Existence of subgroup of order power of prime in a finite abelian group?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
Say I have a finite abelian group $G$ such that $left | G right |=p_1^n_1...p_m^n_m$ where the $p_i$'s are distinct. Can I say that $G$ must have a subgroup of order $p_1^n_1$? I'm thinking that I can use the structure theorem to write $G$ as $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1times...timesmathbbZ/p_m^n_m_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_m^n_m_s_m$ then just take $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1timesleft 1 right ...timesleft 1 right $ where $sum_i n_1_i=n_1$.
Is my reasoning correct? I would like to avoid using Sylow theorems.
Thanks in advance.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups
add a comment |
Say I have a finite abelian group $G$ such that $left | G right |=p_1^n_1...p_m^n_m$ where the $p_i$'s are distinct. Can I say that $G$ must have a subgroup of order $p_1^n_1$? I'm thinking that I can use the structure theorem to write $G$ as $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1times...timesmathbbZ/p_m^n_m_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_m^n_m_s_m$ then just take $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1timesleft 1 right ...timesleft 1 right $ where $sum_i n_1_i=n_1$.
Is my reasoning correct? I would like to avoid using Sylow theorems.
Thanks in advance.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups
1
Yes, you're on the right track (though those $;n_1_r;$ are weird...) . And fixing that a little, you can easily prove that a finite abelian group has a subgroup of any order dividing hte group's order.
– DonAntonio
Dec 20 '18 at 21:49
@DonAntonio Yes that's exactly what I'm considering actually. What would be a better way to indicate the decomposition of each maximal power $n_i$ in the prime decomposition of $G$ as a sum?
– John11
Dec 20 '18 at 21:56
add a comment |
Say I have a finite abelian group $G$ such that $left | G right |=p_1^n_1...p_m^n_m$ where the $p_i$'s are distinct. Can I say that $G$ must have a subgroup of order $p_1^n_1$? I'm thinking that I can use the structure theorem to write $G$ as $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1times...timesmathbbZ/p_m^n_m_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_m^n_m_s_m$ then just take $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1timesleft 1 right ...timesleft 1 right $ where $sum_i n_1_i=n_1$.
Is my reasoning correct? I would like to avoid using Sylow theorems.
Thanks in advance.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups
Say I have a finite abelian group $G$ such that $left | G right |=p_1^n_1...p_m^n_m$ where the $p_i$'s are distinct. Can I say that $G$ must have a subgroup of order $p_1^n_1$? I'm thinking that I can use the structure theorem to write $G$ as $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1times...timesmathbbZ/p_m^n_m_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_m^n_m_s_m$ then just take $mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_1times ...times mathbbZ/p_1^n_1_s_1timesleft 1 right ...timesleft 1 right $ where $sum_i n_1_i=n_1$.
Is my reasoning correct? I would like to avoid using Sylow theorems.
Thanks in advance.
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups
group-theory finite-groups abelian-groups
edited Dec 20 '18 at 22:05
asked Dec 20 '18 at 21:38
John11
1,0071821
1,0071821
1
Yes, you're on the right track (though those $;n_1_r;$ are weird...) . And fixing that a little, you can easily prove that a finite abelian group has a subgroup of any order dividing hte group's order.
– DonAntonio
Dec 20 '18 at 21:49
@DonAntonio Yes that's exactly what I'm considering actually. What would be a better way to indicate the decomposition of each maximal power $n_i$ in the prime decomposition of $G$ as a sum?
– John11
Dec 20 '18 at 21:56
add a comment |
1
Yes, you're on the right track (though those $;n_1_r;$ are weird...) . And fixing that a little, you can easily prove that a finite abelian group has a subgroup of any order dividing hte group's order.
– DonAntonio
Dec 20 '18 at 21:49
@DonAntonio Yes that's exactly what I'm considering actually. What would be a better way to indicate the decomposition of each maximal power $n_i$ in the prime decomposition of $G$ as a sum?
– John11
Dec 20 '18 at 21:56
1
1
Yes, you're on the right track (though those $;n_1_r;$ are weird...) . And fixing that a little, you can easily prove that a finite abelian group has a subgroup of any order dividing hte group's order.
– DonAntonio
Dec 20 '18 at 21:49
Yes, you're on the right track (though those $;n_1_r;$ are weird...) . And fixing that a little, you can easily prove that a finite abelian group has a subgroup of any order dividing hte group's order.
– DonAntonio
Dec 20 '18 at 21:49
@DonAntonio Yes that's exactly what I'm considering actually. What would be a better way to indicate the decomposition of each maximal power $n_i$ in the prime decomposition of $G$ as a sum?
– John11
Dec 20 '18 at 21:56
@DonAntonio Yes that's exactly what I'm considering actually. What would be a better way to indicate the decomposition of each maximal power $n_i$ in the prime decomposition of $G$ as a sum?
– John11
Dec 20 '18 at 21:56
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Some highlights:
First, you can take $;K:=Bbb Z/p_1^n_1Bbb Ztimes1timesldotstimes{1|];$ to get a subgroup of order $;p_1^n_1;$ , and now you can generalize this to each prime $;p_1,..,p_m;$ and their powers.
Next, use the basic lemma that says that a finite $;p,-$ group of order $;p^n;$ has a (normal if you will, even when we're not in the abelian case!) subgroup of order $;p^k;$ , for any $;0le kle n;$ .
Finally, just use the direct product decomposition to get a subgroup of any order dividing the group's.
add a comment |
Here is a roadmap.
Let $p$ be a prime dividing the order of $G$.
Let $P = g in G : ord(g) text is a power of $p$ $.
Then $P$ is a subgroup of $G$ (because $G$ is abelian).
The order of $P$ is a power of $p$ (by Cauchy's theorem).
The order of $P$ is the largest power of $p$ that divides the order of $G$ (by Cauchy's theorem applied to $G/P$).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047992%2fexistence-of-subgroup-of-order-power-of-prime-in-a-finite-abelian-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Some highlights:
First, you can take $;K:=Bbb Z/p_1^n_1Bbb Ztimes1timesldotstimes{1|];$ to get a subgroup of order $;p_1^n_1;$ , and now you can generalize this to each prime $;p_1,..,p_m;$ and their powers.
Next, use the basic lemma that says that a finite $;p,-$ group of order $;p^n;$ has a (normal if you will, even when we're not in the abelian case!) subgroup of order $;p^k;$ , for any $;0le kle n;$ .
Finally, just use the direct product decomposition to get a subgroup of any order dividing the group's.
add a comment |
Some highlights:
First, you can take $;K:=Bbb Z/p_1^n_1Bbb Ztimes1timesldotstimes{1|];$ to get a subgroup of order $;p_1^n_1;$ , and now you can generalize this to each prime $;p_1,..,p_m;$ and their powers.
Next, use the basic lemma that says that a finite $;p,-$ group of order $;p^n;$ has a (normal if you will, even when we're not in the abelian case!) subgroup of order $;p^k;$ , for any $;0le kle n;$ .
Finally, just use the direct product decomposition to get a subgroup of any order dividing the group's.
add a comment |
Some highlights:
First, you can take $;K:=Bbb Z/p_1^n_1Bbb Ztimes1timesldotstimes{1|];$ to get a subgroup of order $;p_1^n_1;$ , and now you can generalize this to each prime $;p_1,..,p_m;$ and their powers.
Next, use the basic lemma that says that a finite $;p,-$ group of order $;p^n;$ has a (normal if you will, even when we're not in the abelian case!) subgroup of order $;p^k;$ , for any $;0le kle n;$ .
Finally, just use the direct product decomposition to get a subgroup of any order dividing the group's.
Some highlights:
First, you can take $;K:=Bbb Z/p_1^n_1Bbb Ztimes1timesldotstimes{1|];$ to get a subgroup of order $;p_1^n_1;$ , and now you can generalize this to each prime $;p_1,..,p_m;$ and their powers.
Next, use the basic lemma that says that a finite $;p,-$ group of order $;p^n;$ has a (normal if you will, even when we're not in the abelian case!) subgroup of order $;p^k;$ , for any $;0le kle n;$ .
Finally, just use the direct product decomposition to get a subgroup of any order dividing the group's.
answered Dec 20 '18 at 23:00
DonAntonio
177k1491225
177k1491225
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here is a roadmap.
Let $p$ be a prime dividing the order of $G$.
Let $P = g in G : ord(g) text is a power of $p$ $.
Then $P$ is a subgroup of $G$ (because $G$ is abelian).
The order of $P$ is a power of $p$ (by Cauchy's theorem).
The order of $P$ is the largest power of $p$ that divides the order of $G$ (by Cauchy's theorem applied to $G/P$).
add a comment |
Here is a roadmap.
Let $p$ be a prime dividing the order of $G$.
Let $P = g in G : ord(g) text is a power of $p$ $.
Then $P$ is a subgroup of $G$ (because $G$ is abelian).
The order of $P$ is a power of $p$ (by Cauchy's theorem).
The order of $P$ is the largest power of $p$ that divides the order of $G$ (by Cauchy's theorem applied to $G/P$).
add a comment |
Here is a roadmap.
Let $p$ be a prime dividing the order of $G$.
Let $P = g in G : ord(g) text is a power of $p$ $.
Then $P$ is a subgroup of $G$ (because $G$ is abelian).
The order of $P$ is a power of $p$ (by Cauchy's theorem).
The order of $P$ is the largest power of $p$ that divides the order of $G$ (by Cauchy's theorem applied to $G/P$).
Here is a roadmap.
Let $p$ be a prime dividing the order of $G$.
Let $P = g in G : ord(g) text is a power of $p$ $.
Then $P$ is a subgroup of $G$ (because $G$ is abelian).
The order of $P$ is a power of $p$ (by Cauchy's theorem).
The order of $P$ is the largest power of $p$ that divides the order of $G$ (by Cauchy's theorem applied to $G/P$).
answered Dec 21 '18 at 0:33
lhf
163k10167386
163k10167386
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3047992%2fexistence-of-subgroup-of-order-power-of-prime-in-a-finite-abelian-group%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Yes, you're on the right track (though those $;n_1_r;$ are weird...) . And fixing that a little, you can easily prove that a finite abelian group has a subgroup of any order dividing hte group's order.
– DonAntonio
Dec 20 '18 at 21:49
@DonAntonio Yes that's exactly what I'm considering actually. What would be a better way to indicate the decomposition of each maximal power $n_i$ in the prime decomposition of $G$ as a sum?
– John11
Dec 20 '18 at 21:56