Permission issue for folder with AD user

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a folder on a linux machine to which a cisco(ISE) device sends the backup through SFTP. The files are coming to the folder successfully but unable to view the files from the device. CISCO TAC says that its a permission issue for the user on the folder. The user is a windows AD user.



I have given the user permission to the folder by the steps below:




  1. Found the uid for the AD user.



    [ananair@cap-nwmon-01 anand]$ id uid=438611341(ananair) gid=438600513(domain users) groups=438600513(domain users)




  2. Changing ownership



    chown 438611341 /var/ISE_BACKUP




  3. Giving full recursive permission.



    sudo chmod -R 777 ISE_BACKUP




  4. Current status.



    drwxrwxrwx 2 ananair root 4096 Feb 16 04:24 ISE_BACKUP



please let me know if there is anything wrong in this




linux permissions sftp active-directory cisco




share|improve this question






















  • Is SELinux running on the server?
    – Raman Sailopal
    Feb 16 at 11:20










  • No SELinux is disabled
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 16 at 12:45










  • I see the group ownership is roor. Although that shouldn't make a difference, but sometimes you need to change the group ownership on the directory too(as in case of apache). Try changing the group ownership by using chgrp command and then check it again.
    – Ayush Goyal
    Feb 16 at 14:18










  • Found these when i checked the log. Feb 19 03:12:05 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair . Feb 19 03:12:06 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair Since the user is an AD user first there is a failure authentication and then a success. will it be due to this
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 19 at 6:17















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a folder on a linux machine to which a cisco(ISE) device sends the backup through SFTP. The files are coming to the folder successfully but unable to view the files from the device. CISCO TAC says that its a permission issue for the user on the folder. The user is a windows AD user.



I have given the user permission to the folder by the steps below:




  1. Found the uid for the AD user.



    [ananair@cap-nwmon-01 anand]$ id uid=438611341(ananair) gid=438600513(domain users) groups=438600513(domain users)




  2. Changing ownership



    chown 438611341 /var/ISE_BACKUP




  3. Giving full recursive permission.



    sudo chmod -R 777 ISE_BACKUP




  4. Current status.



    drwxrwxrwx 2 ananair root 4096 Feb 16 04:24 ISE_BACKUP



please let me know if there is anything wrong in this




linux permissions sftp active-directory cisco




share|improve this question






















  • Is SELinux running on the server?
    – Raman Sailopal
    Feb 16 at 11:20










  • No SELinux is disabled
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 16 at 12:45










  • I see the group ownership is roor. Although that shouldn't make a difference, but sometimes you need to change the group ownership on the directory too(as in case of apache). Try changing the group ownership by using chgrp command and then check it again.
    – Ayush Goyal
    Feb 16 at 14:18










  • Found these when i checked the log. Feb 19 03:12:05 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair . Feb 19 03:12:06 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair Since the user is an AD user first there is a failure authentication and then a success. will it be due to this
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 19 at 6:17













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have a folder on a linux machine to which a cisco(ISE) device sends the backup through SFTP. The files are coming to the folder successfully but unable to view the files from the device. CISCO TAC says that its a permission issue for the user on the folder. The user is a windows AD user.



I have given the user permission to the folder by the steps below:




  1. Found the uid for the AD user.



    [ananair@cap-nwmon-01 anand]$ id uid=438611341(ananair) gid=438600513(domain users) groups=438600513(domain users)




  2. Changing ownership



    chown 438611341 /var/ISE_BACKUP




  3. Giving full recursive permission.



    sudo chmod -R 777 ISE_BACKUP




  4. Current status.



    drwxrwxrwx 2 ananair root 4096 Feb 16 04:24 ISE_BACKUP



please let me know if there is anything wrong in this




linux permissions sftp active-directory cisco




share|improve this question














I have a folder on a linux machine to which a cisco(ISE) device sends the backup through SFTP. The files are coming to the folder successfully but unable to view the files from the device. CISCO TAC says that its a permission issue for the user on the folder. The user is a windows AD user.



I have given the user permission to the folder by the steps below:




  1. Found the uid for the AD user.



    [ananair@cap-nwmon-01 anand]$ id uid=438611341(ananair) gid=438600513(domain users) groups=438600513(domain users)




  2. Changing ownership



    chown 438611341 /var/ISE_BACKUP




  3. Giving full recursive permission.



    sudo chmod -R 777 ISE_BACKUP




  4. Current status.



    drwxrwxrwx 2 ananair root 4096 Feb 16 04:24 ISE_BACKUP



please let me know if there is anything wrong in this





linux permissions sftp active-directory cisco





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 16 at 9:54









Félicien

42819




42819










asked Feb 16 at 8:54









Anand S Nair

11




11











  • Is SELinux running on the server?
    – Raman Sailopal
    Feb 16 at 11:20










  • No SELinux is disabled
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 16 at 12:45










  • I see the group ownership is roor. Although that shouldn't make a difference, but sometimes you need to change the group ownership on the directory too(as in case of apache). Try changing the group ownership by using chgrp command and then check it again.
    – Ayush Goyal
    Feb 16 at 14:18










  • Found these when i checked the log. Feb 19 03:12:05 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair . Feb 19 03:12:06 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair Since the user is an AD user first there is a failure authentication and then a success. will it be due to this
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 19 at 6:17

















  • Is SELinux running on the server?
    – Raman Sailopal
    Feb 16 at 11:20










  • No SELinux is disabled
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 16 at 12:45










  • I see the group ownership is roor. Although that shouldn't make a difference, but sometimes you need to change the group ownership on the directory too(as in case of apache). Try changing the group ownership by using chgrp command and then check it again.
    – Ayush Goyal
    Feb 16 at 14:18










  • Found these when i checked the log. Feb 19 03:12:05 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair . Feb 19 03:12:06 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair Since the user is an AD user first there is a failure authentication and then a success. will it be due to this
    – Anand S Nair
    Feb 19 at 6:17
















Is SELinux running on the server?
– Raman Sailopal
Feb 16 at 11:20




Is SELinux running on the server?
– Raman Sailopal
Feb 16 at 11:20












No SELinux is disabled
– Anand S Nair
Feb 16 at 12:45




No SELinux is disabled
– Anand S Nair
Feb 16 at 12:45












I see the group ownership is roor. Although that shouldn't make a difference, but sometimes you need to change the group ownership on the directory too(as in case of apache). Try changing the group ownership by using chgrp command and then check it again.
– Ayush Goyal
Feb 16 at 14:18




I see the group ownership is roor. Although that shouldn't make a difference, but sometimes you need to change the group ownership on the directory too(as in case of apache). Try changing the group ownership by using chgrp command and then check it again.
– Ayush Goyal
Feb 16 at 14:18












Found these when i checked the log. Feb 19 03:12:05 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair . Feb 19 03:12:06 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair Since the user is an AD user first there is a failure authentication and then a success. will it be due to this
– Anand S Nair
Feb 19 at 6:17





Found these when i checked the log. Feb 19 03:12:05 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair . Feb 19 03:12:06 cap-nwmon-01 sshd[24541]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication success; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=10.155.220.130 user=ananair Since the user is an AD user first there is a failure authentication and then a success. will it be due to this
– Anand S Nair
Feb 19 at 6:17
















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);








 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424559%2fpermission-issue-for-folder-with-ad-user%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






















active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes










 

draft saved


draft discarded


























 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424559%2fpermission-issue-for-folder-with-ad-user%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest
































































-

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
Read more

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
Read more

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
Read more