Biblatex APA style does not support editor types?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












3














I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



documentclassarticle
usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

usepackagefilecontents

beginfilecontentsmwe.bib
@Bookjones1886illustrations,
author = Jones, Howard,
title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
year = 1886,
editor = Jones, N. E.,
editortype = illustrator,
location = Circleville, OH,

endfilecontents

addbibresourcemwe.bib

NewBibliographyStringillustrator
NewBibliographyStringillustrators
NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator

DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
illustrator = illustrator,
illustrators = illustrators,
byillustrator = illustrated by,
cbyillustrator = illustradddot,



begindocument
nocite*
printbibliography
enddocument


Results:



MWE results










share|improve this question




























    3














    I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



    How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



    Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



    I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



    How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



    documentclassarticle
    usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

    usepackagefilecontents

    beginfilecontentsmwe.bib
    @Bookjones1886illustrations,
    author = Jones, Howard,
    title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
    year = 1886,
    editor = Jones, N. E.,
    editortype = illustrator,
    location = Circleville, OH,

    endfilecontents

    addbibresourcemwe.bib

    NewBibliographyStringillustrator
    NewBibliographyStringillustrators
    NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
    NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator

    DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
    illustrator = illustrator,
    illustrators = illustrators,
    byillustrator = illustrated by,
    cbyillustrator = illustradddot,



    begindocument
    nocite*
    printbibliography
    enddocument


    Results:



    MWE results










    share|improve this question


























      3












      3








      3







      I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



      How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



      Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



      I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



      How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

      usepackagefilecontents

      beginfilecontentsmwe.bib
      @Bookjones1886illustrations,
      author = Jones, Howard,
      title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
      year = 1886,
      editor = Jones, N. E.,
      editortype = illustrator,
      location = Circleville, OH,

      endfilecontents

      addbibresourcemwe.bib

      NewBibliographyStringillustrator
      NewBibliographyStringillustrators
      NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
      NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator

      DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
      illustrator = illustrator,
      illustrators = illustrators,
      byillustrator = illustrated by,
      cbyillustrator = illustradddot,



      begindocument
      nocite*
      printbibliography
      enddocument


      Results:



      MWE results










      share|improve this question















      I am attempting to add an "illustrator" editor type to my reference with little success. I have looked at the answers at:



      How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?



      Create new editorial role "organizer" in biblatex



      I can make my MWE work until I add style=APA to biblatex. At that point the editortype is rendered as typeillustrator. Using other predefined editor types produced similar results.



      How can I make the APA bibliography style produce "illustrator" instead of "typeillustrator"?



      documentclassarticle
      usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

      usepackagefilecontents

      beginfilecontentsmwe.bib
      @Bookjones1886illustrations,
      author = Jones, Howard,
      title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
      year = 1886,
      editor = Jones, N. E.,
      editortype = illustrator,
      location = Circleville, OH,

      endfilecontents

      addbibresourcemwe.bib

      NewBibliographyStringillustrator
      NewBibliographyStringillustrators
      NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
      NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator

      DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
      illustrator = illustrator,
      illustrators = illustrators,
      byillustrator = illustrated by,
      cbyillustrator = illustradddot,



      begindocument
      nocite*
      printbibliography
      enddocument


      Results:



      MWE results







      biblatex apa-style






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 21 '18 at 19:48









      moewe

      86.7k9110333




      86.7k9110333










      asked Dec 21 '18 at 17:35









      lightkeeper

      453




      453




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

          NewBibliographyStringillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringillustrators
          NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrators

          DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
          illustrator = illustrator,
          illustrators = illustrators,
          typeillustrator = illustrator,
          typeillustrators = illustrators,
          byillustrator = illustrated by,
          cbyillustrator = illustradddot,


          usepackagefilecontents
          beginfilecontentsjobname.bib
          @bookjones1886illustrations,
          author = Jones, Howard,
          title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
          year = 1886,
          editor = Jones, N. E.,
          editortype = illustrator,
          location = Circleville, OH,

          endfilecontents
          addbibresourcejobname.bib

          begindocument
          nocite*
          printbibliography
          enddocument


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.




          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*apaeditorstrg[1]%
          iffieldundef#1type
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          bibcpstringeditors
          bibcpstringeditor
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringthefield#1types
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringthefield#1type


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.




          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.




          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer






















          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15










          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefieldeditortype. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefieldeditortype, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47










          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "85"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466884%2fbiblatex-apa-style-does-not-support-editor-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5














          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

          NewBibliographyStringillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringillustrators
          NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrators

          DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
          illustrator = illustrator,
          illustrators = illustrators,
          typeillustrator = illustrator,
          typeillustrators = illustrators,
          byillustrator = illustrated by,
          cbyillustrator = illustradddot,


          usepackagefilecontents
          beginfilecontentsjobname.bib
          @bookjones1886illustrations,
          author = Jones, Howard,
          title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
          year = 1886,
          editor = Jones, N. E.,
          editortype = illustrator,
          location = Circleville, OH,

          endfilecontents
          addbibresourcejobname.bib

          begindocument
          nocite*
          printbibliography
          enddocument


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.




          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*apaeditorstrg[1]%
          iffieldundef#1type
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          bibcpstringeditors
          bibcpstringeditor
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringthefield#1types
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringthefield#1type


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.




          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.




          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer






















          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15










          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefieldeditortype. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefieldeditortype, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47















          5














          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

          NewBibliographyStringillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringillustrators
          NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrators

          DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
          illustrator = illustrator,
          illustrators = illustrators,
          typeillustrator = illustrator,
          typeillustrators = illustrators,
          byillustrator = illustrated by,
          cbyillustrator = illustradddot,


          usepackagefilecontents
          beginfilecontentsjobname.bib
          @bookjones1886illustrations,
          author = Jones, Howard,
          title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
          year = 1886,
          editor = Jones, N. E.,
          editortype = illustrator,
          location = Circleville, OH,

          endfilecontents
          addbibresourcejobname.bib

          begindocument
          nocite*
          printbibliography
          enddocument


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.




          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*apaeditorstrg[1]%
          iffieldundef#1type
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          bibcpstringeditors
          bibcpstringeditor
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringthefield#1types
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringthefield#1type


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.




          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.




          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer






















          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15










          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefieldeditortype. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefieldeditortype, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47













          5












          5








          5






          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

          NewBibliographyStringillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringillustrators
          NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrators

          DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
          illustrator = illustrator,
          illustrators = illustrators,
          typeillustrator = illustrator,
          typeillustrators = illustrators,
          byillustrator = illustrated by,
          cbyillustrator = illustradddot,


          usepackagefilecontents
          beginfilecontentsjobname.bib
          @bookjones1886illustrations,
          author = Jones, Howard,
          title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
          year = 1886,
          editor = Jones, N. E.,
          editortype = illustrator,
          location = Circleville, OH,

          endfilecontents
          addbibresourcejobname.bib

          begindocument
          nocite*
          printbibliography
          enddocument


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.




          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*apaeditorstrg[1]%
          iffieldundef#1type
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          bibcpstringeditors
          bibcpstringeditor
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringthefield#1types
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringthefield#1type


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.




          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.




          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.






          share|improve this answer














          The bibstrings that biblatex-apa uses for editortype are called type<editortype> and type<editortype>s, so you have to define those as well.



          documentclassarticle
          usepackage[style=apa, backend=biber]biblatex

          NewBibliographyStringillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringillustrators
          NewBibliographyStringbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringcbyillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrator
          NewBibliographyStringtypeillustrators

          DefineBibliographyStringsenglish%
          illustrator = illustrator,
          illustrators = illustrators,
          typeillustrator = illustrator,
          typeillustrators = illustrators,
          byillustrator = illustrated by,
          cbyillustrator = illustradddot,


          usepackagefilecontents
          beginfilecontentsjobname.bib
          @bookjones1886illustrations,
          author = Jones, Howard,
          title = Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text,
          year = 1886,
          editor = Jones, N. E.,
          editortype = illustrator,
          location = Circleville, OH,

          endfilecontents
          addbibresourcejobname.bib

          begindocument
          nocite*
          printbibliography
          enddocument


          Jones, H. (1886). Illustrations of the nests and eggs of birds of Ohio with text (N. E. Jones, Illustrator). Circleville, OH.




          It is a bit unfortunate that biblatex-apa uses different bibstrings than the standard styles, but given the predefined terms I guess that was done to avoid name clashes with other standard bibstrings (there are typevolume and typeseries for volume and series editors, respectively; these can't be just volume or series because those names are already taken).



          It may be a nicer solution to tell biblatex-apa to try the standard <editorype> bibstring when type<editortype> is undefined.



          With



          renewbibmacro*apaeditorstrg[1]%
          iffieldundef#1type
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          bibcpstringeditors
          bibcpstringeditor
          ifthenelsevalue#1>1ORifandothers#1
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1types
          bibcpstringthefield#1types
          ifbibstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringtypethefield#1type
          bibcpstringthefield#1type


          it should not be necessary to define typeillustrator and typeillustrators.




          The string cbyillustrator is not needed in the MWE since it is only used by biblatex-chicago as pointed out in How to identify Illustrator in bibtex?.




          Finally, note the curly braces around Ohio to stop the sentence casing applied by biblatex-apa from wrongly converting the proper name Ohio to lower case. Cf. BibTeX loses capitals when creating .bbl file.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Dec 22 '18 at 9:19

























          answered Dec 21 '18 at 17:46









          moewe

          86.7k9110333




          86.7k9110333











          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15










          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefieldeditortype. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefieldeditortype, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47
















          • I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
            – lightkeeper
            Dec 21 '18 at 18:15










          • @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefieldeditortype. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefieldeditortype, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
            – moewe
            Dec 21 '18 at 19:47















          I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
          – lightkeeper
          Dec 21 '18 at 18:15




          I recognize that you are the Master. But where can we ordinary mortals find such information? I have read the biblatex-apa documentation and cannot find any relevant information.
          – lightkeeper
          Dec 21 '18 at 18:15












          @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefieldeditortype. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefieldeditortype, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
          – moewe
          Dec 21 '18 at 19:47




          @lightkeeper Things like this are indeed usually not documented in the style documentation. They have to be found in the code. From the output you got (the bold 'typeillustrator') one could guess that the style tries to use something like typethefieldeditortype. I tried typeillustrator which worked. This is not the usual behaviour of the standard styles, which would only look for thefieldeditortype, which means I could be pretty sure that I had to look in apa.bbx. I searched for type (there are quite a few hits) and found the bits of code to verify my guess.
          – moewe
          Dec 21 '18 at 19:47

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466884%2fbiblatex-apa-style-does-not-support-editor-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay