Get a boolean from test expression

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I have this bash code:



 local r2g_keep_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--keep" "$my_args[@]");
local r2g_multi_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--multi" "$my_args[@]");

local r2g_multi=[ "$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp" ];


I just want r2g_multi to represent a boolean, if either $r2g_multi_temp or $r2g_keep_temp is defined. How can I do that? The above is syntactically invalid.



On the other hand, this is syntactically valid, but not sure if it's correct:



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");






share|improve this question





















  • looks good to me, thx :)
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 17:36














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1












I have this bash code:



 local r2g_keep_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--keep" "$my_args[@]");
local r2g_multi_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--multi" "$my_args[@]");

local r2g_multi=[ "$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp" ];


I just want r2g_multi to represent a boolean, if either $r2g_multi_temp or $r2g_keep_temp is defined. How can I do that? The above is syntactically invalid.



On the other hand, this is syntactically valid, but not sure if it's correct:



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");






share|improve this question





















  • looks good to me, thx :)
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 17:36












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
1






1





I have this bash code:



 local r2g_keep_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--keep" "$my_args[@]");
local r2g_multi_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--multi" "$my_args[@]");

local r2g_multi=[ "$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp" ];


I just want r2g_multi to represent a boolean, if either $r2g_multi_temp or $r2g_keep_temp is defined. How can I do that? The above is syntactically invalid.



On the other hand, this is syntactically valid, but not sure if it's correct:



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");






share|improve this question













I have this bash code:



 local r2g_keep_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--keep" "$my_args[@]");
local r2g_multi_temp=$(r2g_match_arg "--multi" "$my_args[@]");

local r2g_multi=[ "$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp" ];


I just want r2g_multi to represent a boolean, if either $r2g_multi_temp or $r2g_keep_temp is defined. How can I do that? The above is syntactically invalid.



On the other hand, this is syntactically valid, but not sure if it's correct:



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");








share|improve this question












share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 7 at 23:06
























asked May 7 at 22:59









Alexander Mills

1,885929




1,885929











  • looks good to me, thx :)
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 17:36
















  • looks good to me, thx :)
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 17:36















looks good to me, thx :)
– Alexander Mills
May 8 at 17:36




looks good to me, thx :)
– Alexander Mills
May 8 at 17:36










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










There are no booleans in the shell scripts.



Best simulation for them are integer values.

For example, 0 for true and 1 for false.



[[ -v variable_name ]] will return 1 if the variable_name was not defined or 0 if it was.



Therefore, you can get your desired behavior with this:



// If one of the variables is defined, return value of this command is 0.
[[ -v r2g_keep_temp ]] || [[ -v r2g_multi_temp ]]

// Save the return value of the last command (0 or 1).
local r2g_multi="$?"


Of courese, you can interpret the numbers however you like, I just wanted to demonstrate one example.




By the way,



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");


is not the thing that you wish.



  1. First the variables r2g_multi_temp and r2g_keep_temp will be replaced by their values.

  2. Now the subshell will try to execute the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

  3. If by some miracle that value is a valid bash command there are 2 cases:

    • That command is executed succesfully and its stdout is saved in the r2g_multi.

    • That command failed and subshell invoked the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

      Similar story again, if it is a valid command it will be executed and its stdout will be appended on the possible stdout of the command executed from the value of r2g_keep_temp and everything will be stored in r2g_multi.


All in all, run away from this :D






share|improve this answer























  • nice, what's the difference between -n $foo and -v $foo? I just heard of using -n to check if a variable is non empty
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:27










  • "0" and "1" are both defined though, so I need to return either "" or "1" not "0" and "1"
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:28






  • 1




    foo="", for this variable -n $foo will return 1 while -v foo (note that there is no $) will return 0. I don't understand the second quetion, can you explain it a bit more?
    – Iskustvo
    May 7 at 23:57











  • nevermind, I was just confused between -v -z -n
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 0:03










Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442421%2fget-a-boolean-from-test-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










There are no booleans in the shell scripts.



Best simulation for them are integer values.

For example, 0 for true and 1 for false.



[[ -v variable_name ]] will return 1 if the variable_name was not defined or 0 if it was.



Therefore, you can get your desired behavior with this:



// If one of the variables is defined, return value of this command is 0.
[[ -v r2g_keep_temp ]] || [[ -v r2g_multi_temp ]]

// Save the return value of the last command (0 or 1).
local r2g_multi="$?"


Of courese, you can interpret the numbers however you like, I just wanted to demonstrate one example.




By the way,



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");


is not the thing that you wish.



  1. First the variables r2g_multi_temp and r2g_keep_temp will be replaced by their values.

  2. Now the subshell will try to execute the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

  3. If by some miracle that value is a valid bash command there are 2 cases:

    • That command is executed succesfully and its stdout is saved in the r2g_multi.

    • That command failed and subshell invoked the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

      Similar story again, if it is a valid command it will be executed and its stdout will be appended on the possible stdout of the command executed from the value of r2g_keep_temp and everything will be stored in r2g_multi.


All in all, run away from this :D






share|improve this answer























  • nice, what's the difference between -n $foo and -v $foo? I just heard of using -n to check if a variable is non empty
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:27










  • "0" and "1" are both defined though, so I need to return either "" or "1" not "0" and "1"
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:28






  • 1




    foo="", for this variable -n $foo will return 1 while -v foo (note that there is no $) will return 0. I don't understand the second quetion, can you explain it a bit more?
    – Iskustvo
    May 7 at 23:57











  • nevermind, I was just confused between -v -z -n
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 0:03














up vote
1
down vote



accepted










There are no booleans in the shell scripts.



Best simulation for them are integer values.

For example, 0 for true and 1 for false.



[[ -v variable_name ]] will return 1 if the variable_name was not defined or 0 if it was.



Therefore, you can get your desired behavior with this:



// If one of the variables is defined, return value of this command is 0.
[[ -v r2g_keep_temp ]] || [[ -v r2g_multi_temp ]]

// Save the return value of the last command (0 or 1).
local r2g_multi="$?"


Of courese, you can interpret the numbers however you like, I just wanted to demonstrate one example.




By the way,



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");


is not the thing that you wish.



  1. First the variables r2g_multi_temp and r2g_keep_temp will be replaced by their values.

  2. Now the subshell will try to execute the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

  3. If by some miracle that value is a valid bash command there are 2 cases:

    • That command is executed succesfully and its stdout is saved in the r2g_multi.

    • That command failed and subshell invoked the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

      Similar story again, if it is a valid command it will be executed and its stdout will be appended on the possible stdout of the command executed from the value of r2g_keep_temp and everything will be stored in r2g_multi.


All in all, run away from this :D






share|improve this answer























  • nice, what's the difference between -n $foo and -v $foo? I just heard of using -n to check if a variable is non empty
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:27










  • "0" and "1" are both defined though, so I need to return either "" or "1" not "0" and "1"
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:28






  • 1




    foo="", for this variable -n $foo will return 1 while -v foo (note that there is no $) will return 0. I don't understand the second quetion, can you explain it a bit more?
    – Iskustvo
    May 7 at 23:57











  • nevermind, I was just confused between -v -z -n
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 0:03












up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






There are no booleans in the shell scripts.



Best simulation for them are integer values.

For example, 0 for true and 1 for false.



[[ -v variable_name ]] will return 1 if the variable_name was not defined or 0 if it was.



Therefore, you can get your desired behavior with this:



// If one of the variables is defined, return value of this command is 0.
[[ -v r2g_keep_temp ]] || [[ -v r2g_multi_temp ]]

// Save the return value of the last command (0 or 1).
local r2g_multi="$?"


Of courese, you can interpret the numbers however you like, I just wanted to demonstrate one example.




By the way,



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");


is not the thing that you wish.



  1. First the variables r2g_multi_temp and r2g_keep_temp will be replaced by their values.

  2. Now the subshell will try to execute the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

  3. If by some miracle that value is a valid bash command there are 2 cases:

    • That command is executed succesfully and its stdout is saved in the r2g_multi.

    • That command failed and subshell invoked the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

      Similar story again, if it is a valid command it will be executed and its stdout will be appended on the possible stdout of the command executed from the value of r2g_keep_temp and everything will be stored in r2g_multi.


All in all, run away from this :D






share|improve this answer















There are no booleans in the shell scripts.



Best simulation for them are integer values.

For example, 0 for true and 1 for false.



[[ -v variable_name ]] will return 1 if the variable_name was not defined or 0 if it was.



Therefore, you can get your desired behavior with this:



// If one of the variables is defined, return value of this command is 0.
[[ -v r2g_keep_temp ]] || [[ -v r2g_multi_temp ]]

// Save the return value of the last command (0 or 1).
local r2g_multi="$?"


Of courese, you can interpret the numbers however you like, I just wanted to demonstrate one example.




By the way,



local r2g_multi=$("$r2g_multi_temp" || "$r2g_keep_temp");


is not the thing that you wish.



  1. First the variables r2g_multi_temp and r2g_keep_temp will be replaced by their values.

  2. Now the subshell will try to execute the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

  3. If by some miracle that value is a valid bash command there are 2 cases:

    • That command is executed succesfully and its stdout is saved in the r2g_multi.

    • That command failed and subshell invoked the value of the r2g_multi_temp.

      Similar story again, if it is a valid command it will be executed and its stdout will be appended on the possible stdout of the command executed from the value of r2g_keep_temp and everything will be stored in r2g_multi.


All in all, run away from this :D







share|improve this answer















share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 7 at 23:51


























answered May 7 at 23:22









Iskustvo

667118




667118











  • nice, what's the difference between -n $foo and -v $foo? I just heard of using -n to check if a variable is non empty
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:27










  • "0" and "1" are both defined though, so I need to return either "" or "1" not "0" and "1"
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:28






  • 1




    foo="", for this variable -n $foo will return 1 while -v foo (note that there is no $) will return 0. I don't understand the second quetion, can you explain it a bit more?
    – Iskustvo
    May 7 at 23:57











  • nevermind, I was just confused between -v -z -n
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 0:03
















  • nice, what's the difference between -n $foo and -v $foo? I just heard of using -n to check if a variable is non empty
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:27










  • "0" and "1" are both defined though, so I need to return either "" or "1" not "0" and "1"
    – Alexander Mills
    May 7 at 23:28






  • 1




    foo="", for this variable -n $foo will return 1 while -v foo (note that there is no $) will return 0. I don't understand the second quetion, can you explain it a bit more?
    – Iskustvo
    May 7 at 23:57











  • nevermind, I was just confused between -v -z -n
    – Alexander Mills
    May 8 at 0:03















nice, what's the difference between -n $foo and -v $foo? I just heard of using -n to check if a variable is non empty
– Alexander Mills
May 7 at 23:27




nice, what's the difference between -n $foo and -v $foo? I just heard of using -n to check if a variable is non empty
– Alexander Mills
May 7 at 23:27












"0" and "1" are both defined though, so I need to return either "" or "1" not "0" and "1"
– Alexander Mills
May 7 at 23:28




"0" and "1" are both defined though, so I need to return either "" or "1" not "0" and "1"
– Alexander Mills
May 7 at 23:28




1




1




foo="", for this variable -n $foo will return 1 while -v foo (note that there is no $) will return 0. I don't understand the second quetion, can you explain it a bit more?
– Iskustvo
May 7 at 23:57





foo="", for this variable -n $foo will return 1 while -v foo (note that there is no $) will return 0. I don't understand the second quetion, can you explain it a bit more?
– Iskustvo
May 7 at 23:57













nevermind, I was just confused between -v -z -n
– Alexander Mills
May 8 at 0:03




nevermind, I was just confused between -v -z -n
– Alexander Mills
May 8 at 0:03












 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f442421%2fget-a-boolean-from-test-expression%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay