How to understand this example in Do Carmo?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
enter image description here



enter image description here



enter image description here



I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?






general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves







share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
    enter image description here



    enter image description here



    enter image description here



    I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
    No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?






    general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves







    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
      No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?






      general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves







      share|cite|improve this question















      I'm reading the book $Riemannian$ $Geometry$ written by Do Carmo. Here is an example that I cannot understand the explanation he gave.
      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      enter image description here



      I really don't understand what he said about why $alpha$ is not an embedding...
      No worry about my knowledge on topology, can anyone help me ''translate'' it to the common language that's easy to understand?






      general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves




      general-topology differential-geometry riemannian-geometry curves






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 12 hours ago









      José Carlos Santos

      137k17109199




      137k17109199










      asked 12 hours ago









      user450201

      597




      597




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          8
          down vote



          accepted










          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:



          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbbR^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbbR^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.

          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            12 hours ago










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            12 hours ago










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995192%2fhow-to-understand-this-example-in-do-carmo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest

















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          8
          down vote



          accepted










          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:



          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbbR^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbbR^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.

          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            12 hours ago










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            12 hours ago














          up vote
          8
          down vote



          accepted










          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:



          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbbR^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbbR^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.

          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer


















          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            12 hours ago










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            12 hours ago












          up vote
          8
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          8
          down vote



          accepted






          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:



          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbbR^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbbR^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.

          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          The set $C=alphabigl((-3,0)bigr)$ has two topologies:



          • the topology it inherits from the usual topology in $mathbbR^2$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subset of $A^star$ of $mathbbR^2$ such that $A=A^starcap C$.

          • the topology in gets from $(-3,0)$: a set $Asubset C$ is open if there is an open subcet $A^star$ of $(-3,0)$ such that $A=alpha(A^star)$.

          Then, Do Carmo explains why these two topologies are distinct: the second one is locally connected, whereas the first one is no.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 9 hours ago

























          answered 12 hours ago









          José Carlos Santos

          137k17109199




          137k17109199







          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            12 hours ago










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            12 hours ago












          • 1




            Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
            – user450201
            12 hours ago










          • That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
            – José Carlos Santos
            12 hours ago







          1




          1




          Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
          – user450201
          12 hours ago




          Can I just say that (-3,0) is locally connected while the image of alpha is not, so alpha is not a homeomorphism?
          – user450201
          12 hours ago












          That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
          – José Carlos Santos
          12 hours ago




          That would be correct. On the other hand, that is what Do Carmo is claiming.
          – José Carlos Santos
          12 hours ago

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995192%2fhow-to-understand-this-example-in-do-carmo%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
          Read more

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
          Read more

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
          Read more