Quaternion holomorphic maps via certain elliptic operator instead of immediate generalization of complex differentiability

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
$$
D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
$$

where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.




Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)



Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?




I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.




Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?











share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
    $$
    D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
    $$

    where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.




    Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)



    Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?




    I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.




    Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?











    share|cite|improve this question

























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
      $$
      D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
      $$

      where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.




      Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)



      Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?




      I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.




      Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?











      share|cite|improve this question















      We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
      $$
      D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
      $$

      where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.




      Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)



      Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?




      I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.




      Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?








      ap.analysis-of-pdes cv.complex-variables elliptic-pde differential-operators quaternions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 27 at 3:34









      M.G.

      2,83222640




      2,83222640










      asked Nov 26 at 21:43









      Ali Taghavi

      4252082




      4252082




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.



          Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.




          1. Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
            $$
            f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
            $$

            where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.

          However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).



          1. Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.


          2. Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.


          3. Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.


          It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).



          1. Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).


          2. Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:03






          • 1




            Thank you for writing out all these details!
            – Vít Tuček
            Nov 27 at 11:30






          • 1




            @AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:50







          • 1




            @VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:54


















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Thank you and +1 for your answer.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:10










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316278%2fquaternion-holomorphic-maps-via-certain-elliptic-operator-instead-of-immediate-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.



          Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.




          1. Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
            $$
            f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
            $$

            where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.

          However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).



          1. Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.


          2. Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.


          3. Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.


          It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).



          1. Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).


          2. Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:03






          • 1




            Thank you for writing out all these details!
            – Vít Tuček
            Nov 27 at 11:30






          • 1




            @AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:50







          • 1




            @VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:54















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.



          Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.




          1. Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
            $$
            f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
            $$

            where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.

          However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).



          1. Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.


          2. Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.


          3. Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.


          It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).



          1. Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).


          2. Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer






















          • Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:03






          • 1




            Thank you for writing out all these details!
            – Vít Tuček
            Nov 27 at 11:30






          • 1




            @AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:50







          • 1




            @VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:54













          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.



          Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.




          1. Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
            $$
            f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
            $$

            where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.

          However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).



          1. Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.


          2. Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.


          3. Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.


          It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).



          1. Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).


          2. Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.



          Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.




          1. Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
            $$
            f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
            $$

            where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.

          However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).



          1. Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.


          2. Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.


          3. Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.


          It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).



          1. Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).


          2. Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 27 at 3:35

























          answered Nov 26 at 23:28









          M.G.

          2,83222640




          2,83222640











          • Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:03






          • 1




            Thank you for writing out all these details!
            – Vít Tuček
            Nov 27 at 11:30






          • 1




            @AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:50







          • 1




            @VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:54

















          • Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:03






          • 1




            Thank you for writing out all these details!
            – Vít Tuček
            Nov 27 at 11:30






          • 1




            @AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:50







          • 1




            @VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
            – M.G.
            Nov 27 at 18:54
















          Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
          – Ali Taghavi
          Nov 27 at 7:03




          Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
          – Ali Taghavi
          Nov 27 at 7:03




          1




          1




          Thank you for writing out all these details!
          – Vít Tuček
          Nov 27 at 11:30




          Thank you for writing out all these details!
          – Vít Tuček
          Nov 27 at 11:30




          1




          1




          @AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
          – M.G.
          Nov 27 at 18:50





          @AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
          – M.G.
          Nov 27 at 18:50





          1




          1




          @VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
          – M.G.
          Nov 27 at 18:54





          @VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
          – M.G.
          Nov 27 at 18:54











          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Thank you and +1 for your answer.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:10














          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.






          share|cite|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Thank you and +1 for your answer.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:10












          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 26 at 22:15









          Vít Tuček

          4,92911748




          4,92911748







          • 1




            Thank you and +1 for your answer.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:10












          • 1




            Thank you and +1 for your answer.
            – Ali Taghavi
            Nov 27 at 7:10







          1




          1




          Thank you and +1 for your answer.
          – Ali Taghavi
          Nov 27 at 7:10




          Thank you and +1 for your answer.
          – Ali Taghavi
          Nov 27 at 7:10

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316278%2fquaternion-holomorphic-maps-via-certain-elliptic-operator-instead-of-immediate-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay