What is the purpose of .bashrc and how does it work?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
110
down vote
favorite
I found the .bashrc
file and I want to know the purpose/function of it. Also how and when is it used?
bash bashrc
add a comment |
up vote
110
down vote
favorite
I found the .bashrc
file and I want to know the purpose/function of it. Also how and when is it used?
bash bashrc
7
superuser.com/questions/49289/what-is-the-bashrc-file
– devnull
May 13 '14 at 5:49
add a comment |
up vote
110
down vote
favorite
up vote
110
down vote
favorite
I found the .bashrc
file and I want to know the purpose/function of it. Also how and when is it used?
bash bashrc
I found the .bashrc
file and I want to know the purpose/function of it. Also how and when is it used?
bash bashrc
bash bashrc
edited May 13 '14 at 23:13
Gilles
524k12610471577
524k12610471577
asked May 13 '14 at 5:48
Pandya
8,3991348102
8,3991348102
7
superuser.com/questions/49289/what-is-the-bashrc-file
– devnull
May 13 '14 at 5:49
add a comment |
7
superuser.com/questions/49289/what-is-the-bashrc-file
– devnull
May 13 '14 at 5:49
7
7
superuser.com/questions/49289/what-is-the-bashrc-file
– devnull
May 13 '14 at 5:49
superuser.com/questions/49289/what-is-the-bashrc-file
– devnull
May 13 '14 at 5:49
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
101
down vote
accepted
.bashrc
is a shell script that Bash runs whenever it is started interactively. It initializes an interactive shell session. You can put any command in that file that you could type at the command prompt.
You put commands here to set up the shell for use in your particular environment, or to customize things to your preferences. A common thing to put in .bashrc
are aliases that you want to always be available.
.bashrc
runs on every interactive shell launch. If you say:
$ bash ; bash ; bash
and then hit Ctrl-D three times, .bashrc
will run three times. But if you say this instead:
$ bash -c exit ; bash -c exit ; bash -c exit
then .bashrc
won't run at all, since -c
makes the Bash call non-interactive. The same is true when you run a shell script from a file.
Contrast .bash_profile
and .profile
which are only run at the start of a new login shell. (bash -l
) You choose whether a command goes in .bashrc
vs .bash_profile
depending on on whether you want it to run once or for every interactive shell start.
As a counterexample to aliases, which I prefer to put in .bashrc
, you want to do PATH
adjustments in .bash_profile
instead, since these changes are typically not idempotent:
export PATH="$PATH:/some/addition"
If you put that in .bashrc
instead, every time you launched an interactive sub-shell, :/some/addition
would get tacked on to the end of the PATH
again, creating extra work for the shell when you mistype a command.
You get a new interactive Bash shell whenever you shell out of vi
with :sh
, for example.
5
Minor quibble: unlike most other shells, bash does not automatically load the per-instance config file.bashrc
when it's started as a login shell. This can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior. The usual workaround is to source.bashrc
from.profile
or.bash_profile
instead.
– Ilmari Karonen
May 13 '14 at 11:14
@IlmariKaronen Since.bashrc
isn't intended for use by other shells, it's better not to source it from.profile
(which might be used by other non-bash
shells).
– chepner
May 14 '14 at 2:32
@IlmariKaronen what happens (read: how can I debug why) whensource ~/.bashrc
or. ~/.bashrc
or[[ -f ~/.bashrc ]] && source. ~/.bashrc
or[ -f ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc
don't work?
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 14:22
@NikosAlexandris: That's a separate question. Please ask it separately.
– Warren Young
Feb 12 '17 at 14:36
@WarrenYoung I would but I realised that.bashrc
is indeed sourced (using the recommended command from superuser.com/a/183980/128768). The problem I face is actually the not sourcing ofhttps://github.com/junegunn/fzf
via this command inside.bashrc
:source ~/.fzf.bash
. I launch a new terminal, thenCtrl
+R
and I get`__fzf_history__`bash: fzf: command not found
. I source manually.bashrc
and the same key shortcut launches fzf as expected. Apologies for the noise here.
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 15:46
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
19
down vote
The purpose of a .bashrc
file is to provide a place where you can set up variables, functions and aliases, define your (PS1) prompt and define other settings that you want to use every start you open a new terminal window.
It works by being run each time you open up a new terminal, window or pane.
You can see mine here (pic with syntax highlighting):
HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth:erasedups HISTSIZE=100000 HISTFILESIZE=200000
ls --color=al > /dev/null 2>&1 && alias ls='ls -F --color=al' || alias ls='ls -G'
md () echo "Error - no directory passed!";
git_branch () git branch 2> /dev/null
HOST='33[02;36m]h'; HOST=' '$HOST
TIME='33[01;31m]t 33[01;32m]'
LOCATION=' 33[01;34m]`pwd | sed "s#(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/).*(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,)/0,1#1_2#g"`'
BRANCH=' 33[00;33m]$(git_branch)[33[00m]n$ '
PS1=$TIME$USER$HOST$LOCATION$BRANCH
PS2='[33[01;36m]>'
set -o vi # vi at command line
export EDITOR=vim
test -f ~/.bash_aliases && . $_
test -f ~/.git-completion.bash && . $_
test -s ~/.autojump/etc/profile.d/autojump && . $_
[ $BASH_VERSINFO[0] -ge 4 ] && shopt -s autocd
[ -f /etc/bash_completion ] && ! shopt -oq posix && . /etc/bash_completion
[ -z $TMUX ] && export TERM=xterm-256color && exec tmux
export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/.rvm/bin" # Add RVM to PATH for scripting
[[ -s "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm" ]] && source "$home/.rvm/scripts/rvm"
Explanation:
-1. Set up my history file to ignore duplicates and be much larger than the default.
-2. Color option for ls
depending on if you are using linux or OSX
-3. Function "md
" to make and cd into a directory with one command
-4. Find the current git branch if in a git repo and...
-5. -9. Define an awesome PS1 prompt, as in
-10. Improved PS2 prompt
-11. Set vi as the editor at the command line
-12. Set vi as the default editor
-13. execute my .bash_aliases
file if it exists
-14. Execute my git tab completion script (for remotes and branches) if it exists.
-15. Execute autojump if it exists
-16. Allow cd'ing without typing the cd part if the bash version >= 4
-17. Execute a bash completion script if it exists
-18. Use TMUX if it is present
-19. Add rvm to my PATH
-20. Use rvm if it exists.
I've made this portable so that it works on any of my linux or OSX machines without customization - hence a number of tests for presence are done before using certain functions and other scripts.
This also makes it easier to use the entire file immediately on a new machine without having issues that affect
opening a new terminal window.
Overkill... ͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
– Pacerier
Nov 2 '17 at 13:42
huh? too helpful for you?
– Michael Durrant
Nov 3 '17 at 2:12
1
Thank you SO much for sharing. A wealth of information here.
– Vic
Jul 3 at 15:28
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It is a bash
config file.
Interactive (non-login) shells, then the config is read from these files:
$HOME/.bashrc
For Login shells, the config is read from these files:
/etc/profile
(Always sourced)$HOME/.bash_profile
(the rest of these files are checked in order until one is found, then no others are read)$HOME/.bash_login
$HOME/.profile
Simple illustration of how/when they are loaded is in the image below.
I added an echo
to my .bashrc
and .bash_profile
see man bash
for more information
2
This doesn't really add additional value to an old question. Also, I see that you're new to Unix & Linux, try not to post pictures of text, instead it's better to use the code block formatting and copy from your console. This allows the text to be searched/copied/etc. In the case of your example there aren't really any complicated commands or anything that would be good to search, but a good practice for other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 18:24
1
I'm not sure I fully understand your reference to 'old question' It is in the top question list, and it is relevant with 60k views. I thought the added value came from the format, as opposed to a dialog/conjecture like the previous answers. but the format has been edited as well. I will keep in mind your comments about using code blocks, thanks.
– Timothy L.J. Stewart
Sep 15 '16 at 19:31
2
It's in the top of the 'active' question list because you posted an answer. The question was originally asked in 2014, and accepted an answer. The accepted answer states the purpose of.bashrc
and distinguishes the difference between.bashrc
and.bash_profile
which covers the content of your answer. Don't be discouraged, you put forward an honest effort, but try to focus on answering questions with some content not covered by other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 19:36
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
101
down vote
accepted
.bashrc
is a shell script that Bash runs whenever it is started interactively. It initializes an interactive shell session. You can put any command in that file that you could type at the command prompt.
You put commands here to set up the shell for use in your particular environment, or to customize things to your preferences. A common thing to put in .bashrc
are aliases that you want to always be available.
.bashrc
runs on every interactive shell launch. If you say:
$ bash ; bash ; bash
and then hit Ctrl-D three times, .bashrc
will run three times. But if you say this instead:
$ bash -c exit ; bash -c exit ; bash -c exit
then .bashrc
won't run at all, since -c
makes the Bash call non-interactive. The same is true when you run a shell script from a file.
Contrast .bash_profile
and .profile
which are only run at the start of a new login shell. (bash -l
) You choose whether a command goes in .bashrc
vs .bash_profile
depending on on whether you want it to run once or for every interactive shell start.
As a counterexample to aliases, which I prefer to put in .bashrc
, you want to do PATH
adjustments in .bash_profile
instead, since these changes are typically not idempotent:
export PATH="$PATH:/some/addition"
If you put that in .bashrc
instead, every time you launched an interactive sub-shell, :/some/addition
would get tacked on to the end of the PATH
again, creating extra work for the shell when you mistype a command.
You get a new interactive Bash shell whenever you shell out of vi
with :sh
, for example.
5
Minor quibble: unlike most other shells, bash does not automatically load the per-instance config file.bashrc
when it's started as a login shell. This can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior. The usual workaround is to source.bashrc
from.profile
or.bash_profile
instead.
– Ilmari Karonen
May 13 '14 at 11:14
@IlmariKaronen Since.bashrc
isn't intended for use by other shells, it's better not to source it from.profile
(which might be used by other non-bash
shells).
– chepner
May 14 '14 at 2:32
@IlmariKaronen what happens (read: how can I debug why) whensource ~/.bashrc
or. ~/.bashrc
or[[ -f ~/.bashrc ]] && source. ~/.bashrc
or[ -f ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc
don't work?
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 14:22
@NikosAlexandris: That's a separate question. Please ask it separately.
– Warren Young
Feb 12 '17 at 14:36
@WarrenYoung I would but I realised that.bashrc
is indeed sourced (using the recommended command from superuser.com/a/183980/128768). The problem I face is actually the not sourcing ofhttps://github.com/junegunn/fzf
via this command inside.bashrc
:source ~/.fzf.bash
. I launch a new terminal, thenCtrl
+R
and I get`__fzf_history__`bash: fzf: command not found
. I source manually.bashrc
and the same key shortcut launches fzf as expected. Apologies for the noise here.
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 15:46
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
101
down vote
accepted
.bashrc
is a shell script that Bash runs whenever it is started interactively. It initializes an interactive shell session. You can put any command in that file that you could type at the command prompt.
You put commands here to set up the shell for use in your particular environment, or to customize things to your preferences. A common thing to put in .bashrc
are aliases that you want to always be available.
.bashrc
runs on every interactive shell launch. If you say:
$ bash ; bash ; bash
and then hit Ctrl-D three times, .bashrc
will run three times. But if you say this instead:
$ bash -c exit ; bash -c exit ; bash -c exit
then .bashrc
won't run at all, since -c
makes the Bash call non-interactive. The same is true when you run a shell script from a file.
Contrast .bash_profile
and .profile
which are only run at the start of a new login shell. (bash -l
) You choose whether a command goes in .bashrc
vs .bash_profile
depending on on whether you want it to run once or for every interactive shell start.
As a counterexample to aliases, which I prefer to put in .bashrc
, you want to do PATH
adjustments in .bash_profile
instead, since these changes are typically not idempotent:
export PATH="$PATH:/some/addition"
If you put that in .bashrc
instead, every time you launched an interactive sub-shell, :/some/addition
would get tacked on to the end of the PATH
again, creating extra work for the shell when you mistype a command.
You get a new interactive Bash shell whenever you shell out of vi
with :sh
, for example.
5
Minor quibble: unlike most other shells, bash does not automatically load the per-instance config file.bashrc
when it's started as a login shell. This can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior. The usual workaround is to source.bashrc
from.profile
or.bash_profile
instead.
– Ilmari Karonen
May 13 '14 at 11:14
@IlmariKaronen Since.bashrc
isn't intended for use by other shells, it's better not to source it from.profile
(which might be used by other non-bash
shells).
– chepner
May 14 '14 at 2:32
@IlmariKaronen what happens (read: how can I debug why) whensource ~/.bashrc
or. ~/.bashrc
or[[ -f ~/.bashrc ]] && source. ~/.bashrc
or[ -f ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc
don't work?
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 14:22
@NikosAlexandris: That's a separate question. Please ask it separately.
– Warren Young
Feb 12 '17 at 14:36
@WarrenYoung I would but I realised that.bashrc
is indeed sourced (using the recommended command from superuser.com/a/183980/128768). The problem I face is actually the not sourcing ofhttps://github.com/junegunn/fzf
via this command inside.bashrc
:source ~/.fzf.bash
. I launch a new terminal, thenCtrl
+R
and I get`__fzf_history__`bash: fzf: command not found
. I source manually.bashrc
and the same key shortcut launches fzf as expected. Apologies for the noise here.
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 15:46
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
101
down vote
accepted
up vote
101
down vote
accepted
.bashrc
is a shell script that Bash runs whenever it is started interactively. It initializes an interactive shell session. You can put any command in that file that you could type at the command prompt.
You put commands here to set up the shell for use in your particular environment, or to customize things to your preferences. A common thing to put in .bashrc
are aliases that you want to always be available.
.bashrc
runs on every interactive shell launch. If you say:
$ bash ; bash ; bash
and then hit Ctrl-D three times, .bashrc
will run three times. But if you say this instead:
$ bash -c exit ; bash -c exit ; bash -c exit
then .bashrc
won't run at all, since -c
makes the Bash call non-interactive. The same is true when you run a shell script from a file.
Contrast .bash_profile
and .profile
which are only run at the start of a new login shell. (bash -l
) You choose whether a command goes in .bashrc
vs .bash_profile
depending on on whether you want it to run once or for every interactive shell start.
As a counterexample to aliases, which I prefer to put in .bashrc
, you want to do PATH
adjustments in .bash_profile
instead, since these changes are typically not idempotent:
export PATH="$PATH:/some/addition"
If you put that in .bashrc
instead, every time you launched an interactive sub-shell, :/some/addition
would get tacked on to the end of the PATH
again, creating extra work for the shell when you mistype a command.
You get a new interactive Bash shell whenever you shell out of vi
with :sh
, for example.
.bashrc
is a shell script that Bash runs whenever it is started interactively. It initializes an interactive shell session. You can put any command in that file that you could type at the command prompt.
You put commands here to set up the shell for use in your particular environment, or to customize things to your preferences. A common thing to put in .bashrc
are aliases that you want to always be available.
.bashrc
runs on every interactive shell launch. If you say:
$ bash ; bash ; bash
and then hit Ctrl-D three times, .bashrc
will run three times. But if you say this instead:
$ bash -c exit ; bash -c exit ; bash -c exit
then .bashrc
won't run at all, since -c
makes the Bash call non-interactive. The same is true when you run a shell script from a file.
Contrast .bash_profile
and .profile
which are only run at the start of a new login shell. (bash -l
) You choose whether a command goes in .bashrc
vs .bash_profile
depending on on whether you want it to run once or for every interactive shell start.
As a counterexample to aliases, which I prefer to put in .bashrc
, you want to do PATH
adjustments in .bash_profile
instead, since these changes are typically not idempotent:
export PATH="$PATH:/some/addition"
If you put that in .bashrc
instead, every time you launched an interactive sub-shell, :/some/addition
would get tacked on to the end of the PATH
again, creating extra work for the shell when you mistype a command.
You get a new interactive Bash shell whenever you shell out of vi
with :sh
, for example.
edited Feb 13 at 7:35
Kusalananda
118k16223364
118k16223364
answered May 13 '14 at 6:02
Warren Young
54.3k9142145
54.3k9142145
5
Minor quibble: unlike most other shells, bash does not automatically load the per-instance config file.bashrc
when it's started as a login shell. This can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior. The usual workaround is to source.bashrc
from.profile
or.bash_profile
instead.
– Ilmari Karonen
May 13 '14 at 11:14
@IlmariKaronen Since.bashrc
isn't intended for use by other shells, it's better not to source it from.profile
(which might be used by other non-bash
shells).
– chepner
May 14 '14 at 2:32
@IlmariKaronen what happens (read: how can I debug why) whensource ~/.bashrc
or. ~/.bashrc
or[[ -f ~/.bashrc ]] && source. ~/.bashrc
or[ -f ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc
don't work?
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 14:22
@NikosAlexandris: That's a separate question. Please ask it separately.
– Warren Young
Feb 12 '17 at 14:36
@WarrenYoung I would but I realised that.bashrc
is indeed sourced (using the recommended command from superuser.com/a/183980/128768). The problem I face is actually the not sourcing ofhttps://github.com/junegunn/fzf
via this command inside.bashrc
:source ~/.fzf.bash
. I launch a new terminal, thenCtrl
+R
and I get`__fzf_history__`bash: fzf: command not found
. I source manually.bashrc
and the same key shortcut launches fzf as expected. Apologies for the noise here.
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 15:46
|
show 2 more comments
5
Minor quibble: unlike most other shells, bash does not automatically load the per-instance config file.bashrc
when it's started as a login shell. This can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior. The usual workaround is to source.bashrc
from.profile
or.bash_profile
instead.
– Ilmari Karonen
May 13 '14 at 11:14
@IlmariKaronen Since.bashrc
isn't intended for use by other shells, it's better not to source it from.profile
(which might be used by other non-bash
shells).
– chepner
May 14 '14 at 2:32
@IlmariKaronen what happens (read: how can I debug why) whensource ~/.bashrc
or. ~/.bashrc
or[[ -f ~/.bashrc ]] && source. ~/.bashrc
or[ -f ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc
don't work?
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 14:22
@NikosAlexandris: That's a separate question. Please ask it separately.
– Warren Young
Feb 12 '17 at 14:36
@WarrenYoung I would but I realised that.bashrc
is indeed sourced (using the recommended command from superuser.com/a/183980/128768). The problem I face is actually the not sourcing ofhttps://github.com/junegunn/fzf
via this command inside.bashrc
:source ~/.fzf.bash
. I launch a new terminal, thenCtrl
+R
and I get`__fzf_history__`bash: fzf: command not found
. I source manually.bashrc
and the same key shortcut launches fzf as expected. Apologies for the noise here.
– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 15:46
5
5
Minor quibble: unlike most other shells, bash does not automatically load the per-instance config file
.bashrc
when it's started as a login shell. This can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior. The usual workaround is to source .bashrc
from .profile
or .bash_profile
instead.– Ilmari Karonen
May 13 '14 at 11:14
Minor quibble: unlike most other shells, bash does not automatically load the per-instance config file
.bashrc
when it's started as a login shell. This can sometimes lead to unexpected behavior. The usual workaround is to source .bashrc
from .profile
or .bash_profile
instead.– Ilmari Karonen
May 13 '14 at 11:14
@IlmariKaronen Since
.bashrc
isn't intended for use by other shells, it's better not to source it from .profile
(which might be used by other non-bash
shells).– chepner
May 14 '14 at 2:32
@IlmariKaronen Since
.bashrc
isn't intended for use by other shells, it's better not to source it from .profile
(which might be used by other non-bash
shells).– chepner
May 14 '14 at 2:32
@IlmariKaronen what happens (read: how can I debug why) when
source ~/.bashrc
or . ~/.bashrc
or [[ -f ~/.bashrc ]] && source. ~/.bashrc
or [ -f ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc
don't work?– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 14:22
@IlmariKaronen what happens (read: how can I debug why) when
source ~/.bashrc
or . ~/.bashrc
or [[ -f ~/.bashrc ]] && source. ~/.bashrc
or [ -f ~/.bashrc ] && source ~/.bashrc
don't work?– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 14:22
@NikosAlexandris: That's a separate question. Please ask it separately.
– Warren Young
Feb 12 '17 at 14:36
@NikosAlexandris: That's a separate question. Please ask it separately.
– Warren Young
Feb 12 '17 at 14:36
@WarrenYoung I would but I realised that
.bashrc
is indeed sourced (using the recommended command from superuser.com/a/183980/128768). The problem I face is actually the not sourcing of https://github.com/junegunn/fzf
via this command inside .bashrc
: source ~/.fzf.bash
. I launch a new terminal, then Ctrl
+R
and I get `__fzf_history__`bash: fzf: command not found
. I source manually .bashrc
and the same key shortcut launches fzf as expected. Apologies for the noise here.– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 15:46
@WarrenYoung I would but I realised that
.bashrc
is indeed sourced (using the recommended command from superuser.com/a/183980/128768). The problem I face is actually the not sourcing of https://github.com/junegunn/fzf
via this command inside .bashrc
: source ~/.fzf.bash
. I launch a new terminal, then Ctrl
+R
and I get `__fzf_history__`bash: fzf: command not found
. I source manually .bashrc
and the same key shortcut launches fzf as expected. Apologies for the noise here.– Nikos Alexandris
Feb 12 '17 at 15:46
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
19
down vote
The purpose of a .bashrc
file is to provide a place where you can set up variables, functions and aliases, define your (PS1) prompt and define other settings that you want to use every start you open a new terminal window.
It works by being run each time you open up a new terminal, window or pane.
You can see mine here (pic with syntax highlighting):
HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth:erasedups HISTSIZE=100000 HISTFILESIZE=200000
ls --color=al > /dev/null 2>&1 && alias ls='ls -F --color=al' || alias ls='ls -G'
md () echo "Error - no directory passed!";
git_branch () git branch 2> /dev/null
HOST='33[02;36m]h'; HOST=' '$HOST
TIME='33[01;31m]t 33[01;32m]'
LOCATION=' 33[01;34m]`pwd | sed "s#(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/).*(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,)/0,1#1_2#g"`'
BRANCH=' 33[00;33m]$(git_branch)[33[00m]n$ '
PS1=$TIME$USER$HOST$LOCATION$BRANCH
PS2='[33[01;36m]>'
set -o vi # vi at command line
export EDITOR=vim
test -f ~/.bash_aliases && . $_
test -f ~/.git-completion.bash && . $_
test -s ~/.autojump/etc/profile.d/autojump && . $_
[ $BASH_VERSINFO[0] -ge 4 ] && shopt -s autocd
[ -f /etc/bash_completion ] && ! shopt -oq posix && . /etc/bash_completion
[ -z $TMUX ] && export TERM=xterm-256color && exec tmux
export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/.rvm/bin" # Add RVM to PATH for scripting
[[ -s "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm" ]] && source "$home/.rvm/scripts/rvm"
Explanation:
-1. Set up my history file to ignore duplicates and be much larger than the default.
-2. Color option for ls
depending on if you are using linux or OSX
-3. Function "md
" to make and cd into a directory with one command
-4. Find the current git branch if in a git repo and...
-5. -9. Define an awesome PS1 prompt, as in
-10. Improved PS2 prompt
-11. Set vi as the editor at the command line
-12. Set vi as the default editor
-13. execute my .bash_aliases
file if it exists
-14. Execute my git tab completion script (for remotes and branches) if it exists.
-15. Execute autojump if it exists
-16. Allow cd'ing without typing the cd part if the bash version >= 4
-17. Execute a bash completion script if it exists
-18. Use TMUX if it is present
-19. Add rvm to my PATH
-20. Use rvm if it exists.
I've made this portable so that it works on any of my linux or OSX machines without customization - hence a number of tests for presence are done before using certain functions and other scripts.
This also makes it easier to use the entire file immediately on a new machine without having issues that affect
opening a new terminal window.
Overkill... ͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
– Pacerier
Nov 2 '17 at 13:42
huh? too helpful for you?
– Michael Durrant
Nov 3 '17 at 2:12
1
Thank you SO much for sharing. A wealth of information here.
– Vic
Jul 3 at 15:28
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
The purpose of a .bashrc
file is to provide a place where you can set up variables, functions and aliases, define your (PS1) prompt and define other settings that you want to use every start you open a new terminal window.
It works by being run each time you open up a new terminal, window or pane.
You can see mine here (pic with syntax highlighting):
HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth:erasedups HISTSIZE=100000 HISTFILESIZE=200000
ls --color=al > /dev/null 2>&1 && alias ls='ls -F --color=al' || alias ls='ls -G'
md () echo "Error - no directory passed!";
git_branch () git branch 2> /dev/null
HOST='33[02;36m]h'; HOST=' '$HOST
TIME='33[01;31m]t 33[01;32m]'
LOCATION=' 33[01;34m]`pwd | sed "s#(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/).*(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,)/0,1#1_2#g"`'
BRANCH=' 33[00;33m]$(git_branch)[33[00m]n$ '
PS1=$TIME$USER$HOST$LOCATION$BRANCH
PS2='[33[01;36m]>'
set -o vi # vi at command line
export EDITOR=vim
test -f ~/.bash_aliases && . $_
test -f ~/.git-completion.bash && . $_
test -s ~/.autojump/etc/profile.d/autojump && . $_
[ $BASH_VERSINFO[0] -ge 4 ] && shopt -s autocd
[ -f /etc/bash_completion ] && ! shopt -oq posix && . /etc/bash_completion
[ -z $TMUX ] && export TERM=xterm-256color && exec tmux
export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/.rvm/bin" # Add RVM to PATH for scripting
[[ -s "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm" ]] && source "$home/.rvm/scripts/rvm"
Explanation:
-1. Set up my history file to ignore duplicates and be much larger than the default.
-2. Color option for ls
depending on if you are using linux or OSX
-3. Function "md
" to make and cd into a directory with one command
-4. Find the current git branch if in a git repo and...
-5. -9. Define an awesome PS1 prompt, as in
-10. Improved PS2 prompt
-11. Set vi as the editor at the command line
-12. Set vi as the default editor
-13. execute my .bash_aliases
file if it exists
-14. Execute my git tab completion script (for remotes and branches) if it exists.
-15. Execute autojump if it exists
-16. Allow cd'ing without typing the cd part if the bash version >= 4
-17. Execute a bash completion script if it exists
-18. Use TMUX if it is present
-19. Add rvm to my PATH
-20. Use rvm if it exists.
I've made this portable so that it works on any of my linux or OSX machines without customization - hence a number of tests for presence are done before using certain functions and other scripts.
This also makes it easier to use the entire file immediately on a new machine without having issues that affect
opening a new terminal window.
Overkill... ͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
– Pacerier
Nov 2 '17 at 13:42
huh? too helpful for you?
– Michael Durrant
Nov 3 '17 at 2:12
1
Thank you SO much for sharing. A wealth of information here.
– Vic
Jul 3 at 15:28
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
up vote
19
down vote
The purpose of a .bashrc
file is to provide a place where you can set up variables, functions and aliases, define your (PS1) prompt and define other settings that you want to use every start you open a new terminal window.
It works by being run each time you open up a new terminal, window or pane.
You can see mine here (pic with syntax highlighting):
HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth:erasedups HISTSIZE=100000 HISTFILESIZE=200000
ls --color=al > /dev/null 2>&1 && alias ls='ls -F --color=al' || alias ls='ls -G'
md () echo "Error - no directory passed!";
git_branch () git branch 2> /dev/null
HOST='33[02;36m]h'; HOST=' '$HOST
TIME='33[01;31m]t 33[01;32m]'
LOCATION=' 33[01;34m]`pwd | sed "s#(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/).*(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,)/0,1#1_2#g"`'
BRANCH=' 33[00;33m]$(git_branch)[33[00m]n$ '
PS1=$TIME$USER$HOST$LOCATION$BRANCH
PS2='[33[01;36m]>'
set -o vi # vi at command line
export EDITOR=vim
test -f ~/.bash_aliases && . $_
test -f ~/.git-completion.bash && . $_
test -s ~/.autojump/etc/profile.d/autojump && . $_
[ $BASH_VERSINFO[0] -ge 4 ] && shopt -s autocd
[ -f /etc/bash_completion ] && ! shopt -oq posix && . /etc/bash_completion
[ -z $TMUX ] && export TERM=xterm-256color && exec tmux
export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/.rvm/bin" # Add RVM to PATH for scripting
[[ -s "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm" ]] && source "$home/.rvm/scripts/rvm"
Explanation:
-1. Set up my history file to ignore duplicates and be much larger than the default.
-2. Color option for ls
depending on if you are using linux or OSX
-3. Function "md
" to make and cd into a directory with one command
-4. Find the current git branch if in a git repo and...
-5. -9. Define an awesome PS1 prompt, as in
-10. Improved PS2 prompt
-11. Set vi as the editor at the command line
-12. Set vi as the default editor
-13. execute my .bash_aliases
file if it exists
-14. Execute my git tab completion script (for remotes and branches) if it exists.
-15. Execute autojump if it exists
-16. Allow cd'ing without typing the cd part if the bash version >= 4
-17. Execute a bash completion script if it exists
-18. Use TMUX if it is present
-19. Add rvm to my PATH
-20. Use rvm if it exists.
I've made this portable so that it works on any of my linux or OSX machines without customization - hence a number of tests for presence are done before using certain functions and other scripts.
This also makes it easier to use the entire file immediately on a new machine without having issues that affect
opening a new terminal window.
The purpose of a .bashrc
file is to provide a place where you can set up variables, functions and aliases, define your (PS1) prompt and define other settings that you want to use every start you open a new terminal window.
It works by being run each time you open up a new terminal, window or pane.
You can see mine here (pic with syntax highlighting):
HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth:erasedups HISTSIZE=100000 HISTFILESIZE=200000
ls --color=al > /dev/null 2>&1 && alias ls='ls -F --color=al' || alias ls='ls -G'
md () echo "Error - no directory passed!";
git_branch () git branch 2> /dev/null
HOST='33[02;36m]h'; HOST=' '$HOST
TIME='33[01;31m]t 33[01;32m]'
LOCATION=' 33[01;34m]`pwd | sed "s#(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/[^/]1,/).*(/[^/]1,/[^/]1,)/0,1#1_2#g"`'
BRANCH=' 33[00;33m]$(git_branch)[33[00m]n$ '
PS1=$TIME$USER$HOST$LOCATION$BRANCH
PS2='[33[01;36m]>'
set -o vi # vi at command line
export EDITOR=vim
test -f ~/.bash_aliases && . $_
test -f ~/.git-completion.bash && . $_
test -s ~/.autojump/etc/profile.d/autojump && . $_
[ $BASH_VERSINFO[0] -ge 4 ] && shopt -s autocd
[ -f /etc/bash_completion ] && ! shopt -oq posix && . /etc/bash_completion
[ -z $TMUX ] && export TERM=xterm-256color && exec tmux
export PATH="$PATH:$HOME/.rvm/bin" # Add RVM to PATH for scripting
[[ -s "$HOME/.rvm/scripts/rvm" ]] && source "$home/.rvm/scripts/rvm"
Explanation:
-1. Set up my history file to ignore duplicates and be much larger than the default.
-2. Color option for ls
depending on if you are using linux or OSX
-3. Function "md
" to make and cd into a directory with one command
-4. Find the current git branch if in a git repo and...
-5. -9. Define an awesome PS1 prompt, as in
-10. Improved PS2 prompt
-11. Set vi as the editor at the command line
-12. Set vi as the default editor
-13. execute my .bash_aliases
file if it exists
-14. Execute my git tab completion script (for remotes and branches) if it exists.
-15. Execute autojump if it exists
-16. Allow cd'ing without typing the cd part if the bash version >= 4
-17. Execute a bash completion script if it exists
-18. Use TMUX if it is present
-19. Add rvm to my PATH
-20. Use rvm if it exists.
I've made this portable so that it works on any of my linux or OSX machines without customization - hence a number of tests for presence are done before using certain functions and other scripts.
This also makes it easier to use the entire file immediately on a new machine without having issues that affect
opening a new terminal window.
edited Aug 16 '17 at 19:12
Aaron Hall
349317
349317
answered May 13 '14 at 23:57
Michael Durrant
15.6k44112180
15.6k44112180
Overkill... ͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
– Pacerier
Nov 2 '17 at 13:42
huh? too helpful for you?
– Michael Durrant
Nov 3 '17 at 2:12
1
Thank you SO much for sharing. A wealth of information here.
– Vic
Jul 3 at 15:28
add a comment |
Overkill... ͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
– Pacerier
Nov 2 '17 at 13:42
huh? too helpful for you?
– Michael Durrant
Nov 3 '17 at 2:12
1
Thank you SO much for sharing. A wealth of information here.
– Vic
Jul 3 at 15:28
Overkill... ͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
– Pacerier
Nov 2 '17 at 13:42
Overkill... ͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏͏
– Pacerier
Nov 2 '17 at 13:42
huh? too helpful for you?
– Michael Durrant
Nov 3 '17 at 2:12
huh? too helpful for you?
– Michael Durrant
Nov 3 '17 at 2:12
1
1
Thank you SO much for sharing. A wealth of information here.
– Vic
Jul 3 at 15:28
Thank you SO much for sharing. A wealth of information here.
– Vic
Jul 3 at 15:28
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It is a bash
config file.
Interactive (non-login) shells, then the config is read from these files:
$HOME/.bashrc
For Login shells, the config is read from these files:
/etc/profile
(Always sourced)$HOME/.bash_profile
(the rest of these files are checked in order until one is found, then no others are read)$HOME/.bash_login
$HOME/.profile
Simple illustration of how/when they are loaded is in the image below.
I added an echo
to my .bashrc
and .bash_profile
see man bash
for more information
2
This doesn't really add additional value to an old question. Also, I see that you're new to Unix & Linux, try not to post pictures of text, instead it's better to use the code block formatting and copy from your console. This allows the text to be searched/copied/etc. In the case of your example there aren't really any complicated commands or anything that would be good to search, but a good practice for other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 18:24
1
I'm not sure I fully understand your reference to 'old question' It is in the top question list, and it is relevant with 60k views. I thought the added value came from the format, as opposed to a dialog/conjecture like the previous answers. but the format has been edited as well. I will keep in mind your comments about using code blocks, thanks.
– Timothy L.J. Stewart
Sep 15 '16 at 19:31
2
It's in the top of the 'active' question list because you posted an answer. The question was originally asked in 2014, and accepted an answer. The accepted answer states the purpose of.bashrc
and distinguishes the difference between.bashrc
and.bash_profile
which covers the content of your answer. Don't be discouraged, you put forward an honest effort, but try to focus on answering questions with some content not covered by other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 19:36
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
It is a bash
config file.
Interactive (non-login) shells, then the config is read from these files:
$HOME/.bashrc
For Login shells, the config is read from these files:
/etc/profile
(Always sourced)$HOME/.bash_profile
(the rest of these files are checked in order until one is found, then no others are read)$HOME/.bash_login
$HOME/.profile
Simple illustration of how/when they are loaded is in the image below.
I added an echo
to my .bashrc
and .bash_profile
see man bash
for more information
2
This doesn't really add additional value to an old question. Also, I see that you're new to Unix & Linux, try not to post pictures of text, instead it's better to use the code block formatting and copy from your console. This allows the text to be searched/copied/etc. In the case of your example there aren't really any complicated commands or anything that would be good to search, but a good practice for other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 18:24
1
I'm not sure I fully understand your reference to 'old question' It is in the top question list, and it is relevant with 60k views. I thought the added value came from the format, as opposed to a dialog/conjecture like the previous answers. but the format has been edited as well. I will keep in mind your comments about using code blocks, thanks.
– Timothy L.J. Stewart
Sep 15 '16 at 19:31
2
It's in the top of the 'active' question list because you posted an answer. The question was originally asked in 2014, and accepted an answer. The accepted answer states the purpose of.bashrc
and distinguishes the difference between.bashrc
and.bash_profile
which covers the content of your answer. Don't be discouraged, you put forward an honest effort, but try to focus on answering questions with some content not covered by other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 19:36
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
It is a bash
config file.
Interactive (non-login) shells, then the config is read from these files:
$HOME/.bashrc
For Login shells, the config is read from these files:
/etc/profile
(Always sourced)$HOME/.bash_profile
(the rest of these files are checked in order until one is found, then no others are read)$HOME/.bash_login
$HOME/.profile
Simple illustration of how/when they are loaded is in the image below.
I added an echo
to my .bashrc
and .bash_profile
see man bash
for more information
It is a bash
config file.
Interactive (non-login) shells, then the config is read from these files:
$HOME/.bashrc
For Login shells, the config is read from these files:
/etc/profile
(Always sourced)$HOME/.bash_profile
(the rest of these files are checked in order until one is found, then no others are read)$HOME/.bash_login
$HOME/.profile
Simple illustration of how/when they are loaded is in the image below.
I added an echo
to my .bashrc
and .bash_profile
see man bash
for more information
edited Sep 15 '16 at 18:37
HalosGhost
3,67592135
3,67592135
answered Sep 15 '16 at 18:09
Timothy L.J. Stewart
1312
1312
2
This doesn't really add additional value to an old question. Also, I see that you're new to Unix & Linux, try not to post pictures of text, instead it's better to use the code block formatting and copy from your console. This allows the text to be searched/copied/etc. In the case of your example there aren't really any complicated commands or anything that would be good to search, but a good practice for other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 18:24
1
I'm not sure I fully understand your reference to 'old question' It is in the top question list, and it is relevant with 60k views. I thought the added value came from the format, as opposed to a dialog/conjecture like the previous answers. but the format has been edited as well. I will keep in mind your comments about using code blocks, thanks.
– Timothy L.J. Stewart
Sep 15 '16 at 19:31
2
It's in the top of the 'active' question list because you posted an answer. The question was originally asked in 2014, and accepted an answer. The accepted answer states the purpose of.bashrc
and distinguishes the difference between.bashrc
and.bash_profile
which covers the content of your answer. Don't be discouraged, you put forward an honest effort, but try to focus on answering questions with some content not covered by other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 19:36
add a comment |
2
This doesn't really add additional value to an old question. Also, I see that you're new to Unix & Linux, try not to post pictures of text, instead it's better to use the code block formatting and copy from your console. This allows the text to be searched/copied/etc. In the case of your example there aren't really any complicated commands or anything that would be good to search, but a good practice for other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 18:24
1
I'm not sure I fully understand your reference to 'old question' It is in the top question list, and it is relevant with 60k views. I thought the added value came from the format, as opposed to a dialog/conjecture like the previous answers. but the format has been edited as well. I will keep in mind your comments about using code blocks, thanks.
– Timothy L.J. Stewart
Sep 15 '16 at 19:31
2
It's in the top of the 'active' question list because you posted an answer. The question was originally asked in 2014, and accepted an answer. The accepted answer states the purpose of.bashrc
and distinguishes the difference between.bashrc
and.bash_profile
which covers the content of your answer. Don't be discouraged, you put forward an honest effort, but try to focus on answering questions with some content not covered by other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 19:36
2
2
This doesn't really add additional value to an old question. Also, I see that you're new to Unix & Linux, try not to post pictures of text, instead it's better to use the code block formatting and copy from your console. This allows the text to be searched/copied/etc. In the case of your example there aren't really any complicated commands or anything that would be good to search, but a good practice for other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 18:24
This doesn't really add additional value to an old question. Also, I see that you're new to Unix & Linux, try not to post pictures of text, instead it's better to use the code block formatting and copy from your console. This allows the text to be searched/copied/etc. In the case of your example there aren't really any complicated commands or anything that would be good to search, but a good practice for other answers.
– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 18:24
1
1
I'm not sure I fully understand your reference to 'old question' It is in the top question list, and it is relevant with 60k views. I thought the added value came from the format, as opposed to a dialog/conjecture like the previous answers. but the format has been edited as well. I will keep in mind your comments about using code blocks, thanks.
– Timothy L.J. Stewart
Sep 15 '16 at 19:31
I'm not sure I fully understand your reference to 'old question' It is in the top question list, and it is relevant with 60k views. I thought the added value came from the format, as opposed to a dialog/conjecture like the previous answers. but the format has been edited as well. I will keep in mind your comments about using code blocks, thanks.
– Timothy L.J. Stewart
Sep 15 '16 at 19:31
2
2
It's in the top of the 'active' question list because you posted an answer. The question was originally asked in 2014, and accepted an answer. The accepted answer states the purpose of
.bashrc
and distinguishes the difference between .bashrc
and .bash_profile
which covers the content of your answer. Don't be discouraged, you put forward an honest effort, but try to focus on answering questions with some content not covered by other answers.– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 19:36
It's in the top of the 'active' question list because you posted an answer. The question was originally asked in 2014, and accepted an answer. The accepted answer states the purpose of
.bashrc
and distinguishes the difference between .bashrc
and .bash_profile
which covers the content of your answer. Don't be discouraged, you put forward an honest effort, but try to focus on answering questions with some content not covered by other answers.– Centimane
Sep 15 '16 at 19:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f129143%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-bashrc-and-how-does-it-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
7
superuser.com/questions/49289/what-is-the-bashrc-file
– devnull
May 13 '14 at 5:49