Proving that a line and a function meet in two points
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
I had an exam today and there was the following question:
Prove that $y=fracx+12$ and $f(x)=frace^2x-12$ meet in two points.
I tried to solve it with the Intermediate value theorem, but without any success. Im not sure that it's the right way.
How should I approach this problem?
calculus algebra-precalculus roots
add a comment |
I had an exam today and there was the following question:
Prove that $y=fracx+12$ and $f(x)=frace^2x-12$ meet in two points.
I tried to solve it with the Intermediate value theorem, but without any success. Im not sure that it's the right way.
How should I approach this problem?
calculus algebra-precalculus roots
add a comment |
I had an exam today and there was the following question:
Prove that $y=fracx+12$ and $f(x)=frace^2x-12$ meet in two points.
I tried to solve it with the Intermediate value theorem, but without any success. Im not sure that it's the right way.
How should I approach this problem?
calculus algebra-precalculus roots
I had an exam today and there was the following question:
Prove that $y=fracx+12$ and $f(x)=frace^2x-12$ meet in two points.
I tried to solve it with the Intermediate value theorem, but without any success. Im not sure that it's the right way.
How should I approach this problem?
calculus algebra-precalculus roots
calculus algebra-precalculus roots
edited Dec 20 '18 at 21:35
Jam
4,94811431
4,94811431
asked Dec 20 '18 at 19:29
TTaJTa4
734
734
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Let $f(x)=(e^2x-1)/2$ and $g(x)=(x+1)/2$.
Let $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)=(e^2x-x-2)/2$. Then,
$$h(-infty)=+infty, h(+infty)=+infty$$
$$h'(x)=(2e^2x-1)/2implies x_0=frac-ln22 is only minima$$
$$h(x_0)=fracln2-34<0$$
Thus, $h(x)$ intersects $x-$axis exactly twice$implies$ $f(x)=g(x)$ exactly twice.
Thank you Rob Arthan for pointing out the mistake in my earlier answer!
1
You also need do some work with the derivatives to show that there are exactly two points of intersection.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 20:14
@RobArthan ya. thanks!
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 20 '18 at 21:10
1
+1 My pleasure! Thanks for improving your answer.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 21:29
add a comment |
hint
let $$g(x)=2(f(x)-y)=e^2x-x-2$$
Observe that
$$g(-2)=e^-4>0$$
$$g(0)=-1<0$$
$$g(2)=e^4-4>0$$
This effectively shows that there are $2$ roots but can you extend your argument to showing that there are only $2$ roots?
– Jam
Dec 20 '18 at 21:47
1
@Jam - the way the question is stated, I read it as only requiring a proof that at least 2 roots exist. The intermediate value theorem cannot be used to prove that there are not more. For that, the easiest method is show that the derivative has only one $0$, as Ross has done, and therefore the function can have only 1 turning point. Having a third $0$ would require at least two turning points.
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 21 '18 at 0:09
@PaulSinclair You could be right.
– Jam
Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
add a comment |
And sometimes a graph helps in these cases:
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047894%2fproving-that-a-line-and-a-function-meet-in-two-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Let $f(x)=(e^2x-1)/2$ and $g(x)=(x+1)/2$.
Let $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)=(e^2x-x-2)/2$. Then,
$$h(-infty)=+infty, h(+infty)=+infty$$
$$h'(x)=(2e^2x-1)/2implies x_0=frac-ln22 is only minima$$
$$h(x_0)=fracln2-34<0$$
Thus, $h(x)$ intersects $x-$axis exactly twice$implies$ $f(x)=g(x)$ exactly twice.
Thank you Rob Arthan for pointing out the mistake in my earlier answer!
1
You also need do some work with the derivatives to show that there are exactly two points of intersection.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 20:14
@RobArthan ya. thanks!
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 20 '18 at 21:10
1
+1 My pleasure! Thanks for improving your answer.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 21:29
add a comment |
Let $f(x)=(e^2x-1)/2$ and $g(x)=(x+1)/2$.
Let $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)=(e^2x-x-2)/2$. Then,
$$h(-infty)=+infty, h(+infty)=+infty$$
$$h'(x)=(2e^2x-1)/2implies x_0=frac-ln22 is only minima$$
$$h(x_0)=fracln2-34<0$$
Thus, $h(x)$ intersects $x-$axis exactly twice$implies$ $f(x)=g(x)$ exactly twice.
Thank you Rob Arthan for pointing out the mistake in my earlier answer!
1
You also need do some work with the derivatives to show that there are exactly two points of intersection.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 20:14
@RobArthan ya. thanks!
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 20 '18 at 21:10
1
+1 My pleasure! Thanks for improving your answer.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 21:29
add a comment |
Let $f(x)=(e^2x-1)/2$ and $g(x)=(x+1)/2$.
Let $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)=(e^2x-x-2)/2$. Then,
$$h(-infty)=+infty, h(+infty)=+infty$$
$$h'(x)=(2e^2x-1)/2implies x_0=frac-ln22 is only minima$$
$$h(x_0)=fracln2-34<0$$
Thus, $h(x)$ intersects $x-$axis exactly twice$implies$ $f(x)=g(x)$ exactly twice.
Thank you Rob Arthan for pointing out the mistake in my earlier answer!
Let $f(x)=(e^2x-1)/2$ and $g(x)=(x+1)/2$.
Let $h(x)=f(x)-g(x)=(e^2x-x-2)/2$. Then,
$$h(-infty)=+infty, h(+infty)=+infty$$
$$h'(x)=(2e^2x-1)/2implies x_0=frac-ln22 is only minima$$
$$h(x_0)=fracln2-34<0$$
Thus, $h(x)$ intersects $x-$axis exactly twice$implies$ $f(x)=g(x)$ exactly twice.
Thank you Rob Arthan for pointing out the mistake in my earlier answer!
edited Dec 20 '18 at 21:18
answered Dec 20 '18 at 19:36
Ankit Kumar
1
1
1
You also need do some work with the derivatives to show that there are exactly two points of intersection.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 20:14
@RobArthan ya. thanks!
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 20 '18 at 21:10
1
+1 My pleasure! Thanks for improving your answer.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 21:29
add a comment |
1
You also need do some work with the derivatives to show that there are exactly two points of intersection.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 20:14
@RobArthan ya. thanks!
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 20 '18 at 21:10
1
+1 My pleasure! Thanks for improving your answer.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 21:29
1
1
You also need do some work with the derivatives to show that there are exactly two points of intersection.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 20:14
You also need do some work with the derivatives to show that there are exactly two points of intersection.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 20:14
@RobArthan ya. thanks!
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 20 '18 at 21:10
@RobArthan ya. thanks!
– Ankit Kumar
Dec 20 '18 at 21:10
1
1
+1 My pleasure! Thanks for improving your answer.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 21:29
+1 My pleasure! Thanks for improving your answer.
– Rob Arthan
Dec 20 '18 at 21:29
add a comment |
hint
let $$g(x)=2(f(x)-y)=e^2x-x-2$$
Observe that
$$g(-2)=e^-4>0$$
$$g(0)=-1<0$$
$$g(2)=e^4-4>0$$
This effectively shows that there are $2$ roots but can you extend your argument to showing that there are only $2$ roots?
– Jam
Dec 20 '18 at 21:47
1
@Jam - the way the question is stated, I read it as only requiring a proof that at least 2 roots exist. The intermediate value theorem cannot be used to prove that there are not more. For that, the easiest method is show that the derivative has only one $0$, as Ross has done, and therefore the function can have only 1 turning point. Having a third $0$ would require at least two turning points.
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 21 '18 at 0:09
@PaulSinclair You could be right.
– Jam
Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
add a comment |
hint
let $$g(x)=2(f(x)-y)=e^2x-x-2$$
Observe that
$$g(-2)=e^-4>0$$
$$g(0)=-1<0$$
$$g(2)=e^4-4>0$$
This effectively shows that there are $2$ roots but can you extend your argument to showing that there are only $2$ roots?
– Jam
Dec 20 '18 at 21:47
1
@Jam - the way the question is stated, I read it as only requiring a proof that at least 2 roots exist. The intermediate value theorem cannot be used to prove that there are not more. For that, the easiest method is show that the derivative has only one $0$, as Ross has done, and therefore the function can have only 1 turning point. Having a third $0$ would require at least two turning points.
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 21 '18 at 0:09
@PaulSinclair You could be right.
– Jam
Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
add a comment |
hint
let $$g(x)=2(f(x)-y)=e^2x-x-2$$
Observe that
$$g(-2)=e^-4>0$$
$$g(0)=-1<0$$
$$g(2)=e^4-4>0$$
hint
let $$g(x)=2(f(x)-y)=e^2x-x-2$$
Observe that
$$g(-2)=e^-4>0$$
$$g(0)=-1<0$$
$$g(2)=e^4-4>0$$
answered Dec 20 '18 at 19:36
hamam_Abdallah
37.9k21634
37.9k21634
This effectively shows that there are $2$ roots but can you extend your argument to showing that there are only $2$ roots?
– Jam
Dec 20 '18 at 21:47
1
@Jam - the way the question is stated, I read it as only requiring a proof that at least 2 roots exist. The intermediate value theorem cannot be used to prove that there are not more. For that, the easiest method is show that the derivative has only one $0$, as Ross has done, and therefore the function can have only 1 turning point. Having a third $0$ would require at least two turning points.
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 21 '18 at 0:09
@PaulSinclair You could be right.
– Jam
Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
add a comment |
This effectively shows that there are $2$ roots but can you extend your argument to showing that there are only $2$ roots?
– Jam
Dec 20 '18 at 21:47
1
@Jam - the way the question is stated, I read it as only requiring a proof that at least 2 roots exist. The intermediate value theorem cannot be used to prove that there are not more. For that, the easiest method is show that the derivative has only one $0$, as Ross has done, and therefore the function can have only 1 turning point. Having a third $0$ would require at least two turning points.
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 21 '18 at 0:09
@PaulSinclair You could be right.
– Jam
Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
This effectively shows that there are $2$ roots but can you extend your argument to showing that there are only $2$ roots?
– Jam
Dec 20 '18 at 21:47
This effectively shows that there are $2$ roots but can you extend your argument to showing that there are only $2$ roots?
– Jam
Dec 20 '18 at 21:47
1
1
@Jam - the way the question is stated, I read it as only requiring a proof that at least 2 roots exist. The intermediate value theorem cannot be used to prove that there are not more. For that, the easiest method is show that the derivative has only one $0$, as Ross has done, and therefore the function can have only 1 turning point. Having a third $0$ would require at least two turning points.
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 21 '18 at 0:09
@Jam - the way the question is stated, I read it as only requiring a proof that at least 2 roots exist. The intermediate value theorem cannot be used to prove that there are not more. For that, the easiest method is show that the derivative has only one $0$, as Ross has done, and therefore the function can have only 1 turning point. Having a third $0$ would require at least two turning points.
– Paul Sinclair
Dec 21 '18 at 0:09
@PaulSinclair You could be right.
– Jam
Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
@PaulSinclair You could be right.
– Jam
Dec 21 '18 at 0:53
add a comment |
And sometimes a graph helps in these cases:
add a comment |
And sometimes a graph helps in these cases:
add a comment |
And sometimes a graph helps in these cases:
And sometimes a graph helps in these cases:
answered Dec 20 '18 at 21:40
David G. Stork
9,79521232
9,79521232
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047894%2fproving-that-a-line-and-a-function-meet-in-two-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown