strongswan get RANDOM dns

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?




fedora vpn ipsec strongswan




share|improve this question















  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?




fedora vpn ipsec strongswan




share|improve this question















  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?




fedora vpn ipsec strongswan




share|improve this question











I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?





fedora vpn ipsec strongswan





share|improve this question










share|improve this question




share|improve this question









asked May 9 at 13:02









Tsumi

1263




1263







  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12












  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12







1




1




Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
– Tsumi
May 9 at 13:10




Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
– Tsumi
May 9 at 13:10




1




1




You should put this as an answer
– Kiwy
May 9 at 14:12




You should put this as an answer
– Kiwy
May 9 at 14:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



dnf clean all
dnf update





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442759%2fstrongswan-get-random-dns%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



    Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



    dnf clean all
    dnf update





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



      Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



      dnf clean all
      dnf update





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



        Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



        dnf clean all
        dnf update





        share|improve this answer













        It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



        Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



        dnf clean all
        dnf update






        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer











        answered May 28 at 8:47









        Tsumi

        1263




        1263






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442759%2fstrongswan-get-random-dns%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Se
            Read more

            Bahrain

            Image
            For other uses, see Bahrain (disambiguation). Sovereign island state in the Persian Gulf Kingdom of Bahrain مملكة البحرين   (Arabic) Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn Flag Coat of arms Anthem:  نشيد البحرين الوطني Bahrainona Our Bahrain Location of   Bahrain    (circled in red) Capital and largest city Manama 26°13′N 50°35′E  /  26.217°N 50.583°E  / 26.217; 50.583 Official languages Arabic Ethnic groups (2010 [1] ) 50.7% Arab (46% Bahrani, 4.7% other Arabs) 45.5% Asian 1% European 1.2% Others Religion Islam Demonym(s) Bahraini Government Unitary constitutional monarchy • King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa • Prime Minister Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa Legislature National Assembly • Upper house Consultative Council • Lower house Council of Representatives Independence • Declared Independence [2] 14 August 1971 • from United Kingdom [1] 15 August 1971 • Admitted to the United Nations 21 September 1971 • Kingdom of Bahrain 14 February 2002
            Read more

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 0 down vote favorite I am trying to setup postfix to relay all mail generated on the local machine via SMTP to a mailgun relay. I have used the mailgun relay before with success on an ubuntu server, but I am migrating to a Centos 7 server which I will be running in FIPS mode. There error log is below, slightly sanitized. I have a small enough network that I choose to have each machine reach out to mailgun individually (this the loopback-only, 127.0.0.0/8 restrictions) and no firewall open port allowing smtp in to the machine. I assume the FIPS mode (and with it disabling of MD5) is causing problems, but I don't know how to overcome it or if it is even possible for tls_fprint to use some supported hash such as sha256 or sha512. However, the relay=none is slightly concerning since I have relayhost set, but perhaps that is because the smtp process is failing? Any help would be appreciated! postconf -n: alias_database = hash:/etc/alia
            Read more