strongswan get RANDOM dns

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?




fedora vpn ipsec strongswan




share|improve this question















  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?




fedora vpn ipsec strongswan




share|improve this question















  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?




fedora vpn ipsec strongswan




share|improve this question











I'm getting a really strange issue on fresh Fedora 28 MATE with an IKEv2 IPSEC VPN.



First thing: this VPN is currently used by some other clients (some windows and my old Fedora 26) with NO issue.



Configuring it on a fresh installed Fedora 28 i can connect, but, from server, i get "random" DNS servers (random in the real way, the change from a connection to another and are random IP from random classes around the world):



Logs show something like:



May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 144.202.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 80.203.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 112.90.1.204
May 9 14:22:30 localhost NetworkManager[783]: <info> [1525868550.0975] vpn-connection[0x55f878e58350,067f1bf4-0581-49a7-a18b-542b64fe8b7a,"VPN",0]: Data: Internal DNS: 16.82.1.204


Trying to force on network manager the correct internal DNS everything work fine instead.



I already googled searching for a bug or a known issue but i didn't found anything, someone has/had a similar issue?





fedora vpn ipsec strongswan





share|improve this question










share|improve this question




share|improve this question









asked May 9 at 13:02









Tsumi

1263




1263







  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12












  • 1




    Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
    – Tsumi
    May 9 at 13:10






  • 1




    You should put this as an answer
    – Kiwy
    May 9 at 14:12







1




1




Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
– Tsumi
May 9 at 13:10




Self-replying... just noticed this bug report: bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939
– Tsumi
May 9 at 13:10




1




1




You should put this as an answer
– Kiwy
May 9 at 14:12




You should put this as an answer
– Kiwy
May 9 at 14:12










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



dnf clean all
dnf update





share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442759%2fstrongswan-get-random-dns%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



    Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



    dnf clean all
    dnf update





    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



      Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



      dnf clean all
      dnf update





      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



        Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



        dnf clean all
        dnf update





        share|improve this answer













        It was a not-pached bug in the strongswan rpm package:
        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574939



        Fixed in strongswan-5.6.2-6.fc28, issue solved with system upgrade:



        dnf clean all
        dnf update






        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer











        answered May 28 at 8:47









        Tsumi

        1263




        1263






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442759%2fstrongswan-get-random-dns%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest
































































            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
            Read more

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
            Read more

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
            Read more