Can you catch a spaceship with a train on the Moon?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












In Kim Stanley Robinson’s new novel Red Moon the first few pages describe a method of Earth-to-Moon transportation that I had not encountered before. The idea is to use a magnetically levitated and accelerated train on the surface of the Moon to catch a spaceship from Earth flying by the Moon at thousands of kilometers per hour. The advantage of this system is that the spaceship does not need to bring fuel to decelerate itself and instead is decelerated by the train.



In more detail, a ship is launched from Earth and is put on a course tangential to the surface of the Moon such that it would just brush past the surface at 8300 kilometers per hour (according to the novel). As it approaches the Moon a maglev train on a 200-kilometer long track is accelerated to match speeds with the incoming spaceship. As the ship comes closest to the surface of the Moon the train is there to catch it and hold on to it. The train then gradually decelerates with the ship using the long track. Because the train is magnetically levitated and there is practically no air resistance on the Moon the train can easily reach such fast speeds. Because the ship doesn’t have to bring its own decelerating fuel much more weight can be dedicated to cargo.



This system is very economically attractive and if practical would appear to cut costs of sending people and supplies to the moon significantly. However, I have never encountered this idea before and a cursory search doesn’t find any other references for the system. Will this scheme work or are there practical difficulties that make it unfeasible?



P.S. I'm also curious whether this is a novel idea of Kim Stanley Robinson's or if someone else has proposed this before?










share|improve this question

















  • 3




    While it seems theoretically doable, the engineering challenges are enormous. For example, if the ship hits the train just a bit too hard, the train goes crashing into the tracks at 8300 kph.
    – RonJohn
    2 hours ago










  • The idea seems sound, but I'm not certain. Instinct says that it'd need a longer track, and any sort of accident would be... bad, as @RonJon says.
    – Andon
    2 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












In Kim Stanley Robinson’s new novel Red Moon the first few pages describe a method of Earth-to-Moon transportation that I had not encountered before. The idea is to use a magnetically levitated and accelerated train on the surface of the Moon to catch a spaceship from Earth flying by the Moon at thousands of kilometers per hour. The advantage of this system is that the spaceship does not need to bring fuel to decelerate itself and instead is decelerated by the train.



In more detail, a ship is launched from Earth and is put on a course tangential to the surface of the Moon such that it would just brush past the surface at 8300 kilometers per hour (according to the novel). As it approaches the Moon a maglev train on a 200-kilometer long track is accelerated to match speeds with the incoming spaceship. As the ship comes closest to the surface of the Moon the train is there to catch it and hold on to it. The train then gradually decelerates with the ship using the long track. Because the train is magnetically levitated and there is practically no air resistance on the Moon the train can easily reach such fast speeds. Because the ship doesn’t have to bring its own decelerating fuel much more weight can be dedicated to cargo.



This system is very economically attractive and if practical would appear to cut costs of sending people and supplies to the moon significantly. However, I have never encountered this idea before and a cursory search doesn’t find any other references for the system. Will this scheme work or are there practical difficulties that make it unfeasible?



P.S. I'm also curious whether this is a novel idea of Kim Stanley Robinson's or if someone else has proposed this before?










share|improve this question

















  • 3




    While it seems theoretically doable, the engineering challenges are enormous. For example, if the ship hits the train just a bit too hard, the train goes crashing into the tracks at 8300 kph.
    – RonJohn
    2 hours ago










  • The idea seems sound, but I'm not certain. Instinct says that it'd need a longer track, and any sort of accident would be... bad, as @RonJon says.
    – Andon
    2 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1





In Kim Stanley Robinson’s new novel Red Moon the first few pages describe a method of Earth-to-Moon transportation that I had not encountered before. The idea is to use a magnetically levitated and accelerated train on the surface of the Moon to catch a spaceship from Earth flying by the Moon at thousands of kilometers per hour. The advantage of this system is that the spaceship does not need to bring fuel to decelerate itself and instead is decelerated by the train.



In more detail, a ship is launched from Earth and is put on a course tangential to the surface of the Moon such that it would just brush past the surface at 8300 kilometers per hour (according to the novel). As it approaches the Moon a maglev train on a 200-kilometer long track is accelerated to match speeds with the incoming spaceship. As the ship comes closest to the surface of the Moon the train is there to catch it and hold on to it. The train then gradually decelerates with the ship using the long track. Because the train is magnetically levitated and there is practically no air resistance on the Moon the train can easily reach such fast speeds. Because the ship doesn’t have to bring its own decelerating fuel much more weight can be dedicated to cargo.



This system is very economically attractive and if practical would appear to cut costs of sending people and supplies to the moon significantly. However, I have never encountered this idea before and a cursory search doesn’t find any other references for the system. Will this scheme work or are there practical difficulties that make it unfeasible?



P.S. I'm also curious whether this is a novel idea of Kim Stanley Robinson's or if someone else has proposed this before?










share|improve this question













In Kim Stanley Robinson’s new novel Red Moon the first few pages describe a method of Earth-to-Moon transportation that I had not encountered before. The idea is to use a magnetically levitated and accelerated train on the surface of the Moon to catch a spaceship from Earth flying by the Moon at thousands of kilometers per hour. The advantage of this system is that the spaceship does not need to bring fuel to decelerate itself and instead is decelerated by the train.



In more detail, a ship is launched from Earth and is put on a course tangential to the surface of the Moon such that it would just brush past the surface at 8300 kilometers per hour (according to the novel). As it approaches the Moon a maglev train on a 200-kilometer long track is accelerated to match speeds with the incoming spaceship. As the ship comes closest to the surface of the Moon the train is there to catch it and hold on to it. The train then gradually decelerates with the ship using the long track. Because the train is magnetically levitated and there is practically no air resistance on the Moon the train can easily reach such fast speeds. Because the ship doesn’t have to bring its own decelerating fuel much more weight can be dedicated to cargo.



This system is very economically attractive and if practical would appear to cut costs of sending people and supplies to the moon significantly. However, I have never encountered this idea before and a cursory search doesn’t find any other references for the system. Will this scheme work or are there practical difficulties that make it unfeasible?



P.S. I'm also curious whether this is a novel idea of Kim Stanley Robinson's or if someone else has proposed this before?







science-based space-travel spaceships






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 3 hours ago









Mike Nichols

7,54152766




7,54152766







  • 3




    While it seems theoretically doable, the engineering challenges are enormous. For example, if the ship hits the train just a bit too hard, the train goes crashing into the tracks at 8300 kph.
    – RonJohn
    2 hours ago










  • The idea seems sound, but I'm not certain. Instinct says that it'd need a longer track, and any sort of accident would be... bad, as @RonJon says.
    – Andon
    2 hours ago












  • 3




    While it seems theoretically doable, the engineering challenges are enormous. For example, if the ship hits the train just a bit too hard, the train goes crashing into the tracks at 8300 kph.
    – RonJohn
    2 hours ago










  • The idea seems sound, but I'm not certain. Instinct says that it'd need a longer track, and any sort of accident would be... bad, as @RonJon says.
    – Andon
    2 hours ago







3




3




While it seems theoretically doable, the engineering challenges are enormous. For example, if the ship hits the train just a bit too hard, the train goes crashing into the tracks at 8300 kph.
– RonJohn
2 hours ago




While it seems theoretically doable, the engineering challenges are enormous. For example, if the ship hits the train just a bit too hard, the train goes crashing into the tracks at 8300 kph.
– RonJohn
2 hours ago












The idea seems sound, but I'm not certain. Instinct says that it'd need a longer track, and any sort of accident would be... bad, as @RonJon says.
– Andon
2 hours ago




The idea seems sound, but I'm not certain. Instinct says that it'd need a longer track, and any sort of accident would be... bad, as @RonJon says.
– Andon
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













It's a clever reverse on the old railgun-up-a-mountainside launcher concept.



There are a few practical difficulties. For one, we can barely build fixed railway infrastructure capable of 400 km/h, much less 8300. Most current maglevs run slower than that, and it's not all due to air resistance. Turns out that a 1-2 cm error in surveying and construction and otherwise minor variations in magnet strength leads to a really bumpy ride. There is no reason to expect kinetic problems to decrease as the speed increases. Maintenance gets much more expensive as speeds increase, too.



Another other big practical difficulty is the same one face by missile-interception: Two very fast masses that must meet precisely. 8300 km/h is 2.31 km per second (barely short of escape velocity 2.38 km/s, so there might be a rounding error somewhere!). In order for a 1m docking grapple to catch properly, both craft must reach the same target spot less than 0.0004 seconds apart.



Now let's talk about mass. If the spaceship's mass is much greater than the train, their combined momentum will try to pull the train into orbit. So either the train needs to be quite (otherwise unnecessarily) massive, or the guideway must contain the train+spaceship movement vertically as well as horizontally. And that vertical control must be upward and downward since the ship is essentially crashing into the train at 0km/s...except when they are off by just the slightest margin, which they will be every time.



Finally, the biggest problem is that there's just no way to make this thing fail safely under lots of conditions. Any kind of guideway failure would be catastrophic. A tiny mistake measuring the spaceship's position or velocity would result in missed meets (and a massive waste of energy)...or a catastrophe.






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    The main challenge I see is that you are accelerating a levitating object to a speed very close to the escape velocity of the Moon. This imposes two problems:



    • Fail to brake and the train will leap up many kilometers high. It will take some minutes to fall on the ground again at an extremely high speed. In fact, if the ship collides and imparts momentum to the train, the train may even escape the Moon.

    • To be stuck to a planet while flying over its escape velociy requires an immoral amount of downwards force. Both the ship and the train must be made of an unobtanium-adamantium-uru alloy.





    share|improve this answer




















      Your Answer




      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128601%2fcan-you-catch-a-spaceship-with-a-train-on-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      3
      down vote













      It's a clever reverse on the old railgun-up-a-mountainside launcher concept.



      There are a few practical difficulties. For one, we can barely build fixed railway infrastructure capable of 400 km/h, much less 8300. Most current maglevs run slower than that, and it's not all due to air resistance. Turns out that a 1-2 cm error in surveying and construction and otherwise minor variations in magnet strength leads to a really bumpy ride. There is no reason to expect kinetic problems to decrease as the speed increases. Maintenance gets much more expensive as speeds increase, too.



      Another other big practical difficulty is the same one face by missile-interception: Two very fast masses that must meet precisely. 8300 km/h is 2.31 km per second (barely short of escape velocity 2.38 km/s, so there might be a rounding error somewhere!). In order for a 1m docking grapple to catch properly, both craft must reach the same target spot less than 0.0004 seconds apart.



      Now let's talk about mass. If the spaceship's mass is much greater than the train, their combined momentum will try to pull the train into orbit. So either the train needs to be quite (otherwise unnecessarily) massive, or the guideway must contain the train+spaceship movement vertically as well as horizontally. And that vertical control must be upward and downward since the ship is essentially crashing into the train at 0km/s...except when they are off by just the slightest margin, which they will be every time.



      Finally, the biggest problem is that there's just no way to make this thing fail safely under lots of conditions. Any kind of guideway failure would be catastrophic. A tiny mistake measuring the spaceship's position or velocity would result in missed meets (and a massive waste of energy)...or a catastrophe.






      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        3
        down vote













        It's a clever reverse on the old railgun-up-a-mountainside launcher concept.



        There are a few practical difficulties. For one, we can barely build fixed railway infrastructure capable of 400 km/h, much less 8300. Most current maglevs run slower than that, and it's not all due to air resistance. Turns out that a 1-2 cm error in surveying and construction and otherwise minor variations in magnet strength leads to a really bumpy ride. There is no reason to expect kinetic problems to decrease as the speed increases. Maintenance gets much more expensive as speeds increase, too.



        Another other big practical difficulty is the same one face by missile-interception: Two very fast masses that must meet precisely. 8300 km/h is 2.31 km per second (barely short of escape velocity 2.38 km/s, so there might be a rounding error somewhere!). In order for a 1m docking grapple to catch properly, both craft must reach the same target spot less than 0.0004 seconds apart.



        Now let's talk about mass. If the spaceship's mass is much greater than the train, their combined momentum will try to pull the train into orbit. So either the train needs to be quite (otherwise unnecessarily) massive, or the guideway must contain the train+spaceship movement vertically as well as horizontally. And that vertical control must be upward and downward since the ship is essentially crashing into the train at 0km/s...except when they are off by just the slightest margin, which they will be every time.



        Finally, the biggest problem is that there's just no way to make this thing fail safely under lots of conditions. Any kind of guideway failure would be catastrophic. A tiny mistake measuring the spaceship's position or velocity would result in missed meets (and a massive waste of energy)...or a catastrophe.






        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          3
          down vote










          up vote
          3
          down vote









          It's a clever reverse on the old railgun-up-a-mountainside launcher concept.



          There are a few practical difficulties. For one, we can barely build fixed railway infrastructure capable of 400 km/h, much less 8300. Most current maglevs run slower than that, and it's not all due to air resistance. Turns out that a 1-2 cm error in surveying and construction and otherwise minor variations in magnet strength leads to a really bumpy ride. There is no reason to expect kinetic problems to decrease as the speed increases. Maintenance gets much more expensive as speeds increase, too.



          Another other big practical difficulty is the same one face by missile-interception: Two very fast masses that must meet precisely. 8300 km/h is 2.31 km per second (barely short of escape velocity 2.38 km/s, so there might be a rounding error somewhere!). In order for a 1m docking grapple to catch properly, both craft must reach the same target spot less than 0.0004 seconds apart.



          Now let's talk about mass. If the spaceship's mass is much greater than the train, their combined momentum will try to pull the train into orbit. So either the train needs to be quite (otherwise unnecessarily) massive, or the guideway must contain the train+spaceship movement vertically as well as horizontally. And that vertical control must be upward and downward since the ship is essentially crashing into the train at 0km/s...except when they are off by just the slightest margin, which they will be every time.



          Finally, the biggest problem is that there's just no way to make this thing fail safely under lots of conditions. Any kind of guideway failure would be catastrophic. A tiny mistake measuring the spaceship's position or velocity would result in missed meets (and a massive waste of energy)...or a catastrophe.






          share|improve this answer














          It's a clever reverse on the old railgun-up-a-mountainside launcher concept.



          There are a few practical difficulties. For one, we can barely build fixed railway infrastructure capable of 400 km/h, much less 8300. Most current maglevs run slower than that, and it's not all due to air resistance. Turns out that a 1-2 cm error in surveying and construction and otherwise minor variations in magnet strength leads to a really bumpy ride. There is no reason to expect kinetic problems to decrease as the speed increases. Maintenance gets much more expensive as speeds increase, too.



          Another other big practical difficulty is the same one face by missile-interception: Two very fast masses that must meet precisely. 8300 km/h is 2.31 km per second (barely short of escape velocity 2.38 km/s, so there might be a rounding error somewhere!). In order for a 1m docking grapple to catch properly, both craft must reach the same target spot less than 0.0004 seconds apart.



          Now let's talk about mass. If the spaceship's mass is much greater than the train, their combined momentum will try to pull the train into orbit. So either the train needs to be quite (otherwise unnecessarily) massive, or the guideway must contain the train+spaceship movement vertically as well as horizontally. And that vertical control must be upward and downward since the ship is essentially crashing into the train at 0km/s...except when they are off by just the slightest margin, which they will be every time.



          Finally, the biggest problem is that there's just no way to make this thing fail safely under lots of conditions. Any kind of guideway failure would be catastrophic. A tiny mistake measuring the spaceship's position or velocity would result in missed meets (and a massive waste of energy)...or a catastrophe.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago

























          answered 2 hours ago









          user535733

          5,6021226




          5,6021226




















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              The main challenge I see is that you are accelerating a levitating object to a speed very close to the escape velocity of the Moon. This imposes two problems:



              • Fail to brake and the train will leap up many kilometers high. It will take some minutes to fall on the ground again at an extremely high speed. In fact, if the ship collides and imparts momentum to the train, the train may even escape the Moon.

              • To be stuck to a planet while flying over its escape velociy requires an immoral amount of downwards force. Both the ship and the train must be made of an unobtanium-adamantium-uru alloy.





              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                The main challenge I see is that you are accelerating a levitating object to a speed very close to the escape velocity of the Moon. This imposes two problems:



                • Fail to brake and the train will leap up many kilometers high. It will take some minutes to fall on the ground again at an extremely high speed. In fact, if the ship collides and imparts momentum to the train, the train may even escape the Moon.

                • To be stuck to a planet while flying over its escape velociy requires an immoral amount of downwards force. Both the ship and the train must be made of an unobtanium-adamantium-uru alloy.





                share|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  The main challenge I see is that you are accelerating a levitating object to a speed very close to the escape velocity of the Moon. This imposes two problems:



                  • Fail to brake and the train will leap up many kilometers high. It will take some minutes to fall on the ground again at an extremely high speed. In fact, if the ship collides and imparts momentum to the train, the train may even escape the Moon.

                  • To be stuck to a planet while flying over its escape velociy requires an immoral amount of downwards force. Both the ship and the train must be made of an unobtanium-adamantium-uru alloy.





                  share|improve this answer












                  The main challenge I see is that you are accelerating a levitating object to a speed very close to the escape velocity of the Moon. This imposes two problems:



                  • Fail to brake and the train will leap up many kilometers high. It will take some minutes to fall on the ground again at an extremely high speed. In fact, if the ship collides and imparts momentum to the train, the train may even escape the Moon.

                  • To be stuck to a planet while flying over its escape velociy requires an immoral amount of downwards force. Both the ship and the train must be made of an unobtanium-adamantium-uru alloy.






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Renan

                  37.5k1186190




                  37.5k1186190



























                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded















































                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128601%2fcan-you-catch-a-spaceship-with-a-train-on-the-moon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                      How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?