Does “recovering journal” prove an unclean shutdown/unmount?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Can we confirm the log message "recovering journal" from fsck should be interpreted as indicating the filesystem was not cleanly unmounted / shut down the last time? Or, are there other possible reasons to be aware of?



May 03 11:52:34 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: recovering journal
May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: clean, 365666/2621440 files, 7297878/10485760 blocks

May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /sysroot...
May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /sysroot.


Compare fsck of /home from the same boot, which shows no such message:



(ignore the -1 hour jump, it's due to "RTC time in the local time zone")



May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Starting File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home...
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[743]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home: clean, 1469608/19857408 files, 70150487/79429632 blocks
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Started File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home.
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd-fsc>
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /home...
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /boot/efi.
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /home.
May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Reached target Local File Systems.


Version



$ rpm -q --whatprovides $(which fsck.ext4)
e2fsprogs-1.43.8-2.fc28.x86_64



Motivation



This happened immediately after an offline update; it was most likely triggered by a PackageKit bug:



Bug 1564462 - offline update performed unclean shutdown



where it effectively uses systemctl reboot --force. I'm concerned that there's a bug in Fedora here, because systemd forced shutdown is still supposed to kill all processes and then unmount the filesystems cleanly where possible.



The above messages are from Fedora 28, systemd-238-7.fc28.1.x86_64. Fedora 27 was using a buggy version of systemd which could have failed to unmount filesystems:



systemd-shutdown[1]: Failed to parse /proc/self/mountinfo #6796



however the fix should be included in systemd 235 and above. So I'm concerned there's yet another bug lurking somewhere.



The filesystem is on LVM.



I seem to remember that shutdown is associated with a few screenfuls of repeated messages in a few seconds immediately before the screen goes black. I think they are from inside the shutdown initrd. I don't know if this represents a problem or not.







share|improve this question

























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    Can we confirm the log message "recovering journal" from fsck should be interpreted as indicating the filesystem was not cleanly unmounted / shut down the last time? Or, are there other possible reasons to be aware of?



    May 03 11:52:34 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: recovering journal
    May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: clean, 365666/2621440 files, 7297878/10485760 blocks

    May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /sysroot...
    May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /sysroot.


    Compare fsck of /home from the same boot, which shows no such message:



    (ignore the -1 hour jump, it's due to "RTC time in the local time zone")



    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Starting File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home...
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[743]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home: clean, 1469608/19857408 files, 70150487/79429632 blocks
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Started File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home.
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd-fsc>
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /home...
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /boot/efi.
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /home.
    May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Reached target Local File Systems.


    Version



    $ rpm -q --whatprovides $(which fsck.ext4)
    e2fsprogs-1.43.8-2.fc28.x86_64



    Motivation



    This happened immediately after an offline update; it was most likely triggered by a PackageKit bug:



    Bug 1564462 - offline update performed unclean shutdown



    where it effectively uses systemctl reboot --force. I'm concerned that there's a bug in Fedora here, because systemd forced shutdown is still supposed to kill all processes and then unmount the filesystems cleanly where possible.



    The above messages are from Fedora 28, systemd-238-7.fc28.1.x86_64. Fedora 27 was using a buggy version of systemd which could have failed to unmount filesystems:



    systemd-shutdown[1]: Failed to parse /proc/self/mountinfo #6796



    however the fix should be included in systemd 235 and above. So I'm concerned there's yet another bug lurking somewhere.



    The filesystem is on LVM.



    I seem to remember that shutdown is associated with a few screenfuls of repeated messages in a few seconds immediately before the screen goes black. I think they are from inside the shutdown initrd. I don't know if this represents a problem or not.







    share|improve this question























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      Can we confirm the log message "recovering journal" from fsck should be interpreted as indicating the filesystem was not cleanly unmounted / shut down the last time? Or, are there other possible reasons to be aware of?



      May 03 11:52:34 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: recovering journal
      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: clean, 365666/2621440 files, 7297878/10485760 blocks

      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /sysroot...
      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /sysroot.


      Compare fsck of /home from the same boot, which shows no such message:



      (ignore the -1 hour jump, it's due to "RTC time in the local time zone")



      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Starting File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home...
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[743]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home: clean, 1469608/19857408 files, 70150487/79429632 blocks
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Started File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home.
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd-fsc>
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /home...
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /boot/efi.
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /home.
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Reached target Local File Systems.


      Version



      $ rpm -q --whatprovides $(which fsck.ext4)
      e2fsprogs-1.43.8-2.fc28.x86_64



      Motivation



      This happened immediately after an offline update; it was most likely triggered by a PackageKit bug:



      Bug 1564462 - offline update performed unclean shutdown



      where it effectively uses systemctl reboot --force. I'm concerned that there's a bug in Fedora here, because systemd forced shutdown is still supposed to kill all processes and then unmount the filesystems cleanly where possible.



      The above messages are from Fedora 28, systemd-238-7.fc28.1.x86_64. Fedora 27 was using a buggy version of systemd which could have failed to unmount filesystems:



      systemd-shutdown[1]: Failed to parse /proc/self/mountinfo #6796



      however the fix should be included in systemd 235 and above. So I'm concerned there's yet another bug lurking somewhere.



      The filesystem is on LVM.



      I seem to remember that shutdown is associated with a few screenfuls of repeated messages in a few seconds immediately before the screen goes black. I think they are from inside the shutdown initrd. I don't know if this represents a problem or not.







      share|improve this question













      Can we confirm the log message "recovering journal" from fsck should be interpreted as indicating the filesystem was not cleanly unmounted / shut down the last time? Or, are there other possible reasons to be aware of?



      May 03 11:52:34 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: recovering journal
      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[461]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-fedora: clean, 365666/2621440 files, 7297878/10485760 blocks

      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /sysroot...
      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
      May 03 11:52:42 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /sysroot.


      Compare fsck of /home from the same boot, which shows no such message:



      (ignore the -1 hour jump, it's due to "RTC time in the local time zone")



      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Starting File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home...
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd-fsck[743]: /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home: clean, 1469608/19857408 files, 70150487/79429632 blocks
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Started File System Check on /dev/mapper/alan_dell_2016-home.
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop audit[1]: SERVICE_START pid=1 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 msg='unit=systemd-fsc>
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounting /home...
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /boot/efi.
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop kernel: EXT4-fs (dm-2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null)
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Mounted /home.
      May 03 10:52:57 alan-laptop systemd[1]: Reached target Local File Systems.


      Version



      $ rpm -q --whatprovides $(which fsck.ext4)
      e2fsprogs-1.43.8-2.fc28.x86_64



      Motivation



      This happened immediately after an offline update; it was most likely triggered by a PackageKit bug:



      Bug 1564462 - offline update performed unclean shutdown



      where it effectively uses systemctl reboot --force. I'm concerned that there's a bug in Fedora here, because systemd forced shutdown is still supposed to kill all processes and then unmount the filesystems cleanly where possible.



      The above messages are from Fedora 28, systemd-238-7.fc28.1.x86_64. Fedora 27 was using a buggy version of systemd which could have failed to unmount filesystems:



      systemd-shutdown[1]: Failed to parse /proc/self/mountinfo #6796



      however the fix should be included in systemd 235 and above. So I'm concerned there's yet another bug lurking somewhere.



      The filesystem is on LVM.



      I seem to remember that shutdown is associated with a few screenfuls of repeated messages in a few seconds immediately before the screen goes black. I think they are from inside the shutdown initrd. I don't know if this represents a problem or not.









      share|improve this question












      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 7 at 11:08









      Jeff Schaller

      31.1k846105




      31.1k846105









      asked May 3 at 10:25









      sourcejedi

      18.2k32475




      18.2k32475




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          The “recovering journal” message is output by e2fsck_run_ext3_journal, which is only called if ext2fs_has_feature_journal_needs_recovery indicates that the journal needs recovery. This “feature” is a flag which is set by the kernel whenever a journalled Ext3/4 file system is mounted, and cleared when the file system is unmounted, when recovery is completed (when mounting an unclean file system, or remounting a file system read-only), and when freezing the file system (before taking a snapshot).



          Ignoring snapshots, this means that e2fsck only prints the message when it encounters a file system which hasn’t been cleanly unmounted, so its presence is proof of an unclean unmount (and perhaps shutdown, assuming the unmount was supposed to take place during shutdown).






          share|improve this answer






























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            The journal contains commands to the filessytem that haven't been yet ben commited. On a clean unmount, whatever is in there is commited, and the journal cleared.
            So yes, replaying a journal means an unclean shutdown. But not viceversa, the unclean shutdown could have happened when there was nothing in the journal.






            share|improve this answer





















              Your Answer







              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "106"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );








               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441511%2fdoes-recovering-journal-prove-an-unclean-shutdown-unmount%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              5
              down vote



              accepted










              The “recovering journal” message is output by e2fsck_run_ext3_journal, which is only called if ext2fs_has_feature_journal_needs_recovery indicates that the journal needs recovery. This “feature” is a flag which is set by the kernel whenever a journalled Ext3/4 file system is mounted, and cleared when the file system is unmounted, when recovery is completed (when mounting an unclean file system, or remounting a file system read-only), and when freezing the file system (before taking a snapshot).



              Ignoring snapshots, this means that e2fsck only prints the message when it encounters a file system which hasn’t been cleanly unmounted, so its presence is proof of an unclean unmount (and perhaps shutdown, assuming the unmount was supposed to take place during shutdown).






              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                5
                down vote



                accepted










                The “recovering journal” message is output by e2fsck_run_ext3_journal, which is only called if ext2fs_has_feature_journal_needs_recovery indicates that the journal needs recovery. This “feature” is a flag which is set by the kernel whenever a journalled Ext3/4 file system is mounted, and cleared when the file system is unmounted, when recovery is completed (when mounting an unclean file system, or remounting a file system read-only), and when freezing the file system (before taking a snapshot).



                Ignoring snapshots, this means that e2fsck only prints the message when it encounters a file system which hasn’t been cleanly unmounted, so its presence is proof of an unclean unmount (and perhaps shutdown, assuming the unmount was supposed to take place during shutdown).






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  The “recovering journal” message is output by e2fsck_run_ext3_journal, which is only called if ext2fs_has_feature_journal_needs_recovery indicates that the journal needs recovery. This “feature” is a flag which is set by the kernel whenever a journalled Ext3/4 file system is mounted, and cleared when the file system is unmounted, when recovery is completed (when mounting an unclean file system, or remounting a file system read-only), and when freezing the file system (before taking a snapshot).



                  Ignoring snapshots, this means that e2fsck only prints the message when it encounters a file system which hasn’t been cleanly unmounted, so its presence is proof of an unclean unmount (and perhaps shutdown, assuming the unmount was supposed to take place during shutdown).






                  share|improve this answer















                  The “recovering journal” message is output by e2fsck_run_ext3_journal, which is only called if ext2fs_has_feature_journal_needs_recovery indicates that the journal needs recovery. This “feature” is a flag which is set by the kernel whenever a journalled Ext3/4 file system is mounted, and cleared when the file system is unmounted, when recovery is completed (when mounting an unclean file system, or remounting a file system read-only), and when freezing the file system (before taking a snapshot).



                  Ignoring snapshots, this means that e2fsck only prints the message when it encounters a file system which hasn’t been cleanly unmounted, so its presence is proof of an unclean unmount (and perhaps shutdown, assuming the unmount was supposed to take place during shutdown).







                  share|improve this answer















                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited May 3 at 11:59


























                  answered May 3 at 11:25









                  Stephen Kitt

                  140k22302363




                  140k22302363






















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      The journal contains commands to the filessytem that haven't been yet ben commited. On a clean unmount, whatever is in there is commited, and the journal cleared.
                      So yes, replaying a journal means an unclean shutdown. But not viceversa, the unclean shutdown could have happened when there was nothing in the journal.






                      share|improve this answer

























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        The journal contains commands to the filessytem that haven't been yet ben commited. On a clean unmount, whatever is in there is commited, and the journal cleared.
                        So yes, replaying a journal means an unclean shutdown. But not viceversa, the unclean shutdown could have happened when there was nothing in the journal.






                        share|improve this answer























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          The journal contains commands to the filessytem that haven't been yet ben commited. On a clean unmount, whatever is in there is commited, and the journal cleared.
                          So yes, replaying a journal means an unclean shutdown. But not viceversa, the unclean shutdown could have happened when there was nothing in the journal.






                          share|improve this answer













                          The journal contains commands to the filessytem that haven't been yet ben commited. On a clean unmount, whatever is in there is commited, and the journal cleared.
                          So yes, replaying a journal means an unclean shutdown. But not viceversa, the unclean shutdown could have happened when there was nothing in the journal.







                          share|improve this answer













                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer











                          answered May 3 at 11:17









                          vonbrand

                          13.9k22443




                          13.9k22443






















                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


























                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f441511%2fdoes-recovering-journal-prove-an-unclean-shutdown-unmount%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Bahrain

                              Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay