Is there a tank priority sequence for using the fuel tanks?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
12
down vote

favorite












Is there a tank priority sequence for using the fuel tanks, or does the pilot decide?










share|improve this question









New contributor




TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Welcome to Av.SE!
    – Ralph J
    yesterday














up vote
12
down vote

favorite












Is there a tank priority sequence for using the fuel tanks, or does the pilot decide?










share|improve this question









New contributor




TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Welcome to Av.SE!
    – Ralph J
    yesterday












up vote
12
down vote

favorite









up vote
12
down vote

favorite











Is there a tank priority sequence for using the fuel tanks, or does the pilot decide?










share|improve this question









New contributor




TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Is there a tank priority sequence for using the fuel tanks, or does the pilot decide?







fuel-tanks fuel-systems aircraft-operations






share|improve this question









New contributor




TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 11 mins ago









ymb1

62.7k6198329




62.7k6198329






New contributor




TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









TestUser

634




634




New contributor




TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






TestUser is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Welcome to Av.SE!
    – Ralph J
    yesterday
















  • Welcome to Av.SE!
    – Ralph J
    yesterday















Welcome to Av.SE!
– Ralph J
yesterday




Welcome to Av.SE!
– Ralph J
yesterday










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
23
down vote



accepted











Which fuel tanks are used in order of priority in aircraft?




What you're talking about, in large aircraft, is often referred to as the fuel burn schedule. Light aircraft generally do not have a fuel burn schedule or have minimal requirements.



The fuel burn schedule is dictated by the aircraft design and is thus different for different aircraft designs.




Is there a sequence of priority?




Yes, and if you don't observe the fuel burn schedule you risk exceeding the structural limitations of the aircraft, and in particular wing bending moments.




Or the pilot decides?




No, the pilot does not decide usually. While there may be some leeway in the fuel burn schedules of large aircraft, the pilot or a flight engineer (old aircraft) or an automated system does not decide but rather implements a preset protocol.



As an example, here's a general outline of the fuel burn schedule for 747-100/200 aircraft. This is from memory so might not be entirely correct but is sufficiently so for example purposes:



  1. On start, taxi, and takeoff burn tank to engine. In other words, route the fuel from main tank 1 to engine 1, main tank 2 to engine 2, etc.

  2. Once you're established in your cruise climb, all engines burn out of the center tank if there is fuel in the center tank until the center tank fuel is exhausted (but don't burn any fuel in the center tank that is there for ballast).

  3. Burn engines 1 & 2 from main tank 2 and engines 3 & 4 from main tank 3 until the amount of fuel in main tank 2 matches that in main tank 1 and the amount of fuel in main tank 3 matches that in main tank 4. Main tanks 2 & 3 are larger than 1 & 4. When parity is reached, burn tank to engine.

  4. At some point transfer the fuel in reserve tank 1 to main tank 1 and reserve tank 4 to main tank 4. Likewise, if you have them, from reserve tank 2 to main tank 2 and reserve tank 3 to main tank 3. Most 747-100/200 aircraft didn't have reserve tanks 2 & 3. You have to get the fuel out of the reserve tanks before landing.

Be aware that just as there is a fuel burn schedule, there may also be a fuel loading schedule. In the 747-100/200 that schedule dictated that no fuel goes into the center tank until all other tanks are full. As I remember, the largest main tank could hold 114999 lbs of fuel in the largest center tank (center tank size varied as ordered by the airline and changed through the production run of the aircraft).






share|improve this answer
















  • 3




    Fortunately, it doesn't need to be committed to memory because it will be on the checklist.
    – GalacticCowboy
    7 hours ago










  • "No, the pilot does not decide usually." I assume though there are overrides possible in case of an emergency?
    – Mast
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    @Mast I can't speak to automated systems or other aircraft, but in the case of 747-100/200 aircraft the system was very flexible (and was considered complicated) with the exception that once you move fuel out of a reserve tank, you can't put it back as I remember. It's not a matter of overriding but of the flight engineer throwing switches in an order other than would normally be done.
    – Terry
    1 hour ago










  • That makes perfect sense, thanks for adding that.
    – Mast
    1 hour ago

















up vote
6
down vote













There is a sequence of priority and it is spelled out in the Aircraft Operations Manual (or similar). For example, in a B757/767 fuel is loaded into the wing tanks first and then if more fuel is required fuel is added to the center tank. During the flight the fuel is used from the center tank first and then the wing tanks.



Some light aircraft, e.g. Cessna 310, 402, etc., may have auxiliary fuel tanks in addition to main tanks that are designed to be used in accordance with procedures in the aircraft's flight manual/pilot operating handbook.






share|improve this answer






















  • I was going to bring up the Cessna 310 as an example too. The backup fuel pumps can only pull from the Main tanks IIRC, so you burn off the Aux fuel first, BUT fuel return from the engines is to the main tank so you need to burn enough off the mains that they don't overfill. Fun ship. :)
    – Erin Anne
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    @ErinAnne - Good comment. Great airplane. Trivia question: Which circuit breaker controls the "tip tank transfer pump?"
    – 757toga
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    @757toga I did all my multi time in 2006, but I found a POH online and looked it up because I'd forgotten: the landing light circuit breaker, lol. (In the 310K POH I found at myhra.org/Cessna310KOnePageperPage.pdf it's on page 2-1, under "Fuel System".
    – Erin Anne
    17 hours ago

















up vote
0
down vote













My G35 Bonanza (and many other, older aircraft) used a pressure carburetor that would return excess fuel to the left main fuel cell.



This meant that no matter what fuel cell the engine was consuming fuel from, the carburetor would always be sending the fuel it did not feed to the intake manifold back to that particular fuel cell.



If the left main fuel cell were full of fuel, the returned fuel from the carburetor would be vented overboard.



The workaround for this behavior of the fuel system was to consume fuel from the left main fuel cell for at least the first hour of the flight before consuming fuel from the other fuel cells/tanks. This would leave space in the left main fuel cell for the the carburetor return unused fuel without it being vented overboard.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    up vote
    -3
    down vote













    Always burn from your drop tanks first. If you have to drop them, it is better than they are mostly empty than not.



    Other than that, fuel tanks should always be used in the order that they were filled.






    share|improve this answer
















    • 1




      "In the order they were filled"??? Where do you get that from? What sequence tanks are filled is generally unrelated to the sequence they're used, and often they can be filled in any order desired. This answer looks like uninformed nonsense, in light of the aircraft I've flown.
      – Ralph J
      14 hours ago










    • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
      – Carlo Felicione
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      What airliner or general aviation aircraft is equipped with drop tanks?
      – DeepSpace
      6 hours ago










    • It could actually be military aircraft (with drop tanks). The question does not specify the type of aircraft.
      – Peter Mortensen
      2 hours ago










    • As some readers seem to assume commercial aircraft (perhaps biased by the existing answers), perhaps be explicit about that in your answer. An example (with a picture) and sources would also greatly help avoiding misunderstandings.
      – Peter Mortensen
      1 hour ago


















    up vote
    -3
    down vote













    Yes! When you are filling up the aircraft and you use the centre tanks, it then means that the pilot has to use the centre tanks first before the 1 or 2 wing tanks are selected, and to keep checking to make sure the tanks are balanced according to the manufacturer’s procedure.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.













    • 2




      Welcome to Av.SE. Your answer is correct & it does answer the question, but you're getting down-votes because it doesn't really add to the other answer here, doesn't explain "why", and doesn't reference any sort of authoritative source. So it ends up looking like "somebody on the internet said..." which isn't particularly useful. Can you add a reference or an explanation "why" we do it this way? That would improve the answer considerably.
      – Ralph J
      15 hours ago










    Your Answer




    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "528"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    TestUser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56009%2fis-there-a-tank-priority-sequence-for-using-the-fuel-tanks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted











    Which fuel tanks are used in order of priority in aircraft?




    What you're talking about, in large aircraft, is often referred to as the fuel burn schedule. Light aircraft generally do not have a fuel burn schedule or have minimal requirements.



    The fuel burn schedule is dictated by the aircraft design and is thus different for different aircraft designs.




    Is there a sequence of priority?




    Yes, and if you don't observe the fuel burn schedule you risk exceeding the structural limitations of the aircraft, and in particular wing bending moments.




    Or the pilot decides?




    No, the pilot does not decide usually. While there may be some leeway in the fuel burn schedules of large aircraft, the pilot or a flight engineer (old aircraft) or an automated system does not decide but rather implements a preset protocol.



    As an example, here's a general outline of the fuel burn schedule for 747-100/200 aircraft. This is from memory so might not be entirely correct but is sufficiently so for example purposes:



    1. On start, taxi, and takeoff burn tank to engine. In other words, route the fuel from main tank 1 to engine 1, main tank 2 to engine 2, etc.

    2. Once you're established in your cruise climb, all engines burn out of the center tank if there is fuel in the center tank until the center tank fuel is exhausted (but don't burn any fuel in the center tank that is there for ballast).

    3. Burn engines 1 & 2 from main tank 2 and engines 3 & 4 from main tank 3 until the amount of fuel in main tank 2 matches that in main tank 1 and the amount of fuel in main tank 3 matches that in main tank 4. Main tanks 2 & 3 are larger than 1 & 4. When parity is reached, burn tank to engine.

    4. At some point transfer the fuel in reserve tank 1 to main tank 1 and reserve tank 4 to main tank 4. Likewise, if you have them, from reserve tank 2 to main tank 2 and reserve tank 3 to main tank 3. Most 747-100/200 aircraft didn't have reserve tanks 2 & 3. You have to get the fuel out of the reserve tanks before landing.

    Be aware that just as there is a fuel burn schedule, there may also be a fuel loading schedule. In the 747-100/200 that schedule dictated that no fuel goes into the center tank until all other tanks are full. As I remember, the largest main tank could hold 114999 lbs of fuel in the largest center tank (center tank size varied as ordered by the airline and changed through the production run of the aircraft).






    share|improve this answer
















    • 3




      Fortunately, it doesn't need to be committed to memory because it will be on the checklist.
      – GalacticCowboy
      7 hours ago










    • "No, the pilot does not decide usually." I assume though there are overrides possible in case of an emergency?
      – Mast
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      @Mast I can't speak to automated systems or other aircraft, but in the case of 747-100/200 aircraft the system was very flexible (and was considered complicated) with the exception that once you move fuel out of a reserve tank, you can't put it back as I remember. It's not a matter of overriding but of the flight engineer throwing switches in an order other than would normally be done.
      – Terry
      1 hour ago










    • That makes perfect sense, thanks for adding that.
      – Mast
      1 hour ago














    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted











    Which fuel tanks are used in order of priority in aircraft?




    What you're talking about, in large aircraft, is often referred to as the fuel burn schedule. Light aircraft generally do not have a fuel burn schedule or have minimal requirements.



    The fuel burn schedule is dictated by the aircraft design and is thus different for different aircraft designs.




    Is there a sequence of priority?




    Yes, and if you don't observe the fuel burn schedule you risk exceeding the structural limitations of the aircraft, and in particular wing bending moments.




    Or the pilot decides?




    No, the pilot does not decide usually. While there may be some leeway in the fuel burn schedules of large aircraft, the pilot or a flight engineer (old aircraft) or an automated system does not decide but rather implements a preset protocol.



    As an example, here's a general outline of the fuel burn schedule for 747-100/200 aircraft. This is from memory so might not be entirely correct but is sufficiently so for example purposes:



    1. On start, taxi, and takeoff burn tank to engine. In other words, route the fuel from main tank 1 to engine 1, main tank 2 to engine 2, etc.

    2. Once you're established in your cruise climb, all engines burn out of the center tank if there is fuel in the center tank until the center tank fuel is exhausted (but don't burn any fuel in the center tank that is there for ballast).

    3. Burn engines 1 & 2 from main tank 2 and engines 3 & 4 from main tank 3 until the amount of fuel in main tank 2 matches that in main tank 1 and the amount of fuel in main tank 3 matches that in main tank 4. Main tanks 2 & 3 are larger than 1 & 4. When parity is reached, burn tank to engine.

    4. At some point transfer the fuel in reserve tank 1 to main tank 1 and reserve tank 4 to main tank 4. Likewise, if you have them, from reserve tank 2 to main tank 2 and reserve tank 3 to main tank 3. Most 747-100/200 aircraft didn't have reserve tanks 2 & 3. You have to get the fuel out of the reserve tanks before landing.

    Be aware that just as there is a fuel burn schedule, there may also be a fuel loading schedule. In the 747-100/200 that schedule dictated that no fuel goes into the center tank until all other tanks are full. As I remember, the largest main tank could hold 114999 lbs of fuel in the largest center tank (center tank size varied as ordered by the airline and changed through the production run of the aircraft).






    share|improve this answer
















    • 3




      Fortunately, it doesn't need to be committed to memory because it will be on the checklist.
      – GalacticCowboy
      7 hours ago










    • "No, the pilot does not decide usually." I assume though there are overrides possible in case of an emergency?
      – Mast
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      @Mast I can't speak to automated systems or other aircraft, but in the case of 747-100/200 aircraft the system was very flexible (and was considered complicated) with the exception that once you move fuel out of a reserve tank, you can't put it back as I remember. It's not a matter of overriding but of the flight engineer throwing switches in an order other than would normally be done.
      – Terry
      1 hour ago










    • That makes perfect sense, thanks for adding that.
      – Mast
      1 hour ago












    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    23
    down vote



    accepted







    Which fuel tanks are used in order of priority in aircraft?




    What you're talking about, in large aircraft, is often referred to as the fuel burn schedule. Light aircraft generally do not have a fuel burn schedule or have minimal requirements.



    The fuel burn schedule is dictated by the aircraft design and is thus different for different aircraft designs.




    Is there a sequence of priority?




    Yes, and if you don't observe the fuel burn schedule you risk exceeding the structural limitations of the aircraft, and in particular wing bending moments.




    Or the pilot decides?




    No, the pilot does not decide usually. While there may be some leeway in the fuel burn schedules of large aircraft, the pilot or a flight engineer (old aircraft) or an automated system does not decide but rather implements a preset protocol.



    As an example, here's a general outline of the fuel burn schedule for 747-100/200 aircraft. This is from memory so might not be entirely correct but is sufficiently so for example purposes:



    1. On start, taxi, and takeoff burn tank to engine. In other words, route the fuel from main tank 1 to engine 1, main tank 2 to engine 2, etc.

    2. Once you're established in your cruise climb, all engines burn out of the center tank if there is fuel in the center tank until the center tank fuel is exhausted (but don't burn any fuel in the center tank that is there for ballast).

    3. Burn engines 1 & 2 from main tank 2 and engines 3 & 4 from main tank 3 until the amount of fuel in main tank 2 matches that in main tank 1 and the amount of fuel in main tank 3 matches that in main tank 4. Main tanks 2 & 3 are larger than 1 & 4. When parity is reached, burn tank to engine.

    4. At some point transfer the fuel in reserve tank 1 to main tank 1 and reserve tank 4 to main tank 4. Likewise, if you have them, from reserve tank 2 to main tank 2 and reserve tank 3 to main tank 3. Most 747-100/200 aircraft didn't have reserve tanks 2 & 3. You have to get the fuel out of the reserve tanks before landing.

    Be aware that just as there is a fuel burn schedule, there may also be a fuel loading schedule. In the 747-100/200 that schedule dictated that no fuel goes into the center tank until all other tanks are full. As I remember, the largest main tank could hold 114999 lbs of fuel in the largest center tank (center tank size varied as ordered by the airline and changed through the production run of the aircraft).






    share|improve this answer













    Which fuel tanks are used in order of priority in aircraft?




    What you're talking about, in large aircraft, is often referred to as the fuel burn schedule. Light aircraft generally do not have a fuel burn schedule or have minimal requirements.



    The fuel burn schedule is dictated by the aircraft design and is thus different for different aircraft designs.




    Is there a sequence of priority?




    Yes, and if you don't observe the fuel burn schedule you risk exceeding the structural limitations of the aircraft, and in particular wing bending moments.




    Or the pilot decides?




    No, the pilot does not decide usually. While there may be some leeway in the fuel burn schedules of large aircraft, the pilot or a flight engineer (old aircraft) or an automated system does not decide but rather implements a preset protocol.



    As an example, here's a general outline of the fuel burn schedule for 747-100/200 aircraft. This is from memory so might not be entirely correct but is sufficiently so for example purposes:



    1. On start, taxi, and takeoff burn tank to engine. In other words, route the fuel from main tank 1 to engine 1, main tank 2 to engine 2, etc.

    2. Once you're established in your cruise climb, all engines burn out of the center tank if there is fuel in the center tank until the center tank fuel is exhausted (but don't burn any fuel in the center tank that is there for ballast).

    3. Burn engines 1 & 2 from main tank 2 and engines 3 & 4 from main tank 3 until the amount of fuel in main tank 2 matches that in main tank 1 and the amount of fuel in main tank 3 matches that in main tank 4. Main tanks 2 & 3 are larger than 1 & 4. When parity is reached, burn tank to engine.

    4. At some point transfer the fuel in reserve tank 1 to main tank 1 and reserve tank 4 to main tank 4. Likewise, if you have them, from reserve tank 2 to main tank 2 and reserve tank 3 to main tank 3. Most 747-100/200 aircraft didn't have reserve tanks 2 & 3. You have to get the fuel out of the reserve tanks before landing.

    Be aware that just as there is a fuel burn schedule, there may also be a fuel loading schedule. In the 747-100/200 that schedule dictated that no fuel goes into the center tank until all other tanks are full. As I remember, the largest main tank could hold 114999 lbs of fuel in the largest center tank (center tank size varied as ordered by the airline and changed through the production run of the aircraft).







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    Terry

    32.2k583159




    32.2k583159







    • 3




      Fortunately, it doesn't need to be committed to memory because it will be on the checklist.
      – GalacticCowboy
      7 hours ago










    • "No, the pilot does not decide usually." I assume though there are overrides possible in case of an emergency?
      – Mast
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      @Mast I can't speak to automated systems or other aircraft, but in the case of 747-100/200 aircraft the system was very flexible (and was considered complicated) with the exception that once you move fuel out of a reserve tank, you can't put it back as I remember. It's not a matter of overriding but of the flight engineer throwing switches in an order other than would normally be done.
      – Terry
      1 hour ago










    • That makes perfect sense, thanks for adding that.
      – Mast
      1 hour ago












    • 3




      Fortunately, it doesn't need to be committed to memory because it will be on the checklist.
      – GalacticCowboy
      7 hours ago










    • "No, the pilot does not decide usually." I assume though there are overrides possible in case of an emergency?
      – Mast
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      @Mast I can't speak to automated systems or other aircraft, but in the case of 747-100/200 aircraft the system was very flexible (and was considered complicated) with the exception that once you move fuel out of a reserve tank, you can't put it back as I remember. It's not a matter of overriding but of the flight engineer throwing switches in an order other than would normally be done.
      – Terry
      1 hour ago










    • That makes perfect sense, thanks for adding that.
      – Mast
      1 hour ago







    3




    3




    Fortunately, it doesn't need to be committed to memory because it will be on the checklist.
    – GalacticCowboy
    7 hours ago




    Fortunately, it doesn't need to be committed to memory because it will be on the checklist.
    – GalacticCowboy
    7 hours ago












    "No, the pilot does not decide usually." I assume though there are overrides possible in case of an emergency?
    – Mast
    4 hours ago




    "No, the pilot does not decide usually." I assume though there are overrides possible in case of an emergency?
    – Mast
    4 hours ago




    1




    1




    @Mast I can't speak to automated systems or other aircraft, but in the case of 747-100/200 aircraft the system was very flexible (and was considered complicated) with the exception that once you move fuel out of a reserve tank, you can't put it back as I remember. It's not a matter of overriding but of the flight engineer throwing switches in an order other than would normally be done.
    – Terry
    1 hour ago




    @Mast I can't speak to automated systems or other aircraft, but in the case of 747-100/200 aircraft the system was very flexible (and was considered complicated) with the exception that once you move fuel out of a reserve tank, you can't put it back as I remember. It's not a matter of overriding but of the flight engineer throwing switches in an order other than would normally be done.
    – Terry
    1 hour ago












    That makes perfect sense, thanks for adding that.
    – Mast
    1 hour ago




    That makes perfect sense, thanks for adding that.
    – Mast
    1 hour ago










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    There is a sequence of priority and it is spelled out in the Aircraft Operations Manual (or similar). For example, in a B757/767 fuel is loaded into the wing tanks first and then if more fuel is required fuel is added to the center tank. During the flight the fuel is used from the center tank first and then the wing tanks.



    Some light aircraft, e.g. Cessna 310, 402, etc., may have auxiliary fuel tanks in addition to main tanks that are designed to be used in accordance with procedures in the aircraft's flight manual/pilot operating handbook.






    share|improve this answer






















    • I was going to bring up the Cessna 310 as an example too. The backup fuel pumps can only pull from the Main tanks IIRC, so you burn off the Aux fuel first, BUT fuel return from the engines is to the main tank so you need to burn enough off the mains that they don't overfill. Fun ship. :)
      – Erin Anne
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @ErinAnne - Good comment. Great airplane. Trivia question: Which circuit breaker controls the "tip tank transfer pump?"
      – 757toga
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @757toga I did all my multi time in 2006, but I found a POH online and looked it up because I'd forgotten: the landing light circuit breaker, lol. (In the 310K POH I found at myhra.org/Cessna310KOnePageperPage.pdf it's on page 2-1, under "Fuel System".
      – Erin Anne
      17 hours ago














    up vote
    6
    down vote













    There is a sequence of priority and it is spelled out in the Aircraft Operations Manual (or similar). For example, in a B757/767 fuel is loaded into the wing tanks first and then if more fuel is required fuel is added to the center tank. During the flight the fuel is used from the center tank first and then the wing tanks.



    Some light aircraft, e.g. Cessna 310, 402, etc., may have auxiliary fuel tanks in addition to main tanks that are designed to be used in accordance with procedures in the aircraft's flight manual/pilot operating handbook.






    share|improve this answer






















    • I was going to bring up the Cessna 310 as an example too. The backup fuel pumps can only pull from the Main tanks IIRC, so you burn off the Aux fuel first, BUT fuel return from the engines is to the main tank so you need to burn enough off the mains that they don't overfill. Fun ship. :)
      – Erin Anne
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @ErinAnne - Good comment. Great airplane. Trivia question: Which circuit breaker controls the "tip tank transfer pump?"
      – 757toga
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @757toga I did all my multi time in 2006, but I found a POH online and looked it up because I'd forgotten: the landing light circuit breaker, lol. (In the 310K POH I found at myhra.org/Cessna310KOnePageperPage.pdf it's on page 2-1, under "Fuel System".
      – Erin Anne
      17 hours ago












    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    There is a sequence of priority and it is spelled out in the Aircraft Operations Manual (or similar). For example, in a B757/767 fuel is loaded into the wing tanks first and then if more fuel is required fuel is added to the center tank. During the flight the fuel is used from the center tank first and then the wing tanks.



    Some light aircraft, e.g. Cessna 310, 402, etc., may have auxiliary fuel tanks in addition to main tanks that are designed to be used in accordance with procedures in the aircraft's flight manual/pilot operating handbook.






    share|improve this answer














    There is a sequence of priority and it is spelled out in the Aircraft Operations Manual (or similar). For example, in a B757/767 fuel is loaded into the wing tanks first and then if more fuel is required fuel is added to the center tank. During the flight the fuel is used from the center tank first and then the wing tanks.



    Some light aircraft, e.g. Cessna 310, 402, etc., may have auxiliary fuel tanks in addition to main tanks that are designed to be used in accordance with procedures in the aircraft's flight manual/pilot operating handbook.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    757toga

    5,2191030




    5,2191030











    • I was going to bring up the Cessna 310 as an example too. The backup fuel pumps can only pull from the Main tanks IIRC, so you burn off the Aux fuel first, BUT fuel return from the engines is to the main tank so you need to burn enough off the mains that they don't overfill. Fun ship. :)
      – Erin Anne
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @ErinAnne - Good comment. Great airplane. Trivia question: Which circuit breaker controls the "tip tank transfer pump?"
      – 757toga
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @757toga I did all my multi time in 2006, but I found a POH online and looked it up because I'd forgotten: the landing light circuit breaker, lol. (In the 310K POH I found at myhra.org/Cessna310KOnePageperPage.pdf it's on page 2-1, under "Fuel System".
      – Erin Anne
      17 hours ago
















    • I was going to bring up the Cessna 310 as an example too. The backup fuel pumps can only pull from the Main tanks IIRC, so you burn off the Aux fuel first, BUT fuel return from the engines is to the main tank so you need to burn enough off the mains that they don't overfill. Fun ship. :)
      – Erin Anne
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @ErinAnne - Good comment. Great airplane. Trivia question: Which circuit breaker controls the "tip tank transfer pump?"
      – 757toga
      18 hours ago






    • 1




      @757toga I did all my multi time in 2006, but I found a POH online and looked it up because I'd forgotten: the landing light circuit breaker, lol. (In the 310K POH I found at myhra.org/Cessna310KOnePageperPage.pdf it's on page 2-1, under "Fuel System".
      – Erin Anne
      17 hours ago















    I was going to bring up the Cessna 310 as an example too. The backup fuel pumps can only pull from the Main tanks IIRC, so you burn off the Aux fuel first, BUT fuel return from the engines is to the main tank so you need to burn enough off the mains that they don't overfill. Fun ship. :)
    – Erin Anne
    18 hours ago




    I was going to bring up the Cessna 310 as an example too. The backup fuel pumps can only pull from the Main tanks IIRC, so you burn off the Aux fuel first, BUT fuel return from the engines is to the main tank so you need to burn enough off the mains that they don't overfill. Fun ship. :)
    – Erin Anne
    18 hours ago




    1




    1




    @ErinAnne - Good comment. Great airplane. Trivia question: Which circuit breaker controls the "tip tank transfer pump?"
    – 757toga
    18 hours ago




    @ErinAnne - Good comment. Great airplane. Trivia question: Which circuit breaker controls the "tip tank transfer pump?"
    – 757toga
    18 hours ago




    1




    1




    @757toga I did all my multi time in 2006, but I found a POH online and looked it up because I'd forgotten: the landing light circuit breaker, lol. (In the 310K POH I found at myhra.org/Cessna310KOnePageperPage.pdf it's on page 2-1, under "Fuel System".
    – Erin Anne
    17 hours ago




    @757toga I did all my multi time in 2006, but I found a POH online and looked it up because I'd forgotten: the landing light circuit breaker, lol. (In the 310K POH I found at myhra.org/Cessna310KOnePageperPage.pdf it's on page 2-1, under "Fuel System".
    – Erin Anne
    17 hours ago










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    My G35 Bonanza (and many other, older aircraft) used a pressure carburetor that would return excess fuel to the left main fuel cell.



    This meant that no matter what fuel cell the engine was consuming fuel from, the carburetor would always be sending the fuel it did not feed to the intake manifold back to that particular fuel cell.



    If the left main fuel cell were full of fuel, the returned fuel from the carburetor would be vented overboard.



    The workaround for this behavior of the fuel system was to consume fuel from the left main fuel cell for at least the first hour of the flight before consuming fuel from the other fuel cells/tanks. This would leave space in the left main fuel cell for the the carburetor return unused fuel without it being vented overboard.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      0
      down vote













      My G35 Bonanza (and many other, older aircraft) used a pressure carburetor that would return excess fuel to the left main fuel cell.



      This meant that no matter what fuel cell the engine was consuming fuel from, the carburetor would always be sending the fuel it did not feed to the intake manifold back to that particular fuel cell.



      If the left main fuel cell were full of fuel, the returned fuel from the carburetor would be vented overboard.



      The workaround for this behavior of the fuel system was to consume fuel from the left main fuel cell for at least the first hour of the flight before consuming fuel from the other fuel cells/tanks. This would leave space in the left main fuel cell for the the carburetor return unused fuel without it being vented overboard.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.



















        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        My G35 Bonanza (and many other, older aircraft) used a pressure carburetor that would return excess fuel to the left main fuel cell.



        This meant that no matter what fuel cell the engine was consuming fuel from, the carburetor would always be sending the fuel it did not feed to the intake manifold back to that particular fuel cell.



        If the left main fuel cell were full of fuel, the returned fuel from the carburetor would be vented overboard.



        The workaround for this behavior of the fuel system was to consume fuel from the left main fuel cell for at least the first hour of the flight before consuming fuel from the other fuel cells/tanks. This would leave space in the left main fuel cell for the the carburetor return unused fuel without it being vented overboard.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        My G35 Bonanza (and many other, older aircraft) used a pressure carburetor that would return excess fuel to the left main fuel cell.



        This meant that no matter what fuel cell the engine was consuming fuel from, the carburetor would always be sending the fuel it did not feed to the intake manifold back to that particular fuel cell.



        If the left main fuel cell were full of fuel, the returned fuel from the carburetor would be vented overboard.



        The workaround for this behavior of the fuel system was to consume fuel from the left main fuel cell for at least the first hour of the flight before consuming fuel from the other fuel cells/tanks. This would leave space in the left main fuel cell for the the carburetor return unused fuel without it being vented overboard.







        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered 43 mins ago









        Dan Nafe

        1




        1




        New contributor




        Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Dan Nafe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




















            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            Always burn from your drop tanks first. If you have to drop them, it is better than they are mostly empty than not.



            Other than that, fuel tanks should always be used in the order that they were filled.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              "In the order they were filled"??? Where do you get that from? What sequence tanks are filled is generally unrelated to the sequence they're used, and often they can be filled in any order desired. This answer looks like uninformed nonsense, in light of the aircraft I've flown.
              – Ralph J
              14 hours ago










            • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
              – Carlo Felicione
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              What airliner or general aviation aircraft is equipped with drop tanks?
              – DeepSpace
              6 hours ago










            • It could actually be military aircraft (with drop tanks). The question does not specify the type of aircraft.
              – Peter Mortensen
              2 hours ago










            • As some readers seem to assume commercial aircraft (perhaps biased by the existing answers), perhaps be explicit about that in your answer. An example (with a picture) and sources would also greatly help avoiding misunderstandings.
              – Peter Mortensen
              1 hour ago















            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            Always burn from your drop tanks first. If you have to drop them, it is better than they are mostly empty than not.



            Other than that, fuel tanks should always be used in the order that they were filled.






            share|improve this answer
















            • 1




              "In the order they were filled"??? Where do you get that from? What sequence tanks are filled is generally unrelated to the sequence they're used, and often they can be filled in any order desired. This answer looks like uninformed nonsense, in light of the aircraft I've flown.
              – Ralph J
              14 hours ago










            • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
              – Carlo Felicione
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              What airliner or general aviation aircraft is equipped with drop tanks?
              – DeepSpace
              6 hours ago










            • It could actually be military aircraft (with drop tanks). The question does not specify the type of aircraft.
              – Peter Mortensen
              2 hours ago










            • As some readers seem to assume commercial aircraft (perhaps biased by the existing answers), perhaps be explicit about that in your answer. An example (with a picture) and sources would also greatly help avoiding misunderstandings.
              – Peter Mortensen
              1 hour ago













            up vote
            -3
            down vote










            up vote
            -3
            down vote









            Always burn from your drop tanks first. If you have to drop them, it is better than they are mostly empty than not.



            Other than that, fuel tanks should always be used in the order that they were filled.






            share|improve this answer












            Always burn from your drop tanks first. If you have to drop them, it is better than they are mostly empty than not.



            Other than that, fuel tanks should always be used in the order that they were filled.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 16 hours ago









            quiet flyer

            19111




            19111







            • 1




              "In the order they were filled"??? Where do you get that from? What sequence tanks are filled is generally unrelated to the sequence they're used, and often they can be filled in any order desired. This answer looks like uninformed nonsense, in light of the aircraft I've flown.
              – Ralph J
              14 hours ago










            • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
              – Carlo Felicione
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              What airliner or general aviation aircraft is equipped with drop tanks?
              – DeepSpace
              6 hours ago










            • It could actually be military aircraft (with drop tanks). The question does not specify the type of aircraft.
              – Peter Mortensen
              2 hours ago










            • As some readers seem to assume commercial aircraft (perhaps biased by the existing answers), perhaps be explicit about that in your answer. An example (with a picture) and sources would also greatly help avoiding misunderstandings.
              – Peter Mortensen
              1 hour ago













            • 1




              "In the order they were filled"??? Where do you get that from? What sequence tanks are filled is generally unrelated to the sequence they're used, and often they can be filled in any order desired. This answer looks like uninformed nonsense, in light of the aircraft I've flown.
              – Ralph J
              14 hours ago










            • This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
              – Carlo Felicione
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              What airliner or general aviation aircraft is equipped with drop tanks?
              – DeepSpace
              6 hours ago










            • It could actually be military aircraft (with drop tanks). The question does not specify the type of aircraft.
              – Peter Mortensen
              2 hours ago










            • As some readers seem to assume commercial aircraft (perhaps biased by the existing answers), perhaps be explicit about that in your answer. An example (with a picture) and sources would also greatly help avoiding misunderstandings.
              – Peter Mortensen
              1 hour ago








            1




            1




            "In the order they were filled"??? Where do you get that from? What sequence tanks are filled is generally unrelated to the sequence they're used, and often they can be filled in any order desired. This answer looks like uninformed nonsense, in light of the aircraft I've flown.
            – Ralph J
            14 hours ago




            "In the order they were filled"??? Where do you get that from? What sequence tanks are filled is generally unrelated to the sequence they're used, and often they can be filled in any order desired. This answer looks like uninformed nonsense, in light of the aircraft I've flown.
            – Ralph J
            14 hours ago












            This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
            – Carlo Felicione
            6 hours ago




            This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post. - From Review
            – Carlo Felicione
            6 hours ago




            1




            1




            What airliner or general aviation aircraft is equipped with drop tanks?
            – DeepSpace
            6 hours ago




            What airliner or general aviation aircraft is equipped with drop tanks?
            – DeepSpace
            6 hours ago












            It could actually be military aircraft (with drop tanks). The question does not specify the type of aircraft.
            – Peter Mortensen
            2 hours ago




            It could actually be military aircraft (with drop tanks). The question does not specify the type of aircraft.
            – Peter Mortensen
            2 hours ago












            As some readers seem to assume commercial aircraft (perhaps biased by the existing answers), perhaps be explicit about that in your answer. An example (with a picture) and sources would also greatly help avoiding misunderstandings.
            – Peter Mortensen
            1 hour ago





            As some readers seem to assume commercial aircraft (perhaps biased by the existing answers), perhaps be explicit about that in your answer. An example (with a picture) and sources would also greatly help avoiding misunderstandings.
            – Peter Mortensen
            1 hour ago











            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            Yes! When you are filling up the aircraft and you use the centre tanks, it then means that the pilot has to use the centre tanks first before the 1 or 2 wing tanks are selected, and to keep checking to make sure the tanks are balanced according to the manufacturer’s procedure.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.













            • 2




              Welcome to Av.SE. Your answer is correct & it does answer the question, but you're getting down-votes because it doesn't really add to the other answer here, doesn't explain "why", and doesn't reference any sort of authoritative source. So it ends up looking like "somebody on the internet said..." which isn't particularly useful. Can you add a reference or an explanation "why" we do it this way? That would improve the answer considerably.
              – Ralph J
              15 hours ago














            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            Yes! When you are filling up the aircraft and you use the centre tanks, it then means that the pilot has to use the centre tanks first before the 1 or 2 wing tanks are selected, and to keep checking to make sure the tanks are balanced according to the manufacturer’s procedure.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.













            • 2




              Welcome to Av.SE. Your answer is correct & it does answer the question, but you're getting down-votes because it doesn't really add to the other answer here, doesn't explain "why", and doesn't reference any sort of authoritative source. So it ends up looking like "somebody on the internet said..." which isn't particularly useful. Can you add a reference or an explanation "why" we do it this way? That would improve the answer considerably.
              – Ralph J
              15 hours ago












            up vote
            -3
            down vote










            up vote
            -3
            down vote









            Yes! When you are filling up the aircraft and you use the centre tanks, it then means that the pilot has to use the centre tanks first before the 1 or 2 wing tanks are selected, and to keep checking to make sure the tanks are balanced according to the manufacturer’s procedure.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            Yes! When you are filling up the aircraft and you use the centre tanks, it then means that the pilot has to use the centre tanks first before the 1 or 2 wing tanks are selected, and to keep checking to make sure the tanks are balanced according to the manufacturer’s procedure.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 14 mins ago









            ymb1

            62.7k6198329




            62.7k6198329






            New contributor




            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 21 hours ago









            frank ifi

            11




            11




            New contributor




            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            frank ifi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.







            • 2




              Welcome to Av.SE. Your answer is correct & it does answer the question, but you're getting down-votes because it doesn't really add to the other answer here, doesn't explain "why", and doesn't reference any sort of authoritative source. So it ends up looking like "somebody on the internet said..." which isn't particularly useful. Can you add a reference or an explanation "why" we do it this way? That would improve the answer considerably.
              – Ralph J
              15 hours ago












            • 2




              Welcome to Av.SE. Your answer is correct & it does answer the question, but you're getting down-votes because it doesn't really add to the other answer here, doesn't explain "why", and doesn't reference any sort of authoritative source. So it ends up looking like "somebody on the internet said..." which isn't particularly useful. Can you add a reference or an explanation "why" we do it this way? That would improve the answer considerably.
              – Ralph J
              15 hours ago







            2




            2




            Welcome to Av.SE. Your answer is correct & it does answer the question, but you're getting down-votes because it doesn't really add to the other answer here, doesn't explain "why", and doesn't reference any sort of authoritative source. So it ends up looking like "somebody on the internet said..." which isn't particularly useful. Can you add a reference or an explanation "why" we do it this way? That would improve the answer considerably.
            – Ralph J
            15 hours ago




            Welcome to Av.SE. Your answer is correct & it does answer the question, but you're getting down-votes because it doesn't really add to the other answer here, doesn't explain "why", and doesn't reference any sort of authoritative source. So it ends up looking like "somebody on the internet said..." which isn't particularly useful. Can you add a reference or an explanation "why" we do it this way? That would improve the answer considerably.
            – Ralph J
            15 hours ago










            TestUser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            TestUser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            TestUser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            TestUser is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56009%2fis-there-a-tank-priority-sequence-for-using-the-fuel-tanks%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?