“Lived a lion” or “there lived a lion” [closed]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












5
















Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.




OR




Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




Are the both correct?










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by SamBC, Hellion, Jason Bassford, J.R. Mar 6 at 18:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – SamBC, Hellion, J.R.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 3





    This is not a proper question for ELL. The purpose of this site is not to solve quizzes for you.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 8:58






  • 8





    @virolino I see no reason why this is not a proper question. What if the OP is genuinely confused with the sentence?

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:04






  • 5





    @Holyprogrammer: because the question does not show any efforts from OP to solve the problem. He just copy / pasted the question from his exercize book and posted it here. He should explain what he understood and what he did not understand. Otherwise, it is just his homework done by the community. Most of his other questions are very similar: giving us quizzes.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 9:06






  • 2





    Yes, they are both correct. In your first example, subject "lion" is postposed to after the verb. In the second, the subject is "there".

    – BillJ
    Mar 6 at 9:10






  • 2





    @virolino Ok, so I reviewed some of his questions, and I see what you mean. I flagged one of his posts for moderator intervention

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:14















5
















Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.




OR




Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




Are the both correct?










share|improve this question















closed as off-topic by SamBC, Hellion, Jason Bassford, J.R. Mar 6 at 18:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – SamBC, Hellion, J.R.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.











  • 3





    This is not a proper question for ELL. The purpose of this site is not to solve quizzes for you.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 8:58






  • 8





    @virolino I see no reason why this is not a proper question. What if the OP is genuinely confused with the sentence?

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:04






  • 5





    @Holyprogrammer: because the question does not show any efforts from OP to solve the problem. He just copy / pasted the question from his exercize book and posted it here. He should explain what he understood and what he did not understand. Otherwise, it is just his homework done by the community. Most of his other questions are very similar: giving us quizzes.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 9:06






  • 2





    Yes, they are both correct. In your first example, subject "lion" is postposed to after the verb. In the second, the subject is "there".

    – BillJ
    Mar 6 at 9:10






  • 2





    @virolino Ok, so I reviewed some of his questions, and I see what you mean. I flagged one of his posts for moderator intervention

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:14













5












5








5


2







Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.




OR




Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




Are the both correct?










share|improve this question

















Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.




OR




Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




Are the both correct?







grammar sentence-choice






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 6 at 10:04









BillJ

6,8181819




6,8181819










asked Mar 6 at 8:17









Kumar sadhuKumar sadhu

6011313




6011313




closed as off-topic by SamBC, Hellion, Jason Bassford, J.R. Mar 6 at 18:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – SamBC, Hellion, J.R.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by SamBC, Hellion, Jason Bassford, J.R. Mar 6 at 18:38


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question should include more details than have been provided here. Please edit to add the research you have done in your efforts to answer the question, or provide more context. See: Details, Please." – SamBC, Hellion, J.R.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







  • 3





    This is not a proper question for ELL. The purpose of this site is not to solve quizzes for you.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 8:58






  • 8





    @virolino I see no reason why this is not a proper question. What if the OP is genuinely confused with the sentence?

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:04






  • 5





    @Holyprogrammer: because the question does not show any efforts from OP to solve the problem. He just copy / pasted the question from his exercize book and posted it here. He should explain what he understood and what he did not understand. Otherwise, it is just his homework done by the community. Most of his other questions are very similar: giving us quizzes.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 9:06






  • 2





    Yes, they are both correct. In your first example, subject "lion" is postposed to after the verb. In the second, the subject is "there".

    – BillJ
    Mar 6 at 9:10






  • 2





    @virolino Ok, so I reviewed some of his questions, and I see what you mean. I flagged one of his posts for moderator intervention

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:14












  • 3





    This is not a proper question for ELL. The purpose of this site is not to solve quizzes for you.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 8:58






  • 8





    @virolino I see no reason why this is not a proper question. What if the OP is genuinely confused with the sentence?

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:04






  • 5





    @Holyprogrammer: because the question does not show any efforts from OP to solve the problem. He just copy / pasted the question from his exercize book and posted it here. He should explain what he understood and what he did not understand. Otherwise, it is just his homework done by the community. Most of his other questions are very similar: giving us quizzes.

    – virolino
    Mar 6 at 9:06






  • 2





    Yes, they are both correct. In your first example, subject "lion" is postposed to after the verb. In the second, the subject is "there".

    – BillJ
    Mar 6 at 9:10






  • 2





    @virolino Ok, so I reviewed some of his questions, and I see what you mean. I flagged one of his posts for moderator intervention

    – Holyprogrammer
    Mar 6 at 9:14







3




3





This is not a proper question for ELL. The purpose of this site is not to solve quizzes for you.

– virolino
Mar 6 at 8:58





This is not a proper question for ELL. The purpose of this site is not to solve quizzes for you.

– virolino
Mar 6 at 8:58




8




8





@virolino I see no reason why this is not a proper question. What if the OP is genuinely confused with the sentence?

– Holyprogrammer
Mar 6 at 9:04





@virolino I see no reason why this is not a proper question. What if the OP is genuinely confused with the sentence?

– Holyprogrammer
Mar 6 at 9:04




5




5





@Holyprogrammer: because the question does not show any efforts from OP to solve the problem. He just copy / pasted the question from his exercize book and posted it here. He should explain what he understood and what he did not understand. Otherwise, it is just his homework done by the community. Most of his other questions are very similar: giving us quizzes.

– virolino
Mar 6 at 9:06





@Holyprogrammer: because the question does not show any efforts from OP to solve the problem. He just copy / pasted the question from his exercize book and posted it here. He should explain what he understood and what he did not understand. Otherwise, it is just his homework done by the community. Most of his other questions are very similar: giving us quizzes.

– virolino
Mar 6 at 9:06




2




2





Yes, they are both correct. In your first example, subject "lion" is postposed to after the verb. In the second, the subject is "there".

– BillJ
Mar 6 at 9:10





Yes, they are both correct. In your first example, subject "lion" is postposed to after the verb. In the second, the subject is "there".

– BillJ
Mar 6 at 9:10




2




2





@virolino Ok, so I reviewed some of his questions, and I see what you mean. I flagged one of his posts for moderator intervention

– Holyprogrammer
Mar 6 at 9:14





@virolino Ok, so I reviewed some of his questions, and I see what you mean. I flagged one of his posts for moderator intervention

– Holyprogrammer
Mar 6 at 9:14










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















10















Once upon a time there lived* a lion in a forest.




English clauses which are not imperatives** must have a subject. Sometimes we need to use a ‘dummy’ or ‘empty’ or ‘artificial’ subject when there is no subject attached to the verb, and where the real subject is somewhere else in the clause. There is one of the two dummy subjects used in English.



Regarding the first sentence, it’s also correct. This grammatical construction is called subject–verb inversion.




Beside the bed stood a lamp.



Down the street lived the man and his wife without anyone suspecting that they were really spies for a foreign power.



In the vase are some flowers.




On a side note, subject-verb inversion is usually impossible if the subject is a weak (non-stressed) definite pronoun. You can’t write




Long long ago in the dense forest lived it.





*It’s a common literary technique used to begin some children's stories written in a traditional style.




There once lived a poor widow who had a beautiful daughter.



At the edge of a great forest there once lived a king with his beautiful daughters.



There once lived a woman who was so fat, she couldn't fit in a taxi.




**An imperative sentence/clause gives a command/request to do something:




Sit down!







share|improve this answer




















  • 6





    Especially for storytelling, it helps with framing. When I say "A lion lives in the forest", you're most likely thinking about a lion in a forest (narrow view). But if I say "There lives a lion in the forest", you're more likely to think about a forest with a lion in it (a wider view). This isn't a literal rule of English, but it is related to how people convert a written story into a mental image, which is the main goal of storytelling. Consider the difference between "once upon a time" (= don't worry about the timeframe) or "some time ago" (= it's relevant to consider the timeframe)

    – Flater
    Mar 6 at 12:12







  • 1





    It's really weird knowing I've used this rule for 33 years and never once thought of there as a dummy subject

    – Mark
    Mar 6 at 15:55


















2















[1] Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.



[2] Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




They are both OK.



In [1] the subject is "a lion", which has been postposed to a position after the verb, cf. a lion lived. A postposed element occurs in a position that tends to receive greater phonological prominence; the emphasis here is on the lion, not on when or where it lived.



In [2] "there lived a lion" is a presentational clause with "there" as subject.






share|improve this answer































    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10















    Once upon a time there lived* a lion in a forest.




    English clauses which are not imperatives** must have a subject. Sometimes we need to use a ‘dummy’ or ‘empty’ or ‘artificial’ subject when there is no subject attached to the verb, and where the real subject is somewhere else in the clause. There is one of the two dummy subjects used in English.



    Regarding the first sentence, it’s also correct. This grammatical construction is called subject–verb inversion.




    Beside the bed stood a lamp.



    Down the street lived the man and his wife without anyone suspecting that they were really spies for a foreign power.



    In the vase are some flowers.




    On a side note, subject-verb inversion is usually impossible if the subject is a weak (non-stressed) definite pronoun. You can’t write




    Long long ago in the dense forest lived it.





    *It’s a common literary technique used to begin some children's stories written in a traditional style.




    There once lived a poor widow who had a beautiful daughter.



    At the edge of a great forest there once lived a king with his beautiful daughters.



    There once lived a woman who was so fat, she couldn't fit in a taxi.




    **An imperative sentence/clause gives a command/request to do something:




    Sit down!







    share|improve this answer




















    • 6





      Especially for storytelling, it helps with framing. When I say "A lion lives in the forest", you're most likely thinking about a lion in a forest (narrow view). But if I say "There lives a lion in the forest", you're more likely to think about a forest with a lion in it (a wider view). This isn't a literal rule of English, but it is related to how people convert a written story into a mental image, which is the main goal of storytelling. Consider the difference between "once upon a time" (= don't worry about the timeframe) or "some time ago" (= it's relevant to consider the timeframe)

      – Flater
      Mar 6 at 12:12







    • 1





      It's really weird knowing I've used this rule for 33 years and never once thought of there as a dummy subject

      – Mark
      Mar 6 at 15:55















    10















    Once upon a time there lived* a lion in a forest.




    English clauses which are not imperatives** must have a subject. Sometimes we need to use a ‘dummy’ or ‘empty’ or ‘artificial’ subject when there is no subject attached to the verb, and where the real subject is somewhere else in the clause. There is one of the two dummy subjects used in English.



    Regarding the first sentence, it’s also correct. This grammatical construction is called subject–verb inversion.




    Beside the bed stood a lamp.



    Down the street lived the man and his wife without anyone suspecting that they were really spies for a foreign power.



    In the vase are some flowers.




    On a side note, subject-verb inversion is usually impossible if the subject is a weak (non-stressed) definite pronoun. You can’t write




    Long long ago in the dense forest lived it.





    *It’s a common literary technique used to begin some children's stories written in a traditional style.




    There once lived a poor widow who had a beautiful daughter.



    At the edge of a great forest there once lived a king with his beautiful daughters.



    There once lived a woman who was so fat, she couldn't fit in a taxi.




    **An imperative sentence/clause gives a command/request to do something:




    Sit down!







    share|improve this answer




















    • 6





      Especially for storytelling, it helps with framing. When I say "A lion lives in the forest", you're most likely thinking about a lion in a forest (narrow view). But if I say "There lives a lion in the forest", you're more likely to think about a forest with a lion in it (a wider view). This isn't a literal rule of English, but it is related to how people convert a written story into a mental image, which is the main goal of storytelling. Consider the difference between "once upon a time" (= don't worry about the timeframe) or "some time ago" (= it's relevant to consider the timeframe)

      – Flater
      Mar 6 at 12:12







    • 1





      It's really weird knowing I've used this rule for 33 years and never once thought of there as a dummy subject

      – Mark
      Mar 6 at 15:55













    10












    10








    10








    Once upon a time there lived* a lion in a forest.




    English clauses which are not imperatives** must have a subject. Sometimes we need to use a ‘dummy’ or ‘empty’ or ‘artificial’ subject when there is no subject attached to the verb, and where the real subject is somewhere else in the clause. There is one of the two dummy subjects used in English.



    Regarding the first sentence, it’s also correct. This grammatical construction is called subject–verb inversion.




    Beside the bed stood a lamp.



    Down the street lived the man and his wife without anyone suspecting that they were really spies for a foreign power.



    In the vase are some flowers.




    On a side note, subject-verb inversion is usually impossible if the subject is a weak (non-stressed) definite pronoun. You can’t write




    Long long ago in the dense forest lived it.





    *It’s a common literary technique used to begin some children's stories written in a traditional style.




    There once lived a poor widow who had a beautiful daughter.



    At the edge of a great forest there once lived a king with his beautiful daughters.



    There once lived a woman who was so fat, she couldn't fit in a taxi.




    **An imperative sentence/clause gives a command/request to do something:




    Sit down!







    share|improve this answer
















    Once upon a time there lived* a lion in a forest.




    English clauses which are not imperatives** must have a subject. Sometimes we need to use a ‘dummy’ or ‘empty’ or ‘artificial’ subject when there is no subject attached to the verb, and where the real subject is somewhere else in the clause. There is one of the two dummy subjects used in English.



    Regarding the first sentence, it’s also correct. This grammatical construction is called subject–verb inversion.




    Beside the bed stood a lamp.



    Down the street lived the man and his wife without anyone suspecting that they were really spies for a foreign power.



    In the vase are some flowers.




    On a side note, subject-verb inversion is usually impossible if the subject is a weak (non-stressed) definite pronoun. You can’t write




    Long long ago in the dense forest lived it.





    *It’s a common literary technique used to begin some children's stories written in a traditional style.




    There once lived a poor widow who had a beautiful daughter.



    At the edge of a great forest there once lived a king with his beautiful daughters.



    There once lived a woman who was so fat, she couldn't fit in a taxi.




    **An imperative sentence/clause gives a command/request to do something:




    Sit down!








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 6 at 9:50

























    answered Mar 6 at 8:58









    Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko

    2,339624




    2,339624







    • 6





      Especially for storytelling, it helps with framing. When I say "A lion lives in the forest", you're most likely thinking about a lion in a forest (narrow view). But if I say "There lives a lion in the forest", you're more likely to think about a forest with a lion in it (a wider view). This isn't a literal rule of English, but it is related to how people convert a written story into a mental image, which is the main goal of storytelling. Consider the difference between "once upon a time" (= don't worry about the timeframe) or "some time ago" (= it's relevant to consider the timeframe)

      – Flater
      Mar 6 at 12:12







    • 1





      It's really weird knowing I've used this rule for 33 years and never once thought of there as a dummy subject

      – Mark
      Mar 6 at 15:55












    • 6





      Especially for storytelling, it helps with framing. When I say "A lion lives in the forest", you're most likely thinking about a lion in a forest (narrow view). But if I say "There lives a lion in the forest", you're more likely to think about a forest with a lion in it (a wider view). This isn't a literal rule of English, but it is related to how people convert a written story into a mental image, which is the main goal of storytelling. Consider the difference between "once upon a time" (= don't worry about the timeframe) or "some time ago" (= it's relevant to consider the timeframe)

      – Flater
      Mar 6 at 12:12







    • 1





      It's really weird knowing I've used this rule for 33 years and never once thought of there as a dummy subject

      – Mark
      Mar 6 at 15:55







    6




    6





    Especially for storytelling, it helps with framing. When I say "A lion lives in the forest", you're most likely thinking about a lion in a forest (narrow view). But if I say "There lives a lion in the forest", you're more likely to think about a forest with a lion in it (a wider view). This isn't a literal rule of English, but it is related to how people convert a written story into a mental image, which is the main goal of storytelling. Consider the difference between "once upon a time" (= don't worry about the timeframe) or "some time ago" (= it's relevant to consider the timeframe)

    – Flater
    Mar 6 at 12:12






    Especially for storytelling, it helps with framing. When I say "A lion lives in the forest", you're most likely thinking about a lion in a forest (narrow view). But if I say "There lives a lion in the forest", you're more likely to think about a forest with a lion in it (a wider view). This isn't a literal rule of English, but it is related to how people convert a written story into a mental image, which is the main goal of storytelling. Consider the difference between "once upon a time" (= don't worry about the timeframe) or "some time ago" (= it's relevant to consider the timeframe)

    – Flater
    Mar 6 at 12:12





    1




    1





    It's really weird knowing I've used this rule for 33 years and never once thought of there as a dummy subject

    – Mark
    Mar 6 at 15:55





    It's really weird knowing I've used this rule for 33 years and never once thought of there as a dummy subject

    – Mark
    Mar 6 at 15:55













    2















    [1] Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.



    [2] Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




    They are both OK.



    In [1] the subject is "a lion", which has been postposed to a position after the verb, cf. a lion lived. A postposed element occurs in a position that tends to receive greater phonological prominence; the emphasis here is on the lion, not on when or where it lived.



    In [2] "there lived a lion" is a presentational clause with "there" as subject.






    share|improve this answer





























      2















      [1] Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.



      [2] Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




      They are both OK.



      In [1] the subject is "a lion", which has been postposed to a position after the verb, cf. a lion lived. A postposed element occurs in a position that tends to receive greater phonological prominence; the emphasis here is on the lion, not on when or where it lived.



      In [2] "there lived a lion" is a presentational clause with "there" as subject.






      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2








        [1] Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.



        [2] Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




        They are both OK.



        In [1] the subject is "a lion", which has been postposed to a position after the verb, cf. a lion lived. A postposed element occurs in a position that tends to receive greater phonological prominence; the emphasis here is on the lion, not on when or where it lived.



        In [2] "there lived a lion" is a presentational clause with "there" as subject.






        share|improve this answer
















        [1] Long long ago in the dense forest lived a lion.



        [2] Long long ago in the dense forest there lived a lion.




        They are both OK.



        In [1] the subject is "a lion", which has been postposed to a position after the verb, cf. a lion lived. A postposed element occurs in a position that tends to receive greater phonological prominence; the emphasis here is on the lion, not on when or where it lived.



        In [2] "there lived a lion" is a presentational clause with "there" as subject.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 6 at 13:32

























        answered Mar 6 at 9:23









        BillJBillJ

        6,8181819




        6,8181819












            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?