The unit that is written between parentheses alongside the dB

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












8












$begingroup$


What is the meaning of the unit that is written between parentheses alongside the dB unit? For example 2 dB (mW) or 2 dB (uW)? What exactly does this unit refer to? Does it refers to the unit of the reference value, the measured value (P2), or both?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Unusual notation but I would interpret it as being 2 dB referenced to the unit in brackets.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    related and might already answer the question: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/194755/… but not exactly a duplicate
    $endgroup$
    – Arsenal
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I would interpret 2 dB (mW) as 2 dB over the 1 mW base unit = 1.585 mW
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Feb 15 at 14:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    According to ISO 80000, such an addition of a postscript to the unit symbol dB is incorrect. This information should be carried by the quantity symbol.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Feb 15 at 18:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And here I expected (from the question title) that this would be about dB(A) ...
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Feb 15 at 20:40















8












$begingroup$


What is the meaning of the unit that is written between parentheses alongside the dB unit? For example 2 dB (mW) or 2 dB (uW)? What exactly does this unit refer to? Does it refers to the unit of the reference value, the measured value (P2), or both?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Unusual notation but I would interpret it as being 2 dB referenced to the unit in brackets.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    related and might already answer the question: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/194755/… but not exactly a duplicate
    $endgroup$
    – Arsenal
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I would interpret 2 dB (mW) as 2 dB over the 1 mW base unit = 1.585 mW
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Feb 15 at 14:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    According to ISO 80000, such an addition of a postscript to the unit symbol dB is incorrect. This information should be carried by the quantity symbol.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Feb 15 at 18:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And here I expected (from the question title) that this would be about dB(A) ...
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Feb 15 at 20:40













8












8








8





$begingroup$


What is the meaning of the unit that is written between parentheses alongside the dB unit? For example 2 dB (mW) or 2 dB (uW)? What exactly does this unit refer to? Does it refers to the unit of the reference value, the measured value (P2), or both?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




What is the meaning of the unit that is written between parentheses alongside the dB unit? For example 2 dB (mW) or 2 dB (uW)? What exactly does this unit refer to? Does it refers to the unit of the reference value, the measured value (P2), or both?







decibel






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 15 at 16:06









JYelton

16.3k2891192




16.3k2891192










asked Feb 15 at 14:47









John adamsJohn adams

575




575







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Unusual notation but I would interpret it as being 2 dB referenced to the unit in brackets.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    related and might already answer the question: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/194755/… but not exactly a duplicate
    $endgroup$
    – Arsenal
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I would interpret 2 dB (mW) as 2 dB over the 1 mW base unit = 1.585 mW
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Feb 15 at 14:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    According to ISO 80000, such an addition of a postscript to the unit symbol dB is incorrect. This information should be carried by the quantity symbol.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Feb 15 at 18:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And here I expected (from the question title) that this would be about dB(A) ...
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Feb 15 at 20:40












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Unusual notation but I would interpret it as being 2 dB referenced to the unit in brackets.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Smith
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    related and might already answer the question: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/194755/… but not exactly a duplicate
    $endgroup$
    – Arsenal
    Feb 15 at 14:51






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I would interpret 2 dB (mW) as 2 dB over the 1 mW base unit = 1.585 mW
    $endgroup$
    – winny
    Feb 15 at 14:52






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    According to ISO 80000, such an addition of a postscript to the unit symbol dB is incorrect. This information should be carried by the quantity symbol.
    $endgroup$
    – Loong
    Feb 15 at 18:48






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And here I expected (from the question title) that this would be about dB(A) ...
    $endgroup$
    – Hagen von Eitzen
    Feb 15 at 20:40







1




1




$begingroup$
Unusual notation but I would interpret it as being 2 dB referenced to the unit in brackets.
$endgroup$
– Peter Smith
Feb 15 at 14:51




$begingroup$
Unusual notation but I would interpret it as being 2 dB referenced to the unit in brackets.
$endgroup$
– Peter Smith
Feb 15 at 14:51




1




1




$begingroup$
related and might already answer the question: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/194755/… but not exactly a duplicate
$endgroup$
– Arsenal
Feb 15 at 14:51




$begingroup$
related and might already answer the question: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/194755/… but not exactly a duplicate
$endgroup$
– Arsenal
Feb 15 at 14:51




4




4




$begingroup$
I would interpret 2 dB (mW) as 2 dB over the 1 mW base unit = 1.585 mW
$endgroup$
– winny
Feb 15 at 14:52




$begingroup$
I would interpret 2 dB (mW) as 2 dB over the 1 mW base unit = 1.585 mW
$endgroup$
– winny
Feb 15 at 14:52




1




1




$begingroup$
According to ISO 80000, such an addition of a postscript to the unit symbol dB is incorrect. This information should be carried by the quantity symbol.
$endgroup$
– Loong
Feb 15 at 18:48




$begingroup$
According to ISO 80000, such an addition of a postscript to the unit symbol dB is incorrect. This information should be carried by the quantity symbol.
$endgroup$
– Loong
Feb 15 at 18:48




1




1




$begingroup$
And here I expected (from the question title) that this would be about dB(A) ...
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Feb 15 at 20:40




$begingroup$
And here I expected (from the question title) that this would be about dB(A) ...
$endgroup$
– Hagen von Eitzen
Feb 15 at 20:40










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

dB is a measure of ratio, nothing more.



As such, if an absolute measurement is expressed in dB, then we need to know what the denominator of that ratio is.



For frequently used units, like dBm for instance, the string 'dBm' is a recognised standard way of expressing 'dB with respect to 1mW'.



Some writers baulk at combining dB directly with a unit, and so the practice has grown up of putting the reference level in brackets, for clarity, giving us dB(unit). Some people write dB(mW), it means exactly the same as dBm.



As a ratio, dB is dimensionless. The quantity expressed by dB(unit) will therefore have the same dimensions as the unit.



In some fields, it's not uncommon to see the unit being left off, which is very naughty, but unfortunately very common. I often read reports of sound having a level of so many dBs. You can usually guess what the default reference level is.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sound is usually dB relative to the threshold of human hearing, right? Something like dBmPa or dBμPa or whatever. Edit: looked it up, I suppose that would be dB (20 μPa). dB(SPL) seems to be a more common term.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Feb 15 at 15:53







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Hearth I most often see "dB (SPL)". Properly, a weighting should be indicated, but I think A weighting is assumed if none is specified. In the US, laws about sound pressure levels are all with reference to A-weighted values, so at least in The States that's the default.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Feb 15 at 17:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ToddWilcox for A weighting (or B and C) I would write dB A while dB SPL generally means a flat frequency weighting and a 20 $mu$Pa reference. dB HL would be referenced to the norms of hearing and the corresponding dB SPL depends on the frequency and headphones/transducer. dB SL (sensation level) is referenced to the hearing of the individual.
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    Feb 15 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    dB is always a measure of power ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Feb 15 at 20:55










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f422479%2fthe-unit-that-is-written-between-parentheses-alongside-the-db%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12












$begingroup$

dB is a measure of ratio, nothing more.



As such, if an absolute measurement is expressed in dB, then we need to know what the denominator of that ratio is.



For frequently used units, like dBm for instance, the string 'dBm' is a recognised standard way of expressing 'dB with respect to 1mW'.



Some writers baulk at combining dB directly with a unit, and so the practice has grown up of putting the reference level in brackets, for clarity, giving us dB(unit). Some people write dB(mW), it means exactly the same as dBm.



As a ratio, dB is dimensionless. The quantity expressed by dB(unit) will therefore have the same dimensions as the unit.



In some fields, it's not uncommon to see the unit being left off, which is very naughty, but unfortunately very common. I often read reports of sound having a level of so many dBs. You can usually guess what the default reference level is.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sound is usually dB relative to the threshold of human hearing, right? Something like dBmPa or dBμPa or whatever. Edit: looked it up, I suppose that would be dB (20 μPa). dB(SPL) seems to be a more common term.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Feb 15 at 15:53







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Hearth I most often see "dB (SPL)". Properly, a weighting should be indicated, but I think A weighting is assumed if none is specified. In the US, laws about sound pressure levels are all with reference to A-weighted values, so at least in The States that's the default.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Feb 15 at 17:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ToddWilcox for A weighting (or B and C) I would write dB A while dB SPL generally means a flat frequency weighting and a 20 $mu$Pa reference. dB HL would be referenced to the norms of hearing and the corresponding dB SPL depends on the frequency and headphones/transducer. dB SL (sensation level) is referenced to the hearing of the individual.
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    Feb 15 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    dB is always a measure of power ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Feb 15 at 20:55















12












$begingroup$

dB is a measure of ratio, nothing more.



As such, if an absolute measurement is expressed in dB, then we need to know what the denominator of that ratio is.



For frequently used units, like dBm for instance, the string 'dBm' is a recognised standard way of expressing 'dB with respect to 1mW'.



Some writers baulk at combining dB directly with a unit, and so the practice has grown up of putting the reference level in brackets, for clarity, giving us dB(unit). Some people write dB(mW), it means exactly the same as dBm.



As a ratio, dB is dimensionless. The quantity expressed by dB(unit) will therefore have the same dimensions as the unit.



In some fields, it's not uncommon to see the unit being left off, which is very naughty, but unfortunately very common. I often read reports of sound having a level of so many dBs. You can usually guess what the default reference level is.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sound is usually dB relative to the threshold of human hearing, right? Something like dBmPa or dBμPa or whatever. Edit: looked it up, I suppose that would be dB (20 μPa). dB(SPL) seems to be a more common term.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Feb 15 at 15:53







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Hearth I most often see "dB (SPL)". Properly, a weighting should be indicated, but I think A weighting is assumed if none is specified. In the US, laws about sound pressure levels are all with reference to A-weighted values, so at least in The States that's the default.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Feb 15 at 17:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ToddWilcox for A weighting (or B and C) I would write dB A while dB SPL generally means a flat frequency weighting and a 20 $mu$Pa reference. dB HL would be referenced to the norms of hearing and the corresponding dB SPL depends on the frequency and headphones/transducer. dB SL (sensation level) is referenced to the hearing of the individual.
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    Feb 15 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    dB is always a measure of power ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Feb 15 at 20:55













12












12








12





$begingroup$

dB is a measure of ratio, nothing more.



As such, if an absolute measurement is expressed in dB, then we need to know what the denominator of that ratio is.



For frequently used units, like dBm for instance, the string 'dBm' is a recognised standard way of expressing 'dB with respect to 1mW'.



Some writers baulk at combining dB directly with a unit, and so the practice has grown up of putting the reference level in brackets, for clarity, giving us dB(unit). Some people write dB(mW), it means exactly the same as dBm.



As a ratio, dB is dimensionless. The quantity expressed by dB(unit) will therefore have the same dimensions as the unit.



In some fields, it's not uncommon to see the unit being left off, which is very naughty, but unfortunately very common. I often read reports of sound having a level of so many dBs. You can usually guess what the default reference level is.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



dB is a measure of ratio, nothing more.



As such, if an absolute measurement is expressed in dB, then we need to know what the denominator of that ratio is.



For frequently used units, like dBm for instance, the string 'dBm' is a recognised standard way of expressing 'dB with respect to 1mW'.



Some writers baulk at combining dB directly with a unit, and so the practice has grown up of putting the reference level in brackets, for clarity, giving us dB(unit). Some people write dB(mW), it means exactly the same as dBm.



As a ratio, dB is dimensionless. The quantity expressed by dB(unit) will therefore have the same dimensions as the unit.



In some fields, it's not uncommon to see the unit being left off, which is very naughty, but unfortunately very common. I often read reports of sound having a level of so many dBs. You can usually guess what the default reference level is.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 15 at 17:04

























answered Feb 15 at 15:41









Neil_UKNeil_UK

77.2k283176




77.2k283176







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sound is usually dB relative to the threshold of human hearing, right? Something like dBmPa or dBμPa or whatever. Edit: looked it up, I suppose that would be dB (20 μPa). dB(SPL) seems to be a more common term.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Feb 15 at 15:53







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Hearth I most often see "dB (SPL)". Properly, a weighting should be indicated, but I think A weighting is assumed if none is specified. In the US, laws about sound pressure levels are all with reference to A-weighted values, so at least in The States that's the default.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Feb 15 at 17:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ToddWilcox for A weighting (or B and C) I would write dB A while dB SPL generally means a flat frequency weighting and a 20 $mu$Pa reference. dB HL would be referenced to the norms of hearing and the corresponding dB SPL depends on the frequency and headphones/transducer. dB SL (sensation level) is referenced to the hearing of the individual.
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    Feb 15 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    dB is always a measure of power ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Feb 15 at 20:55












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Sound is usually dB relative to the threshold of human hearing, right? Something like dBmPa or dBμPa or whatever. Edit: looked it up, I suppose that would be dB (20 μPa). dB(SPL) seems to be a more common term.
    $endgroup$
    – Hearth
    Feb 15 at 15:53







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Hearth I most often see "dB (SPL)". Properly, a weighting should be indicated, but I think A weighting is assumed if none is specified. In the US, laws about sound pressure levels are all with reference to A-weighted values, so at least in The States that's the default.
    $endgroup$
    – Todd Wilcox
    Feb 15 at 17:03






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @ToddWilcox for A weighting (or B and C) I would write dB A while dB SPL generally means a flat frequency weighting and a 20 $mu$Pa reference. dB HL would be referenced to the norms of hearing and the corresponding dB SPL depends on the frequency and headphones/transducer. dB SL (sensation level) is referenced to the hearing of the individual.
    $endgroup$
    – StrongBad
    Feb 15 at 18:33










  • $begingroup$
    dB is always a measure of power ratio.
    $endgroup$
    – Mike Waters
    Feb 15 at 20:55







1




1




$begingroup$
Sound is usually dB relative to the threshold of human hearing, right? Something like dBmPa or dBμPa or whatever. Edit: looked it up, I suppose that would be dB (20 μPa). dB(SPL) seems to be a more common term.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Feb 15 at 15:53





$begingroup$
Sound is usually dB relative to the threshold of human hearing, right? Something like dBmPa or dBμPa or whatever. Edit: looked it up, I suppose that would be dB (20 μPa). dB(SPL) seems to be a more common term.
$endgroup$
– Hearth
Feb 15 at 15:53





1




1




$begingroup$
@Hearth I most often see "dB (SPL)". Properly, a weighting should be indicated, but I think A weighting is assumed if none is specified. In the US, laws about sound pressure levels are all with reference to A-weighted values, so at least in The States that's the default.
$endgroup$
– Todd Wilcox
Feb 15 at 17:03




$begingroup$
@Hearth I most often see "dB (SPL)". Properly, a weighting should be indicated, but I think A weighting is assumed if none is specified. In the US, laws about sound pressure levels are all with reference to A-weighted values, so at least in The States that's the default.
$endgroup$
– Todd Wilcox
Feb 15 at 17:03




1




1




$begingroup$
@ToddWilcox for A weighting (or B and C) I would write dB A while dB SPL generally means a flat frequency weighting and a 20 $mu$Pa reference. dB HL would be referenced to the norms of hearing and the corresponding dB SPL depends on the frequency and headphones/transducer. dB SL (sensation level) is referenced to the hearing of the individual.
$endgroup$
– StrongBad
Feb 15 at 18:33




$begingroup$
@ToddWilcox for A weighting (or B and C) I would write dB A while dB SPL generally means a flat frequency weighting and a 20 $mu$Pa reference. dB HL would be referenced to the norms of hearing and the corresponding dB SPL depends on the frequency and headphones/transducer. dB SL (sensation level) is referenced to the hearing of the individual.
$endgroup$
– StrongBad
Feb 15 at 18:33












$begingroup$
dB is always a measure of power ratio.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Feb 15 at 20:55




$begingroup$
dB is always a measure of power ratio.
$endgroup$
– Mike Waters
Feb 15 at 20:55

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f422479%2fthe-unit-that-is-written-between-parentheses-alongside-the-db%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay