Probability using combinatorics: probability doesn't sum to 1

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1












$begingroup$



In a certain lottery, 10,000 tickets are sold and 10 prizes are awarded. What is the probability of not getting a prize if you buy 2 tickets.




The answer to this question is simple enough: $$ frac 9990 choose 210000 choose 2 $$
I understand this answer, since there are 2 ways of picking from the 9990 tickets that don't give you a ticket. And 2 ways of picking some ticket from the 10,000 tickets. But, I wanted to verify this by calculating the probability of getting a ticket.



I used a similar method:



$$ frac10 choose 210000 choose 2 $$



However, when I use a calculator to add them up, they don't sum to 1. I repeated this exercise for buying 10 tickets, in which case the answers for not getting a ticket and getting a ticket were respectively:



$$ frac 9990 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$
$$ frac10 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$



In this case as well, the probability don't sum to 1. I understand that I'm actually decreasing the numerator in the second case. But I can't understand intuitively why this is wrong.



While calculating the probability of not getting a ticket, we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that doesn't give you a prize by the number of ways you can pick any ticket. So, while calculuating the probability of getting a ticket, shouldn't we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that gives you a prize divided the total number of ways you can pick a ticket?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    These are good questions to ask. What if you buy $20$ tickets; what are the outcomes and their probabilities?
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Feb 15 at 12:08















1












$begingroup$



In a certain lottery, 10,000 tickets are sold and 10 prizes are awarded. What is the probability of not getting a prize if you buy 2 tickets.




The answer to this question is simple enough: $$ frac 9990 choose 210000 choose 2 $$
I understand this answer, since there are 2 ways of picking from the 9990 tickets that don't give you a ticket. And 2 ways of picking some ticket from the 10,000 tickets. But, I wanted to verify this by calculating the probability of getting a ticket.



I used a similar method:



$$ frac10 choose 210000 choose 2 $$



However, when I use a calculator to add them up, they don't sum to 1. I repeated this exercise for buying 10 tickets, in which case the answers for not getting a ticket and getting a ticket were respectively:



$$ frac 9990 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$
$$ frac10 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$



In this case as well, the probability don't sum to 1. I understand that I'm actually decreasing the numerator in the second case. But I can't understand intuitively why this is wrong.



While calculating the probability of not getting a ticket, we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that doesn't give you a prize by the number of ways you can pick any ticket. So, while calculuating the probability of getting a ticket, shouldn't we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that gives you a prize divided the total number of ways you can pick a ticket?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    These are good questions to ask. What if you buy $20$ tickets; what are the outcomes and their probabilities?
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Feb 15 at 12:08













1












1








1





$begingroup$



In a certain lottery, 10,000 tickets are sold and 10 prizes are awarded. What is the probability of not getting a prize if you buy 2 tickets.




The answer to this question is simple enough: $$ frac 9990 choose 210000 choose 2 $$
I understand this answer, since there are 2 ways of picking from the 9990 tickets that don't give you a ticket. And 2 ways of picking some ticket from the 10,000 tickets. But, I wanted to verify this by calculating the probability of getting a ticket.



I used a similar method:



$$ frac10 choose 210000 choose 2 $$



However, when I use a calculator to add them up, they don't sum to 1. I repeated this exercise for buying 10 tickets, in which case the answers for not getting a ticket and getting a ticket were respectively:



$$ frac 9990 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$
$$ frac10 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$



In this case as well, the probability don't sum to 1. I understand that I'm actually decreasing the numerator in the second case. But I can't understand intuitively why this is wrong.



While calculating the probability of not getting a ticket, we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that doesn't give you a prize by the number of ways you can pick any ticket. So, while calculuating the probability of getting a ticket, shouldn't we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that gives you a prize divided the total number of ways you can pick a ticket?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





In a certain lottery, 10,000 tickets are sold and 10 prizes are awarded. What is the probability of not getting a prize if you buy 2 tickets.




The answer to this question is simple enough: $$ frac 9990 choose 210000 choose 2 $$
I understand this answer, since there are 2 ways of picking from the 9990 tickets that don't give you a ticket. And 2 ways of picking some ticket from the 10,000 tickets. But, I wanted to verify this by calculating the probability of getting a ticket.



I used a similar method:



$$ frac10 choose 210000 choose 2 $$



However, when I use a calculator to add them up, they don't sum to 1. I repeated this exercise for buying 10 tickets, in which case the answers for not getting a ticket and getting a ticket were respectively:



$$ frac 9990 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$
$$ frac10 choose 1010000 choose 10 $$



In this case as well, the probability don't sum to 1. I understand that I'm actually decreasing the numerator in the second case. But I can't understand intuitively why this is wrong.



While calculating the probability of not getting a ticket, we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that doesn't give you a prize by the number of ways you can pick any ticket. So, while calculuating the probability of getting a ticket, shouldn't we divide the number of ways we can pick a ticket that gives you a prize divided the total number of ways you can pick a ticket?







probability combinatorics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Feb 15 at 11:49









Max

564317




564317










asked Feb 15 at 11:43









WorldGovWorldGov

324111




324111







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    These are good questions to ask. What if you buy $20$ tickets; what are the outcomes and their probabilities?
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Feb 15 at 12:08












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    These are good questions to ask. What if you buy $20$ tickets; what are the outcomes and their probabilities?
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Feb 15 at 12:08







2




2




$begingroup$
These are good questions to ask. What if you buy $20$ tickets; what are the outcomes and their probabilities?
$endgroup$
– David K
Feb 15 at 12:08




$begingroup$
These are good questions to ask. What if you buy $20$ tickets; what are the outcomes and their probabilities?
$endgroup$
– David K
Feb 15 at 12:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Note that $fracbinom102binom100002$ is the probability of getting two prizes! Hence, you are missing the case where you get just one price. If you add that, you do indeed get $1$:



$$
fracbinom99902binom100002
+fracbinom102binom100002
+fracbinom99901cdotbinom101binom100002
= 1.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you also show the correct probability for winning at least one prize?
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang Kais
    Feb 15 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Winning at least one prize is the same as winning exactly one or exactly two prices, so the last two summands.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Wow, that was really useful! I also used this logic to answer the question posed by @David in the comments, and they summed to 1 as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – WorldGov
    Feb 15 at 14:00


















0












$begingroup$

You can also solve by Binomial as the numbers are large. Hypergeometric distribution used by @Christoph gives the exact probabilities:



Probability that you will get a prize $= frac11000$



probability that you will not get a prize $= frac9991000$



If you buy two tickets, the probability that you will not get a prize is



$approx 2choose0(frac11000)^0(frac9991000)^2$ you will get a sum of 1 in this too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You are using the symbol "$=$" for an approximation. Please stress the fact that this answer does not give the exact probabilities!
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:08











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Done!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:10










  • $begingroup$
    Why a downvote, I am introducing another way to look at the problem!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:27










  • $begingroup$
    I downvoted because this is not an answer to the question "Why do my probabilities do not sum up to $1$?"
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:35










  • $begingroup$
    Although it does not answer the question that the OP asked, it is still a valid answer to the problem posed by OP. I am going to leave it even if it receives further downvotes.
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:38










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3113812%2fprobability-using-combinatorics-probability-doesnt-sum-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6












$begingroup$

Note that $fracbinom102binom100002$ is the probability of getting two prizes! Hence, you are missing the case where you get just one price. If you add that, you do indeed get $1$:



$$
fracbinom99902binom100002
+fracbinom102binom100002
+fracbinom99901cdotbinom101binom100002
= 1.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you also show the correct probability for winning at least one prize?
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang Kais
    Feb 15 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Winning at least one prize is the same as winning exactly one or exactly two prices, so the last two summands.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Wow, that was really useful! I also used this logic to answer the question posed by @David in the comments, and they summed to 1 as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – WorldGov
    Feb 15 at 14:00















6












$begingroup$

Note that $fracbinom102binom100002$ is the probability of getting two prizes! Hence, you are missing the case where you get just one price. If you add that, you do indeed get $1$:



$$
fracbinom99902binom100002
+fracbinom102binom100002
+fracbinom99901cdotbinom101binom100002
= 1.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you also show the correct probability for winning at least one prize?
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang Kais
    Feb 15 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Winning at least one prize is the same as winning exactly one or exactly two prices, so the last two summands.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Wow, that was really useful! I also used this logic to answer the question posed by @David in the comments, and they summed to 1 as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – WorldGov
    Feb 15 at 14:00













6












6








6





$begingroup$

Note that $fracbinom102binom100002$ is the probability of getting two prizes! Hence, you are missing the case where you get just one price. If you add that, you do indeed get $1$:



$$
fracbinom99902binom100002
+fracbinom102binom100002
+fracbinom99901cdotbinom101binom100002
= 1.
$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Note that $fracbinom102binom100002$ is the probability of getting two prizes! Hence, you are missing the case where you get just one price. If you add that, you do indeed get $1$:



$$
fracbinom99902binom100002
+fracbinom102binom100002
+fracbinom99901cdotbinom101binom100002
= 1.
$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Feb 15 at 11:56









ChristophChristoph

12.5k1642




12.5k1642











  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you also show the correct probability for winning at least one prize?
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang Kais
    Feb 15 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Winning at least one prize is the same as winning exactly one or exactly two prices, so the last two summands.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Wow, that was really useful! I also used this logic to answer the question posed by @David in the comments, and they summed to 1 as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – WorldGov
    Feb 15 at 14:00
















  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you also show the correct probability for winning at least one prize?
    $endgroup$
    – Wolfgang Kais
    Feb 15 at 13:13






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Winning at least one prize is the same as winning exactly one or exactly two prices, so the last two summands.
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 13:51










  • $begingroup$
    Wow, that was really useful! I also used this logic to answer the question posed by @David in the comments, and they summed to 1 as well. Thank you.
    $endgroup$
    – WorldGov
    Feb 15 at 14:00















$begingroup$
Shouldn't you also show the correct probability for winning at least one prize?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Feb 15 at 13:13




$begingroup$
Shouldn't you also show the correct probability for winning at least one prize?
$endgroup$
– Wolfgang Kais
Feb 15 at 13:13




1




1




$begingroup$
Winning at least one prize is the same as winning exactly one or exactly two prices, so the last two summands.
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Feb 15 at 13:51




$begingroup$
Winning at least one prize is the same as winning exactly one or exactly two prices, so the last two summands.
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Feb 15 at 13:51












$begingroup$
Wow, that was really useful! I also used this logic to answer the question posed by @David in the comments, and they summed to 1 as well. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– WorldGov
Feb 15 at 14:00




$begingroup$
Wow, that was really useful! I also used this logic to answer the question posed by @David in the comments, and they summed to 1 as well. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– WorldGov
Feb 15 at 14:00











0












$begingroup$

You can also solve by Binomial as the numbers are large. Hypergeometric distribution used by @Christoph gives the exact probabilities:



Probability that you will get a prize $= frac11000$



probability that you will not get a prize $= frac9991000$



If you buy two tickets, the probability that you will not get a prize is



$approx 2choose0(frac11000)^0(frac9991000)^2$ you will get a sum of 1 in this too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You are using the symbol "$=$" for an approximation. Please stress the fact that this answer does not give the exact probabilities!
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:08











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Done!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:10










  • $begingroup$
    Why a downvote, I am introducing another way to look at the problem!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:27










  • $begingroup$
    I downvoted because this is not an answer to the question "Why do my probabilities do not sum up to $1$?"
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:35










  • $begingroup$
    Although it does not answer the question that the OP asked, it is still a valid answer to the problem posed by OP. I am going to leave it even if it receives further downvotes.
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:38















0












$begingroup$

You can also solve by Binomial as the numbers are large. Hypergeometric distribution used by @Christoph gives the exact probabilities:



Probability that you will get a prize $= frac11000$



probability that you will not get a prize $= frac9991000$



If you buy two tickets, the probability that you will not get a prize is



$approx 2choose0(frac11000)^0(frac9991000)^2$ you will get a sum of 1 in this too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    You are using the symbol "$=$" for an approximation. Please stress the fact that this answer does not give the exact probabilities!
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:08











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Done!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:10










  • $begingroup$
    Why a downvote, I am introducing another way to look at the problem!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:27










  • $begingroup$
    I downvoted because this is not an answer to the question "Why do my probabilities do not sum up to $1$?"
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:35










  • $begingroup$
    Although it does not answer the question that the OP asked, it is still a valid answer to the problem posed by OP. I am going to leave it even if it receives further downvotes.
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:38













0












0








0





$begingroup$

You can also solve by Binomial as the numbers are large. Hypergeometric distribution used by @Christoph gives the exact probabilities:



Probability that you will get a prize $= frac11000$



probability that you will not get a prize $= frac9991000$



If you buy two tickets, the probability that you will not get a prize is



$approx 2choose0(frac11000)^0(frac9991000)^2$ you will get a sum of 1 in this too.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



You can also solve by Binomial as the numbers are large. Hypergeometric distribution used by @Christoph gives the exact probabilities:



Probability that you will get a prize $= frac11000$



probability that you will not get a prize $= frac9991000$



If you buy two tickets, the probability that you will not get a prize is



$approx 2choose0(frac11000)^0(frac9991000)^2$ you will get a sum of 1 in this too.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Feb 15 at 12:09

























answered Feb 15 at 12:02









Satish RamanathanSatish Ramanathan

10k31323




10k31323











  • $begingroup$
    You are using the symbol "$=$" for an approximation. Please stress the fact that this answer does not give the exact probabilities!
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:08











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Done!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:10










  • $begingroup$
    Why a downvote, I am introducing another way to look at the problem!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:27










  • $begingroup$
    I downvoted because this is not an answer to the question "Why do my probabilities do not sum up to $1$?"
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:35










  • $begingroup$
    Although it does not answer the question that the OP asked, it is still a valid answer to the problem posed by OP. I am going to leave it even if it receives further downvotes.
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:38
















  • $begingroup$
    You are using the symbol "$=$" for an approximation. Please stress the fact that this answer does not give the exact probabilities!
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:08











  • $begingroup$
    @Christoph: Done!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:10










  • $begingroup$
    Why a downvote, I am introducing another way to look at the problem!!
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:27










  • $begingroup$
    I downvoted because this is not an answer to the question "Why do my probabilities do not sum up to $1$?"
    $endgroup$
    – Christoph
    Feb 15 at 12:35










  • $begingroup$
    Although it does not answer the question that the OP asked, it is still a valid answer to the problem posed by OP. I am going to leave it even if it receives further downvotes.
    $endgroup$
    – Satish Ramanathan
    Feb 15 at 12:38















$begingroup$
You are using the symbol "$=$" for an approximation. Please stress the fact that this answer does not give the exact probabilities!
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Feb 15 at 12:08





$begingroup$
You are using the symbol "$=$" for an approximation. Please stress the fact that this answer does not give the exact probabilities!
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Feb 15 at 12:08













$begingroup$
@Christoph: Done!!
$endgroup$
– Satish Ramanathan
Feb 15 at 12:10




$begingroup$
@Christoph: Done!!
$endgroup$
– Satish Ramanathan
Feb 15 at 12:10












$begingroup$
Why a downvote, I am introducing another way to look at the problem!!
$endgroup$
– Satish Ramanathan
Feb 15 at 12:27




$begingroup$
Why a downvote, I am introducing another way to look at the problem!!
$endgroup$
– Satish Ramanathan
Feb 15 at 12:27












$begingroup$
I downvoted because this is not an answer to the question "Why do my probabilities do not sum up to $1$?"
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Feb 15 at 12:35




$begingroup$
I downvoted because this is not an answer to the question "Why do my probabilities do not sum up to $1$?"
$endgroup$
– Christoph
Feb 15 at 12:35












$begingroup$
Although it does not answer the question that the OP asked, it is still a valid answer to the problem posed by OP. I am going to leave it even if it receives further downvotes.
$endgroup$
– Satish Ramanathan
Feb 15 at 12:38




$begingroup$
Although it does not answer the question that the OP asked, it is still a valid answer to the problem posed by OP. I am going to leave it even if it receives further downvotes.
$endgroup$
– Satish Ramanathan
Feb 15 at 12:38

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3113812%2fprobability-using-combinatorics-probability-doesnt-sum-to-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

Peggy Mitchell

Palaiologos

The Forum (Inglewood, California)