 hour ago











                      • So we can't provide reasoned answers, but must only cite the reasoning of others? The best analysis of lying I recall seeing was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all. This was decades ago. I can try to find an online reference.
                        – Dcleve
                        1 hour ago







                      • 1




                        It does not even have to be referenced all the time and especially not in academic style. But it does not hurt if some namedropping is involved either. The main problem with this answer is that one-liners are generally discouraged. Even if you only had added the last comment as part of the answer, it would have improved it a lot.
                        – Philip Klöcking♦
                        1 hour ago














                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Lying is a communication intended to deceive or mislead. Lies of omission, and of misdirection, are lies.



                      The best analysis of lying I have seen was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all.






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1




                        It might be good to add references. This strengthens the answer and provides the reader a place to go for more information. However, I do agree with your answer.
                        – Frank Hubeny
                        4 hours ago










                      • Agreed -- but this is not a conclusion I have drawn based on reading or references, it is simply a life experience -- IE the sort of wisdom that is philosophizing.
                        – Dcleve
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1




                        If that is the case then this answer doesn't fall under the guidelines of how to write a good answer and is merely a comment.
                        – Not_Here
                        1 hour ago











                      • So we can't provide reasoned answers, but must only cite the reasoning of others? The best analysis of lying I recall seeing was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all. This was decades ago. I can try to find an online reference.
                        – Dcleve
                        1 hour ago







                      • 1




                        It does not even have to be referenced all the time and especially not in academic style. But it does not hurt if some namedropping is involved either. The main problem with this answer is that one-liners are generally discouraged. Even if you only had added the last comment as part of the answer, it would have improved it a lot.
                        – Philip Klöcking♦
                        1 hour ago












                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote









                      Lying is a communication intended to deceive or mislead. Lies of omission, and of misdirection, are lies.



                      The best analysis of lying I have seen was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all.






                      share|improve this answer














                      Lying is a communication intended to deceive or mislead. Lies of omission, and of misdirection, are lies.



                      The best analysis of lying I have seen was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 35 mins ago

























                      answered 5 hours ago









                      Dcleve

                      45727




                      45727







                      • 1




                        It might be good to add references. This strengthens the answer and provides the reader a place to go for more information. However, I do agree with your answer.
                        – Frank Hubeny
                        4 hours ago










                      • Agreed -- but this is not a conclusion I have drawn based on reading or references, it is simply a life experience -- IE the sort of wisdom that is philosophizing.
                        – Dcleve
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1




                        If that is the case then this answer doesn't fall under the guidelines of how to write a good answer and is merely a comment.
                        – Not_Here
                        1 hour ago











                      • So we can't provide reasoned answers, but must only cite the reasoning of others? The best analysis of lying I recall seeing was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all. This was decades ago. I can try to find an online reference.
                        – Dcleve
                        1 hour ago







                      • 1




                        It does not even have to be referenced all the time and especially not in academic style. But it does not hurt if some namedropping is involved either. The main problem with this answer is that one-liners are generally discouraged. Even if you only had added the last comment as part of the answer, it would have improved it a lot.
                        – Philip Klöcking♦
                        1 hour ago












                      • 1




                        It might be good to add references. This strengthens the answer and provides the reader a place to go for more information. However, I do agree with your answer.
                        – Frank Hubeny
                        4 hours ago










                      • Agreed -- but this is not a conclusion I have drawn based on reading or references, it is simply a life experience -- IE the sort of wisdom that is philosophizing.
                        – Dcleve
                        3 hours ago






                      • 1




                        If that is the case then this answer doesn't fall under the guidelines of how to write a good answer and is merely a comment.
                        – Not_Here
                        1 hour ago











                      • So we can't provide reasoned answers, but must only cite the reasoning of others? The best analysis of lying I recall seeing was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all. This was decades ago. I can try to find an online reference.
                        – Dcleve
                        1 hour ago







                      • 1




                        It does not even have to be referenced all the time and especially not in academic style. But it does not hurt if some namedropping is involved either. The main problem with this answer is that one-liners are generally discouraged. Even if you only had added the last comment as part of the answer, it would have improved it a lot.
                        – Philip Klöcking♦
                        1 hour ago







                      1




                      1




                      It might be good to add references. This strengthens the answer and provides the reader a place to go for more information. However, I do agree with your answer.
                      – Frank Hubeny
                      4 hours ago




                      It might be good to add references. This strengthens the answer and provides the reader a place to go for more information. However, I do agree with your answer.
                      – Frank Hubeny
                      4 hours ago












                      Agreed -- but this is not a conclusion I have drawn based on reading or references, it is simply a life experience -- IE the sort of wisdom that is philosophizing.
                      – Dcleve
                      3 hours ago




                      Agreed -- but this is not a conclusion I have drawn based on reading or references, it is simply a life experience -- IE the sort of wisdom that is philosophizing.
                      – Dcleve
                      3 hours ago




                      1




                      1




                      If that is the case then this answer doesn't fall under the guidelines of how to write a good answer and is merely a comment.
                      – Not_Here
                      1 hour ago





                      If that is the case then this answer doesn't fall under the guidelines of how to write a good answer and is merely a comment.
                      – Not_Here
                      1 hour ago













                      So we can't provide reasoned answers, but must only cite the reasoning of others? The best analysis of lying I recall seeing was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all. This was decades ago. I can try to find an online reference.
                      – Dcleve
                      1 hour ago





                      So we can't provide reasoned answers, but must only cite the reasoning of others? The best analysis of lying I recall seeing was from libertarian thought, and it treated lying as a degradation of the common currency of communication we all need to access the world and society, hence all miscommunication of any kind was harmful to all. This was decades ago. I can try to find an online reference.
                      – Dcleve
                      1 hour ago





                      1




                      1




                      It does not even have to be referenced all the time and especially not in academic style. But it does not hurt if some namedropping is involved either. The main problem with this answer is that one-liners are generally discouraged. Even if you only had added the last comment as part of the answer, it would have improved it a lot.
                      – Philip Klöcking♦
                      1 hour ago




                      It does not even have to be referenced all the time and especially not in academic style. But it does not hurt if some namedropping is involved either. The main problem with this answer is that one-liners are generally discouraged. Even if you only had added the last comment as part of the answer, it would have improved it a lot.
                      – Philip Klöcking♦
                      1 hour ago










                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      From "The Gulag Archipelago" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, part 1 chapter 3 "The Interrogation" (bracketed clarifications added):




                      N. Stolyarova recalls an old woman who was her neighbor on the Butyrki bunks [in lockup] in 1937. They kept on interrogating her every night. Two years earlier, a former Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church, [equiv to a bishop or perhaps archbishop] who had escaped from exile, had spent a night at her home on his way through Moscow.



                      LADY: "But he wasn't the former Metropolitan, he was the Metropolitan! Truly I was worthy of receiving him."



                      INTERROGATOR: "All right then. To whom did he go when he left Moscow?"



                      LADY: "I know, but I won't tell you!"




                      Did the old lady lie to the interrogators? Was she morally obligated to answer their question as it was stated? I believe that the answer to both questions is "no".






                      share|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        From "The Gulag Archipelago" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, part 1 chapter 3 "The Interrogation" (bracketed clarifications added):




                        N. Stolyarova recalls an old woman who was her neighbor on the Butyrki bunks [in lockup] in 1937. They kept on interrogating her every night. Two years earlier, a former Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church, [equiv to a bishop or perhaps archbishop] who had escaped from exile, had spent a night at her home on his way through Moscow.



                        LADY: "But he wasn't the former Metropolitan, he was the Metropolitan! Truly I was worthy of receiving him."



                        INTERROGATOR: "All right then. To whom did he go when he left Moscow?"



                        LADY: "I know, but I won't tell you!"




                        Did the old lady lie to the interrogators? Was she morally obligated to answer their question as it was stated? I believe that the answer to both questions is "no".






                        share|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          From "The Gulag Archipelago" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, part 1 chapter 3 "The Interrogation" (bracketed clarifications added):




                          N. Stolyarova recalls an old woman who was her neighbor on the Butyrki bunks [in lockup] in 1937. They kept on interrogating her every night. Two years earlier, a former Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church, [equiv to a bishop or perhaps archbishop] who had escaped from exile, had spent a night at her home on his way through Moscow.



                          LADY: "But he wasn't the former Metropolitan, he was the Metropolitan! Truly I was worthy of receiving him."



                          INTERROGATOR: "All right then. To whom did he go when he left Moscow?"



                          LADY: "I know, but I won't tell you!"




                          Did the old lady lie to the interrogators? Was she morally obligated to answer their question as it was stated? I believe that the answer to both questions is "no".






                          share|improve this answer












                          From "The Gulag Archipelago" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, part 1 chapter 3 "The Interrogation" (bracketed clarifications added):




                          N. Stolyarova recalls an old woman who was her neighbor on the Butyrki bunks [in lockup] in 1937. They kept on interrogating her every night. Two years earlier, a former Metropolitan of the Orthodox Church, [equiv to a bishop or perhaps archbishop] who had escaped from exile, had spent a night at her home on his way through Moscow.



                          LADY: "But he wasn't the former Metropolitan, he was the Metropolitan! Truly I was worthy of receiving him."



                          INTERROGATOR: "All right then. To whom did he go when he left Moscow?"



                          LADY: "I know, but I won't tell you!"




                          Did the old lady lie to the interrogators? Was she morally obligated to answer their question as it was stated? I believe that the answer to both questions is "no".







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 13 mins ago









                          elliot svensson

                          2,51718




                          2,51718



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphilosophy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56836%2fdoes-hiding-a-truth-constitute-lying%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                              How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?