Unable to load SFP+

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am using CentOS7 7.5.1804. I have a Intel 82599 based 10gig SFP+ card. When I try my SFP's I get:



failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.


I tried everything I found online[1] including adding to the kernel options:



ixgbe.allow_unsupported_sfp=1


I also tried



modprobe ixgbe allow_unsupported_sfp=1


In fact when afterwards if I did modinfo -p ixgbe I got back:



[root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe 
[root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)
[root@codd-b01 ~]#


Below you can see all the steps including showing that Linux wont allow the SFP AFTER I unloaded and reloaded the module.



[root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
[ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
[ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
[root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe -r ixgbe
[root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe
[root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)

[root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
[ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
[ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
[ 6324.524966] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
[ 6324.538955] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
[root@codd-b01 ~]#


The best I found was [2] but I don't have a RHEL subscription.



[1] For instance https://ahelpme.com/linux/kernel/missing-network-interface-10g-intel-x520-with-error-failed-to-load-because-of-unsupported-sfp/



[2] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/275333










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am using CentOS7 7.5.1804. I have a Intel 82599 based 10gig SFP+ card. When I try my SFP's I get:



    failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.


    I tried everything I found online[1] including adding to the kernel options:



    ixgbe.allow_unsupported_sfp=1


    I also tried



    modprobe ixgbe allow_unsupported_sfp=1


    In fact when afterwards if I did modinfo -p ixgbe I got back:



    [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe 
    [root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
    max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
    allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
    debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)
    [root@codd-b01 ~]#


    Below you can see all the steps including showing that Linux wont allow the SFP AFTER I unloaded and reloaded the module.



    [root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
    [ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
    [ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
    [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe -r ixgbe
    [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe
    [root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
    max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
    allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
    debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)

    [root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
    [ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
    [ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
    [ 6324.524966] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
    [ 6324.538955] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
    [root@codd-b01 ~]#


    The best I found was [2] but I don't have a RHEL subscription.



    [1] For instance https://ahelpme.com/linux/kernel/missing-network-interface-10g-intel-x520-with-error-failed-to-load-because-of-unsupported-sfp/



    [2] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/275333










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am using CentOS7 7.5.1804. I have a Intel 82599 based 10gig SFP+ card. When I try my SFP's I get:



      failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.


      I tried everything I found online[1] including adding to the kernel options:



      ixgbe.allow_unsupported_sfp=1


      I also tried



      modprobe ixgbe allow_unsupported_sfp=1


      In fact when afterwards if I did modinfo -p ixgbe I got back:



      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe 
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
      max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
      allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
      debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)
      [root@codd-b01 ~]#


      Below you can see all the steps including showing that Linux wont allow the SFP AFTER I unloaded and reloaded the module.



      [root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
      [ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe -r ixgbe
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
      max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
      allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
      debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)

      [root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
      [ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 6324.524966] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 6324.538955] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [root@codd-b01 ~]#


      The best I found was [2] but I don't have a RHEL subscription.



      [1] For instance https://ahelpme.com/linux/kernel/missing-network-interface-10g-intel-x520-with-error-failed-to-load-because-of-unsupported-sfp/



      [2] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/275333










      share|improve this question













      I am using CentOS7 7.5.1804. I have a Intel 82599 based 10gig SFP+ card. When I try my SFP's I get:



      failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.


      I tried everything I found online[1] including adding to the kernel options:



      ixgbe.allow_unsupported_sfp=1


      I also tried



      modprobe ixgbe allow_unsupported_sfp=1


      In fact when afterwards if I did modinfo -p ixgbe I got back:



      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe 
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
      max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
      allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
      debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)
      [root@codd-b01 ~]#


      Below you can see all the steps including showing that Linux wont allow the SFP AFTER I unloaded and reloaded the module.



      [root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
      [ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe -r ixgbe
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modprobe ixgbe
      [root@codd-b01 ~]# modinfo -p ixgbe
      max_vfs:Maximum number of virtual functions to allocate per physical function - default is zero and maximum value is 63 (uint)
      allow_unsupported_sfp:Allow unsupported and untested SFP+ modules on 82599-based adapters (uint)
      debug:Debug level (0=none,...,16=all) (int)

      [root@codd-b01 ~]# dmesg | grep SFP
      [ 8.981009] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 8.994928] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 6324.524966] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.0: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [ 6324.538955] ixgbe 0000:5f:00.1: failed to load because an unsupported SFP+ or QSFP module type was detected.
      [root@codd-b01 ~]#


      The best I found was [2] but I don't have a RHEL subscription.



      [1] For instance https://ahelpme.com/linux/kernel/missing-network-interface-10g-intel-x520-with-error-failed-to-load-because-of-unsupported-sfp/



      [2] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/275333







      centos networking kernel-modules






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 at 1:00









      Dovid Bender

      1199




      1199




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          It turns out there was some weird issue with the firmware on one side of the optics (I was using a DAC) cable. If it was switched around it would work.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482873%2funable-to-load-sfp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            0
            down vote













            It turns out there was some weird issue with the firmware on one side of the optics (I was using a DAC) cable. If it was switched around it would work.






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              0
              down vote













              It turns out there was some weird issue with the firmware on one side of the optics (I was using a DAC) cable. If it was switched around it would work.






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                0
                down vote










                up vote
                0
                down vote









                It turns out there was some weird issue with the firmware on one side of the optics (I was using a DAC) cable. If it was switched around it would work.






                share|improve this answer












                It turns out there was some weird issue with the firmware on one side of the optics (I was using a DAC) cable. If it was switched around it would work.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 2 days ago









                Dovid Bender

                1199




                1199



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f482873%2funable-to-load-sfp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown






                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                    How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?