SoX - Mix original signal with effected signal
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there an option in SoX effects processing to mix the wet and dry signals instead of only outputting the wet?
For example, say my effects chain is overdrive into pitch shift:
sox in.wav out.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700
Except I don't want the final file to be just the shifted signal. I want a mix of the distorted, shifted signal and the distorted, unshifted signal.
Does SoX support this somehow?
command-line audio sox
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there an option in SoX effects processing to mix the wet and dry signals instead of only outputting the wet?
For example, say my effects chain is overdrive into pitch shift:
sox in.wav out.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700
Except I don't want the final file to be just the shifted signal. I want a mix of the distorted, shifted signal and the distorted, unshifted signal.
Does SoX support this somehow?
command-line audio sox
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Is there an option in SoX effects processing to mix the wet and dry signals instead of only outputting the wet?
For example, say my effects chain is overdrive into pitch shift:
sox in.wav out.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700
Except I don't want the final file to be just the shifted signal. I want a mix of the distorted, shifted signal and the distorted, unshifted signal.
Does SoX support this somehow?
command-line audio sox
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
Is there an option in SoX effects processing to mix the wet and dry signals instead of only outputting the wet?
For example, say my effects chain is overdrive into pitch shift:
sox in.wav out.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700
Except I don't want the final file to be just the shifted signal. I want a mix of the distorted, shifted signal and the distorted, unshifted signal.
Does SoX support this somehow?
command-line audio sox
command-line audio sox
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
asked Oct 9 '17 at 22:13
vomitHatSteve
11
11
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If I understand you, there is an option especially to mix two signals: -m.
sox in.wav out.wav mix.wav -m
play mix.wav
You can probably do the effect and mix in one command, but I'm just a beginner with sox.
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
I figured there was probably an option with -m, but I was hoping to do it without splitting the signal into multiple chains. What you're describing, applied to the original example would be something like:sox -m -v 0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700 out.wavBut that's pretty ugly for something that I was hoping would be a single extra argument.
– vomitHatSteve
Oct 12 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
If I understand you, there is an option especially to mix two signals: -m.
sox in.wav out.wav mix.wav -m
play mix.wav
You can probably do the effect and mix in one command, but I'm just a beginner with sox.
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
I figured there was probably an option with -m, but I was hoping to do it without splitting the signal into multiple chains. What you're describing, applied to the original example would be something like:sox -m -v 0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700 out.wavBut that's pretty ugly for something that I was hoping would be a single extra argument.
– vomitHatSteve
Oct 12 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
If I understand you, there is an option especially to mix two signals: -m.
sox in.wav out.wav mix.wav -m
play mix.wav
You can probably do the effect and mix in one command, but I'm just a beginner with sox.
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
I figured there was probably an option with -m, but I was hoping to do it without splitting the signal into multiple chains. What you're describing, applied to the original example would be something like:sox -m -v 0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700 out.wavBut that's pretty ugly for something that I was hoping would be a single extra argument.
– vomitHatSteve
Oct 12 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |Â
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
If I understand you, there is an option especially to mix two signals: -m.
sox in.wav out.wav mix.wav -m
play mix.wav
You can probably do the effect and mix in one command, but I'm just a beginner with sox.
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
If I understand you, there is an option especially to mix two signals: -m.
sox in.wav out.wav mix.wav -m
play mix.wav
You can probably do the effect and mix in one command, but I'm just a beginner with sox.
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
answered Oct 11 '17 at 18:46
meuh
29.8k11751
29.8k11751
I figured there was probably an option with -m, but I was hoping to do it without splitting the signal into multiple chains. What you're describing, applied to the original example would be something like:sox -m -v 0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700 out.wavBut that's pretty ugly for something that I was hoping would be a single extra argument.
– vomitHatSteve
Oct 12 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |Â
I figured there was probably an option with -m, but I was hoping to do it without splitting the signal into multiple chains. What you're describing, applied to the original example would be something like:sox -m -v 0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700 out.wavBut that's pretty ugly for something that I was hoping would be a single extra argument.
– vomitHatSteve
Oct 12 '17 at 14:42
I figured there was probably an option with -m, but I was hoping to do it without splitting the signal into multiple chains. What you're describing, applied to the original example would be something like:
sox -m -v 0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700 out.wav But that's pretty ugly for something that I was hoping would be a single extra argument.– vomitHatSteve
Oct 12 '17 at 14:42
I figured there was probably an option with -m, but I was hoping to do it without splitting the signal into multiple chains. What you're describing, applied to the original example would be something like:
sox -m -v 0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 in.wav overdrive 0.5 gain -0.5 pitch 700 out.wav But that's pretty ugly for something that I was hoping would be a single extra argument.– vomitHatSteve
Oct 12 '17 at 14:42
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f397129%2fsox-mix-original-signal-with-effected-signal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password