Different formulas for copper pyrites and bauxite
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
In my book in the chapter on General Principles and Processes of Isolation of Elements, I found that the formula for copper pyrites was stated as $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ at one place, $ceCuFeS2$ at another place and $ceCu2FeS2$ at another place.
Are all these taken to be the formula for copper pyrites or are these printing mistakes. I have searched the internet but could not find any useful information regarding this.
inorganic-chemistry notation metallurgy
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my book in the chapter on General Principles and Processes of Isolation of Elements, I found that the formula for copper pyrites was stated as $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ at one place, $ceCuFeS2$ at another place and $ceCu2FeS2$ at another place.
Are all these taken to be the formula for copper pyrites or are these printing mistakes. I have searched the internet but could not find any useful information regarding this.
inorganic-chemistry notation metallurgy
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my book in the chapter on General Principles and Processes of Isolation of Elements, I found that the formula for copper pyrites was stated as $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ at one place, $ceCuFeS2$ at another place and $ceCu2FeS2$ at another place.
Are all these taken to be the formula for copper pyrites or are these printing mistakes. I have searched the internet but could not find any useful information regarding this.
inorganic-chemistry notation metallurgy
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
$endgroup$
In my book in the chapter on General Principles and Processes of Isolation of Elements, I found that the formula for copper pyrites was stated as $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ at one place, $ceCuFeS2$ at another place and $ceCu2FeS2$ at another place.
Are all these taken to be the formula for copper pyrites or are these printing mistakes. I have searched the internet but could not find any useful information regarding this.
inorganic-chemistry notation metallurgy
inorganic-chemistry notation metallurgy
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
edited Jan 26 at 19:43
andselisk
16.1k653114
16.1k653114
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
asked Jan 26 at 18:45
MrAPMrAP
29721034
29721034
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Both $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ and $ceCuFeS2$ are the equivalent means to denote chalcopyrite. The first notation, $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$, commonly used a few decades ago, shows that two sulfides are not just a mechanical mix, but form a chemical compound (same as for crystallohydrates, e.g. $ceCuSO4 * 5 H2O$). The second one, $ceCuFeS2$, is a formula unit, a more universal and modern representation. Chalcopyrite is a mineral of $ceABX2$ type, crystallizes in $Ibar42d$ space group.
Figure 1. Unit cell of chalcopyrite $ceCuFeS2$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
On the other hand, $ceCu2FeS2$ is a reduced formula of $ceCu8Fe4S8$, a superstructured bornite [1]. A compound of $ceAB2X2$ type, crystallizes in $Fbar43m$ space group.
Figure 2. Unit cell of superstructured bornite $ceCu8Fe4S8$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
Structurally, chalcopyrite and superstructured bornite have very little in common. Unless there is a specific context given, I'd rather say that $ceCu2FeS2$ is an outlier among the three and is probably a typographic issue. Also, it's not a good practice to mix dot-notated formulas with formula unit representations unless one wants to underline some structural aspects (e.g. molecular assemblies/coordination polyhedra/domains etc.)
References
- Ding, Y.; Veblen, D. R.; Prewitt, C. T. Possible $ceFe/Cu$ Ordering Schemes in the 2a Superstructure of Bornite ($ceCu5FeS4$). American Mineralogist 2005, 90 (8–9), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1518.
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know of five copper iron sulfide minerals:
Bornite - $ceCu5FeS4$
Chalcopyrite - $ceCuFeS2$
Cubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
Idaite - $ceCu5FeS6$
Isocubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Here is some more: talnakhite $ceCu18Fe16S32$, valleriite $ceCu2Fe4S7$, fukuchilite $ceCu3FeS8$, nukundamite $ceCu_3.39Fe_0.61S4$, haycockite $ceCu4Fe5S8$, mooihoekite $ceCu9Fe9S16$.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Jan 26 at 20:05
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108604%2fdifferent-formulas-for-copper-pyrites-and-bauxite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Both $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ and $ceCuFeS2$ are the equivalent means to denote chalcopyrite. The first notation, $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$, commonly used a few decades ago, shows that two sulfides are not just a mechanical mix, but form a chemical compound (same as for crystallohydrates, e.g. $ceCuSO4 * 5 H2O$). The second one, $ceCuFeS2$, is a formula unit, a more universal and modern representation. Chalcopyrite is a mineral of $ceABX2$ type, crystallizes in $Ibar42d$ space group.
Figure 1. Unit cell of chalcopyrite $ceCuFeS2$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
On the other hand, $ceCu2FeS2$ is a reduced formula of $ceCu8Fe4S8$, a superstructured bornite [1]. A compound of $ceAB2X2$ type, crystallizes in $Fbar43m$ space group.
Figure 2. Unit cell of superstructured bornite $ceCu8Fe4S8$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
Structurally, chalcopyrite and superstructured bornite have very little in common. Unless there is a specific context given, I'd rather say that $ceCu2FeS2$ is an outlier among the three and is probably a typographic issue. Also, it's not a good practice to mix dot-notated formulas with formula unit representations unless one wants to underline some structural aspects (e.g. molecular assemblies/coordination polyhedra/domains etc.)
References
- Ding, Y.; Veblen, D. R.; Prewitt, C. T. Possible $ceFe/Cu$ Ordering Schemes in the 2a Superstructure of Bornite ($ceCu5FeS4$). American Mineralogist 2005, 90 (8–9), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1518.
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ and $ceCuFeS2$ are the equivalent means to denote chalcopyrite. The first notation, $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$, commonly used a few decades ago, shows that two sulfides are not just a mechanical mix, but form a chemical compound (same as for crystallohydrates, e.g. $ceCuSO4 * 5 H2O$). The second one, $ceCuFeS2$, is a formula unit, a more universal and modern representation. Chalcopyrite is a mineral of $ceABX2$ type, crystallizes in $Ibar42d$ space group.
Figure 1. Unit cell of chalcopyrite $ceCuFeS2$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
On the other hand, $ceCu2FeS2$ is a reduced formula of $ceCu8Fe4S8$, a superstructured bornite [1]. A compound of $ceAB2X2$ type, crystallizes in $Fbar43m$ space group.
Figure 2. Unit cell of superstructured bornite $ceCu8Fe4S8$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
Structurally, chalcopyrite and superstructured bornite have very little in common. Unless there is a specific context given, I'd rather say that $ceCu2FeS2$ is an outlier among the three and is probably a typographic issue. Also, it's not a good practice to mix dot-notated formulas with formula unit representations unless one wants to underline some structural aspects (e.g. molecular assemblies/coordination polyhedra/domains etc.)
References
- Ding, Y.; Veblen, D. R.; Prewitt, C. T. Possible $ceFe/Cu$ Ordering Schemes in the 2a Superstructure of Bornite ($ceCu5FeS4$). American Mineralogist 2005, 90 (8–9), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1518.
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Both $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ and $ceCuFeS2$ are the equivalent means to denote chalcopyrite. The first notation, $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$, commonly used a few decades ago, shows that two sulfides are not just a mechanical mix, but form a chemical compound (same as for crystallohydrates, e.g. $ceCuSO4 * 5 H2O$). The second one, $ceCuFeS2$, is a formula unit, a more universal and modern representation. Chalcopyrite is a mineral of $ceABX2$ type, crystallizes in $Ibar42d$ space group.
Figure 1. Unit cell of chalcopyrite $ceCuFeS2$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
On the other hand, $ceCu2FeS2$ is a reduced formula of $ceCu8Fe4S8$, a superstructured bornite [1]. A compound of $ceAB2X2$ type, crystallizes in $Fbar43m$ space group.
Figure 2. Unit cell of superstructured bornite $ceCu8Fe4S8$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
Structurally, chalcopyrite and superstructured bornite have very little in common. Unless there is a specific context given, I'd rather say that $ceCu2FeS2$ is an outlier among the three and is probably a typographic issue. Also, it's not a good practice to mix dot-notated formulas with formula unit representations unless one wants to underline some structural aspects (e.g. molecular assemblies/coordination polyhedra/domains etc.)
References
- Ding, Y.; Veblen, D. R.; Prewitt, C. T. Possible $ceFe/Cu$ Ordering Schemes in the 2a Superstructure of Bornite ($ceCu5FeS4$). American Mineralogist 2005, 90 (8–9), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1518.
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
$endgroup$
Both $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$ and $ceCuFeS2$ are the equivalent means to denote chalcopyrite. The first notation, $ceCu2S.Fe2S3$, commonly used a few decades ago, shows that two sulfides are not just a mechanical mix, but form a chemical compound (same as for crystallohydrates, e.g. $ceCuSO4 * 5 H2O$). The second one, $ceCuFeS2$, is a formula unit, a more universal and modern representation. Chalcopyrite is a mineral of $ceABX2$ type, crystallizes in $Ibar42d$ space group.
Figure 1. Unit cell of chalcopyrite $ceCuFeS2$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
On the other hand, $ceCu2FeS2$ is a reduced formula of $ceCu8Fe4S8$, a superstructured bornite [1]. A compound of $ceAB2X2$ type, crystallizes in $Fbar43m$ space group.
Figure 2. Unit cell of superstructured bornite $ceCu8Fe4S8$. Color code: $color#FFFF30Largebullet~ceS$; $color#E06633Largebullet~ceFe$; $color#C88033Largebullet~ceCu$.
Structurally, chalcopyrite and superstructured bornite have very little in common. Unless there is a specific context given, I'd rather say that $ceCu2FeS2$ is an outlier among the three and is probably a typographic issue. Also, it's not a good practice to mix dot-notated formulas with formula unit representations unless one wants to underline some structural aspects (e.g. molecular assemblies/coordination polyhedra/domains etc.)
References
- Ding, Y.; Veblen, D. R.; Prewitt, C. T. Possible $ceFe/Cu$ Ordering Schemes in the 2a Superstructure of Bornite ($ceCu5FeS4$). American Mineralogist 2005, 90 (8–9), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.2138/am.2005.1518.
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
edited Jan 26 at 19:57
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
answered Jan 26 at 19:40
andseliskandselisk
16.1k653114
16.1k653114
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know of five copper iron sulfide minerals:
Bornite - $ceCu5FeS4$
Chalcopyrite - $ceCuFeS2$
Cubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
Idaite - $ceCu5FeS6$
Isocubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Here is some more: talnakhite $ceCu18Fe16S32$, valleriite $ceCu2Fe4S7$, fukuchilite $ceCu3FeS8$, nukundamite $ceCu_3.39Fe_0.61S4$, haycockite $ceCu4Fe5S8$, mooihoekite $ceCu9Fe9S16$.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Jan 26 at 20:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know of five copper iron sulfide minerals:
Bornite - $ceCu5FeS4$
Chalcopyrite - $ceCuFeS2$
Cubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
Idaite - $ceCu5FeS6$
Isocubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Here is some more: talnakhite $ceCu18Fe16S32$, valleriite $ceCu2Fe4S7$, fukuchilite $ceCu3FeS8$, nukundamite $ceCu_3.39Fe_0.61S4$, haycockite $ceCu4Fe5S8$, mooihoekite $ceCu9Fe9S16$.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Jan 26 at 20:05
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I know of five copper iron sulfide minerals:
Bornite - $ceCu5FeS4$
Chalcopyrite - $ceCuFeS2$
Cubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
Idaite - $ceCu5FeS6$
Isocubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
$endgroup$
I know of five copper iron sulfide minerals:
Bornite - $ceCu5FeS4$
Chalcopyrite - $ceCuFeS2$
Cubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
Idaite - $ceCu5FeS6$
Isocubanite - $ceCuFe2S3$
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
answered Jan 26 at 19:10
MaxWMaxW
14.7k12158
14.7k12158
2
$begingroup$
Here is some more: talnakhite $ceCu18Fe16S32$, valleriite $ceCu2Fe4S7$, fukuchilite $ceCu3FeS8$, nukundamite $ceCu_3.39Fe_0.61S4$, haycockite $ceCu4Fe5S8$, mooihoekite $ceCu9Fe9S16$.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Jan 26 at 20:05
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Here is some more: talnakhite $ceCu18Fe16S32$, valleriite $ceCu2Fe4S7$, fukuchilite $ceCu3FeS8$, nukundamite $ceCu_3.39Fe_0.61S4$, haycockite $ceCu4Fe5S8$, mooihoekite $ceCu9Fe9S16$.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Jan 26 at 20:05
2
2
$begingroup$
Here is some more: talnakhite $ceCu18Fe16S32$, valleriite $ceCu2Fe4S7$, fukuchilite $ceCu3FeS8$, nukundamite $ceCu_3.39Fe_0.61S4$, haycockite $ceCu4Fe5S8$, mooihoekite $ceCu9Fe9S16$.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Jan 26 at 20:05
$begingroup$
Here is some more: talnakhite $ceCu18Fe16S32$, valleriite $ceCu2Fe4S7$, fukuchilite $ceCu3FeS8$, nukundamite $ceCu_3.39Fe_0.61S4$, haycockite $ceCu4Fe5S8$, mooihoekite $ceCu9Fe9S16$.
$endgroup$
– andselisk
Jan 26 at 20:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108604%2fdifferent-formulas-for-copper-pyrites-and-bauxite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown