--numeric-ports option for netstat

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












$ netstat --version
net-tools 1.60
netstat 1.42 (2001-04-15)
Fred Baumgarten, Alan Cox, Bernd Eckenfels, Phil Blundell, Tuan Hoang and others
+NEW_ADDRT +RTF_IRTT +RTF_REJECT +FW_MASQUERADE +I18N
AF: (inet) +UNIX +INET +INET6 +IPX +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +ATALK +ECONET +ROSE
HW: +ETHER +ARC +SLIP +PPP +TUNNEL -TR +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +FR +ROSE +ASH +SIT +FDDI +HIPPI +HDLC/LAPB +EUI64

$ netstat --wide --inet | head -5
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 jl-in-f188.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 lga15s44-in-f14.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:https ESTABLISHED


According to the netstat man page on my Ubuntu Linux:



 --numeric-ports
shows numerical port numbers but does not affect the resolution of host or user names.


Yet, that option seems to affect the resolution of host names, too.



$ netstat --wide --inet --numeric-ports | head -5
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 209.85.200.188:443 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 172.217.1.78:443 ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:443 ESTABLISHED


I expected to see host names and port numbers.







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    $ netstat --version
    net-tools 1.60
    netstat 1.42 (2001-04-15)
    Fred Baumgarten, Alan Cox, Bernd Eckenfels, Phil Blundell, Tuan Hoang and others
    +NEW_ADDRT +RTF_IRTT +RTF_REJECT +FW_MASQUERADE +I18N
    AF: (inet) +UNIX +INET +INET6 +IPX +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +ATALK +ECONET +ROSE
    HW: +ETHER +ARC +SLIP +PPP +TUNNEL -TR +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +FR +ROSE +ASH +SIT +FDDI +HIPPI +HDLC/LAPB +EUI64

    $ netstat --wide --inet | head -5
    Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
    Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 jl-in-f188.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 lga15s44-in-f14.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:https ESTABLISHED


    According to the netstat man page on my Ubuntu Linux:



     --numeric-ports
    shows numerical port numbers but does not affect the resolution of host or user names.


    Yet, that option seems to affect the resolution of host names, too.



    $ netstat --wide --inet --numeric-ports | head -5
    Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
    Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 209.85.200.188:443 ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 172.217.1.78:443 ESTABLISHED
    tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:443 ESTABLISHED


    I expected to see host names and port numbers.







    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      $ netstat --version
      net-tools 1.60
      netstat 1.42 (2001-04-15)
      Fred Baumgarten, Alan Cox, Bernd Eckenfels, Phil Blundell, Tuan Hoang and others
      +NEW_ADDRT +RTF_IRTT +RTF_REJECT +FW_MASQUERADE +I18N
      AF: (inet) +UNIX +INET +INET6 +IPX +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +ATALK +ECONET +ROSE
      HW: +ETHER +ARC +SLIP +PPP +TUNNEL -TR +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +FR +ROSE +ASH +SIT +FDDI +HIPPI +HDLC/LAPB +EUI64

      $ netstat --wide --inet | head -5
      Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
      Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 jl-in-f188.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 lga15s44-in-f14.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:https ESTABLISHED


      According to the netstat man page on my Ubuntu Linux:



       --numeric-ports
      shows numerical port numbers but does not affect the resolution of host or user names.


      Yet, that option seems to affect the resolution of host names, too.



      $ netstat --wide --inet --numeric-ports | head -5
      Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
      Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 209.85.200.188:443 ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 172.217.1.78:443 ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:443 ESTABLISHED


      I expected to see host names and port numbers.







      share|improve this question














      $ netstat --version
      net-tools 1.60
      netstat 1.42 (2001-04-15)
      Fred Baumgarten, Alan Cox, Bernd Eckenfels, Phil Blundell, Tuan Hoang and others
      +NEW_ADDRT +RTF_IRTT +RTF_REJECT +FW_MASQUERADE +I18N
      AF: (inet) +UNIX +INET +INET6 +IPX +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +ATALK +ECONET +ROSE
      HW: +ETHER +ARC +SLIP +PPP +TUNNEL -TR +AX25 +NETROM +X25 +FR +ROSE +ASH +SIT +FDDI +HIPPI +HDLC/LAPB +EUI64

      $ netstat --wide --inet | head -5
      Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
      Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 jl-in-f188.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 lga15s44-in-f14.1e100.net:https ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:https ESTABLISHED


      According to the netstat man page on my Ubuntu Linux:



       --numeric-ports
      shows numerical port numbers but does not affect the resolution of host or user names.


      Yet, that option seems to affect the resolution of host names, too.



      $ netstat --wide --inet --numeric-ports | head -5
      Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
      Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:38752 209.85.200.188:443 ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:50882 172.217.1.78:443 ESTABLISHED
      tcp 0 0 192.168.1.11:45874 151.101.1.69:443 ESTABLISHED


      I expected to see host names and port numbers.









      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Feb 19 at 0:31

























      asked Feb 18 at 3:30









      jsf80238

      1164




      1164




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          I have net-tools 1.60_p20170221182432 (Gentoo) and it works as documented, so there may be a bug in the version that you have. If you have ss available, you can get very similar results using ss -4rn (-4: IPv4 only, -r: resolve names, -n: numeric service numbers); the difference will be the order that the data are displayed and some formatting details.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424900%2fnumeric-ports-option-for-netstat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote













            I have net-tools 1.60_p20170221182432 (Gentoo) and it works as documented, so there may be a bug in the version that you have. If you have ss available, you can get very similar results using ss -4rn (-4: IPv4 only, -r: resolve names, -n: numeric service numbers); the difference will be the order that the data are displayed and some formatting details.






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              I have net-tools 1.60_p20170221182432 (Gentoo) and it works as documented, so there may be a bug in the version that you have. If you have ss available, you can get very similar results using ss -4rn (-4: IPv4 only, -r: resolve names, -n: numeric service numbers); the difference will be the order that the data are displayed and some formatting details.






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                I have net-tools 1.60_p20170221182432 (Gentoo) and it works as documented, so there may be a bug in the version that you have. If you have ss available, you can get very similar results using ss -4rn (-4: IPv4 only, -r: resolve names, -n: numeric service numbers); the difference will be the order that the data are displayed and some formatting details.






                share|improve this answer












                I have net-tools 1.60_p20170221182432 (Gentoo) and it works as documented, so there may be a bug in the version that you have. If you have ss available, you can get very similar results using ss -4rn (-4: IPv4 only, -r: resolve names, -n: numeric service numbers); the difference will be the order that the data are displayed and some formatting details.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 18 at 10:16









                ErikF

                2,7111413




                2,7111413






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f424900%2fnumeric-ports-option-for-netstat%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    brrlgkHnvs5pOU5iVAhduXUPeTprem SX3dysRHFdlYi,442xhjSwBrL2CJkMrQjYbS,ef,W,cKBmZ 8aAxxUnyjE3rDRoHn
                    H4mPvtA,Q1XDH3wKF Nh,BsfPcMC riJYOj2gOBy9 fyIPCY6D14f

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

                    Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS