Pacman saying no update, but pamac saying there are some?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Wanting to try out Arch Linux, I installed Manjaro, and so far find it pretty good.
However, I have a problem, I am used to Debian's apt update
then apt upgrade
, and the fact pacman combine both with pacman -Syu
is awesome.
However, pamac, the GUI for pacman installed by default in XFCE Manjaro, is telling me that there are update to be made:
Is there anything that I just didn't saw in the manual?
manjaro pacman software-updates
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Wanting to try out Arch Linux, I installed Manjaro, and so far find it pretty good.
However, I have a problem, I am used to Debian's apt update
then apt upgrade
, and the fact pacman combine both with pacman -Syu
is awesome.
However, pamac, the GUI for pacman installed by default in XFCE Manjaro, is telling me that there are update to be made:
Is there anything that I just didn't saw in the manual?
manjaro pacman software-updates
I guess they're out of sync? Have you refreshed the package list in pamac since thepacman -Syu
?
â Anko
Nov 27 '17 at 22:04
@Anko: Yes, but it seems it is pacman that is late, I have Firefox 56 installed, pacman says up to date, but pamac tell me it can upgrade to 57.
â DrakaSAN
Nov 27 '17 at 22:08
2
Trypacman -Syyu
to force a database update. If pamac still claims there are updates after pacman finishes updating from that, then refresh pamac by going back to its main menu and doing another check.
â Mioriin
Nov 28 '17 at 0:47
@Mioriin: Sorry for the long time to answer, I had updated via paman in the meantime, so I had to wait for new package to need update to try your solution. I can now confirm it indeed work, and would be pleased to see this as a answer so I can accept it :)
â DrakaSAN
Dec 3 '17 at 0:36
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Wanting to try out Arch Linux, I installed Manjaro, and so far find it pretty good.
However, I have a problem, I am used to Debian's apt update
then apt upgrade
, and the fact pacman combine both with pacman -Syu
is awesome.
However, pamac, the GUI for pacman installed by default in XFCE Manjaro, is telling me that there are update to be made:
Is there anything that I just didn't saw in the manual?
manjaro pacman software-updates
Wanting to try out Arch Linux, I installed Manjaro, and so far find it pretty good.
However, I have a problem, I am used to Debian's apt update
then apt upgrade
, and the fact pacman combine both with pacman -Syu
is awesome.
However, pamac, the GUI for pacman installed by default in XFCE Manjaro, is telling me that there are update to be made:
Is there anything that I just didn't saw in the manual?
manjaro pacman software-updates
edited Aug 25 at 18:30
Rui F Ribeiro
35.7k1271114
35.7k1271114
asked Nov 27 '17 at 20:18
DrakaSAN
214213
214213
I guess they're out of sync? Have you refreshed the package list in pamac since thepacman -Syu
?
â Anko
Nov 27 '17 at 22:04
@Anko: Yes, but it seems it is pacman that is late, I have Firefox 56 installed, pacman says up to date, but pamac tell me it can upgrade to 57.
â DrakaSAN
Nov 27 '17 at 22:08
2
Trypacman -Syyu
to force a database update. If pamac still claims there are updates after pacman finishes updating from that, then refresh pamac by going back to its main menu and doing another check.
â Mioriin
Nov 28 '17 at 0:47
@Mioriin: Sorry for the long time to answer, I had updated via paman in the meantime, so I had to wait for new package to need update to try your solution. I can now confirm it indeed work, and would be pleased to see this as a answer so I can accept it :)
â DrakaSAN
Dec 3 '17 at 0:36
add a comment |Â
I guess they're out of sync? Have you refreshed the package list in pamac since thepacman -Syu
?
â Anko
Nov 27 '17 at 22:04
@Anko: Yes, but it seems it is pacman that is late, I have Firefox 56 installed, pacman says up to date, but pamac tell me it can upgrade to 57.
â DrakaSAN
Nov 27 '17 at 22:08
2
Trypacman -Syyu
to force a database update. If pamac still claims there are updates after pacman finishes updating from that, then refresh pamac by going back to its main menu and doing another check.
â Mioriin
Nov 28 '17 at 0:47
@Mioriin: Sorry for the long time to answer, I had updated via paman in the meantime, so I had to wait for new package to need update to try your solution. I can now confirm it indeed work, and would be pleased to see this as a answer so I can accept it :)
â DrakaSAN
Dec 3 '17 at 0:36
I guess they're out of sync? Have you refreshed the package list in pamac since the
pacman -Syu
?â Anko
Nov 27 '17 at 22:04
I guess they're out of sync? Have you refreshed the package list in pamac since the
pacman -Syu
?â Anko
Nov 27 '17 at 22:04
@Anko: Yes, but it seems it is pacman that is late, I have Firefox 56 installed, pacman says up to date, but pamac tell me it can upgrade to 57.
â DrakaSAN
Nov 27 '17 at 22:08
@Anko: Yes, but it seems it is pacman that is late, I have Firefox 56 installed, pacman says up to date, but pamac tell me it can upgrade to 57.
â DrakaSAN
Nov 27 '17 at 22:08
2
2
Try
pacman -Syyu
to force a database update. If pamac still claims there are updates after pacman finishes updating from that, then refresh pamac by going back to its main menu and doing another check.â Mioriin
Nov 28 '17 at 0:47
Try
pacman -Syyu
to force a database update. If pamac still claims there are updates after pacman finishes updating from that, then refresh pamac by going back to its main menu and doing another check.â Mioriin
Nov 28 '17 at 0:47
@Mioriin: Sorry for the long time to answer, I had updated via paman in the meantime, so I had to wait for new package to need update to try your solution. I can now confirm it indeed work, and would be pleased to see this as a answer so I can accept it :)
â DrakaSAN
Dec 3 '17 at 0:36
@Mioriin: Sorry for the long time to answer, I had updated via paman in the meantime, so I had to wait for new package to need update to try your solution. I can now confirm it indeed work, and would be pleased to see this as a answer so I can accept it :)
â DrakaSAN
Dec 3 '17 at 0:36
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f407372%2fpacman-saying-no-update-but-pamac-saying-there-are-some%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I guess they're out of sync? Have you refreshed the package list in pamac since the
pacman -Syu
?â Anko
Nov 27 '17 at 22:04
@Anko: Yes, but it seems it is pacman that is late, I have Firefox 56 installed, pacman says up to date, but pamac tell me it can upgrade to 57.
â DrakaSAN
Nov 27 '17 at 22:08
2
Try
pacman -Syyu
to force a database update. If pamac still claims there are updates after pacman finishes updating from that, then refresh pamac by going back to its main menu and doing another check.â Mioriin
Nov 28 '17 at 0:47
@Mioriin: Sorry for the long time to answer, I had updated via paman in the meantime, so I had to wait for new package to need update to try your solution. I can now confirm it indeed work, and would be pleased to see this as a answer so I can accept it :)
â DrakaSAN
Dec 3 '17 at 0:36