Quaternion holomorphic maps via certain elliptic operator instead of immediate generalization of complex differentiability
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
$$
D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
$$
where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.
Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)
Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?
I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?
ap.analysis-of-pdes cv.complex-variables elliptic-pde differential-operators quaternions
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
$$
D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
$$
where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.
Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)
Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?
I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?
ap.analysis-of-pdes cv.complex-variables elliptic-pde differential-operators quaternions
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
$$
D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
$$
where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.
Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)
Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?
I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?
ap.analysis-of-pdes cv.complex-variables elliptic-pde differential-operators quaternions
We identify $mathbbR^4$ with the quaternions $mathbbH=t=x+yi+zj+wkmid x,y,z,win mathbbR$. We define the differential operator $D$ on $C^infty(mathbbR^4)$, the space of smooth quaternion-valued maps, via
$$
D(f):= fracpartialpartialbartf,
$$
where notice that $partial/partialbart = partial/partial x+ ipartial /partial y +jpartial/partial z+kpartial /partial w$.
Is $ker D$ closed under the quaternionic multiplication? Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? (A kind of Lioville theorem?)
Is there a terminology and a classification of all $4$-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well defined independently of the choice of a local chart?
I vaguely remember that the generalization of holomorphic calculus in the quaternion setting has some technical difficulties if we generalize differentiability as existence of the usual limit $lim_tto t_0 fracf(t)-f(t_0)t-t_0$.
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty?
ap.analysis-of-pdes cv.complex-variables elliptic-pde differential-operators quaternions
ap.analysis-of-pdes cv.complex-variables elliptic-pde differential-operators quaternions
edited Nov 27 at 3:34
M.G.
2,83222640
2,83222640
asked Nov 26 at 21:43
Ali Taghavi
4252082
4252082
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.
Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.
Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
$$
f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
$$
where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.
However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).
Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.
Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.
Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.
It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).
Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.
Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:03
1
Thank you for writing out all these details!
– Vít Tuček
Nov 27 at 11:30
1
@AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:50
1
@VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.
1
Thank you and +1 for your answer.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:10
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.
Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.
Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
$$
f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
$$
where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.
However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).
Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.
Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.
Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.
It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).
Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.
Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:03
1
Thank you for writing out all these details!
– Vít Tuček
Nov 27 at 11:30
1
@AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:50
1
@VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.
Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.
Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
$$
f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
$$
where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.
However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).
Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.
Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.
Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.
It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).
Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.
Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:03
1
Thank you for writing out all these details!
– Vít Tuček
Nov 27 at 11:30
1
@AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:50
1
@VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.
Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.
Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
$$
f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
$$
where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.
However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).
Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.
Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.
Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.
It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).
Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.
This is more of a complementary answer to Vít Tuček's that addresses the individual questions in the OP. As per his answer, everything that follows below is valid in the more general context of Clifford Algebras in place of $mathbbH$.
Functions satisfying $Df=0$ are usually called (left) (quaternionic-)monogenic.
Is $ker D$ closed under quaternionic multiplication? - Sadly, no, due to non-commutativity of $mathbbH$. Here is an explicit example: define
$$
f_k := x_0 e_k - x_k e_0, 1leq kleq 3,
$$
where $e_0,dots,e_3$ are the standard basis vectors of $mathbbH$. Then $forall 1leq kleq 3: D f_k = 0$, but $forall 1leq kneqellleq 3: D(f_k f_ell) neq 0$.
However, the situation can be somewhat rectified by introducing the so called Cauchy–Kovalevskaya product of two left-monogenic functions. For details about this product see Chapter 14 of Brackx, Delanghe, Sommen - Clifford Analysis (1982).
Is this kernel closed under the topology of uniform convergence on compact subsets? - There is a direct analogue of Cauchy's Integral Formula, which eventually leads to establishing that monogenic functions are in particular real-analytic, which in turn leads to the usual Weierstrass Theorems.
Does this kernel contain a non-constant bounded function? A kind of Lioville theorem? - Yes, again by real analyticity, an analogue of Liouville's theorem holds: a bounded left-entire monogenic function is constant.
Is there a terminology and a classification of all 4-manifolds with an atlas with the property that this operator can be well-defined independently of the choice of a local chart? - Yes, such manifolds are called hypercomplex. I am not aware of any classification of 4-dimensional hypercomplex manifolds (i.e. quaternionic analogues of Riemann surfaces) without further structural assumptions, but then again I am not really familiar with the field, so you should wait for someone else to answer the classification question or post a new question specifically concerning classification issues of hypercomplex manifolds.
It is worth mentioning that despite the negative answer to 1., monogenic functions over hypercomplex manifolds do have an interesting algebraic structure, see for example D. Joyce - Hypercomplex Algebraic Geometry (1998).
Indeed, left or right differentiability using the differential quotient approach is satisfied only by linear functions. This and more (including precise references) is explained in Rosenfeld - Differentiable Functions over Associative Algebras (2000).
Is the above elliptic differential operator $D$ an appropriate remedy for such technical difficulty? - Yes, studying $D$ and $ker D$ and their generalizations to the Clifford Algebras is the right approach as indicated by Vít Tuček's answer. Some other buzz words include Hypercomplex Analysis and Geometry.
edited Nov 27 at 3:35
answered Nov 26 at 23:28
M.G.
2,83222640
2,83222640
Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:03
1
Thank you for writing out all these details!
– Vít Tuček
Nov 27 at 11:30
1
@AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:50
1
@VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:03
1
Thank you for writing out all these details!
– Vít Tuček
Nov 27 at 11:30
1
@AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:50
1
@VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:54
Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:03
Thank you and +1 for your answer. I also thank you for editing my question.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:03
1
1
Thank you for writing out all these details!
– Vít Tuček
Nov 27 at 11:30
Thank you for writing out all these details!
– Vít Tuček
Nov 27 at 11:30
1
1
@AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:50
@AliTaghavi: you are most welcome! I hope my answer was helpful.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:50
1
1
@VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:54
@VítTuček: no problem at all. Most of it is probably already contained in the book you mentioned, but I wasn't aware that Delanghe had coauthored that much more recent book (compared to the 1982 book). I guess my references are somewhat outdated.
– M.G.
Nov 27 at 18:54
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.
1
Thank you and +1 for your answer.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:10
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.
1
Thank you and +1 for your answer.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:10
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.
Quaternionic analysis is less well behaved than complex analysis. Defining the functions spaces through kernel of appropriate generalization of Cauchy-Riemann operator leads to Clifford analysis which generalizes these question to yet broader setting. The quaternionic case was studied by Fueter in 1930s. For questions about function spaces I suggest you check out Clifford Algebra and Spinor-Valued Functions: A Function Theory for the Dirac Operator by Delanghe, R., Sommen, F., Soucek, V.
answered Nov 26 at 22:15
Vít Tuček
4,92911748
4,92911748
1
Thank you and +1 for your answer.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:10
add a comment |
1
Thank you and +1 for your answer.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:10
1
1
Thank you and +1 for your answer.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:10
Thank you and +1 for your answer.
– Ali Taghavi
Nov 27 at 7:10
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f316278%2fquaternion-holomorphic-maps-via-certain-elliptic-operator-instead-of-immediate-g%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown