Debian: How to make UFW active at boot

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to get ufw to activate on boot on my Debian 9 server. So for, I've tried 



ufw enable


and 



systemctl enable ufw


but neither make ufw enabled at boot.



Any suggestions on how to make ufw active, not just enabled, on boot?



Update #1



Tried this too:



root@server:~# systemctl enable --now ufw
Synchronizing state of ufw.service with SysV service script with /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install.
Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install enable ufw
root@server:~# ufw enable


After a reboot, the ufw service is not active:



root@server:~# ufw status verbose
Status: inactive


The journalctl -x log says this:



May 18 15:47:58 server systemd[1]: Started Uncomplicated firewall.
-- Subject: Unit ufw.service has finished start-up
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: https://www.debian.org/support
--
-- Unit ufw.service has finished starting up.
--
-- The start-up result is done.


So the service seems to be enabled, but ufw itself is not active.



Any suggestions on how to further debug this issue?




debian ufw




share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Enable the systemd service enable --now and then start ufw: ufw enable. If it doesn't come up at boot, read your journal to see why not.
    – jasonwryan
    May 18 at 8:11















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm trying to get ufw to activate on boot on my Debian 9 server. So for, I've tried 



ufw enable


and 



systemctl enable ufw


but neither make ufw enabled at boot.



Any suggestions on how to make ufw active, not just enabled, on boot?



Update #1



Tried this too:



root@server:~# systemctl enable --now ufw
Synchronizing state of ufw.service with SysV service script with /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install.
Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install enable ufw
root@server:~# ufw enable


After a reboot, the ufw service is not active:



root@server:~# ufw status verbose
Status: inactive


The journalctl -x log says this:



May 18 15:47:58 server systemd[1]: Started Uncomplicated firewall.
-- Subject: Unit ufw.service has finished start-up
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: https://www.debian.org/support
--
-- Unit ufw.service has finished starting up.
--
-- The start-up result is done.


So the service seems to be enabled, but ufw itself is not active.



Any suggestions on how to further debug this issue?




debian ufw




share|improve this question

















  • 1




    Enable the systemd service enable --now and then start ufw: ufw enable. If it doesn't come up at boot, read your journal to see why not.
    – jasonwryan
    May 18 at 8:11













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm trying to get ufw to activate on boot on my Debian 9 server. So for, I've tried 



ufw enable


and 



systemctl enable ufw


but neither make ufw enabled at boot.



Any suggestions on how to make ufw active, not just enabled, on boot?



Update #1



Tried this too:



root@server:~# systemctl enable --now ufw
Synchronizing state of ufw.service with SysV service script with /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install.
Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install enable ufw
root@server:~# ufw enable


After a reboot, the ufw service is not active:



root@server:~# ufw status verbose
Status: inactive


The journalctl -x log says this:



May 18 15:47:58 server systemd[1]: Started Uncomplicated firewall.
-- Subject: Unit ufw.service has finished start-up
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: https://www.debian.org/support
--
-- Unit ufw.service has finished starting up.
--
-- The start-up result is done.


So the service seems to be enabled, but ufw itself is not active.



Any suggestions on how to further debug this issue?




debian ufw




share|improve this question













I'm trying to get ufw to activate on boot on my Debian 9 server. So for, I've tried 



ufw enable


and 



systemctl enable ufw


but neither make ufw enabled at boot.



Any suggestions on how to make ufw active, not just enabled, on boot?



Update #1



Tried this too:



root@server:~# systemctl enable --now ufw
Synchronizing state of ufw.service with SysV service script with /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install.
Executing: /lib/systemd/systemd-sysv-install enable ufw
root@server:~# ufw enable


After a reboot, the ufw service is not active:



root@server:~# ufw status verbose
Status: inactive


The journalctl -x log says this:



May 18 15:47:58 server systemd[1]: Started Uncomplicated firewall.
-- Subject: Unit ufw.service has finished start-up
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: https://www.debian.org/support
--
-- Unit ufw.service has finished starting up.
--
-- The start-up result is done.


So the service seems to be enabled, but ufw itself is not active.



Any suggestions on how to further debug this issue?





debian ufw





share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 18 at 13:55
























asked May 18 at 8:09









protoken

62




62







  • 1




    Enable the systemd service enable --now and then start ufw: ufw enable. If it doesn't come up at boot, read your journal to see why not.
    – jasonwryan
    May 18 at 8:11













  • 1




    Enable the systemd service enable --now and then start ufw: ufw enable. If it doesn't come up at boot, read your journal to see why not.
    – jasonwryan
    May 18 at 8:11








1




1




Enable the systemd service enable --now and then start ufw: ufw enable. If it doesn't come up at boot, read your journal to see why not.
– jasonwryan
May 18 at 8:11





Enable the systemd service enable --now and then start ufw: ufw enable. If it doesn't come up at boot, read your journal to see why not.
– jasonwryan
May 18 at 8:11
















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444535%2fdebian-how-to-make-ufw-active-at-boot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f444535%2fdebian-how-to-make-ufw-active-at-boot%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































-

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
Read more

Bahrain

Image
For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
Read more

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
Read more