Traceroute doesn't show one hop?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












4















I have an interesting issue where my traceroute skips one hop on the way. I do not know why but it seems to be some kind of Juniper behaviour which I do not understand yet. Blue routers are Cisco machines, The other PC-like icons are Juniper routers.



I have this topology:
enter image description here



But when I do a CE2: traceroute 172.16.0.1 (to CE1 Lo0 interface) I get the following:



root> traceroute 172.16.0.1 
traceroute to 172.16.0.1 (172.16.0.1), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 192.168.1.9 (192.168.1.9) 2.514 ms 1.861 ms 1.393 ms
2 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1) 5.597 ms 6.516 ms 5.480 ms
MPLS Label=300160 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
3 10.0.2.5 (10.0.2.5) 5.618 ms 6.154 ms 5.312 ms
MPLS Label=300 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=2 S=1
4 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 5.742 ms 5.344 ms 5.366 ms
MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
5 172.16.1.9 (172.16.1.9) 5.550 ms 4.752 ms 4.675 ms
MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
6 172.16.1.10 (172.16.1.10) 5.315 ms 5.238 ms 5.532 ms

root>


And I try the same thing from the other side CE1: traceroute 192.168.0.1 (to CE2 interface Lo0) I get this:



CE1#traceroute 192.168.0.1 
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 1 msec 0 msec
2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 201/16 Exp 0] 5 msec 5 msec 4 msec
3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
5 192.168.0.1 5 msec 6 msec 6 msec
CE1#


As you can see, the PE2_2 router is not present in the output?
Can anyone please explain why this occurs?










share|improve this question




























    4















    I have an interesting issue where my traceroute skips one hop on the way. I do not know why but it seems to be some kind of Juniper behaviour which I do not understand yet. Blue routers are Cisco machines, The other PC-like icons are Juniper routers.



    I have this topology:
    enter image description here



    But when I do a CE2: traceroute 172.16.0.1 (to CE1 Lo0 interface) I get the following:



    root> traceroute 172.16.0.1 
    traceroute to 172.16.0.1 (172.16.0.1), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
    1 192.168.1.9 (192.168.1.9) 2.514 ms 1.861 ms 1.393 ms
    2 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1) 5.597 ms 6.516 ms 5.480 ms
    MPLS Label=300160 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
    MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
    3 10.0.2.5 (10.0.2.5) 5.618 ms 6.154 ms 5.312 ms
    MPLS Label=300 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
    MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
    MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=2 S=1
    4 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 5.742 ms 5.344 ms 5.366 ms
    MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
    MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
    5 172.16.1.9 (172.16.1.9) 5.550 ms 4.752 ms 4.675 ms
    MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
    6 172.16.1.10 (172.16.1.10) 5.315 ms 5.238 ms 5.532 ms

    root>


    And I try the same thing from the other side CE1: traceroute 192.168.0.1 (to CE2 interface Lo0) I get this:



    CE1#traceroute 192.168.0.1 
    Type escape sequence to abort.
    Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
    1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 1 msec 0 msec
    2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 201/16 Exp 0] 5 msec 5 msec 4 msec
    3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
    4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
    5 192.168.0.1 5 msec 6 msec 6 msec
    CE1#


    As you can see, the PE2_2 router is not present in the output?
    Can anyone please explain why this occurs?










    share|improve this question


























      4












      4








      4








      I have an interesting issue where my traceroute skips one hop on the way. I do not know why but it seems to be some kind of Juniper behaviour which I do not understand yet. Blue routers are Cisco machines, The other PC-like icons are Juniper routers.



      I have this topology:
      enter image description here



      But when I do a CE2: traceroute 172.16.0.1 (to CE1 Lo0 interface) I get the following:



      root> traceroute 172.16.0.1 
      traceroute to 172.16.0.1 (172.16.0.1), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
      1 192.168.1.9 (192.168.1.9) 2.514 ms 1.861 ms 1.393 ms
      2 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1) 5.597 ms 6.516 ms 5.480 ms
      MPLS Label=300160 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
      3 10.0.2.5 (10.0.2.5) 5.618 ms 6.154 ms 5.312 ms
      MPLS Label=300 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=2 S=1
      4 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 5.742 ms 5.344 ms 5.366 ms
      MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
      5 172.16.1.9 (172.16.1.9) 5.550 ms 4.752 ms 4.675 ms
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
      6 172.16.1.10 (172.16.1.10) 5.315 ms 5.238 ms 5.532 ms

      root>


      And I try the same thing from the other side CE1: traceroute 192.168.0.1 (to CE2 interface Lo0) I get this:



      CE1#traceroute 192.168.0.1 
      Type escape sequence to abort.
      Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
      VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
      1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 1 msec 0 msec
      2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 201/16 Exp 0] 5 msec 5 msec 4 msec
      3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
      4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
      5 192.168.0.1 5 msec 6 msec 6 msec
      CE1#


      As you can see, the PE2_2 router is not present in the output?
      Can anyone please explain why this occurs?










      share|improve this question
















      I have an interesting issue where my traceroute skips one hop on the way. I do not know why but it seems to be some kind of Juniper behaviour which I do not understand yet. Blue routers are Cisco machines, The other PC-like icons are Juniper routers.



      I have this topology:
      enter image description here



      But when I do a CE2: traceroute 172.16.0.1 (to CE1 Lo0 interface) I get the following:



      root> traceroute 172.16.0.1 
      traceroute to 172.16.0.1 (172.16.0.1), 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
      1 192.168.1.9 (192.168.1.9) 2.514 ms 1.861 ms 1.393 ms
      2 10.0.3.1 (10.0.3.1) 5.597 ms 6.516 ms 5.480 ms
      MPLS Label=300160 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
      3 10.0.2.5 (10.0.2.5) 5.618 ms 6.154 ms 5.312 ms
      MPLS Label=300 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=2 S=1
      4 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1) 5.742 ms 5.344 ms 5.366 ms
      MPLS Label=203 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
      5 172.16.1.9 (172.16.1.9) 5.550 ms 4.752 ms 4.675 ms
      MPLS Label=18 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1
      6 172.16.1.10 (172.16.1.10) 5.315 ms 5.238 ms 5.532 ms

      root>


      And I try the same thing from the other side CE1: traceroute 192.168.0.1 (to CE2 interface Lo0) I get this:



      CE1#traceroute 192.168.0.1 
      Type escape sequence to abort.
      Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
      VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
      1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 1 msec 0 msec
      2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 201/16 Exp 0] 5 msec 5 msec 4 msec
      3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
      4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 300144/16 Exp 0] 4 msec 4 msec 4 msec
      5 192.168.0.1 5 msec 6 msec 6 msec
      CE1#


      As you can see, the PE2_2 router is not present in the output?
      Can anyone please explain why this occurs?







      cisco juniper mpls vrf






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 27 at 4:28









      Cœur

      1033




      1033










      asked Jan 26 at 16:06









      RadovanRadovan

      765




      765




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          traceroute works by using probe packets with increasing TTL values. The hop where a packet's TTL times out is supposed to return an time exceeded ICMP message which is processed and displayed by traceroute. If a hop doesn't decrement the TTL you simply don't see it.



          Apparently, PE2_2 doesn't decrement TTL in that path - without the (sanitized) configuration we won't be able to tell you why.






          share|improve this answer
































            3














            That is how MPLS works. The packet doesn't get routed at that point, it is label switched.



            Traceroute works by having the packet TTL expire and an ICMP message is sent back saying that the packet expired. Routers will decrement the TTL as they route the packet. MPLS doesn't route packets, it places labels on the packet and switches based on the labels. That means the router doesn't route the packet, so it doesn't decrement the TTL, and the TTL doesn't expire.



            If you use some other type of tunnel, you will observe the same behavior because the outer packet of the tunnel will have its TTL decremented, not the traceroute packet TTL, so the traceroute packet header TTL will not expire.



            Basically, a tunnel looks like a single hop to the original traceroute packet, and the intermediate routes probably do not have a route back to the source host to even be able to send an ICMP timeout.






            share|improve this answer
































              1














              Weirdly enough, this was caused by a command on PE2_2 juniper.



              delete routing-instances L3VPN-1 vrf-table-label solved this behaviour, now i get:



              CE1#trace 192.168.0.1
              Type escape sequence to abort.
              Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
              VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
              1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 0 msec 0 msec
              2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 205/299792 Exp 0] 6 msec 6 msec 5 msec
              3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 6 msec 5 msec
              4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 8 msec 5 msec
              5 10.0.3.2 [MPLS: Label 299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 3 msec 3 msec
              6 192.168.0.1 5 msec 5 msec 5 msec
              CE1#


              Still not sure what happened there. Cheers






              share|improve this answer






















                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "496"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                noCode: true, onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56408%2ftraceroute-doesnt-show-one-hop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                3














                traceroute works by using probe packets with increasing TTL values. The hop where a packet's TTL times out is supposed to return an time exceeded ICMP message which is processed and displayed by traceroute. If a hop doesn't decrement the TTL you simply don't see it.



                Apparently, PE2_2 doesn't decrement TTL in that path - without the (sanitized) configuration we won't be able to tell you why.






                share|improve this answer





























                  3














                  traceroute works by using probe packets with increasing TTL values. The hop where a packet's TTL times out is supposed to return an time exceeded ICMP message which is processed and displayed by traceroute. If a hop doesn't decrement the TTL you simply don't see it.



                  Apparently, PE2_2 doesn't decrement TTL in that path - without the (sanitized) configuration we won't be able to tell you why.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    3












                    3








                    3







                    traceroute works by using probe packets with increasing TTL values. The hop where a packet's TTL times out is supposed to return an time exceeded ICMP message which is processed and displayed by traceroute. If a hop doesn't decrement the TTL you simply don't see it.



                    Apparently, PE2_2 doesn't decrement TTL in that path - without the (sanitized) configuration we won't be able to tell you why.






                    share|improve this answer















                    traceroute works by using probe packets with increasing TTL values. The hop where a packet's TTL times out is supposed to return an time exceeded ICMP message which is processed and displayed by traceroute. If a hop doesn't decrement the TTL you simply don't see it.



                    Apparently, PE2_2 doesn't decrement TTL in that path - without the (sanitized) configuration we won't be able to tell you why.







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Jan 26 at 16:30

























                    answered Jan 26 at 16:15









                    Zac67Zac67

                    29.4k21859




                    29.4k21859





















                        3














                        That is how MPLS works. The packet doesn't get routed at that point, it is label switched.



                        Traceroute works by having the packet TTL expire and an ICMP message is sent back saying that the packet expired. Routers will decrement the TTL as they route the packet. MPLS doesn't route packets, it places labels on the packet and switches based on the labels. That means the router doesn't route the packet, so it doesn't decrement the TTL, and the TTL doesn't expire.



                        If you use some other type of tunnel, you will observe the same behavior because the outer packet of the tunnel will have its TTL decremented, not the traceroute packet TTL, so the traceroute packet header TTL will not expire.



                        Basically, a tunnel looks like a single hop to the original traceroute packet, and the intermediate routes probably do not have a route back to the source host to even be able to send an ICMP timeout.






                        share|improve this answer





























                          3














                          That is how MPLS works. The packet doesn't get routed at that point, it is label switched.



                          Traceroute works by having the packet TTL expire and an ICMP message is sent back saying that the packet expired. Routers will decrement the TTL as they route the packet. MPLS doesn't route packets, it places labels on the packet and switches based on the labels. That means the router doesn't route the packet, so it doesn't decrement the TTL, and the TTL doesn't expire.



                          If you use some other type of tunnel, you will observe the same behavior because the outer packet of the tunnel will have its TTL decremented, not the traceroute packet TTL, so the traceroute packet header TTL will not expire.



                          Basically, a tunnel looks like a single hop to the original traceroute packet, and the intermediate routes probably do not have a route back to the source host to even be able to send an ICMP timeout.






                          share|improve this answer



























                            3












                            3








                            3







                            That is how MPLS works. The packet doesn't get routed at that point, it is label switched.



                            Traceroute works by having the packet TTL expire and an ICMP message is sent back saying that the packet expired. Routers will decrement the TTL as they route the packet. MPLS doesn't route packets, it places labels on the packet and switches based on the labels. That means the router doesn't route the packet, so it doesn't decrement the TTL, and the TTL doesn't expire.



                            If you use some other type of tunnel, you will observe the same behavior because the outer packet of the tunnel will have its TTL decremented, not the traceroute packet TTL, so the traceroute packet header TTL will not expire.



                            Basically, a tunnel looks like a single hop to the original traceroute packet, and the intermediate routes probably do not have a route back to the source host to even be able to send an ICMP timeout.






                            share|improve this answer















                            That is how MPLS works. The packet doesn't get routed at that point, it is label switched.



                            Traceroute works by having the packet TTL expire and an ICMP message is sent back saying that the packet expired. Routers will decrement the TTL as they route the packet. MPLS doesn't route packets, it places labels on the packet and switches based on the labels. That means the router doesn't route the packet, so it doesn't decrement the TTL, and the TTL doesn't expire.



                            If you use some other type of tunnel, you will observe the same behavior because the outer packet of the tunnel will have its TTL decremented, not the traceroute packet TTL, so the traceroute packet header TTL will not expire.



                            Basically, a tunnel looks like a single hop to the original traceroute packet, and the intermediate routes probably do not have a route back to the source host to even be able to send an ICMP timeout.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Jan 26 at 17:07

























                            answered Jan 26 at 16:17









                            Ron MaupinRon Maupin

                            65.1k1368122




                            65.1k1368122





















                                1














                                Weirdly enough, this was caused by a command on PE2_2 juniper.



                                delete routing-instances L3VPN-1 vrf-table-label solved this behaviour, now i get:



                                CE1#trace 192.168.0.1
                                Type escape sequence to abort.
                                Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
                                VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
                                1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 0 msec 0 msec
                                2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 205/299792 Exp 0] 6 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 8 msec 5 msec
                                5 10.0.3.2 [MPLS: Label 299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 3 msec 3 msec
                                6 192.168.0.1 5 msec 5 msec 5 msec
                                CE1#


                                Still not sure what happened there. Cheers






                                share|improve this answer



























                                  1














                                  Weirdly enough, this was caused by a command on PE2_2 juniper.



                                  delete routing-instances L3VPN-1 vrf-table-label solved this behaviour, now i get:



                                  CE1#trace 192.168.0.1
                                  Type escape sequence to abort.
                                  Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
                                  VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
                                  1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 0 msec 0 msec
                                  2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 205/299792 Exp 0] 6 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                  3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                  4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 8 msec 5 msec
                                  5 10.0.3.2 [MPLS: Label 299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 3 msec 3 msec
                                  6 192.168.0.1 5 msec 5 msec 5 msec
                                  CE1#


                                  Still not sure what happened there. Cheers






                                  share|improve this answer

























                                    1












                                    1








                                    1







                                    Weirdly enough, this was caused by a command on PE2_2 juniper.



                                    delete routing-instances L3VPN-1 vrf-table-label solved this behaviour, now i get:



                                    CE1#trace 192.168.0.1
                                    Type escape sequence to abort.
                                    Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
                                    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
                                    1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 0 msec 0 msec
                                    2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 205/299792 Exp 0] 6 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                    3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                    4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 8 msec 5 msec
                                    5 10.0.3.2 [MPLS: Label 299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 3 msec 3 msec
                                    6 192.168.0.1 5 msec 5 msec 5 msec
                                    CE1#


                                    Still not sure what happened there. Cheers






                                    share|improve this answer













                                    Weirdly enough, this was caused by a command on PE2_2 juniper.



                                    delete routing-instances L3VPN-1 vrf-table-label solved this behaviour, now i get:



                                    CE1#trace 192.168.0.1
                                    Type escape sequence to abort.
                                    Tracing the route to 192.168.0.1
                                    VRF info: (vrf in name/id, vrf out name/id)
                                    1 172.16.1.9 1 msec 0 msec 0 msec
                                    2 10.0.1.2 [MPLS: Labels 205/299792 Exp 0] 6 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                    3 10.0.2.2 [MPLS: Labels 301/299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 6 msec 5 msec
                                    4 10.0.2.6 [MPLS: Labels 299888/299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 8 msec 5 msec
                                    5 10.0.3.2 [MPLS: Label 299792 Exp 0] 5 msec 3 msec 3 msec
                                    6 192.168.0.1 5 msec 5 msec 5 msec
                                    CE1#


                                    Still not sure what happened there. Cheers







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered Jan 26 at 21:21









                                    RadovanRadovan

                                    765




                                    765



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56408%2ftraceroute-doesnt-show-one-hop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown






                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                        Bahrain

                                        Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay