mjhjmtu

I can read English. I could read a thesis about nuclear science, or whatever, but it wouldn't make a lot of sense to m, although anyone listening may be able to understand what was being read.

Sight-reading is a great skill to have, but I don't think that that, in itself, will particularly give you a great insight into music, or music theory. Learning how to sight-read may well help, as there are certain premises and facts that are important to know and understand whilst learning how to sight-read.

So, studying theory - with the all important practical playing in tandem to make it make sense - is your better route, learning how to sight-read on the way will help, but purely sight-reading things won't necessarily give you much insight into music. Apart from being able to pick up anything, and play it, so bringing that sheet music to life, and perhaps meeting other genres that, if you can't sight-read, may be denied.

(This answer addresses the original posted question, not the subsequent edit.)

I don't see how sight reading would help with learning the fundamentals of music theory, but there is a very strong case of the converse: a better understanding of music theory makes you a better sight reader.

So much of the "Classical" repertoire is built around fundamental patterns of scales and triads. When a pianist simply knows their scales, sight reading a Mozart piano sonata becomes much easier. Instead of tallying a string of 50 straight sixteenth notes, a student adequately trained in music theory will recognize those sixteenths notes as patterns of the A-major scale; the music then almost plays itself.

In the world of jazz, a string of nine chord changes might look completely foreign to someone untrained in music theory. But the adequately trained student recognizes it as a string of ii–V–I progressions; now suddenly the student hearkens back to their training and the improvisation flows naturally.

Keep in mind too that "music theory" isn't just written theory; it also involves ear training. Musicians that "don't want to be a classical nor professional interpreter" often prefer to play by ear. In such cases, the knowledge of common chord patterns makes playing by ear (not to mention composing) much easier and much more successful.

I want to understand music, its elements and details to be able to
express myself with no more limitations than my abilities.

The trouble is, we DO limit ourselves to our abilities. If our musical journey is limited to 'monkey see, monkey do' we're only going to understand music that we can play, on our chosen instrument, at our level of technique.

It's useful to see music as notation. It can also be quite an eye-opener to see it as graphic display on a sequencer screen (but that's 'notation' too!) particularly when it's a performance not a quantized construction.

And yes, even a skilled, reading pianist has to consciously break away from writing stuff that lies under 10 fingers on a keyboard! (But he can, quite easily. His technique isn't a disability.)

Standard notation inherently relates to a certain model of what music is - for example

• The idea that music is made of 'notes' and 'rests'


• The idea of rhythms as being constructed of units of time that are hierarchical subdivisions of a bar


• the idea that a piece of music is assumed to be diatonic and can be said to be in a certain key

(There's no reason you have to think of music as being made of 'notes', or having a 'key' - that's just a particular model, albeit a very common one).

The more used to standard notation you are, the better you will be at thinking of music from the perspective of the model that is implied by standard notation. But if thinking of music in that way is already straightforward for you, then it might be that there isn't any major new musical concept that sight-reading or reading music is going to teach you.

That isn't to say that reading music might not be an incredibly valuable skill, of course. But then learning Chinese, or real estate law, or welding could also be incredibly valuable too. You have to focus your efforts where it seems the return will be greatest.

I want to understand music, its elements and details to be able to express myself with no more limitations than my abilities. Beyond some basic knowledge of notation, is there any fundamental element of music that sight reading would help me to understand better? I'm thinking in rhythm but not sure.

After reading your waste introduction I assume that you actually mean understanding sheet music as you mention just some basic knowledge of notation and the 10 elements of music ...

Reading and understanding of sheet music will be of an interactive benefit for the process of understanding music theory, listening, analyzing and also for the skill of sight reading. Each moment you are investigating to improve your skills for reading scales, intervals, triads and all sorts of chords, rhythm, solfège, clefs and scores will have agreat benefit for all other occupations with music, also for someone who comes from computer music or any instrument.

Don’t forget that all the genius performers who were musical analphabethists were not those genies because they were lacking of reading knowledge, they didn’t know to read sheet music because they were poor and didn’t have the opportunity to learn it.

Reading is pretty basic to understanding theory, because we name things differently based on the notation (e.g. an augmented fourth sounds the same as a diminished fifth). Reading also gives a notation to rhythm, and articulation through slurs, legato lines, staccato dots, etc.

In any field it's useful to have some kind of nomenclature. It gives you something to wrap your head around and communicate with others. You could get along by demonstrating what you mean if you don't have a language to describe it, but notation gives you a faster and clearer method.

That said, "sight" reading means being able to interepret a piece that you haven't seen before. I think it's a useful skill for the work I do as a guitarist, but it's certainly not essential for all guitarists, and the speed at which you can recognize things like intervals and chords isn't much of a barrier to understanding music theory - if you can follow and understand the written examples in theory texts, you're reading skills are sufficient, and reading faster won't help al that much.

You have to see that musical sheets gives to you only 2 things:

1. WHAT to play/execute;


2. HOW to play/execute.

For the first one the sheets will brings to you all the notes or elements which are contained in the song. Is valid reforce that music is not made only of sound and notes but it is made by silence as well. Then this part brings this elements for you.

Once you know what you need to play (or even sing) the song now you have to know how to perform these elements and this will took by the second topic. If you know all notes and silences you have to do, the sheet music will teach you the durations, expressions, dynamics or even feeling.

Knowing this you see that sheets can not teach you any music rules or theory, but you don't have to quit from its learning.

Why?

Answering: you need to know that sheets are the VISUAL form of a sound. We only can LISTEN to a sound, but we can't see it. The sheet is the way that humans can to SEE the song.

Then, if you really want be a person that understand music you really have to do it completelly, and learn sheet reading is a part of this knownledge.

While the primary purpose of sheet music may be a way to communicate musical works so that a musician can play the piece that the composer intended,
it is also a (practically) universal language among musicians to describe notes, scales, chords, and other elements of music.

You could probably express a lot of the ideas of music theory in a digital format, or even in guitar tablature, but the number of people who would be able to read it (or write more theory in the same format) is much more limited.

If you want to learn theory, you'll need a teacher (or teachers) and you'll need to be able to receive instruction about music in a form in which they know how to deliver it. It's possible to learn quite a bit of theory merely by ear, without writing any notes, but to really learn a substantial amount of theory I think you need some way for people to be able to notate the ideas for you, and standard music notation is the way most teachers understand. So it's probably a good idea to learn enough of it to follow the theory lessons.

To borrow an analogy from another answer, there are fields of study where almost all current material is published in English. You could learn some of one of those fields in a different language, but if you want to really be up to date in the field, it pays to learn English. Knowing English won't make you a good nuclear physicist, but not knowing English might prevent you from becoming a good nuclear physicist.

It is hugely beneficial for learning to be able to read and write. Without this ability you're illiterate. You could develop your own writing system, but then you would have to teach that system to anybody else you want to communicate with, and most probably your system would suffer from many first-generation deficiencies. Using the same common system of written language as other people is hugely beneficial too. Traditional Western musical notation has been developed through centuries of practice by countless people, for communicating music-related ideas to other people. Performers, composers, arrangers, theorists. And not just any ideas and aspects, but those ideas and aspects that all the people have deemed to be actually relevant, in a way that they have deemed to be actually practical.

Learning a language enables you to interact with a culture, people using the language. If you think you're a self-sufficient entity and don't need to be in touch with the part of musical culture and history that uses musical notation... Okay. :)

If you're not convinced yet, it would be possible to list all the useful technical properties of musical notation, but it would be an endless list. I think it should suffice to say "just learn it or otherwise you're illiterate". Though on the other hand, of course nowadays we have Youtube videos, speech recognition and everything, so we can gradually fade away this awkward reading and writing thing. ;)