Is intltoolize obsolete? If so, is there any alternatives?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite
1












From GNOME page, it states:




If you are still using the almost obsolete intltoolize, then add the following line immediately before autoreconf:



intltoolize --force --copy --automake || exit 1



Is intltoolize obsolete? If so, is there any alternatives?




linux compiling autotools




share|improve this question























    up vote
    -1
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    From GNOME page, it states:




    If you are still using the almost obsolete intltoolize, then add the following line immediately before autoreconf:



    intltoolize --force --copy --automake || exit 1



    Is intltoolize obsolete? If so, is there any alternatives?




    linux compiling autotools




    share|improve this question





















      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      -1
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      From GNOME page, it states:




      If you are still using the almost obsolete intltoolize, then add the following line immediately before autoreconf:



      intltoolize --force --copy --automake || exit 1



      Is intltoolize obsolete? If so, is there any alternatives?




      linux compiling autotools




      share|improve this question











      From GNOME page, it states:




      If you are still using the almost obsolete intltoolize, then add the following line immediately before autoreconf:



      intltoolize --force --copy --automake || exit 1



      Is intltoolize obsolete? If so, is there any alternatives?





      linux compiling autotools





      share|improve this question










      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question









      asked May 3 at 18:59









      Mark J. Adams

      252213




      252213




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Literally the first sentence on the page to which you link in your question answers it.




          gnome-common [which contains intltoolize] is completely deprecated, in favour of using macros from upstream autoconf-archive, and open-coding things in autogen.sh.







          share|improve this answer




























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            There is another GNOME page guide how to Migrating from Intltool to Gettext. From that page, it states:




            Since about version 0.18, Gettext has been adding support for a lot more file formats that are used in modern GNOME desktop applications. This has slowly been making Intltool obsolete, which was invented to bridge that gap between what Gettext supported and what applications needed.







            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer







              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "106"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );








               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441635%2fis-intltoolize-obsolete-if-so-is-there-any-alternatives%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest

















              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              1
              down vote













              Literally the first sentence on the page to which you link in your question answers it.




              gnome-common [which contains intltoolize] is completely deprecated, in favour of using macros from upstream autoconf-archive, and open-coding things in autogen.sh.







              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                Literally the first sentence on the page to which you link in your question answers it.




                gnome-common [which contains intltoolize] is completely deprecated, in favour of using macros from upstream autoconf-archive, and open-coding things in autogen.sh.







                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  Literally the first sentence on the page to which you link in your question answers it.




                  gnome-common [which contains intltoolize] is completely deprecated, in favour of using macros from upstream autoconf-archive, and open-coding things in autogen.sh.







                  share|improve this answer













                  Literally the first sentence on the page to which you link in your question answers it.




                  gnome-common [which contains intltoolize] is completely deprecated, in favour of using macros from upstream autoconf-archive, and open-coding things in autogen.sh.








                  share|improve this answer













                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer











                  answered May 3 at 19:06









                  DopeGhoti

                  40k54779




                  40k54779






















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      There is another GNOME page guide how to Migrating from Intltool to Gettext. From that page, it states:




                      Since about version 0.18, Gettext has been adding support for a lot more file formats that are used in modern GNOME desktop applications. This has slowly been making Intltool obsolete, which was invented to bridge that gap between what Gettext supported and what applications needed.







                      share|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        There is another GNOME page guide how to Migrating from Intltool to Gettext. From that page, it states:




                        Since about version 0.18, Gettext has been adding support for a lot more file formats that are used in modern GNOME desktop applications. This has slowly been making Intltool obsolete, which was invented to bridge that gap between what Gettext supported and what applications needed.







                        share|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          There is another GNOME page guide how to Migrating from Intltool to Gettext. From that page, it states:




                          Since about version 0.18, Gettext has been adding support for a lot more file formats that are used in modern GNOME desktop applications. This has slowly been making Intltool obsolete, which was invented to bridge that gap between what Gettext supported and what applications needed.







                          share|improve this answer













                          There is another GNOME page guide how to Migrating from Intltool to Gettext. From that page, it states:




                          Since about version 0.18, Gettext has been adding support for a lot more file formats that are used in modern GNOME desktop applications. This has slowly been making Intltool obsolete, which was invented to bridge that gap between what Gettext supported and what applications needed.








                          share|improve this answer













                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer











                          answered May 3 at 19:05









                          Mark J. Adams

                          252213




                          252213






















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


























                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441635%2fis-intltoolize-obsolete-if-so-is-there-any-alternatives%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest
































































                              -

                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Image
                              Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
                              Read more

                              Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                              Image
                              Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
                              Read more

                              How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

                              Image
                              Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
                              Read more