Possible redirection bug in zsh 5x

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












3














The following command produces different outputs in zsh v. 4.x and 5.x:



 grep -v foo >&2
3>&1


(This code is supposed to illustrate how to selectively suppress some of the output sent to stderr by a program; in this case, the warning foo is being suppressed selectively, while the warning bar is allowed to go through; note that in the end, stderr and stdout streams remain separate.)



On v 4.x the output I see at the terminal is as desired/expected:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar


(You may see a different ordering of the WARNING: bar line relative to the other ones.)



On v 5.0.7 (Debian) and 5.1.1 (Darwin), however, what I see at the terminal is this:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar
X
Y
1
2


IOW, the lines that should be sent to stdout appear twice.



I figure there are three possibilities:



  1. this is a bug in v. 5.x (in which case my question is: is there a workaround?)

  2. I have not properly configured my v. 5.x zsh (in which case my question is: how should I configure my v. 5.x zsh to get the desired behavior?);

  3. there is a bug in v. 4.x, but not in v. 5.x, that masked a bug in my code (in which case my question is: how could I fix my code to get the desired behavior in v 5.x?)









share|improve this question



















  • 1




    It's worth mentioning that both dash and bash produce the same behaviour as zsh 4, which lends credence to the hypothesis that the original behaviour was correct.
    – Celada
    Mar 5 '16 at 19:42















3














The following command produces different outputs in zsh v. 4.x and 5.x:



 grep -v foo >&2
3>&1


(This code is supposed to illustrate how to selectively suppress some of the output sent to stderr by a program; in this case, the warning foo is being suppressed selectively, while the warning bar is allowed to go through; note that in the end, stderr and stdout streams remain separate.)



On v 4.x the output I see at the terminal is as desired/expected:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar


(You may see a different ordering of the WARNING: bar line relative to the other ones.)



On v 5.0.7 (Debian) and 5.1.1 (Darwin), however, what I see at the terminal is this:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar
X
Y
1
2


IOW, the lines that should be sent to stdout appear twice.



I figure there are three possibilities:



  1. this is a bug in v. 5.x (in which case my question is: is there a workaround?)

  2. I have not properly configured my v. 5.x zsh (in which case my question is: how should I configure my v. 5.x zsh to get the desired behavior?);

  3. there is a bug in v. 4.x, but not in v. 5.x, that masked a bug in my code (in which case my question is: how could I fix my code to get the desired behavior in v 5.x?)









share|improve this question



















  • 1




    It's worth mentioning that both dash and bash produce the same behaviour as zsh 4, which lends credence to the hypothesis that the original behaviour was correct.
    – Celada
    Mar 5 '16 at 19:42













3












3








3







The following command produces different outputs in zsh v. 4.x and 5.x:



 grep -v foo >&2
3>&1


(This code is supposed to illustrate how to selectively suppress some of the output sent to stderr by a program; in this case, the warning foo is being suppressed selectively, while the warning bar is allowed to go through; note that in the end, stderr and stdout streams remain separate.)



On v 4.x the output I see at the terminal is as desired/expected:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar


(You may see a different ordering of the WARNING: bar line relative to the other ones.)



On v 5.0.7 (Debian) and 5.1.1 (Darwin), however, what I see at the terminal is this:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar
X
Y
1
2


IOW, the lines that should be sent to stdout appear twice.



I figure there are three possibilities:



  1. this is a bug in v. 5.x (in which case my question is: is there a workaround?)

  2. I have not properly configured my v. 5.x zsh (in which case my question is: how should I configure my v. 5.x zsh to get the desired behavior?);

  3. there is a bug in v. 4.x, but not in v. 5.x, that masked a bug in my code (in which case my question is: how could I fix my code to get the desired behavior in v 5.x?)









share|improve this question















The following command produces different outputs in zsh v. 4.x and 5.x:



 grep -v foo >&2
3>&1


(This code is supposed to illustrate how to selectively suppress some of the output sent to stderr by a program; in this case, the warning foo is being suppressed selectively, while the warning bar is allowed to go through; note that in the end, stderr and stdout streams remain separate.)



On v 4.x the output I see at the terminal is as desired/expected:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar


(You may see a different ordering of the WARNING: bar line relative to the other ones.)



On v 5.0.7 (Debian) and 5.1.1 (Darwin), however, what I see at the terminal is this:



X
Y
1
2
WARNING: bar
X
Y
1
2


IOW, the lines that should be sent to stdout appear twice.



I figure there are three possibilities:



  1. this is a bug in v. 5.x (in which case my question is: is there a workaround?)

  2. I have not properly configured my v. 5.x zsh (in which case my question is: how should I configure my v. 5.x zsh to get the desired behavior?);

  3. there is a bug in v. 4.x, but not in v. 5.x, that masked a bug in my code (in which case my question is: how could I fix my code to get the desired behavior in v 5.x?)






zsh io-redirection






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 20 '18 at 7:25









Rui F Ribeiro

39k1479130




39k1479130










asked Mar 5 '16 at 19:28









kjo

4,04393763




4,04393763







  • 1




    It's worth mentioning that both dash and bash produce the same behaviour as zsh 4, which lends credence to the hypothesis that the original behaviour was correct.
    – Celada
    Mar 5 '16 at 19:42












  • 1




    It's worth mentioning that both dash and bash produce the same behaviour as zsh 4, which lends credence to the hypothesis that the original behaviour was correct.
    – Celada
    Mar 5 '16 at 19:42







1




1




It's worth mentioning that both dash and bash produce the same behaviour as zsh 4, which lends credence to the hypothesis that the original behaviour was correct.
– Celada
Mar 5 '16 at 19:42




It's worth mentioning that both dash and bash produce the same behaviour as zsh 4, which lends credence to the hypothesis that the original behaviour was correct.
– Celada
Mar 5 '16 at 19:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














Actually, the bug was in 4.0 and has been fixed.



What you're seeing is the effect of the multios options, specific to zsh. If you want to see the same behaviour as in other shells, you need to disable that option setopt nomultios or call zsh as sh.



With multios, in cmd1 >&3 | cmd2, you're redirecting cmd1's stdout to both &3 and the pipe to cmd2. See How can I pipe only stderr in zsh? for more details.






share|improve this answer






















  • I was very curious about this question myself and I knew I could count on you coming along with the answer :-)
    – Celada
    Mar 6 '16 at 18:57










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f267855%2fpossible-redirection-bug-in-zsh-5x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














Actually, the bug was in 4.0 and has been fixed.



What you're seeing is the effect of the multios options, specific to zsh. If you want to see the same behaviour as in other shells, you need to disable that option setopt nomultios or call zsh as sh.



With multios, in cmd1 >&3 | cmd2, you're redirecting cmd1's stdout to both &3 and the pipe to cmd2. See How can I pipe only stderr in zsh? for more details.






share|improve this answer






















  • I was very curious about this question myself and I knew I could count on you coming along with the answer :-)
    – Celada
    Mar 6 '16 at 18:57















2














Actually, the bug was in 4.0 and has been fixed.



What you're seeing is the effect of the multios options, specific to zsh. If you want to see the same behaviour as in other shells, you need to disable that option setopt nomultios or call zsh as sh.



With multios, in cmd1 >&3 | cmd2, you're redirecting cmd1's stdout to both &3 and the pipe to cmd2. See How can I pipe only stderr in zsh? for more details.






share|improve this answer






















  • I was very curious about this question myself and I knew I could count on you coming along with the answer :-)
    – Celada
    Mar 6 '16 at 18:57













2












2








2






Actually, the bug was in 4.0 and has been fixed.



What you're seeing is the effect of the multios options, specific to zsh. If you want to see the same behaviour as in other shells, you need to disable that option setopt nomultios or call zsh as sh.



With multios, in cmd1 >&3 | cmd2, you're redirecting cmd1's stdout to both &3 and the pipe to cmd2. See How can I pipe only stderr in zsh? for more details.






share|improve this answer














Actually, the bug was in 4.0 and has been fixed.



What you're seeing is the effect of the multios options, specific to zsh. If you want to see the same behaviour as in other shells, you need to disable that option setopt nomultios or call zsh as sh.



With multios, in cmd1 >&3 | cmd2, you're redirecting cmd1's stdout to both &3 and the pipe to cmd2. See How can I pipe only stderr in zsh? for more details.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36









Community

1




1










answered Mar 6 '16 at 18:51









Stéphane Chazelas

299k54564913




299k54564913











  • I was very curious about this question myself and I knew I could count on you coming along with the answer :-)
    – Celada
    Mar 6 '16 at 18:57
















  • I was very curious about this question myself and I knew I could count on you coming along with the answer :-)
    – Celada
    Mar 6 '16 at 18:57















I was very curious about this question myself and I knew I could count on you coming along with the answer :-)
– Celada
Mar 6 '16 at 18:57




I was very curious about this question myself and I knew I could count on you coming along with the answer :-)
– Celada
Mar 6 '16 at 18:57

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f267855%2fpossible-redirection-bug-in-zsh-5x%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?