Do I need to specify the pathname of a command added in `/etc/sudoers`, every time I run it with `sudo`?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












For a line that I added to /etc/sudoers, for example:



t ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /path/to/myscript


/path/to is in PATH of the current user t, but not in PATH of root.



$ sudo /path/to/myscript


works without password, but do I need to specify the pathname of the script every time I run the script with sudo?



$ sudo myscript
[sudo] password for t:
sudo: changeCpuFreq.sh: command not found


doesn't work even with password, because myscript's path isn't in PATH of root.



$ sudo -E env "PATH=$PATH" myscript
[sudo] password for t:


works with password, because PATH of t is copied to that of root, but the problem is that it still needs password.



Thanks.







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    For a line that I added to /etc/sudoers, for example:



    t ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /path/to/myscript


    /path/to is in PATH of the current user t, but not in PATH of root.



    $ sudo /path/to/myscript


    works without password, but do I need to specify the pathname of the script every time I run the script with sudo?



    $ sudo myscript
    [sudo] password for t:
    sudo: changeCpuFreq.sh: command not found


    doesn't work even with password, because myscript's path isn't in PATH of root.



    $ sudo -E env "PATH=$PATH" myscript
    [sudo] password for t:


    works with password, because PATH of t is copied to that of root, but the problem is that it still needs password.



    Thanks.







    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      For a line that I added to /etc/sudoers, for example:



      t ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /path/to/myscript


      /path/to is in PATH of the current user t, but not in PATH of root.



      $ sudo /path/to/myscript


      works without password, but do I need to specify the pathname of the script every time I run the script with sudo?



      $ sudo myscript
      [sudo] password for t:
      sudo: changeCpuFreq.sh: command not found


      doesn't work even with password, because myscript's path isn't in PATH of root.



      $ sudo -E env "PATH=$PATH" myscript
      [sudo] password for t:


      works with password, because PATH of t is copied to that of root, but the problem is that it still needs password.



      Thanks.







      share|improve this question














      For a line that I added to /etc/sudoers, for example:



      t ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: /path/to/myscript


      /path/to is in PATH of the current user t, but not in PATH of root.



      $ sudo /path/to/myscript


      works without password, but do I need to specify the pathname of the script every time I run the script with sudo?



      $ sudo myscript
      [sudo] password for t:
      sudo: changeCpuFreq.sh: command not found


      doesn't work even with password, because myscript's path isn't in PATH of root.



      $ sudo -E env "PATH=$PATH" myscript
      [sudo] password for t:


      works with password, because PATH of t is copied to that of root, but the problem is that it still needs password.



      Thanks.









      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 2 at 0:36

























      asked Apr 1 at 23:54









      Tim

      22.6k63224401




      22.6k63224401




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          You do not need per se to define the full pathname in sudoers; however you should do it for security reasons.



          Otherwise, it is fairly easy to gain root privileges; you just need to invoke another binary with the same name, and presto, instant root privileges.






          share|improve this answer




















          • Thanks. How do you achieve "not need per se to define the full pathname" in /etc/sudoers? My post is whether I need to specify pathname when running it with sudo.
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:33











          • You do not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path; nonetheless defining the full path gives you an extra layer of security.
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:37










          • Do I need to specify pathname to the command, when I run it with sudo?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:40










          • If the pathname is there as in your first example, you need to do it, unless you create an alias. See this for other security considerations: openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2004/10/20/6
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:42











          • do you mean if pathname exists in /etc/sudoers, then it must also be specified when running the command? How do you "not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path"?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:47










          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f434933%2fdo-i-need-to-specify-the-pathname-of-a-command-added-in-etc-sudoers-every-ti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          1
          down vote













          You do not need per se to define the full pathname in sudoers; however you should do it for security reasons.



          Otherwise, it is fairly easy to gain root privileges; you just need to invoke another binary with the same name, and presto, instant root privileges.






          share|improve this answer




















          • Thanks. How do you achieve "not need per se to define the full pathname" in /etc/sudoers? My post is whether I need to specify pathname when running it with sudo.
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:33











          • You do not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path; nonetheless defining the full path gives you an extra layer of security.
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:37










          • Do I need to specify pathname to the command, when I run it with sudo?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:40










          • If the pathname is there as in your first example, you need to do it, unless you create an alias. See this for other security considerations: openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2004/10/20/6
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:42











          • do you mean if pathname exists in /etc/sudoers, then it must also be specified when running the command? How do you "not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path"?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:47














          up vote
          1
          down vote













          You do not need per se to define the full pathname in sudoers; however you should do it for security reasons.



          Otherwise, it is fairly easy to gain root privileges; you just need to invoke another binary with the same name, and presto, instant root privileges.






          share|improve this answer




















          • Thanks. How do you achieve "not need per se to define the full pathname" in /etc/sudoers? My post is whether I need to specify pathname when running it with sudo.
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:33











          • You do not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path; nonetheless defining the full path gives you an extra layer of security.
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:37










          • Do I need to specify pathname to the command, when I run it with sudo?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:40










          • If the pathname is there as in your first example, you need to do it, unless you create an alias. See this for other security considerations: openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2004/10/20/6
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:42











          • do you mean if pathname exists in /etc/sudoers, then it must also be specified when running the command? How do you "not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path"?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:47












          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          You do not need per se to define the full pathname in sudoers; however you should do it for security reasons.



          Otherwise, it is fairly easy to gain root privileges; you just need to invoke another binary with the same name, and presto, instant root privileges.






          share|improve this answer












          You do not need per se to define the full pathname in sudoers; however you should do it for security reasons.



          Otherwise, it is fairly easy to gain root privileges; you just need to invoke another binary with the same name, and presto, instant root privileges.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 2 at 0:32









          Rui F Ribeiro

          34.7k1269113




          34.7k1269113











          • Thanks. How do you achieve "not need per se to define the full pathname" in /etc/sudoers? My post is whether I need to specify pathname when running it with sudo.
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:33











          • You do not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path; nonetheless defining the full path gives you an extra layer of security.
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:37










          • Do I need to specify pathname to the command, when I run it with sudo?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:40










          • If the pathname is there as in your first example, you need to do it, unless you create an alias. See this for other security considerations: openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2004/10/20/6
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:42











          • do you mean if pathname exists in /etc/sudoers, then it must also be specified when running the command? How do you "not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path"?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:47
















          • Thanks. How do you achieve "not need per se to define the full pathname" in /etc/sudoers? My post is whether I need to specify pathname when running it with sudo.
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:33











          • You do not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path; nonetheless defining the full path gives you an extra layer of security.
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:37










          • Do I need to specify pathname to the command, when I run it with sudo?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:40










          • If the pathname is there as in your first example, you need to do it, unless you create an alias. See this for other security considerations: openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2004/10/20/6
            – Rui F Ribeiro
            Apr 2 at 0:42











          • do you mean if pathname exists in /etc/sudoers, then it must also be specified when running the command? How do you "not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path"?
            – Tim
            Apr 2 at 0:47















          Thanks. How do you achieve "not need per se to define the full pathname" in /etc/sudoers? My post is whether I need to specify pathname when running it with sudo.
          – Tim
          Apr 2 at 0:33





          Thanks. How do you achieve "not need per se to define the full pathname" in /etc/sudoers? My post is whether I need to specify pathname when running it with sudo.
          – Tim
          Apr 2 at 0:33













          You do not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path; nonetheless defining the full path gives you an extra layer of security.
          – Rui F Ribeiro
          Apr 2 at 0:37




          You do not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path; nonetheless defining the full path gives you an extra layer of security.
          – Rui F Ribeiro
          Apr 2 at 0:37












          Do I need to specify pathname to the command, when I run it with sudo?
          – Tim
          Apr 2 at 0:40




          Do I need to specify pathname to the command, when I run it with sudo?
          – Tim
          Apr 2 at 0:40












          If the pathname is there as in your first example, you need to do it, unless you create an alias. See this for other security considerations: openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2004/10/20/6
          – Rui F Ribeiro
          Apr 2 at 0:42





          If the pathname is there as in your first example, you need to do it, unless you create an alias. See this for other security considerations: openwall.com/lists/owl-users/2004/10/20/6
          – Rui F Ribeiro
          Apr 2 at 0:42













          do you mean if pathname exists in /etc/sudoers, then it must also be specified when running the command? How do you "not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path"?
          – Tim
          Apr 2 at 0:47




          do you mean if pathname exists in /etc/sudoers, then it must also be specified when running the command? How do you "not use the full pathname, and configure a restricted Defaults secure_path"?
          – Tim
          Apr 2 at 0:47












           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f434933%2fdo-i-need-to-specify-the-pathname-of-a-command-added-in-etc-sudoers-every-ti%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Christian Cage

          How to properly install USB display driver for Fresco Logic FL2000DX on Ubuntu?