Could “essentia” be understood in Latin as “the act of being”?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
Almost every verb has a noun that implies "the act and effect of" whatever the verb is. So, an existence is the act of existing. Nonetheless, the most simple verb, to be seems to lack such a noun, at least in Spanish (link in Spanish, sorry).
But then someone came up with essence as a possibility for the noun of to be, but in Spanish it lacks that meaning (it means roughly "the most important and charasteristic part of a thing"). But what about Latin? In Latin we have exsistĕre and its noun exsistentia, and also essentĭa which seems to mean the being or essence of a thing, according to the Lewis & Short dictionary.
Can then essentĭa be understood as "the act of being" the same way as exsistentia is "the act of existing"?
verbs substantivum
add a comment |
Almost every verb has a noun that implies "the act and effect of" whatever the verb is. So, an existence is the act of existing. Nonetheless, the most simple verb, to be seems to lack such a noun, at least in Spanish (link in Spanish, sorry).
But then someone came up with essence as a possibility for the noun of to be, but in Spanish it lacks that meaning (it means roughly "the most important and charasteristic part of a thing"). But what about Latin? In Latin we have exsistĕre and its noun exsistentia, and also essentĭa which seems to mean the being or essence of a thing, according to the Lewis & Short dictionary.
Can then essentĭa be understood as "the act of being" the same way as exsistentia is "the act of existing"?
verbs substantivum
add a comment |
Almost every verb has a noun that implies "the act and effect of" whatever the verb is. So, an existence is the act of existing. Nonetheless, the most simple verb, to be seems to lack such a noun, at least in Spanish (link in Spanish, sorry).
But then someone came up with essence as a possibility for the noun of to be, but in Spanish it lacks that meaning (it means roughly "the most important and charasteristic part of a thing"). But what about Latin? In Latin we have exsistĕre and its noun exsistentia, and also essentĭa which seems to mean the being or essence of a thing, according to the Lewis & Short dictionary.
Can then essentĭa be understood as "the act of being" the same way as exsistentia is "the act of existing"?
verbs substantivum
Almost every verb has a noun that implies "the act and effect of" whatever the verb is. So, an existence is the act of existing. Nonetheless, the most simple verb, to be seems to lack such a noun, at least in Spanish (link in Spanish, sorry).
But then someone came up with essence as a possibility for the noun of to be, but in Spanish it lacks that meaning (it means roughly "the most important and charasteristic part of a thing"). But what about Latin? In Latin we have exsistĕre and its noun exsistentia, and also essentĭa which seems to mean the being or essence of a thing, according to the Lewis & Short dictionary.
Can then essentĭa be understood as "the act of being" the same way as exsistentia is "the act of existing"?
verbs substantivum
verbs substantivum
asked Jan 10 at 16:02
CharlieCharlie
903220
903220
add a comment |
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
No. Essentia (to-be-ness) was coined by Cicero as a Latin counterpart for the Greek οὐσία (ousia). Both words refer to something's essence or nature, that which makes a thing "to be" the particular kind of thing that it is. Nature or essence is contrasted with accidents, those qualities of a thing that can change without changing what kind of thing something is.
Eventually, medieval philosophers would come up with three terms: ens (an existing thing), essentia (the nature of a thing), and esse (the act or property of being/existing). So, every thing that actually exists (ens) possesses both a particular nature (essentia) and the property of existing (esse).
1
So the word I am looking for is "esse"?
– Charlie
Jan 10 at 18:13
1
@Charlie yes, esse.
– Kingshorsey
Jan 10 at 18:15
add a comment |
FWIW, the act of being in Medieval philosophy was called actus essendi (from which the English and Spanish expressions are mere translations). The term was apparently coined by St. Thomas Aquinas (XIII cent.)
add a comment |
The original meaning of οὐσία is “that which is one’s own; property”, attested since Herodotus. In the philosophers (Plato, Aristotle and perhaps already Democritus) it takes on the sense “true nature of something” as opposed to πάθη. Latin essentia is a calque on οὐσία and is not attested before the imperial period, though Seneca says that he thinks it was coined by Cicero ("Ciceronem auctorem hujus verbi habeo").
add a comment |
Well I agree with Kingshorsey about Essentia. If I talked about Unicorns, or Justice, or Beauty, you know what I mean because you know their essence: essentia.
And if I asked you to describe them you might start with 'spiral horns and white hair;' or 'wigs, black robes, and juries;' or 'angel choirs and tangerine skies.' These are
accidental properties which remind you of the 'Essentia.'
But in this world Unicorns are not alive; Justice turns out to be about plea bargaining and how much you can afford for a lawyer; and beauty means hours of sweat in a gym or sleepless nights creating a novel.
What Unicorns don't have; but what Law, and ballet, and novels have is an extra something called 'ΥΛΗ
I think the word you are looking for is 'ΥΛΗ or hyle. Accusative hylen.
But I'm just an apocalyptic platonist.
I think most ancient and medieval philosophers would disagree: matter (hyle) isn't a principle of existence. Immaterial substances can fail to exist just as much as material substances.
– brianpck
Jan 11 at 15:41
@brianpck While it's abstract nature, and the accidental nature have been discussed, I thought Charlie was asking for the actuality, the 'thing,' the kickable object and its distinctive reality in the world. Isn't that hyle?
– Hugh
Jan 11 at 19:47
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8852%2fcould-essentia-be-understood-in-latin-as-the-act-of-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No. Essentia (to-be-ness) was coined by Cicero as a Latin counterpart for the Greek οὐσία (ousia). Both words refer to something's essence or nature, that which makes a thing "to be" the particular kind of thing that it is. Nature or essence is contrasted with accidents, those qualities of a thing that can change without changing what kind of thing something is.
Eventually, medieval philosophers would come up with three terms: ens (an existing thing), essentia (the nature of a thing), and esse (the act or property of being/existing). So, every thing that actually exists (ens) possesses both a particular nature (essentia) and the property of existing (esse).
1
So the word I am looking for is "esse"?
– Charlie
Jan 10 at 18:13
1
@Charlie yes, esse.
– Kingshorsey
Jan 10 at 18:15
add a comment |
No. Essentia (to-be-ness) was coined by Cicero as a Latin counterpart for the Greek οὐσία (ousia). Both words refer to something's essence or nature, that which makes a thing "to be" the particular kind of thing that it is. Nature or essence is contrasted with accidents, those qualities of a thing that can change without changing what kind of thing something is.
Eventually, medieval philosophers would come up with three terms: ens (an existing thing), essentia (the nature of a thing), and esse (the act or property of being/existing). So, every thing that actually exists (ens) possesses both a particular nature (essentia) and the property of existing (esse).
1
So the word I am looking for is "esse"?
– Charlie
Jan 10 at 18:13
1
@Charlie yes, esse.
– Kingshorsey
Jan 10 at 18:15
add a comment |
No. Essentia (to-be-ness) was coined by Cicero as a Latin counterpart for the Greek οὐσία (ousia). Both words refer to something's essence or nature, that which makes a thing "to be" the particular kind of thing that it is. Nature or essence is contrasted with accidents, those qualities of a thing that can change without changing what kind of thing something is.
Eventually, medieval philosophers would come up with three terms: ens (an existing thing), essentia (the nature of a thing), and esse (the act or property of being/existing). So, every thing that actually exists (ens) possesses both a particular nature (essentia) and the property of existing (esse).
No. Essentia (to-be-ness) was coined by Cicero as a Latin counterpart for the Greek οὐσία (ousia). Both words refer to something's essence or nature, that which makes a thing "to be" the particular kind of thing that it is. Nature or essence is contrasted with accidents, those qualities of a thing that can change without changing what kind of thing something is.
Eventually, medieval philosophers would come up with three terms: ens (an existing thing), essentia (the nature of a thing), and esse (the act or property of being/existing). So, every thing that actually exists (ens) possesses both a particular nature (essentia) and the property of existing (esse).
edited Jan 10 at 18:14
answered Jan 10 at 18:11
KingshorseyKingshorsey
66918
66918
1
So the word I am looking for is "esse"?
– Charlie
Jan 10 at 18:13
1
@Charlie yes, esse.
– Kingshorsey
Jan 10 at 18:15
add a comment |
1
So the word I am looking for is "esse"?
– Charlie
Jan 10 at 18:13
1
@Charlie yes, esse.
– Kingshorsey
Jan 10 at 18:15
1
1
So the word I am looking for is "esse"?
– Charlie
Jan 10 at 18:13
So the word I am looking for is "esse"?
– Charlie
Jan 10 at 18:13
1
1
@Charlie yes, esse.
– Kingshorsey
Jan 10 at 18:15
@Charlie yes, esse.
– Kingshorsey
Jan 10 at 18:15
add a comment |
FWIW, the act of being in Medieval philosophy was called actus essendi (from which the English and Spanish expressions are mere translations). The term was apparently coined by St. Thomas Aquinas (XIII cent.)
add a comment |
FWIW, the act of being in Medieval philosophy was called actus essendi (from which the English and Spanish expressions are mere translations). The term was apparently coined by St. Thomas Aquinas (XIII cent.)
add a comment |
FWIW, the act of being in Medieval philosophy was called actus essendi (from which the English and Spanish expressions are mere translations). The term was apparently coined by St. Thomas Aquinas (XIII cent.)
FWIW, the act of being in Medieval philosophy was called actus essendi (from which the English and Spanish expressions are mere translations). The term was apparently coined by St. Thomas Aquinas (XIII cent.)
answered Jan 11 at 14:24
RafaelRafael
6,1772938
6,1772938
add a comment |
add a comment |
The original meaning of οὐσία is “that which is one’s own; property”, attested since Herodotus. In the philosophers (Plato, Aristotle and perhaps already Democritus) it takes on the sense “true nature of something” as opposed to πάθη. Latin essentia is a calque on οὐσία and is not attested before the imperial period, though Seneca says that he thinks it was coined by Cicero ("Ciceronem auctorem hujus verbi habeo").
add a comment |
The original meaning of οὐσία is “that which is one’s own; property”, attested since Herodotus. In the philosophers (Plato, Aristotle and perhaps already Democritus) it takes on the sense “true nature of something” as opposed to πάθη. Latin essentia is a calque on οὐσία and is not attested before the imperial period, though Seneca says that he thinks it was coined by Cicero ("Ciceronem auctorem hujus verbi habeo").
add a comment |
The original meaning of οὐσία is “that which is one’s own; property”, attested since Herodotus. In the philosophers (Plato, Aristotle and perhaps already Democritus) it takes on the sense “true nature of something” as opposed to πάθη. Latin essentia is a calque on οὐσία and is not attested before the imperial period, though Seneca says that he thinks it was coined by Cicero ("Ciceronem auctorem hujus verbi habeo").
The original meaning of οὐσία is “that which is one’s own; property”, attested since Herodotus. In the philosophers (Plato, Aristotle and perhaps already Democritus) it takes on the sense “true nature of something” as opposed to πάθη. Latin essentia is a calque on οὐσία and is not attested before the imperial period, though Seneca says that he thinks it was coined by Cicero ("Ciceronem auctorem hujus verbi habeo").
answered Jan 11 at 13:56
fdbfdb
10.6k11127
10.6k11127
add a comment |
add a comment |
Well I agree with Kingshorsey about Essentia. If I talked about Unicorns, or Justice, or Beauty, you know what I mean because you know their essence: essentia.
And if I asked you to describe them you might start with 'spiral horns and white hair;' or 'wigs, black robes, and juries;' or 'angel choirs and tangerine skies.' These are
accidental properties which remind you of the 'Essentia.'
But in this world Unicorns are not alive; Justice turns out to be about plea bargaining and how much you can afford for a lawyer; and beauty means hours of sweat in a gym or sleepless nights creating a novel.
What Unicorns don't have; but what Law, and ballet, and novels have is an extra something called 'ΥΛΗ
I think the word you are looking for is 'ΥΛΗ or hyle. Accusative hylen.
But I'm just an apocalyptic platonist.
I think most ancient and medieval philosophers would disagree: matter (hyle) isn't a principle of existence. Immaterial substances can fail to exist just as much as material substances.
– brianpck
Jan 11 at 15:41
@brianpck While it's abstract nature, and the accidental nature have been discussed, I thought Charlie was asking for the actuality, the 'thing,' the kickable object and its distinctive reality in the world. Isn't that hyle?
– Hugh
Jan 11 at 19:47
add a comment |
Well I agree with Kingshorsey about Essentia. If I talked about Unicorns, or Justice, or Beauty, you know what I mean because you know their essence: essentia.
And if I asked you to describe them you might start with 'spiral horns and white hair;' or 'wigs, black robes, and juries;' or 'angel choirs and tangerine skies.' These are
accidental properties which remind you of the 'Essentia.'
But in this world Unicorns are not alive; Justice turns out to be about plea bargaining and how much you can afford for a lawyer; and beauty means hours of sweat in a gym or sleepless nights creating a novel.
What Unicorns don't have; but what Law, and ballet, and novels have is an extra something called 'ΥΛΗ
I think the word you are looking for is 'ΥΛΗ or hyle. Accusative hylen.
But I'm just an apocalyptic platonist.
I think most ancient and medieval philosophers would disagree: matter (hyle) isn't a principle of existence. Immaterial substances can fail to exist just as much as material substances.
– brianpck
Jan 11 at 15:41
@brianpck While it's abstract nature, and the accidental nature have been discussed, I thought Charlie was asking for the actuality, the 'thing,' the kickable object and its distinctive reality in the world. Isn't that hyle?
– Hugh
Jan 11 at 19:47
add a comment |
Well I agree with Kingshorsey about Essentia. If I talked about Unicorns, or Justice, or Beauty, you know what I mean because you know their essence: essentia.
And if I asked you to describe them you might start with 'spiral horns and white hair;' or 'wigs, black robes, and juries;' or 'angel choirs and tangerine skies.' These are
accidental properties which remind you of the 'Essentia.'
But in this world Unicorns are not alive; Justice turns out to be about plea bargaining and how much you can afford for a lawyer; and beauty means hours of sweat in a gym or sleepless nights creating a novel.
What Unicorns don't have; but what Law, and ballet, and novels have is an extra something called 'ΥΛΗ
I think the word you are looking for is 'ΥΛΗ or hyle. Accusative hylen.
But I'm just an apocalyptic platonist.
Well I agree with Kingshorsey about Essentia. If I talked about Unicorns, or Justice, or Beauty, you know what I mean because you know their essence: essentia.
And if I asked you to describe them you might start with 'spiral horns and white hair;' or 'wigs, black robes, and juries;' or 'angel choirs and tangerine skies.' These are
accidental properties which remind you of the 'Essentia.'
But in this world Unicorns are not alive; Justice turns out to be about plea bargaining and how much you can afford for a lawyer; and beauty means hours of sweat in a gym or sleepless nights creating a novel.
What Unicorns don't have; but what Law, and ballet, and novels have is an extra something called 'ΥΛΗ
I think the word you are looking for is 'ΥΛΗ or hyle. Accusative hylen.
But I'm just an apocalyptic platonist.
answered Jan 10 at 19:43
HughHugh
5,2452616
5,2452616
I think most ancient and medieval philosophers would disagree: matter (hyle) isn't a principle of existence. Immaterial substances can fail to exist just as much as material substances.
– brianpck
Jan 11 at 15:41
@brianpck While it's abstract nature, and the accidental nature have been discussed, I thought Charlie was asking for the actuality, the 'thing,' the kickable object and its distinctive reality in the world. Isn't that hyle?
– Hugh
Jan 11 at 19:47
add a comment |
I think most ancient and medieval philosophers would disagree: matter (hyle) isn't a principle of existence. Immaterial substances can fail to exist just as much as material substances.
– brianpck
Jan 11 at 15:41
@brianpck While it's abstract nature, and the accidental nature have been discussed, I thought Charlie was asking for the actuality, the 'thing,' the kickable object and its distinctive reality in the world. Isn't that hyle?
– Hugh
Jan 11 at 19:47
I think most ancient and medieval philosophers would disagree: matter (hyle) isn't a principle of existence. Immaterial substances can fail to exist just as much as material substances.
– brianpck
Jan 11 at 15:41
I think most ancient and medieval philosophers would disagree: matter (hyle) isn't a principle of existence. Immaterial substances can fail to exist just as much as material substances.
– brianpck
Jan 11 at 15:41
@brianpck While it's abstract nature, and the accidental nature have been discussed, I thought Charlie was asking for the actuality, the 'thing,' the kickable object and its distinctive reality in the world. Isn't that hyle?
– Hugh
Jan 11 at 19:47
@brianpck While it's abstract nature, and the accidental nature have been discussed, I thought Charlie was asking for the actuality, the 'thing,' the kickable object and its distinctive reality in the world. Isn't that hyle?
– Hugh
Jan 11 at 19:47
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f8852%2fcould-essentia-be-understood-in-latin-as-the-act-of-being%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown