Starting Resque worker with script doesnt work, starting by hand does

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












0















I am trying to figure out why my process doesn't work if started via a script, but works fine if started by hand.



Here's the details:



script is a resque worker start script. The script location is /etc/monit/conf.d/start_resque.sh. Permissions are 755 and owned by ubuntu:ubuntu



When I run the script, the log output gets a pid and it says "starting worker ip-xx-xxx-xxx-xx:26732 (or whatever the pid is)", however when I ps aux | grep 26732, nothing is shown as running. When I run the same exact command by hand in my rails project directory, the same "starting worker" output is displayed, and the process is actually started and continues to run. One thing to note, additional output is displayed if started by hand: "nohup: ignoring input"



Another question someone might be able to help with, is why does BACKGROUND=yes not actually daemonize my worker...thus I'm resorting to nohup, which seems to work fine.



Here's my script (the command I run by hand is after the cd):



#!/bin/bash
echo "starting worker.."
workercount="$(ps aux | grep -c resque)"
currentdir="/var/www/apps/myapp/current"
logdir=$currentdir/log/resque_worker.log
pidfile=$currentdir/tmp/pids/resque_worker_$workercount.pid
cd $currentdir
nohup bundle exec rake environment resque:work RAILS_ENV=production QUEUE='*' VERBOSE=1 PIDFILE=$pidfile >> $logdir 2>&1 &
echo "started worker $workercount! view log at $logdir. view pidfile at $pidfile"


Additional notes: on Ubuntu 12.04 and am connected via ssh while running both the script and the manual command.










share|improve this question
























  • Try running pstree to see if the child ( your background process ) was adopted by init ;)

    – Rany Albeg Wein
    Apr 22 '13 at 19:07











  • I don't think it has been, since I don't see it there. I do see redis-server, but no children attached to that process.

    – Danny
    Apr 22 '13 at 22:49















0















I am trying to figure out why my process doesn't work if started via a script, but works fine if started by hand.



Here's the details:



script is a resque worker start script. The script location is /etc/monit/conf.d/start_resque.sh. Permissions are 755 and owned by ubuntu:ubuntu



When I run the script, the log output gets a pid and it says "starting worker ip-xx-xxx-xxx-xx:26732 (or whatever the pid is)", however when I ps aux | grep 26732, nothing is shown as running. When I run the same exact command by hand in my rails project directory, the same "starting worker" output is displayed, and the process is actually started and continues to run. One thing to note, additional output is displayed if started by hand: "nohup: ignoring input"



Another question someone might be able to help with, is why does BACKGROUND=yes not actually daemonize my worker...thus I'm resorting to nohup, which seems to work fine.



Here's my script (the command I run by hand is after the cd):



#!/bin/bash
echo "starting worker.."
workercount="$(ps aux | grep -c resque)"
currentdir="/var/www/apps/myapp/current"
logdir=$currentdir/log/resque_worker.log
pidfile=$currentdir/tmp/pids/resque_worker_$workercount.pid
cd $currentdir
nohup bundle exec rake environment resque:work RAILS_ENV=production QUEUE='*' VERBOSE=1 PIDFILE=$pidfile >> $logdir 2>&1 &
echo "started worker $workercount! view log at $logdir. view pidfile at $pidfile"


Additional notes: on Ubuntu 12.04 and am connected via ssh while running both the script and the manual command.










share|improve this question
























  • Try running pstree to see if the child ( your background process ) was adopted by init ;)

    – Rany Albeg Wein
    Apr 22 '13 at 19:07











  • I don't think it has been, since I don't see it there. I do see redis-server, but no children attached to that process.

    – Danny
    Apr 22 '13 at 22:49













0












0








0








I am trying to figure out why my process doesn't work if started via a script, but works fine if started by hand.



Here's the details:



script is a resque worker start script. The script location is /etc/monit/conf.d/start_resque.sh. Permissions are 755 and owned by ubuntu:ubuntu



When I run the script, the log output gets a pid and it says "starting worker ip-xx-xxx-xxx-xx:26732 (or whatever the pid is)", however when I ps aux | grep 26732, nothing is shown as running. When I run the same exact command by hand in my rails project directory, the same "starting worker" output is displayed, and the process is actually started and continues to run. One thing to note, additional output is displayed if started by hand: "nohup: ignoring input"



Another question someone might be able to help with, is why does BACKGROUND=yes not actually daemonize my worker...thus I'm resorting to nohup, which seems to work fine.



Here's my script (the command I run by hand is after the cd):



#!/bin/bash
echo "starting worker.."
workercount="$(ps aux | grep -c resque)"
currentdir="/var/www/apps/myapp/current"
logdir=$currentdir/log/resque_worker.log
pidfile=$currentdir/tmp/pids/resque_worker_$workercount.pid
cd $currentdir
nohup bundle exec rake environment resque:work RAILS_ENV=production QUEUE='*' VERBOSE=1 PIDFILE=$pidfile >> $logdir 2>&1 &
echo "started worker $workercount! view log at $logdir. view pidfile at $pidfile"


Additional notes: on Ubuntu 12.04 and am connected via ssh while running both the script and the manual command.










share|improve this question
















I am trying to figure out why my process doesn't work if started via a script, but works fine if started by hand.



Here's the details:



script is a resque worker start script. The script location is /etc/monit/conf.d/start_resque.sh. Permissions are 755 and owned by ubuntu:ubuntu



When I run the script, the log output gets a pid and it says "starting worker ip-xx-xxx-xxx-xx:26732 (or whatever the pid is)", however when I ps aux | grep 26732, nothing is shown as running. When I run the same exact command by hand in my rails project directory, the same "starting worker" output is displayed, and the process is actually started and continues to run. One thing to note, additional output is displayed if started by hand: "nohup: ignoring input"



Another question someone might be able to help with, is why does BACKGROUND=yes not actually daemonize my worker...thus I'm resorting to nohup, which seems to work fine.



Here's my script (the command I run by hand is after the cd):



#!/bin/bash
echo "starting worker.."
workercount="$(ps aux | grep -c resque)"
currentdir="/var/www/apps/myapp/current"
logdir=$currentdir/log/resque_worker.log
pidfile=$currentdir/tmp/pids/resque_worker_$workercount.pid
cd $currentdir
nohup bundle exec rake environment resque:work RAILS_ENV=production QUEUE='*' VERBOSE=1 PIDFILE=$pidfile >> $logdir 2>&1 &
echo "started worker $workercount! view log at $logdir. view pidfile at $pidfile"


Additional notes: on Ubuntu 12.04 and am connected via ssh while running both the script and the manual command.







ubuntu shell-script nohup






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 27 '13 at 7:32









Anthon

61k17104166




61k17104166










asked Apr 22 '13 at 17:50









DannyDanny

19117




19117












  • Try running pstree to see if the child ( your background process ) was adopted by init ;)

    – Rany Albeg Wein
    Apr 22 '13 at 19:07











  • I don't think it has been, since I don't see it there. I do see redis-server, but no children attached to that process.

    – Danny
    Apr 22 '13 at 22:49

















  • Try running pstree to see if the child ( your background process ) was adopted by init ;)

    – Rany Albeg Wein
    Apr 22 '13 at 19:07











  • I don't think it has been, since I don't see it there. I do see redis-server, but no children attached to that process.

    – Danny
    Apr 22 '13 at 22:49
















Try running pstree to see if the child ( your background process ) was adopted by init ;)

– Rany Albeg Wein
Apr 22 '13 at 19:07





Try running pstree to see if the child ( your background process ) was adopted by init ;)

– Rany Albeg Wein
Apr 22 '13 at 19:07













I don't think it has been, since I don't see it there. I do see redis-server, but no children attached to that process.

– Danny
Apr 22 '13 at 22:49





I don't think it has been, since I don't see it there. I do see redis-server, but no children attached to that process.

– Danny
Apr 22 '13 at 22:49










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Ok I switched to Sidekiq and it "just works". Lots of lost time mucking around with resque and deploying, but I gained some xp and almost leveled up in my sysadmin skill. Sidekiq seems a better option - it takes advantage of threads and has a great wiki, updated web interface, a pro option, and a really cool ninja icon on their homepage.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73338%2fstarting-resque-worker-with-script-doesnt-work-starting-by-hand-does%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    Ok I switched to Sidekiq and it "just works". Lots of lost time mucking around with resque and deploying, but I gained some xp and almost leveled up in my sysadmin skill. Sidekiq seems a better option - it takes advantage of threads and has a great wiki, updated web interface, a pro option, and a really cool ninja icon on their homepage.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      Ok I switched to Sidekiq and it "just works". Lots of lost time mucking around with resque and deploying, but I gained some xp and almost leveled up in my sysadmin skill. Sidekiq seems a better option - it takes advantage of threads and has a great wiki, updated web interface, a pro option, and a really cool ninja icon on their homepage.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        Ok I switched to Sidekiq and it "just works". Lots of lost time mucking around with resque and deploying, but I gained some xp and almost leveled up in my sysadmin skill. Sidekiq seems a better option - it takes advantage of threads and has a great wiki, updated web interface, a pro option, and a really cool ninja icon on their homepage.






        share|improve this answer













        Ok I switched to Sidekiq and it "just works". Lots of lost time mucking around with resque and deploying, but I gained some xp and almost leveled up in my sysadmin skill. Sidekiq seems a better option - it takes advantage of threads and has a great wiki, updated web interface, a pro option, and a really cool ninja icon on their homepage.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 23 '13 at 4:58









        DannyDanny

        19117




        19117



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73338%2fstarting-resque-worker-with-script-doesnt-work-starting-by-hand-does%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            Peggy Mitchell

            Palaiologos

            The Forum (Inglewood, California)