Relation between independence and correlation of uniform random variables
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
My question is fairly simple: let $X$ and $Y$ be two uncorrelated uniform random variables on $[-1,1]$. Are they independent?
I was under the impression that two random, uncorrelated variables are only necessarily independent if their joint distribution is normal. However, I can't come up with a counterexample to disprove the claim I am asking about. Please provide either a counterexample or a proof.
correlation independence uniform
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question is fairly simple: let $X$ and $Y$ be two uncorrelated uniform random variables on $[-1,1]$. Are they independent?
I was under the impression that two random, uncorrelated variables are only necessarily independent if their joint distribution is normal. However, I can't come up with a counterexample to disprove the claim I am asking about. Please provide either a counterexample or a proof.
correlation independence uniform
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My question is fairly simple: let $X$ and $Y$ be two uncorrelated uniform random variables on $[-1,1]$. Are they independent?
I was under the impression that two random, uncorrelated variables are only necessarily independent if their joint distribution is normal. However, I can't come up with a counterexample to disprove the claim I am asking about. Please provide either a counterexample or a proof.
correlation independence uniform
$endgroup$
My question is fairly simple: let $X$ and $Y$ be two uncorrelated uniform random variables on $[-1,1]$. Are they independent?
I was under the impression that two random, uncorrelated variables are only necessarily independent if their joint distribution is normal. However, I can't come up with a counterexample to disprove the claim I am asking about. Please provide either a counterexample or a proof.
correlation independence uniform
correlation independence uniform
edited Mar 18 at 8:48
Community♦
1
1
asked Mar 17 at 22:38
PeiffapPeiffap
546
546
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Independent implies uncorrelated but the implication doesn't go the other way.
Uncorrelated implies independence only under certain conditions. e.g. if you have a bivariate normal, it is the case that uncorrelated implies independent (as you said).
It is easy to construct bivariate distributions with uniform margins where the variables are uncorrelated but are not independent. Here are a few examples:
consider an additional random variable $B$ which takes the values $pm 1$ each with probability $frac12$, independent of $X$. Then let $Y=BX$.
take the bivariate distribution of two independent uniforms and slice it in 4 equal-size sections on each margin (yielding $4times 4=16$ pieces, each of size $frac12timesfrac12$). Now take all the probability from the 4 corner pieces and the 4 center pieces and put it evenly into the other 8 pieces.
Let $Y = 2|X|-1$.
In each case, the variables are uncorrelated but not independent (e.g. if $X=1$, what is $P(-0.1<Y<0.1),$?)
If you specify some particular family of bivariate distributions with uniform margins it might be possible that under that formulation the only uncorrelated one is independent. Then being uncorrelated would imply independence.
For example, if you restrict your attention to say the Gaussian copula, then I think the only uncorrelated one has independent margins; you can readily rescale that so that each margin is on (-1,1).
Some R code for sampling from and plotting these bivariates (not necessarily efficiently):
n <- 100000
x <- runif(n,-1,1)
b <- rbinom(n,1,.5)*2-1
y1 <-b*x
y2 <-ifelse(0.5<abs(x)&abs(x)<1,
runif(n,-.5,.5),
runif(n,0.5,1)*b
)
y3 <- 2*abs(x)-1
par(mfrow=c(1,3))
plot(x,y1,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
plot(x,y2,pch=16,cex=.5,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
abline(h=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
abline(v=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
plot(x,y3,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
(In this formulation, $(Y_2, Y_3)$ gives a fourth example)
[Incidentally by transforming all of these to normality (i.e. transforming $X$ to $Phi^-1(frac12(X+1))$ and so forth), you get examples of uncorrelated normal random variables that are not independent. Naturally they aren't jointly normal.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I'm struggling to see why the examples you provided still guarantee that $Y$ is uniformly distributed on $[-1, 1]$, though.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Do the plots of the bivariate densities help? In each case the shaded parts are all of constant density
$endgroup$
– Glen_b♦
Mar 17 at 23:49
$begingroup$
They make it visually clearer, yes. Thank you, again.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:51
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398050%2frelation-between-independence-and-correlation-of-uniform-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Independent implies uncorrelated but the implication doesn't go the other way.
Uncorrelated implies independence only under certain conditions. e.g. if you have a bivariate normal, it is the case that uncorrelated implies independent (as you said).
It is easy to construct bivariate distributions with uniform margins where the variables are uncorrelated but are not independent. Here are a few examples:
consider an additional random variable $B$ which takes the values $pm 1$ each with probability $frac12$, independent of $X$. Then let $Y=BX$.
take the bivariate distribution of two independent uniforms and slice it in 4 equal-size sections on each margin (yielding $4times 4=16$ pieces, each of size $frac12timesfrac12$). Now take all the probability from the 4 corner pieces and the 4 center pieces and put it evenly into the other 8 pieces.
Let $Y = 2|X|-1$.
In each case, the variables are uncorrelated but not independent (e.g. if $X=1$, what is $P(-0.1<Y<0.1),$?)
If you specify some particular family of bivariate distributions with uniform margins it might be possible that under that formulation the only uncorrelated one is independent. Then being uncorrelated would imply independence.
For example, if you restrict your attention to say the Gaussian copula, then I think the only uncorrelated one has independent margins; you can readily rescale that so that each margin is on (-1,1).
Some R code for sampling from and plotting these bivariates (not necessarily efficiently):
n <- 100000
x <- runif(n,-1,1)
b <- rbinom(n,1,.5)*2-1
y1 <-b*x
y2 <-ifelse(0.5<abs(x)&abs(x)<1,
runif(n,-.5,.5),
runif(n,0.5,1)*b
)
y3 <- 2*abs(x)-1
par(mfrow=c(1,3))
plot(x,y1,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
plot(x,y2,pch=16,cex=.5,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
abline(h=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
abline(v=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
plot(x,y3,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
(In this formulation, $(Y_2, Y_3)$ gives a fourth example)
[Incidentally by transforming all of these to normality (i.e. transforming $X$ to $Phi^-1(frac12(X+1))$ and so forth), you get examples of uncorrelated normal random variables that are not independent. Naturally they aren't jointly normal.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I'm struggling to see why the examples you provided still guarantee that $Y$ is uniformly distributed on $[-1, 1]$, though.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Do the plots of the bivariate densities help? In each case the shaded parts are all of constant density
$endgroup$
– Glen_b♦
Mar 17 at 23:49
$begingroup$
They make it visually clearer, yes. Thank you, again.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Independent implies uncorrelated but the implication doesn't go the other way.
Uncorrelated implies independence only under certain conditions. e.g. if you have a bivariate normal, it is the case that uncorrelated implies independent (as you said).
It is easy to construct bivariate distributions with uniform margins where the variables are uncorrelated but are not independent. Here are a few examples:
consider an additional random variable $B$ which takes the values $pm 1$ each with probability $frac12$, independent of $X$. Then let $Y=BX$.
take the bivariate distribution of two independent uniforms and slice it in 4 equal-size sections on each margin (yielding $4times 4=16$ pieces, each of size $frac12timesfrac12$). Now take all the probability from the 4 corner pieces and the 4 center pieces and put it evenly into the other 8 pieces.
Let $Y = 2|X|-1$.
In each case, the variables are uncorrelated but not independent (e.g. if $X=1$, what is $P(-0.1<Y<0.1),$?)
If you specify some particular family of bivariate distributions with uniform margins it might be possible that under that formulation the only uncorrelated one is independent. Then being uncorrelated would imply independence.
For example, if you restrict your attention to say the Gaussian copula, then I think the only uncorrelated one has independent margins; you can readily rescale that so that each margin is on (-1,1).
Some R code for sampling from and plotting these bivariates (not necessarily efficiently):
n <- 100000
x <- runif(n,-1,1)
b <- rbinom(n,1,.5)*2-1
y1 <-b*x
y2 <-ifelse(0.5<abs(x)&abs(x)<1,
runif(n,-.5,.5),
runif(n,0.5,1)*b
)
y3 <- 2*abs(x)-1
par(mfrow=c(1,3))
plot(x,y1,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
plot(x,y2,pch=16,cex=.5,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
abline(h=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
abline(v=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
plot(x,y3,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
(In this formulation, $(Y_2, Y_3)$ gives a fourth example)
[Incidentally by transforming all of these to normality (i.e. transforming $X$ to $Phi^-1(frac12(X+1))$ and so forth), you get examples of uncorrelated normal random variables that are not independent. Naturally they aren't jointly normal.]
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you. I'm struggling to see why the examples you provided still guarantee that $Y$ is uniformly distributed on $[-1, 1]$, though.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Do the plots of the bivariate densities help? In each case the shaded parts are all of constant density
$endgroup$
– Glen_b♦
Mar 17 at 23:49
$begingroup$
They make it visually clearer, yes. Thank you, again.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Independent implies uncorrelated but the implication doesn't go the other way.
Uncorrelated implies independence only under certain conditions. e.g. if you have a bivariate normal, it is the case that uncorrelated implies independent (as you said).
It is easy to construct bivariate distributions with uniform margins where the variables are uncorrelated but are not independent. Here are a few examples:
consider an additional random variable $B$ which takes the values $pm 1$ each with probability $frac12$, independent of $X$. Then let $Y=BX$.
take the bivariate distribution of two independent uniforms and slice it in 4 equal-size sections on each margin (yielding $4times 4=16$ pieces, each of size $frac12timesfrac12$). Now take all the probability from the 4 corner pieces and the 4 center pieces and put it evenly into the other 8 pieces.
Let $Y = 2|X|-1$.
In each case, the variables are uncorrelated but not independent (e.g. if $X=1$, what is $P(-0.1<Y<0.1),$?)
If you specify some particular family of bivariate distributions with uniform margins it might be possible that under that formulation the only uncorrelated one is independent. Then being uncorrelated would imply independence.
For example, if you restrict your attention to say the Gaussian copula, then I think the only uncorrelated one has independent margins; you can readily rescale that so that each margin is on (-1,1).
Some R code for sampling from and plotting these bivariates (not necessarily efficiently):
n <- 100000
x <- runif(n,-1,1)
b <- rbinom(n,1,.5)*2-1
y1 <-b*x
y2 <-ifelse(0.5<abs(x)&abs(x)<1,
runif(n,-.5,.5),
runif(n,0.5,1)*b
)
y3 <- 2*abs(x)-1
par(mfrow=c(1,3))
plot(x,y1,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
plot(x,y2,pch=16,cex=.5,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
abline(h=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
abline(v=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
plot(x,y3,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
(In this formulation, $(Y_2, Y_3)$ gives a fourth example)
[Incidentally by transforming all of these to normality (i.e. transforming $X$ to $Phi^-1(frac12(X+1))$ and so forth), you get examples of uncorrelated normal random variables that are not independent. Naturally they aren't jointly normal.]
$endgroup$
Independent implies uncorrelated but the implication doesn't go the other way.
Uncorrelated implies independence only under certain conditions. e.g. if you have a bivariate normal, it is the case that uncorrelated implies independent (as you said).
It is easy to construct bivariate distributions with uniform margins where the variables are uncorrelated but are not independent. Here are a few examples:
consider an additional random variable $B$ which takes the values $pm 1$ each with probability $frac12$, independent of $X$. Then let $Y=BX$.
take the bivariate distribution of two independent uniforms and slice it in 4 equal-size sections on each margin (yielding $4times 4=16$ pieces, each of size $frac12timesfrac12$). Now take all the probability from the 4 corner pieces and the 4 center pieces and put it evenly into the other 8 pieces.
Let $Y = 2|X|-1$.
In each case, the variables are uncorrelated but not independent (e.g. if $X=1$, what is $P(-0.1<Y<0.1),$?)
If you specify some particular family of bivariate distributions with uniform margins it might be possible that under that formulation the only uncorrelated one is independent. Then being uncorrelated would imply independence.
For example, if you restrict your attention to say the Gaussian copula, then I think the only uncorrelated one has independent margins; you can readily rescale that so that each margin is on (-1,1).
Some R code for sampling from and plotting these bivariates (not necessarily efficiently):
n <- 100000
x <- runif(n,-1,1)
b <- rbinom(n,1,.5)*2-1
y1 <-b*x
y2 <-ifelse(0.5<abs(x)&abs(x)<1,
runif(n,-.5,.5),
runif(n,0.5,1)*b
)
y3 <- 2*abs(x)-1
par(mfrow=c(1,3))
plot(x,y1,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
plot(x,y2,pch=16,cex=.5,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
abline(h=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
abline(v=c(-1,-.5,0,.5,1),col=4,lty=3)
plot(x,y3,pch=16,cex=.3,col=rgb(.5,.5,.5,.5))
(In this formulation, $(Y_2, Y_3)$ gives a fourth example)
[Incidentally by transforming all of these to normality (i.e. transforming $X$ to $Phi^-1(frac12(X+1))$ and so forth), you get examples of uncorrelated normal random variables that are not independent. Naturally they aren't jointly normal.]
edited Mar 18 at 7:57
answered Mar 17 at 23:03
Glen_b♦Glen_b
215k23421774
215k23421774
$begingroup$
Thank you. I'm struggling to see why the examples you provided still guarantee that $Y$ is uniformly distributed on $[-1, 1]$, though.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Do the plots of the bivariate densities help? In each case the shaded parts are all of constant density
$endgroup$
– Glen_b♦
Mar 17 at 23:49
$begingroup$
They make it visually clearer, yes. Thank you, again.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:51
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you. I'm struggling to see why the examples you provided still guarantee that $Y$ is uniformly distributed on $[-1, 1]$, though.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Do the plots of the bivariate densities help? In each case the shaded parts are all of constant density
$endgroup$
– Glen_b♦
Mar 17 at 23:49
$begingroup$
They make it visually clearer, yes. Thank you, again.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:51
$begingroup$
Thank you. I'm struggling to see why the examples you provided still guarantee that $Y$ is uniformly distributed on $[-1, 1]$, though.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Thank you. I'm struggling to see why the examples you provided still guarantee that $Y$ is uniformly distributed on $[-1, 1]$, though.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:34
$begingroup$
Do the plots of the bivariate densities help? In each case the shaded parts are all of constant density
$endgroup$
– Glen_b♦
Mar 17 at 23:49
$begingroup$
Do the plots of the bivariate densities help? In each case the shaded parts are all of constant density
$endgroup$
– Glen_b♦
Mar 17 at 23:49
$begingroup$
They make it visually clearer, yes. Thank you, again.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:51
$begingroup$
They make it visually clearer, yes. Thank you, again.
$endgroup$
– Peiffap
Mar 17 at 23:51
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f398050%2frelation-between-independence-and-correlation-of-uniform-random-variables%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown