Can a paralyzed creature targeted by an Evocation Wizard's Sculpt Spells feature actually succeed a Dex save?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
21
down vote

favorite












Say a friendly barbarian is currently paralyzed. Part of the description of the paralyzed condition says:




The creature automatically fails Strength and Dexterity saving throws.




Its friend, the School of Evocation wizard, casts a fireball in the room, using its Sculpt Spells feature to protect the Barbarian:




When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level. The chosen creatures automatically succeed on their saving throws against the spell, and they take no damage if they would normally take half damage on a successful save.




Fireball requires a Dex save, but paralyzed creatures normally fail Dex saves; you can easily see the conundrum.



Does the Barbarian fail its Dex save?










share|improve this question



























    up vote
    21
    down vote

    favorite












    Say a friendly barbarian is currently paralyzed. Part of the description of the paralyzed condition says:




    The creature automatically fails Strength and Dexterity saving throws.




    Its friend, the School of Evocation wizard, casts a fireball in the room, using its Sculpt Spells feature to protect the Barbarian:




    When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level. The chosen creatures automatically succeed on their saving throws against the spell, and they take no damage if they would normally take half damage on a successful save.




    Fireball requires a Dex save, but paralyzed creatures normally fail Dex saves; you can easily see the conundrum.



    Does the Barbarian fail its Dex save?










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      21
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      21
      down vote

      favorite











      Say a friendly barbarian is currently paralyzed. Part of the description of the paralyzed condition says:




      The creature automatically fails Strength and Dexterity saving throws.




      Its friend, the School of Evocation wizard, casts a fireball in the room, using its Sculpt Spells feature to protect the Barbarian:




      When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level. The chosen creatures automatically succeed on their saving throws against the spell, and they take no damage if they would normally take half damage on a successful save.




      Fireball requires a Dex save, but paralyzed creatures normally fail Dex saves; you can easily see the conundrum.



      Does the Barbarian fail its Dex save?










      share|improve this question















      Say a friendly barbarian is currently paralyzed. Part of the description of the paralyzed condition says:




      The creature automatically fails Strength and Dexterity saving throws.




      Its friend, the School of Evocation wizard, casts a fireball in the room, using its Sculpt Spells feature to protect the Barbarian:




      When you cast an evocation spell that affects other creatures that you can see, you can choose a number of them equal to 1 + the spell’s level. The chosen creatures automatically succeed on their saving throws against the spell, and they take no damage if they would normally take half damage on a successful save.




      Fireball requires a Dex save, but paralyzed creatures normally fail Dex saves; you can easily see the conundrum.



      Does the Barbarian fail its Dex save?







      dnd-5e spells wizard saving-throw conditions






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 30 mins ago









      V2Blast

      17.5k247112




      17.5k247112










      asked 7 hours ago









      Alex Millette

      1,740827




      1,740827




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          31
          down vote













          While this is two contrary rules exceptions, and therefore ambiguous, from a story perspective, Sculpt Spell is intended to represent the evoker guiding their damaging spell to avoid the target, so it doesn't matter if they actively dodge the attack or not; it just doesn't hit them (or at least has the minimum possible effect). So I would say Sculpt Spell overrides the condition -- the paralyzed character takes no damage, because the fireball just isn't intruding into their space.



          The argument could also be made that these are 'simultaneous effects' as discussed on page 77 of Xanathar's Guide to Everything, in which case the character whose turn it is -- the caster -- chooses which effect happens first, so the 'sculpt spell' effect can be the last one, overriding all previous effects.



          But I think the conceptual storytelling aspect should be enough to make a decision in this case.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 3




            Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
            – Slagmoth
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
            – XAQT78
            7 hours ago






          • 1




            WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
            – Mindwin
            6 hours ago


















          up vote
          9
          down vote













          The barbarian is fine



          While it will be difficult to argue if the wizard feature or the paralyzed feature are more 'specific', the intent is obviously that the wizard is sculpting the spell in such a way that the damage goes around the target.



          It doesn't matter how bad the target is at dodging, they will always dodge it, so why would it matter if they're physically restrained? The spell isn't trying to hit them, it's sculpted around them.



          The reason that the sculpt spell feature says characters automatically succeed on the save, instead of stating that creatures are simply unaffected, is because this might cause other weird interactions.






          share|improve this answer





























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            Specific Beats General: Sculpt Wins.



            Generally, paralyzed creatures automatically fail Str and Dex saves.



            Paralysis is a general condition. There are a myriad of ways creatures can end up with this condition.



            The sculpt spell feature is more specific.



            Sculpt spell specifies single instances where the target creatures always succeed. It defines a narrower scope of targets and circumstances.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              I'm not sure the Paralysis qualifies as the general. The general is you roll to save. Both Paralysis and Sculpt present specific instances for doing something else.
              – NautArch
              6 hours ago







            • 1




              @NautArch paralysis is listed in the conditions list. The opening of that list states that the conditions can come about in many ways. That's more widespread or applicable to multiple things than sculpt spell.
              – Grosscol
              6 hours ago










            • I'm not sure that's enough of a differentiation for me. On one hand, you've got a specific condition, on the other hand, you've got a specific ability. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your methodology, but I think it's more your methodology than game methodology.
              – NautArch
              6 hours ago










            • @NautArch, I'm going by the mundane English definitions of general. Applies to more things is more general. The rules for the paralysis condition apply to more things and more broadly than the sculpt feature. Also, does the game system specify a methodology for determining more or less general? I was assuming that was deferring to the common English.
              – Grosscol
              6 hours ago











            • WoTC don't really explain how to determine general over specific. But I'm always wary of using plain english personally. Game mechanics override plain english, and creating different levels of 'specificity' is more than I'm willing to do. I just look at general rule vs specific outlier. And both of those mechanics are outliers.
              – NautArch
              6 hours ago










            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135020%2fcan-a-paralyzed-creature-targeted-by-an-evocation-wizards-sculpt-spells-feature%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            31
            down vote













            While this is two contrary rules exceptions, and therefore ambiguous, from a story perspective, Sculpt Spell is intended to represent the evoker guiding their damaging spell to avoid the target, so it doesn't matter if they actively dodge the attack or not; it just doesn't hit them (or at least has the minimum possible effect). So I would say Sculpt Spell overrides the condition -- the paralyzed character takes no damage, because the fireball just isn't intruding into their space.



            The argument could also be made that these are 'simultaneous effects' as discussed on page 77 of Xanathar's Guide to Everything, in which case the character whose turn it is -- the caster -- chooses which effect happens first, so the 'sculpt spell' effect can be the last one, overriding all previous effects.



            But I think the conceptual storytelling aspect should be enough to make a decision in this case.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 3




              Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
              – Slagmoth
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
              – XAQT78
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
              – Mindwin
              6 hours ago















            up vote
            31
            down vote













            While this is two contrary rules exceptions, and therefore ambiguous, from a story perspective, Sculpt Spell is intended to represent the evoker guiding their damaging spell to avoid the target, so it doesn't matter if they actively dodge the attack or not; it just doesn't hit them (or at least has the minimum possible effect). So I would say Sculpt Spell overrides the condition -- the paralyzed character takes no damage, because the fireball just isn't intruding into their space.



            The argument could also be made that these are 'simultaneous effects' as discussed on page 77 of Xanathar's Guide to Everything, in which case the character whose turn it is -- the caster -- chooses which effect happens first, so the 'sculpt spell' effect can be the last one, overriding all previous effects.



            But I think the conceptual storytelling aspect should be enough to make a decision in this case.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 3




              Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
              – Slagmoth
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
              – XAQT78
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
              – Mindwin
              6 hours ago













            up vote
            31
            down vote










            up vote
            31
            down vote









            While this is two contrary rules exceptions, and therefore ambiguous, from a story perspective, Sculpt Spell is intended to represent the evoker guiding their damaging spell to avoid the target, so it doesn't matter if they actively dodge the attack or not; it just doesn't hit them (or at least has the minimum possible effect). So I would say Sculpt Spell overrides the condition -- the paralyzed character takes no damage, because the fireball just isn't intruding into their space.



            The argument could also be made that these are 'simultaneous effects' as discussed on page 77 of Xanathar's Guide to Everything, in which case the character whose turn it is -- the caster -- chooses which effect happens first, so the 'sculpt spell' effect can be the last one, overriding all previous effects.



            But I think the conceptual storytelling aspect should be enough to make a decision in this case.






            share|improve this answer












            While this is two contrary rules exceptions, and therefore ambiguous, from a story perspective, Sculpt Spell is intended to represent the evoker guiding their damaging spell to avoid the target, so it doesn't matter if they actively dodge the attack or not; it just doesn't hit them (or at least has the minimum possible effect). So I would say Sculpt Spell overrides the condition -- the paralyzed character takes no damage, because the fireball just isn't intruding into their space.



            The argument could also be made that these are 'simultaneous effects' as discussed on page 77 of Xanathar's Guide to Everything, in which case the character whose turn it is -- the caster -- chooses which effect happens first, so the 'sculpt spell' effect can be the last one, overriding all previous effects.



            But I think the conceptual storytelling aspect should be enough to make a decision in this case.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            Darth Pseudonym

            8,2241948




            8,2241948







            • 3




              Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
              – Slagmoth
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
              – XAQT78
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
              – Mindwin
              6 hours ago













            • 3




              Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
              – Slagmoth
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
              – XAQT78
              7 hours ago






            • 1




              WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
              – Mindwin
              6 hours ago








            3




            3




            Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
            – Slagmoth
            7 hours ago




            Specificity would agree with you... most creatures can have the condition of Paralysis placed upon them but much fewer, in theory, would be able to use Sculpt Spell. Specific beats general.
            – Slagmoth
            7 hours ago




            1




            1




            The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
            – XAQT78
            7 hours ago




            The “intent” of the Sculpt Spell is to control the area of effect from the spell to spare an ally from most of the damage. As well as the Xanathar reference and Slagmoth comment are compelling enough to save your barbarian.
            – XAQT78
            7 hours ago




            1




            1




            WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
            – Mindwin
            6 hours ago





            WoTC is doing a wonderful job of shaping Dungeons the Gathering little by little. The active player has control over the effect stack now.
            – Mindwin
            6 hours ago













            up vote
            9
            down vote













            The barbarian is fine



            While it will be difficult to argue if the wizard feature or the paralyzed feature are more 'specific', the intent is obviously that the wizard is sculpting the spell in such a way that the damage goes around the target.



            It doesn't matter how bad the target is at dodging, they will always dodge it, so why would it matter if they're physically restrained? The spell isn't trying to hit them, it's sculpted around them.



            The reason that the sculpt spell feature says characters automatically succeed on the save, instead of stating that creatures are simply unaffected, is because this might cause other weird interactions.






            share|improve this answer


























              up vote
              9
              down vote













              The barbarian is fine



              While it will be difficult to argue if the wizard feature or the paralyzed feature are more 'specific', the intent is obviously that the wizard is sculpting the spell in such a way that the damage goes around the target.



              It doesn't matter how bad the target is at dodging, they will always dodge it, so why would it matter if they're physically restrained? The spell isn't trying to hit them, it's sculpted around them.



              The reason that the sculpt spell feature says characters automatically succeed on the save, instead of stating that creatures are simply unaffected, is because this might cause other weird interactions.






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                9
                down vote










                up vote
                9
                down vote









                The barbarian is fine



                While it will be difficult to argue if the wizard feature or the paralyzed feature are more 'specific', the intent is obviously that the wizard is sculpting the spell in such a way that the damage goes around the target.



                It doesn't matter how bad the target is at dodging, they will always dodge it, so why would it matter if they're physically restrained? The spell isn't trying to hit them, it's sculpted around them.



                The reason that the sculpt spell feature says characters automatically succeed on the save, instead of stating that creatures are simply unaffected, is because this might cause other weird interactions.






                share|improve this answer














                The barbarian is fine



                While it will be difficult to argue if the wizard feature or the paralyzed feature are more 'specific', the intent is obviously that the wizard is sculpting the spell in such a way that the damage goes around the target.



                It doesn't matter how bad the target is at dodging, they will always dodge it, so why would it matter if they're physically restrained? The spell isn't trying to hit them, it's sculpted around them.



                The reason that the sculpt spell feature says characters automatically succeed on the save, instead of stating that creatures are simply unaffected, is because this might cause other weird interactions.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 7 hours ago









                ravery

                6,3471949




                6,3471949










                answered 7 hours ago









                Theik

                10.7k4462




                10.7k4462




















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    Specific Beats General: Sculpt Wins.



                    Generally, paralyzed creatures automatically fail Str and Dex saves.



                    Paralysis is a general condition. There are a myriad of ways creatures can end up with this condition.



                    The sculpt spell feature is more specific.



                    Sculpt spell specifies single instances where the target creatures always succeed. It defines a narrower scope of targets and circumstances.






                    share|improve this answer
















                    • 1




                      I'm not sure the Paralysis qualifies as the general. The general is you roll to save. Both Paralysis and Sculpt present specific instances for doing something else.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago







                    • 1




                      @NautArch paralysis is listed in the conditions list. The opening of that list states that the conditions can come about in many ways. That's more widespread or applicable to multiple things than sculpt spell.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago










                    • I'm not sure that's enough of a differentiation for me. On one hand, you've got a specific condition, on the other hand, you've got a specific ability. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your methodology, but I think it's more your methodology than game methodology.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago










                    • @NautArch, I'm going by the mundane English definitions of general. Applies to more things is more general. The rules for the paralysis condition apply to more things and more broadly than the sculpt feature. Also, does the game system specify a methodology for determining more or less general? I was assuming that was deferring to the common English.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago











                    • WoTC don't really explain how to determine general over specific. But I'm always wary of using plain english personally. Game mechanics override plain english, and creating different levels of 'specificity' is more than I'm willing to do. I just look at general rule vs specific outlier. And both of those mechanics are outliers.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago














                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    Specific Beats General: Sculpt Wins.



                    Generally, paralyzed creatures automatically fail Str and Dex saves.



                    Paralysis is a general condition. There are a myriad of ways creatures can end up with this condition.



                    The sculpt spell feature is more specific.



                    Sculpt spell specifies single instances where the target creatures always succeed. It defines a narrower scope of targets and circumstances.






                    share|improve this answer
















                    • 1




                      I'm not sure the Paralysis qualifies as the general. The general is you roll to save. Both Paralysis and Sculpt present specific instances for doing something else.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago







                    • 1




                      @NautArch paralysis is listed in the conditions list. The opening of that list states that the conditions can come about in many ways. That's more widespread or applicable to multiple things than sculpt spell.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago










                    • I'm not sure that's enough of a differentiation for me. On one hand, you've got a specific condition, on the other hand, you've got a specific ability. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your methodology, but I think it's more your methodology than game methodology.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago










                    • @NautArch, I'm going by the mundane English definitions of general. Applies to more things is more general. The rules for the paralysis condition apply to more things and more broadly than the sculpt feature. Also, does the game system specify a methodology for determining more or less general? I was assuming that was deferring to the common English.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago











                    • WoTC don't really explain how to determine general over specific. But I'm always wary of using plain english personally. Game mechanics override plain english, and creating different levels of 'specificity' is more than I'm willing to do. I just look at general rule vs specific outlier. And both of those mechanics are outliers.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago












                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    Specific Beats General: Sculpt Wins.



                    Generally, paralyzed creatures automatically fail Str and Dex saves.



                    Paralysis is a general condition. There are a myriad of ways creatures can end up with this condition.



                    The sculpt spell feature is more specific.



                    Sculpt spell specifies single instances where the target creatures always succeed. It defines a narrower scope of targets and circumstances.






                    share|improve this answer












                    Specific Beats General: Sculpt Wins.



                    Generally, paralyzed creatures automatically fail Str and Dex saves.



                    Paralysis is a general condition. There are a myriad of ways creatures can end up with this condition.



                    The sculpt spell feature is more specific.



                    Sculpt spell specifies single instances where the target creatures always succeed. It defines a narrower scope of targets and circumstances.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 6 hours ago









                    Grosscol

                    6,0521451




                    6,0521451







                    • 1




                      I'm not sure the Paralysis qualifies as the general. The general is you roll to save. Both Paralysis and Sculpt present specific instances for doing something else.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago







                    • 1




                      @NautArch paralysis is listed in the conditions list. The opening of that list states that the conditions can come about in many ways. That's more widespread or applicable to multiple things than sculpt spell.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago










                    • I'm not sure that's enough of a differentiation for me. On one hand, you've got a specific condition, on the other hand, you've got a specific ability. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your methodology, but I think it's more your methodology than game methodology.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago










                    • @NautArch, I'm going by the mundane English definitions of general. Applies to more things is more general. The rules for the paralysis condition apply to more things and more broadly than the sculpt feature. Also, does the game system specify a methodology for determining more or less general? I was assuming that was deferring to the common English.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago











                    • WoTC don't really explain how to determine general over specific. But I'm always wary of using plain english personally. Game mechanics override plain english, and creating different levels of 'specificity' is more than I'm willing to do. I just look at general rule vs specific outlier. And both of those mechanics are outliers.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago












                    • 1




                      I'm not sure the Paralysis qualifies as the general. The general is you roll to save. Both Paralysis and Sculpt present specific instances for doing something else.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago







                    • 1




                      @NautArch paralysis is listed in the conditions list. The opening of that list states that the conditions can come about in many ways. That's more widespread or applicable to multiple things than sculpt spell.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago










                    • I'm not sure that's enough of a differentiation for me. On one hand, you've got a specific condition, on the other hand, you've got a specific ability. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your methodology, but I think it's more your methodology than game methodology.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago










                    • @NautArch, I'm going by the mundane English definitions of general. Applies to more things is more general. The rules for the paralysis condition apply to more things and more broadly than the sculpt feature. Also, does the game system specify a methodology for determining more or less general? I was assuming that was deferring to the common English.
                      – Grosscol
                      6 hours ago











                    • WoTC don't really explain how to determine general over specific. But I'm always wary of using plain english personally. Game mechanics override plain english, and creating different levels of 'specificity' is more than I'm willing to do. I just look at general rule vs specific outlier. And both of those mechanics are outliers.
                      – NautArch
                      6 hours ago







                    1




                    1




                    I'm not sure the Paralysis qualifies as the general. The general is you roll to save. Both Paralysis and Sculpt present specific instances for doing something else.
                    – NautArch
                    6 hours ago





                    I'm not sure the Paralysis qualifies as the general. The general is you roll to save. Both Paralysis and Sculpt present specific instances for doing something else.
                    – NautArch
                    6 hours ago





                    1




                    1




                    @NautArch paralysis is listed in the conditions list. The opening of that list states that the conditions can come about in many ways. That's more widespread or applicable to multiple things than sculpt spell.
                    – Grosscol
                    6 hours ago




                    @NautArch paralysis is listed in the conditions list. The opening of that list states that the conditions can come about in many ways. That's more widespread or applicable to multiple things than sculpt spell.
                    – Grosscol
                    6 hours ago












                    I'm not sure that's enough of a differentiation for me. On one hand, you've got a specific condition, on the other hand, you've got a specific ability. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your methodology, but I think it's more your methodology than game methodology.
                    – NautArch
                    6 hours ago




                    I'm not sure that's enough of a differentiation for me. On one hand, you've got a specific condition, on the other hand, you've got a specific ability. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with your methodology, but I think it's more your methodology than game methodology.
                    – NautArch
                    6 hours ago












                    @NautArch, I'm going by the mundane English definitions of general. Applies to more things is more general. The rules for the paralysis condition apply to more things and more broadly than the sculpt feature. Also, does the game system specify a methodology for determining more or less general? I was assuming that was deferring to the common English.
                    – Grosscol
                    6 hours ago





                    @NautArch, I'm going by the mundane English definitions of general. Applies to more things is more general. The rules for the paralysis condition apply to more things and more broadly than the sculpt feature. Also, does the game system specify a methodology for determining more or less general? I was assuming that was deferring to the common English.
                    – Grosscol
                    6 hours ago













                    WoTC don't really explain how to determine general over specific. But I'm always wary of using plain english personally. Game mechanics override plain english, and creating different levels of 'specificity' is more than I'm willing to do. I just look at general rule vs specific outlier. And both of those mechanics are outliers.
                    – NautArch
                    6 hours ago




                    WoTC don't really explain how to determine general over specific. But I'm always wary of using plain english personally. Game mechanics override plain english, and creating different levels of 'specificity' is more than I'm willing to do. I just look at general rule vs specific outlier. And both of those mechanics are outliers.
                    – NautArch
                    6 hours ago

















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135020%2fcan-a-paralyzed-creature-targeted-by-an-evocation-wizards-sculpt-spells-feature%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                    How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?