Can I change an existing partition from MBR to GPT?

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I needed to add extra 2.5TB to the existing 400GB disk (sda) on my system. I added new virtual disks with 2.5TB (sdb), proceeded to create the partition table with fdisk.
Used pvcreate /dev/sdb1, to create the physical volume, then extended the volume group and finally extended the logical volume.
At the end I used the xfs_grow2fs for the filesystem to recognize. Only until then I realized that I only got 2TB out of the 2.5TB on the new disk due to MBR limitation.
Can I convert this drive to GPT without affecting sda? Will this movement affect the filesystem due to xfs_grow2fs being used? The worst case scenario would be having .5TB missing.
Using CentOS 7.
lsblk command output
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
fd0 2:0 1 4K 0 disk
sda 8:0 0 420G 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsda1 8:1 0 500M 0 part /boot
âÂÂâÂÂsda2 8:2 0 419.5G 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-root 253:0 0 15G 0 lvm /
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-swap 253:1 0 2G 0 lvm [SWAP]
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sdb 8:16 0 2.5T 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsdb1 8:17 0 2T 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
lvs command
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log
Cpy%Sync Convert
home centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.39t
root centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 15.00g
swap centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.00g
df command
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-root 15G 2.7G 13G 18% /
devtmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 2.9G 8.6M 2.9G 1% /run
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-home 2.4T 103G 2.3T 5% /home
/dev/sda1 497M 171M 326M 35% /boot
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/1000
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/0
I used xfs_growfs to extend home to use the additional 2.5TB but only got 2TB from the new disk due to MBR limits.
output of fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 2748.8 GB, 2748779069440 bytes, 5368709120 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x3633c5d9
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 2048 4294967294 2147482623+ 8e Linux LVM
linux partition lvm gpt mbr
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I needed to add extra 2.5TB to the existing 400GB disk (sda) on my system. I added new virtual disks with 2.5TB (sdb), proceeded to create the partition table with fdisk.
Used pvcreate /dev/sdb1, to create the physical volume, then extended the volume group and finally extended the logical volume.
At the end I used the xfs_grow2fs for the filesystem to recognize. Only until then I realized that I only got 2TB out of the 2.5TB on the new disk due to MBR limitation.
Can I convert this drive to GPT without affecting sda? Will this movement affect the filesystem due to xfs_grow2fs being used? The worst case scenario would be having .5TB missing.
Using CentOS 7.
lsblk command output
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
fd0 2:0 1 4K 0 disk
sda 8:0 0 420G 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsda1 8:1 0 500M 0 part /boot
âÂÂâÂÂsda2 8:2 0 419.5G 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-root 253:0 0 15G 0 lvm /
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-swap 253:1 0 2G 0 lvm [SWAP]
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sdb 8:16 0 2.5T 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsdb1 8:17 0 2T 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
lvs command
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log
Cpy%Sync Convert
home centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.39t
root centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 15.00g
swap centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.00g
df command
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-root 15G 2.7G 13G 18% /
devtmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 2.9G 8.6M 2.9G 1% /run
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-home 2.4T 103G 2.3T 5% /home
/dev/sda1 497M 171M 326M 35% /boot
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/1000
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/0
I used xfs_growfs to extend home to use the additional 2.5TB but only got 2TB from the new disk due to MBR limits.
output of fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 2748.8 GB, 2748779069440 bytes, 5368709120 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x3633c5d9
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 2048 4294967294 2147482623+ 8e Linux LVM
linux partition lvm gpt mbr
I'm confused. If you ranpvcreate sdbthen there's neither a MBR nor a GPT on sdb. If the XFS filesystem is on a logical volume, then there's no MBR that impacts it in any way. What makes you think that your problem is related to MBR partitions? Post the output oflsblk,lvsanddf. Also tell us exactly how you calledxfs_grow2fsand copy-paste the output.
â Gilles
May 9 at 21:59
Output is available.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:09
1
I see. You evidently didn't runpvcreate sdb, butpvcreate /dev/sdb1. Please copy-paste the actual commands you ran, otherwise it's hard to help you. It's also confusing that you refer to 2TB as the filesystem size, but you have a 2.4TB filesystem, your problem is the size of the partition/dev/sdb1which doesn't span the whole disk unlike what you intended. And now post the output offdisk -l /dev/sdb.
â Gilles
May 9 at 22:24
I followed the commands listed on this tutorial. The only thing changing is the names of the groups displayed.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:36
WARNING: The size of this disk is 2.7 TB (2748779069440 bytes). DOS partition table format can not be used on drives for volumes larger than (2199023255040 bytes) for 512-byte sectors. Use parted(1) and GUID partition table format (GPT).This is what makes me think I need to change sdb to GPT.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:38
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
I needed to add extra 2.5TB to the existing 400GB disk (sda) on my system. I added new virtual disks with 2.5TB (sdb), proceeded to create the partition table with fdisk.
Used pvcreate /dev/sdb1, to create the physical volume, then extended the volume group and finally extended the logical volume.
At the end I used the xfs_grow2fs for the filesystem to recognize. Only until then I realized that I only got 2TB out of the 2.5TB on the new disk due to MBR limitation.
Can I convert this drive to GPT without affecting sda? Will this movement affect the filesystem due to xfs_grow2fs being used? The worst case scenario would be having .5TB missing.
Using CentOS 7.
lsblk command output
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
fd0 2:0 1 4K 0 disk
sda 8:0 0 420G 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsda1 8:1 0 500M 0 part /boot
âÂÂâÂÂsda2 8:2 0 419.5G 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-root 253:0 0 15G 0 lvm /
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-swap 253:1 0 2G 0 lvm [SWAP]
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sdb 8:16 0 2.5T 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsdb1 8:17 0 2T 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
lvs command
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log
Cpy%Sync Convert
home centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.39t
root centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 15.00g
swap centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.00g
df command
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-root 15G 2.7G 13G 18% /
devtmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 2.9G 8.6M 2.9G 1% /run
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-home 2.4T 103G 2.3T 5% /home
/dev/sda1 497M 171M 326M 35% /boot
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/1000
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/0
I used xfs_growfs to extend home to use the additional 2.5TB but only got 2TB from the new disk due to MBR limits.
output of fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 2748.8 GB, 2748779069440 bytes, 5368709120 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x3633c5d9
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 2048 4294967294 2147482623+ 8e Linux LVM
linux partition lvm gpt mbr
I needed to add extra 2.5TB to the existing 400GB disk (sda) on my system. I added new virtual disks with 2.5TB (sdb), proceeded to create the partition table with fdisk.
Used pvcreate /dev/sdb1, to create the physical volume, then extended the volume group and finally extended the logical volume.
At the end I used the xfs_grow2fs for the filesystem to recognize. Only until then I realized that I only got 2TB out of the 2.5TB on the new disk due to MBR limitation.
Can I convert this drive to GPT without affecting sda? Will this movement affect the filesystem due to xfs_grow2fs being used? The worst case scenario would be having .5TB missing.
Using CentOS 7.
lsblk command output
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
fd0 2:0 1 4K 0 disk
sda 8:0 0 420G 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsda1 8:1 0 500M 0 part /boot
âÂÂâÂÂsda2 8:2 0 419.5G 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-root 253:0 0 15G 0 lvm /
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-swap 253:1 0 2G 0 lvm [SWAP]
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sdb 8:16 0 2.5T 0 disk
âÂÂâÂÂsdb1 8:17 0 2T 0 part
âÂÂâÂÂcentos_sftp-home 253:2 0 2.4T 0 lvm /home
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
lvs command
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log
Cpy%Sync Convert
home centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.39t
root centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 15.00g
swap centos_sftp -wi-ao---- 2.00g
df command
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-root 15G 2.7G 13G 18% /
devtmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 2.9G 8.6M 2.9G 1% /run
tmpfs 2.9G 0 2.9G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
/dev/mapper/centos_sftp-home 2.4T 103G 2.3T 5% /home
/dev/sda1 497M 171M 326M 35% /boot
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/1000
tmpfs 581M 0 581M 0% /run/user/0
I used xfs_growfs to extend home to use the additional 2.5TB but only got 2TB from the new disk due to MBR limits.
output of fdisk -l /dev/sdb
Disk /dev/sdb: 2748.8 GB, 2748779069440 bytes, 5368709120 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x3633c5d9
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdb1 2048 4294967294 2147482623+ 8e Linux LVM
linux partition lvm gpt mbr
edited May 10 at 10:06
Gilles
503k1189951522
503k1189951522
asked May 9 at 20:47
Dagonar
413
413
I'm confused. If you ranpvcreate sdbthen there's neither a MBR nor a GPT on sdb. If the XFS filesystem is on a logical volume, then there's no MBR that impacts it in any way. What makes you think that your problem is related to MBR partitions? Post the output oflsblk,lvsanddf. Also tell us exactly how you calledxfs_grow2fsand copy-paste the output.
â Gilles
May 9 at 21:59
Output is available.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:09
1
I see. You evidently didn't runpvcreate sdb, butpvcreate /dev/sdb1. Please copy-paste the actual commands you ran, otherwise it's hard to help you. It's also confusing that you refer to 2TB as the filesystem size, but you have a 2.4TB filesystem, your problem is the size of the partition/dev/sdb1which doesn't span the whole disk unlike what you intended. And now post the output offdisk -l /dev/sdb.
â Gilles
May 9 at 22:24
I followed the commands listed on this tutorial. The only thing changing is the names of the groups displayed.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:36
WARNING: The size of this disk is 2.7 TB (2748779069440 bytes). DOS partition table format can not be used on drives for volumes larger than (2199023255040 bytes) for 512-byte sectors. Use parted(1) and GUID partition table format (GPT).This is what makes me think I need to change sdb to GPT.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:38
 |Â
show 2 more comments
I'm confused. If you ranpvcreate sdbthen there's neither a MBR nor a GPT on sdb. If the XFS filesystem is on a logical volume, then there's no MBR that impacts it in any way. What makes you think that your problem is related to MBR partitions? Post the output oflsblk,lvsanddf. Also tell us exactly how you calledxfs_grow2fsand copy-paste the output.
â Gilles
May 9 at 21:59
Output is available.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:09
1
I see. You evidently didn't runpvcreate sdb, butpvcreate /dev/sdb1. Please copy-paste the actual commands you ran, otherwise it's hard to help you. It's also confusing that you refer to 2TB as the filesystem size, but you have a 2.4TB filesystem, your problem is the size of the partition/dev/sdb1which doesn't span the whole disk unlike what you intended. And now post the output offdisk -l /dev/sdb.
â Gilles
May 9 at 22:24
I followed the commands listed on this tutorial. The only thing changing is the names of the groups displayed.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:36
WARNING: The size of this disk is 2.7 TB (2748779069440 bytes). DOS partition table format can not be used on drives for volumes larger than (2199023255040 bytes) for 512-byte sectors. Use parted(1) and GUID partition table format (GPT).This is what makes me think I need to change sdb to GPT.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:38
I'm confused. If you ran
pvcreate sdb then there's neither a MBR nor a GPT on sdb. If the XFS filesystem is on a logical volume, then there's no MBR that impacts it in any way. What makes you think that your problem is related to MBR partitions? Post the output of lsblk, lvs and df. Also tell us exactly how you called xfs_grow2fs and copy-paste the output.â Gilles
May 9 at 21:59
I'm confused. If you ran
pvcreate sdb then there's neither a MBR nor a GPT on sdb. If the XFS filesystem is on a logical volume, then there's no MBR that impacts it in any way. What makes you think that your problem is related to MBR partitions? Post the output of lsblk, lvs and df. Also tell us exactly how you called xfs_grow2fs and copy-paste the output.â Gilles
May 9 at 21:59
Output is available.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:09
Output is available.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:09
1
1
I see. You evidently didn't run
pvcreate sdb, but pvcreate /dev/sdb1. Please copy-paste the actual commands you ran, otherwise it's hard to help you. It's also confusing that you refer to 2TB as the filesystem size, but you have a 2.4TB filesystem, your problem is the size of the partition /dev/sdb1 which doesn't span the whole disk unlike what you intended. And now post the output of fdisk -l /dev/sdb.â Gilles
May 9 at 22:24
I see. You evidently didn't run
pvcreate sdb, but pvcreate /dev/sdb1. Please copy-paste the actual commands you ran, otherwise it's hard to help you. It's also confusing that you refer to 2TB as the filesystem size, but you have a 2.4TB filesystem, your problem is the size of the partition /dev/sdb1 which doesn't span the whole disk unlike what you intended. And now post the output of fdisk -l /dev/sdb.â Gilles
May 9 at 22:24
I followed the commands listed on this tutorial. The only thing changing is the names of the groups displayed.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:36
I followed the commands listed on this tutorial. The only thing changing is the names of the groups displayed.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:36
WARNING: The size of this disk is 2.7 TB (2748779069440 bytes). DOS partition table format can not be used on drives for volumes larger than (2199023255040 bytes) for 512-byte sectors. Use parted(1) and GUID partition table format (GPT). This is what makes me think I need to change sdb to GPT.â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:38
WARNING: The size of this disk is 2.7 TB (2748779069440 bytes). DOS partition table format can not be used on drives for volumes larger than (2199023255040 bytes) for 512-byte sectors. Use parted(1) and GUID partition table format (GPT). This is what makes me think I need to change sdb to GPT.â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:38
 |Â
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The MBR partition /dev/sdb1 starts at the offset 1MB. This is good, because the first GPT partition would also start at the offset 1MB.
So delete the current partition with fdisk and use g to create a new GPT partition. Choose type LVM for this partition. Make sure that the new partition starts at the same offset as the old one, before you use the w command. Otherwise you will lose all your data.
You can now use the full extent of the 2.5TB instead of the 2TB limit on MBR. Write the changes on disk and reboot. Use fdisk -l to check that changes on sdb are okay. Now we read 2.5TB available. Time to resize the volume groups and physical volumes.
Use pvresize /dev/sdb1 to resize to the new additional space appropriately. Afterwards use lvresize to resize the logical volume group. And finally xfs_growfs to increase the filesystem. Use df to confirm the changes at the end.
For this last part you may refer to this article.
2
This worked, not because the new disk contains no data, but because the GPT partition you created started at the same offset as the original MBR partition.
â Gilles
May 10 at 9:59
1
@sourcejedi The reason it worked is that the procedure actually doesn't overwrite anything insdbexcept the partition table. Crucially, the content of the partition wasn't modified.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:03
@Gilles I have edited for an amusing typo, and to be even more explicit about the safe sequence, and changed my downvote to upvote :).
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:26
@Gilles I reverted "Reboot the machine if you feel like it but you shouldn't need to." See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/441789/â¦
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:28
@sourcejedi I thinkpartprobeworks in this case on modern systems, but better safe than sorry.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:58
 |Â
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
The MBR partition /dev/sdb1 starts at the offset 1MB. This is good, because the first GPT partition would also start at the offset 1MB.
So delete the current partition with fdisk and use g to create a new GPT partition. Choose type LVM for this partition. Make sure that the new partition starts at the same offset as the old one, before you use the w command. Otherwise you will lose all your data.
You can now use the full extent of the 2.5TB instead of the 2TB limit on MBR. Write the changes on disk and reboot. Use fdisk -l to check that changes on sdb are okay. Now we read 2.5TB available. Time to resize the volume groups and physical volumes.
Use pvresize /dev/sdb1 to resize to the new additional space appropriately. Afterwards use lvresize to resize the logical volume group. And finally xfs_growfs to increase the filesystem. Use df to confirm the changes at the end.
For this last part you may refer to this article.
2
This worked, not because the new disk contains no data, but because the GPT partition you created started at the same offset as the original MBR partition.
â Gilles
May 10 at 9:59
1
@sourcejedi The reason it worked is that the procedure actually doesn't overwrite anything insdbexcept the partition table. Crucially, the content of the partition wasn't modified.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:03
@Gilles I have edited for an amusing typo, and to be even more explicit about the safe sequence, and changed my downvote to upvote :).
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:26
@Gilles I reverted "Reboot the machine if you feel like it but you shouldn't need to." See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/441789/â¦
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:28
@sourcejedi I thinkpartprobeworks in this case on modern systems, but better safe than sorry.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:58
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
The MBR partition /dev/sdb1 starts at the offset 1MB. This is good, because the first GPT partition would also start at the offset 1MB.
So delete the current partition with fdisk and use g to create a new GPT partition. Choose type LVM for this partition. Make sure that the new partition starts at the same offset as the old one, before you use the w command. Otherwise you will lose all your data.
You can now use the full extent of the 2.5TB instead of the 2TB limit on MBR. Write the changes on disk and reboot. Use fdisk -l to check that changes on sdb are okay. Now we read 2.5TB available. Time to resize the volume groups and physical volumes.
Use pvresize /dev/sdb1 to resize to the new additional space appropriately. Afterwards use lvresize to resize the logical volume group. And finally xfs_growfs to increase the filesystem. Use df to confirm the changes at the end.
For this last part you may refer to this article.
2
This worked, not because the new disk contains no data, but because the GPT partition you created started at the same offset as the original MBR partition.
â Gilles
May 10 at 9:59
1
@sourcejedi The reason it worked is that the procedure actually doesn't overwrite anything insdbexcept the partition table. Crucially, the content of the partition wasn't modified.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:03
@Gilles I have edited for an amusing typo, and to be even more explicit about the safe sequence, and changed my downvote to upvote :).
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:26
@Gilles I reverted "Reboot the machine if you feel like it but you shouldn't need to." See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/441789/â¦
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:28
@sourcejedi I thinkpartprobeworks in this case on modern systems, but better safe than sorry.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:58
 |Â
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
The MBR partition /dev/sdb1 starts at the offset 1MB. This is good, because the first GPT partition would also start at the offset 1MB.
So delete the current partition with fdisk and use g to create a new GPT partition. Choose type LVM for this partition. Make sure that the new partition starts at the same offset as the old one, before you use the w command. Otherwise you will lose all your data.
You can now use the full extent of the 2.5TB instead of the 2TB limit on MBR. Write the changes on disk and reboot. Use fdisk -l to check that changes on sdb are okay. Now we read 2.5TB available. Time to resize the volume groups and physical volumes.
Use pvresize /dev/sdb1 to resize to the new additional space appropriately. Afterwards use lvresize to resize the logical volume group. And finally xfs_growfs to increase the filesystem. Use df to confirm the changes at the end.
For this last part you may refer to this article.
The MBR partition /dev/sdb1 starts at the offset 1MB. This is good, because the first GPT partition would also start at the offset 1MB.
So delete the current partition with fdisk and use g to create a new GPT partition. Choose type LVM for this partition. Make sure that the new partition starts at the same offset as the old one, before you use the w command. Otherwise you will lose all your data.
You can now use the full extent of the 2.5TB instead of the 2TB limit on MBR. Write the changes on disk and reboot. Use fdisk -l to check that changes on sdb are okay. Now we read 2.5TB available. Time to resize the volume groups and physical volumes.
Use pvresize /dev/sdb1 to resize to the new additional space appropriately. Afterwards use lvresize to resize the logical volume group. And finally xfs_growfs to increase the filesystem. Use df to confirm the changes at the end.
For this last part you may refer to this article.
edited May 10 at 10:23
sourcejedi
18.2k32475
18.2k32475
answered May 10 at 0:15
Dagonar
413
413
2
This worked, not because the new disk contains no data, but because the GPT partition you created started at the same offset as the original MBR partition.
â Gilles
May 10 at 9:59
1
@sourcejedi The reason it worked is that the procedure actually doesn't overwrite anything insdbexcept the partition table. Crucially, the content of the partition wasn't modified.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:03
@Gilles I have edited for an amusing typo, and to be even more explicit about the safe sequence, and changed my downvote to upvote :).
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:26
@Gilles I reverted "Reboot the machine if you feel like it but you shouldn't need to." See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/441789/â¦
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:28
@sourcejedi I thinkpartprobeworks in this case on modern systems, but better safe than sorry.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:58
 |Â
show 2 more comments
2
This worked, not because the new disk contains no data, but because the GPT partition you created started at the same offset as the original MBR partition.
â Gilles
May 10 at 9:59
1
@sourcejedi The reason it worked is that the procedure actually doesn't overwrite anything insdbexcept the partition table. Crucially, the content of the partition wasn't modified.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:03
@Gilles I have edited for an amusing typo, and to be even more explicit about the safe sequence, and changed my downvote to upvote :).
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:26
@Gilles I reverted "Reboot the machine if you feel like it but you shouldn't need to." See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/441789/â¦
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:28
@sourcejedi I thinkpartprobeworks in this case on modern systems, but better safe than sorry.
â Gilles
May 10 at 10:58
2
2
This worked, not because the new disk contains no data, but because the GPT partition you created started at the same offset as the original MBR partition.
â Gilles
May 10 at 9:59
This worked, not because the new disk contains no data, but because the GPT partition you created started at the same offset as the original MBR partition.
â Gilles
May 10 at 9:59
1
1
@sourcejedi The reason it worked is that the procedure actually doesn't overwrite anything in
sdb except the partition table. Crucially, the content of the partition wasn't modified.â Gilles
May 10 at 10:03
@sourcejedi The reason it worked is that the procedure actually doesn't overwrite anything in
sdb except the partition table. Crucially, the content of the partition wasn't modified.â Gilles
May 10 at 10:03
@Gilles I have edited for an amusing typo, and to be even more explicit about the safe sequence, and changed my downvote to upvote :).
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:26
@Gilles I have edited for an amusing typo, and to be even more explicit about the safe sequence, and changed my downvote to upvote :).
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:26
@Gilles I reverted "Reboot the machine if you feel like it but you shouldn't need to." See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/441789/â¦
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:28
@Gilles I reverted "Reboot the machine if you feel like it but you shouldn't need to." See unix.stackexchange.com/questions/441789/â¦
â sourcejedi
May 10 at 10:28
@sourcejedi I think
partprobe works in this case on modern systems, but better safe than sorry.â Gilles
May 10 at 10:58
@sourcejedi I think
partprobe works in this case on modern systems, but better safe than sorry.â Gilles
May 10 at 10:58
 |Â
show 2 more comments
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442862%2fcan-i-change-an-existing-partition-from-mbr-to-gpt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
I'm confused. If you ran
pvcreate sdbthen there's neither a MBR nor a GPT on sdb. If the XFS filesystem is on a logical volume, then there's no MBR that impacts it in any way. What makes you think that your problem is related to MBR partitions? Post the output oflsblk,lvsanddf. Also tell us exactly how you calledxfs_grow2fsand copy-paste the output.â Gilles
May 9 at 21:59
Output is available.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:09
1
I see. You evidently didn't run
pvcreate sdb, butpvcreate /dev/sdb1. Please copy-paste the actual commands you ran, otherwise it's hard to help you. It's also confusing that you refer to 2TB as the filesystem size, but you have a 2.4TB filesystem, your problem is the size of the partition/dev/sdb1which doesn't span the whole disk unlike what you intended. And now post the output offdisk -l /dev/sdb.â Gilles
May 9 at 22:24
I followed the commands listed on this tutorial. The only thing changing is the names of the groups displayed.
â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:36
WARNING: The size of this disk is 2.7 TB (2748779069440 bytes). DOS partition table format can not be used on drives for volumes larger than (2199023255040 bytes) for 512-byte sectors. Use parted(1) and GUID partition table format (GPT).This is what makes me think I need to change sdb to GPT.â Dagonar
May 9 at 22:38