Checking server is listening without telnet, from CLI?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1















Typically an easy diagnostic approach to checking an application server is running is to run telnet again the host and port:



telnet somehost port


The issue is that some operating systems, such as macOS now make the tool unavailable by default. For this reason, instead of trying to see how to install telnet, I am curious to know if there are any other CLI approaches to check a server is listening, without needing special privileges?



Just to clarify I am looking for solutions that are as quick to use on any system as telnet, which is achievable in 5 seconds. Coding a solution doesn’t really offer a quick access approach.










share|improve this question
























  • Is Perl available?

    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 9 at 21:31















1















Typically an easy diagnostic approach to checking an application server is running is to run telnet again the host and port:



telnet somehost port


The issue is that some operating systems, such as macOS now make the tool unavailable by default. For this reason, instead of trying to see how to install telnet, I am curious to know if there are any other CLI approaches to check a server is listening, without needing special privileges?



Just to clarify I am looking for solutions that are as quick to use on any system as telnet, which is achievable in 5 seconds. Coding a solution doesn’t really offer a quick access approach.










share|improve this question
























  • Is Perl available?

    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 9 at 21:31













1












1








1








Typically an easy diagnostic approach to checking an application server is running is to run telnet again the host and port:



telnet somehost port


The issue is that some operating systems, such as macOS now make the tool unavailable by default. For this reason, instead of trying to see how to install telnet, I am curious to know if there are any other CLI approaches to check a server is listening, without needing special privileges?



Just to clarify I am looking for solutions that are as quick to use on any system as telnet, which is achievable in 5 seconds. Coding a solution doesn’t really offer a quick access approach.










share|improve this question
















Typically an easy diagnostic approach to checking an application server is running is to run telnet again the host and port:



telnet somehost port


The issue is that some operating systems, such as macOS now make the tool unavailable by default. For this reason, instead of trying to see how to install telnet, I am curious to know if there are any other CLI approaches to check a server is listening, without needing special privileges?



Just to clarify I am looking for solutions that are as quick to use on any system as telnet, which is achievable in 5 seconds. Coding a solution doesn’t really offer a quick access approach.







linux osx telnet






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 10 at 23:05







Andre M

















asked Feb 9 at 21:02









Andre MAndre M

1787




1787












  • Is Perl available?

    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 9 at 21:31

















  • Is Perl available?

    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 9 at 21:31
















Is Perl available?

– Jeff Schaller
Feb 9 at 21:31





Is Perl available?

– Jeff Schaller
Feb 9 at 21:31










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can try several ways to check if something listen on particular port:



With wget/curl



wget your_IP:port


With netstat



netstat -an|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With lsof



lsof -i :port


With netcat



nc -vz your_IP port


With /proc filesystem (probably will work only on linux)
(explained here)



With ss



ss|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With nmap



nmap -sS -O -pport your_IP


EDIT1 Also (almost) every ssh,http,ftp client can be used, but sometime will be hard to understand if port is closed by firewall or not available.
EDIT2 Found in this Q/A sample way to use cat and echo to do the job:



true &>/dev/null </dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/$PORT && echo open || echo closed


or with only exec command (if you do not see error port is open):



exec 6<>/dev/tcp/your_IP/port


And I found a way to use only awk to do the job (original here):



awk -v port=your_port 'function hextodec(str,ret,n,i,k,c)
ret = 0
n = length(str)
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
c = tolower(substr(str, i, 1))
k = index("123456789abcdef", c)
ret = ret * 16 + k

return ret

function getIP(str,ret)
ret=hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")-2,2));
for (i=5; i>0; i-=2)
ret = ret"."hextodec(substr(str,i,2))

ret = ret":"hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")+1,4))
return ret

NR > 1 local=getIP($2);remote=getIP($3) if (remote ~ "0:0" && local ~ ":"port) print local' /proc/net/tcp


EDIT3 As mentioned in to comment some of the methods, especially based on /dev filesystem may bot work in your environment






share|improve this answer

























  • you should mention explictily that /dev/tcp/host/port only works in bash (and gawk) and that it's something internal, completely fake (you cannot use that path with external commands).

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 11:45












  • @mosvy, by fake, do you mean is local?

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 13:55











  • no, I mean that it's completely internal to bash, only bash and its builtin commands are able to use those paths. compare cat </dev/tcp/localhost/smtp to cat /dev/tcp/localhost/smtp

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 14:37











  • @mosvy, I added comment in to the answer :)

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 14:47


















2














It's actually better not to use the telnet tool, which does more than just open a TCP socket, in certain circumstances trying to speak the TELNET protocol over the opened connection. There are many tools that can be used to open a TCP socket, not least the client tools of all of the other TCP-based protocols, like FTP clients. Again, like telnet, these can end up trying to speak their respective protocols after the connection opens.



For this very basic operation of making a TCP connection and immediately closing it, without attempting to speak any protocol over the connection, one does best to look at low-level tools. nc is one, which I leave to other answers. But others are the various UCSPI-TCP and UCSPI-SSL clients, whose job is solely to do exactly what you want: open the connection. Just make the program that they then chain-load to do nothing except report the success.




  • tcp-socket-connect in the nosh package:
    tcp-socket-connect "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • the tcpclient in the djbwares package, a slightly polished version of Daniel J. Bernstein's original tcpclient:
    tcpclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This only does IPv4, although a few patched versions exist that can also do IPv6.

  • Laurent Bercot's s6-tcpclient from s6-networking:
    s6-tcpclient -N -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • William Baxter's sslclient:
    sslclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $SSLREMOTEIP:$SSLREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This negotiates SSL/TLS as well. It only does IPv4, although Felix von Leitner publishes a patched version that does IPv6 too.

See the manual pages for details. The options used here turn off various informational lookups about the endpoints that you do not need for a connectivity test. The input host and port can be symbolic. What is printed will be numeric.



These tools are portable, and can be built from source on a range of systems. Indeed they are even pre-built and packaged as binaries for several operating systems, or available through ports, including but not limited to:



  • s6-networking for Arch Linux


  • Archnosh and packages for Debian Linux, for OpenBSD, and for FreeBSD

  • ucspi-tcp for Arch Linux, for Debian Linux, for Ubuntu Linux, in the FreeBSD ports tree, in the OpenBSD ports tree, in the NetBSD packages collection, and in MacPorts

  • ucspi-ssl in the FreeBSD ports tree and in the NetBSD packages collection





share|improve this answer























  • My concern here is that these solutions aren’t a 5 second check with a command line tool, which is the beauty of telnet.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:01











  • Clearly that is not the beauty of telnet, as telnet needs to be compiled/installed first on your system, as stated in the question. Then there's the well-known fact that telnet speaks an actual protocol as pointed out. Giving these commands a host and port, the only two inputs that they take and much the same as one would give telnet, is a "5 second" job, furthermore.

    – JdeBP
    Feb 11 at 5:37


















1














To solve this problem, I wrote a perl script:



#!/usr/bin/perl -w

# tries to connect to the given IP and port (tcp)

use strict;
use IO::Socket;

my $desthost = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";
my $destport = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";

gethostbyname($desthost) || die "Invalid host givenn";

my $handle = IO::Socket::INET->new(
PeerAddr => $desthost,
PeerPort => $destport,
Proto => 'tcp')
or die "can't connect to $desthost:$destport: $!n";
close $handle;
print "Success!n"


It simulates a telnet connection (see the hard-coded 'tcp') and allows you to enter a hostname and port; it reports back success or failure based on the remote side answering (listening) at that port.






share|improve this answer























  • Coding a solution isn’t practical and doesn’t really offer a quick solution. The key is really to be able to use something readily available with the minimum effort.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:02











  • It looks like it could become a one-liner quite easily.

    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Feb 11 at 0:38










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499694%2fchecking-server-is-listening-without-telnet-from-cli%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4














You can try several ways to check if something listen on particular port:



With wget/curl



wget your_IP:port


With netstat



netstat -an|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With lsof



lsof -i :port


With netcat



nc -vz your_IP port


With /proc filesystem (probably will work only on linux)
(explained here)



With ss



ss|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With nmap



nmap -sS -O -pport your_IP


EDIT1 Also (almost) every ssh,http,ftp client can be used, but sometime will be hard to understand if port is closed by firewall or not available.
EDIT2 Found in this Q/A sample way to use cat and echo to do the job:



true &>/dev/null </dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/$PORT && echo open || echo closed


or with only exec command (if you do not see error port is open):



exec 6<>/dev/tcp/your_IP/port


And I found a way to use only awk to do the job (original here):



awk -v port=your_port 'function hextodec(str,ret,n,i,k,c)
ret = 0
n = length(str)
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
c = tolower(substr(str, i, 1))
k = index("123456789abcdef", c)
ret = ret * 16 + k

return ret

function getIP(str,ret)
ret=hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")-2,2));
for (i=5; i>0; i-=2)
ret = ret"."hextodec(substr(str,i,2))

ret = ret":"hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")+1,4))
return ret

NR > 1 local=getIP($2);remote=getIP($3) if (remote ~ "0:0" && local ~ ":"port) print local' /proc/net/tcp


EDIT3 As mentioned in to comment some of the methods, especially based on /dev filesystem may bot work in your environment






share|improve this answer

























  • you should mention explictily that /dev/tcp/host/port only works in bash (and gawk) and that it's something internal, completely fake (you cannot use that path with external commands).

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 11:45












  • @mosvy, by fake, do you mean is local?

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 13:55











  • no, I mean that it's completely internal to bash, only bash and its builtin commands are able to use those paths. compare cat </dev/tcp/localhost/smtp to cat /dev/tcp/localhost/smtp

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 14:37











  • @mosvy, I added comment in to the answer :)

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 14:47















4














You can try several ways to check if something listen on particular port:



With wget/curl



wget your_IP:port


With netstat



netstat -an|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With lsof



lsof -i :port


With netcat



nc -vz your_IP port


With /proc filesystem (probably will work only on linux)
(explained here)



With ss



ss|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With nmap



nmap -sS -O -pport your_IP


EDIT1 Also (almost) every ssh,http,ftp client can be used, but sometime will be hard to understand if port is closed by firewall or not available.
EDIT2 Found in this Q/A sample way to use cat and echo to do the job:



true &>/dev/null </dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/$PORT && echo open || echo closed


or with only exec command (if you do not see error port is open):



exec 6<>/dev/tcp/your_IP/port


And I found a way to use only awk to do the job (original here):



awk -v port=your_port 'function hextodec(str,ret,n,i,k,c)
ret = 0
n = length(str)
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
c = tolower(substr(str, i, 1))
k = index("123456789abcdef", c)
ret = ret * 16 + k

return ret

function getIP(str,ret)
ret=hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")-2,2));
for (i=5; i>0; i-=2)
ret = ret"."hextodec(substr(str,i,2))

ret = ret":"hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")+1,4))
return ret

NR > 1 local=getIP($2);remote=getIP($3) if (remote ~ "0:0" && local ~ ":"port) print local' /proc/net/tcp


EDIT3 As mentioned in to comment some of the methods, especially based on /dev filesystem may bot work in your environment






share|improve this answer

























  • you should mention explictily that /dev/tcp/host/port only works in bash (and gawk) and that it's something internal, completely fake (you cannot use that path with external commands).

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 11:45












  • @mosvy, by fake, do you mean is local?

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 13:55











  • no, I mean that it's completely internal to bash, only bash and its builtin commands are able to use those paths. compare cat </dev/tcp/localhost/smtp to cat /dev/tcp/localhost/smtp

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 14:37











  • @mosvy, I added comment in to the answer :)

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 14:47













4












4








4







You can try several ways to check if something listen on particular port:



With wget/curl



wget your_IP:port


With netstat



netstat -an|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With lsof



lsof -i :port


With netcat



nc -vz your_IP port


With /proc filesystem (probably will work only on linux)
(explained here)



With ss



ss|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With nmap



nmap -sS -O -pport your_IP


EDIT1 Also (almost) every ssh,http,ftp client can be used, but sometime will be hard to understand if port is closed by firewall or not available.
EDIT2 Found in this Q/A sample way to use cat and echo to do the job:



true &>/dev/null </dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/$PORT && echo open || echo closed


or with only exec command (if you do not see error port is open):



exec 6<>/dev/tcp/your_IP/port


And I found a way to use only awk to do the job (original here):



awk -v port=your_port 'function hextodec(str,ret,n,i,k,c)
ret = 0
n = length(str)
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
c = tolower(substr(str, i, 1))
k = index("123456789abcdef", c)
ret = ret * 16 + k

return ret

function getIP(str,ret)
ret=hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")-2,2));
for (i=5; i>0; i-=2)
ret = ret"."hextodec(substr(str,i,2))

ret = ret":"hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")+1,4))
return ret

NR > 1 local=getIP($2);remote=getIP($3) if (remote ~ "0:0" && local ~ ":"port) print local' /proc/net/tcp


EDIT3 As mentioned in to comment some of the methods, especially based on /dev filesystem may bot work in your environment






share|improve this answer















You can try several ways to check if something listen on particular port:



With wget/curl



wget your_IP:port


With netstat



netstat -an|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With lsof



lsof -i :port


With netcat



nc -vz your_IP port


With /proc filesystem (probably will work only on linux)
(explained here)



With ss



ss|grep LISTEN|grep :port


With nmap



nmap -sS -O -pport your_IP


EDIT1 Also (almost) every ssh,http,ftp client can be used, but sometime will be hard to understand if port is closed by firewall or not available.
EDIT2 Found in this Q/A sample way to use cat and echo to do the job:



true &>/dev/null </dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/$PORT && echo open || echo closed


or with only exec command (if you do not see error port is open):



exec 6<>/dev/tcp/your_IP/port


And I found a way to use only awk to do the job (original here):



awk -v port=your_port 'function hextodec(str,ret,n,i,k,c)
ret = 0
n = length(str)
for (i = 1; i <= n; i++)
c = tolower(substr(str, i, 1))
k = index("123456789abcdef", c)
ret = ret * 16 + k

return ret

function getIP(str,ret)
ret=hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")-2,2));
for (i=5; i>0; i-=2)
ret = ret"."hextodec(substr(str,i,2))

ret = ret":"hextodec(substr(str,index(str,":")+1,4))
return ret

NR > 1 local=getIP($2);remote=getIP($3) if (remote ~ "0:0" && local ~ ":"port) print local' /proc/net/tcp


EDIT3 As mentioned in to comment some of the methods, especially based on /dev filesystem may bot work in your environment







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 10 at 14:47

























answered Feb 9 at 21:53









Romeo NinovRomeo Ninov

6,54132028




6,54132028












  • you should mention explictily that /dev/tcp/host/port only works in bash (and gawk) and that it's something internal, completely fake (you cannot use that path with external commands).

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 11:45












  • @mosvy, by fake, do you mean is local?

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 13:55











  • no, I mean that it's completely internal to bash, only bash and its builtin commands are able to use those paths. compare cat </dev/tcp/localhost/smtp to cat /dev/tcp/localhost/smtp

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 14:37











  • @mosvy, I added comment in to the answer :)

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 14:47

















  • you should mention explictily that /dev/tcp/host/port only works in bash (and gawk) and that it's something internal, completely fake (you cannot use that path with external commands).

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 11:45












  • @mosvy, by fake, do you mean is local?

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 13:55











  • no, I mean that it's completely internal to bash, only bash and its builtin commands are able to use those paths. compare cat </dev/tcp/localhost/smtp to cat /dev/tcp/localhost/smtp

    – mosvy
    Feb 10 at 14:37











  • @mosvy, I added comment in to the answer :)

    – Romeo Ninov
    Feb 10 at 14:47
















you should mention explictily that /dev/tcp/host/port only works in bash (and gawk) and that it's something internal, completely fake (you cannot use that path with external commands).

– mosvy
Feb 10 at 11:45






you should mention explictily that /dev/tcp/host/port only works in bash (and gawk) and that it's something internal, completely fake (you cannot use that path with external commands).

– mosvy
Feb 10 at 11:45














@mosvy, by fake, do you mean is local?

– Romeo Ninov
Feb 10 at 13:55





@mosvy, by fake, do you mean is local?

– Romeo Ninov
Feb 10 at 13:55













no, I mean that it's completely internal to bash, only bash and its builtin commands are able to use those paths. compare cat </dev/tcp/localhost/smtp to cat /dev/tcp/localhost/smtp

– mosvy
Feb 10 at 14:37





no, I mean that it's completely internal to bash, only bash and its builtin commands are able to use those paths. compare cat </dev/tcp/localhost/smtp to cat /dev/tcp/localhost/smtp

– mosvy
Feb 10 at 14:37













@mosvy, I added comment in to the answer :)

– Romeo Ninov
Feb 10 at 14:47





@mosvy, I added comment in to the answer :)

– Romeo Ninov
Feb 10 at 14:47













2














It's actually better not to use the telnet tool, which does more than just open a TCP socket, in certain circumstances trying to speak the TELNET protocol over the opened connection. There are many tools that can be used to open a TCP socket, not least the client tools of all of the other TCP-based protocols, like FTP clients. Again, like telnet, these can end up trying to speak their respective protocols after the connection opens.



For this very basic operation of making a TCP connection and immediately closing it, without attempting to speak any protocol over the connection, one does best to look at low-level tools. nc is one, which I leave to other answers. But others are the various UCSPI-TCP and UCSPI-SSL clients, whose job is solely to do exactly what you want: open the connection. Just make the program that they then chain-load to do nothing except report the success.




  • tcp-socket-connect in the nosh package:
    tcp-socket-connect "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • the tcpclient in the djbwares package, a slightly polished version of Daniel J. Bernstein's original tcpclient:
    tcpclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This only does IPv4, although a few patched versions exist that can also do IPv6.

  • Laurent Bercot's s6-tcpclient from s6-networking:
    s6-tcpclient -N -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • William Baxter's sslclient:
    sslclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $SSLREMOTEIP:$SSLREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This negotiates SSL/TLS as well. It only does IPv4, although Felix von Leitner publishes a patched version that does IPv6 too.

See the manual pages for details. The options used here turn off various informational lookups about the endpoints that you do not need for a connectivity test. The input host and port can be symbolic. What is printed will be numeric.



These tools are portable, and can be built from source on a range of systems. Indeed they are even pre-built and packaged as binaries for several operating systems, or available through ports, including but not limited to:



  • s6-networking for Arch Linux


  • Archnosh and packages for Debian Linux, for OpenBSD, and for FreeBSD

  • ucspi-tcp for Arch Linux, for Debian Linux, for Ubuntu Linux, in the FreeBSD ports tree, in the OpenBSD ports tree, in the NetBSD packages collection, and in MacPorts

  • ucspi-ssl in the FreeBSD ports tree and in the NetBSD packages collection





share|improve this answer























  • My concern here is that these solutions aren’t a 5 second check with a command line tool, which is the beauty of telnet.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:01











  • Clearly that is not the beauty of telnet, as telnet needs to be compiled/installed first on your system, as stated in the question. Then there's the well-known fact that telnet speaks an actual protocol as pointed out. Giving these commands a host and port, the only two inputs that they take and much the same as one would give telnet, is a "5 second" job, furthermore.

    – JdeBP
    Feb 11 at 5:37















2














It's actually better not to use the telnet tool, which does more than just open a TCP socket, in certain circumstances trying to speak the TELNET protocol over the opened connection. There are many tools that can be used to open a TCP socket, not least the client tools of all of the other TCP-based protocols, like FTP clients. Again, like telnet, these can end up trying to speak their respective protocols after the connection opens.



For this very basic operation of making a TCP connection and immediately closing it, without attempting to speak any protocol over the connection, one does best to look at low-level tools. nc is one, which I leave to other answers. But others are the various UCSPI-TCP and UCSPI-SSL clients, whose job is solely to do exactly what you want: open the connection. Just make the program that they then chain-load to do nothing except report the success.




  • tcp-socket-connect in the nosh package:
    tcp-socket-connect "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • the tcpclient in the djbwares package, a slightly polished version of Daniel J. Bernstein's original tcpclient:
    tcpclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This only does IPv4, although a few patched versions exist that can also do IPv6.

  • Laurent Bercot's s6-tcpclient from s6-networking:
    s6-tcpclient -N -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • William Baxter's sslclient:
    sslclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $SSLREMOTEIP:$SSLREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This negotiates SSL/TLS as well. It only does IPv4, although Felix von Leitner publishes a patched version that does IPv6 too.

See the manual pages for details. The options used here turn off various informational lookups about the endpoints that you do not need for a connectivity test. The input host and port can be symbolic. What is printed will be numeric.



These tools are portable, and can be built from source on a range of systems. Indeed they are even pre-built and packaged as binaries for several operating systems, or available through ports, including but not limited to:



  • s6-networking for Arch Linux


  • Archnosh and packages for Debian Linux, for OpenBSD, and for FreeBSD

  • ucspi-tcp for Arch Linux, for Debian Linux, for Ubuntu Linux, in the FreeBSD ports tree, in the OpenBSD ports tree, in the NetBSD packages collection, and in MacPorts

  • ucspi-ssl in the FreeBSD ports tree and in the NetBSD packages collection





share|improve this answer























  • My concern here is that these solutions aren’t a 5 second check with a command line tool, which is the beauty of telnet.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:01











  • Clearly that is not the beauty of telnet, as telnet needs to be compiled/installed first on your system, as stated in the question. Then there's the well-known fact that telnet speaks an actual protocol as pointed out. Giving these commands a host and port, the only two inputs that they take and much the same as one would give telnet, is a "5 second" job, furthermore.

    – JdeBP
    Feb 11 at 5:37













2












2








2







It's actually better not to use the telnet tool, which does more than just open a TCP socket, in certain circumstances trying to speak the TELNET protocol over the opened connection. There are many tools that can be used to open a TCP socket, not least the client tools of all of the other TCP-based protocols, like FTP clients. Again, like telnet, these can end up trying to speak their respective protocols after the connection opens.



For this very basic operation of making a TCP connection and immediately closing it, without attempting to speak any protocol over the connection, one does best to look at low-level tools. nc is one, which I leave to other answers. But others are the various UCSPI-TCP and UCSPI-SSL clients, whose job is solely to do exactly what you want: open the connection. Just make the program that they then chain-load to do nothing except report the success.




  • tcp-socket-connect in the nosh package:
    tcp-socket-connect "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • the tcpclient in the djbwares package, a slightly polished version of Daniel J. Bernstein's original tcpclient:
    tcpclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This only does IPv4, although a few patched versions exist that can also do IPv6.

  • Laurent Bercot's s6-tcpclient from s6-networking:
    s6-tcpclient -N -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • William Baxter's sslclient:
    sslclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $SSLREMOTEIP:$SSLREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This negotiates SSL/TLS as well. It only does IPv4, although Felix von Leitner publishes a patched version that does IPv6 too.

See the manual pages for details. The options used here turn off various informational lookups about the endpoints that you do not need for a connectivity test. The input host and port can be symbolic. What is printed will be numeric.



These tools are portable, and can be built from source on a range of systems. Indeed they are even pre-built and packaged as binaries for several operating systems, or available through ports, including but not limited to:



  • s6-networking for Arch Linux


  • Archnosh and packages for Debian Linux, for OpenBSD, and for FreeBSD

  • ucspi-tcp for Arch Linux, for Debian Linux, for Ubuntu Linux, in the FreeBSD ports tree, in the OpenBSD ports tree, in the NetBSD packages collection, and in MacPorts

  • ucspi-ssl in the FreeBSD ports tree and in the NetBSD packages collection





share|improve this answer













It's actually better not to use the telnet tool, which does more than just open a TCP socket, in certain circumstances trying to speak the TELNET protocol over the opened connection. There are many tools that can be used to open a TCP socket, not least the client tools of all of the other TCP-based protocols, like FTP clients. Again, like telnet, these can end up trying to speak their respective protocols after the connection opens.



For this very basic operation of making a TCP connection and immediately closing it, without attempting to speak any protocol over the connection, one does best to look at low-level tools. nc is one, which I leave to other answers. But others are the various UCSPI-TCP and UCSPI-SSL clients, whose job is solely to do exactly what you want: open the connection. Just make the program that they then chain-load to do nothing except report the success.




  • tcp-socket-connect in the nosh package:
    tcp-socket-connect "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • the tcpclient in the djbwares package, a slightly polished version of Daniel J. Bernstein's original tcpclient:
    tcpclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This only does IPv4, although a few patched versions exist that can also do IPv6.

  • Laurent Bercot's s6-tcpclient from s6-networking:
    s6-tcpclient -N -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $TCPREMOTEIP:$TCPREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This does both IPv4 and IPv6.

  • William Baxter's sslclient:
    sslclient -H -R -l 0 "$HOST" "$PORT" 
    sh -c 'echo Connected to $SSLREMOTEIP:$SSLREMOTEPORT successfully.'
    This negotiates SSL/TLS as well. It only does IPv4, although Felix von Leitner publishes a patched version that does IPv6 too.

See the manual pages for details. The options used here turn off various informational lookups about the endpoints that you do not need for a connectivity test. The input host and port can be symbolic. What is printed will be numeric.



These tools are portable, and can be built from source on a range of systems. Indeed they are even pre-built and packaged as binaries for several operating systems, or available through ports, including but not limited to:



  • s6-networking for Arch Linux


  • Archnosh and packages for Debian Linux, for OpenBSD, and for FreeBSD

  • ucspi-tcp for Arch Linux, for Debian Linux, for Ubuntu Linux, in the FreeBSD ports tree, in the OpenBSD ports tree, in the NetBSD packages collection, and in MacPorts

  • ucspi-ssl in the FreeBSD ports tree and in the NetBSD packages collection






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 10 at 10:32









JdeBPJdeBP

35.8k473171




35.8k473171












  • My concern here is that these solutions aren’t a 5 second check with a command line tool, which is the beauty of telnet.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:01











  • Clearly that is not the beauty of telnet, as telnet needs to be compiled/installed first on your system, as stated in the question. Then there's the well-known fact that telnet speaks an actual protocol as pointed out. Giving these commands a host and port, the only two inputs that they take and much the same as one would give telnet, is a "5 second" job, furthermore.

    – JdeBP
    Feb 11 at 5:37

















  • My concern here is that these solutions aren’t a 5 second check with a command line tool, which is the beauty of telnet.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:01











  • Clearly that is not the beauty of telnet, as telnet needs to be compiled/installed first on your system, as stated in the question. Then there's the well-known fact that telnet speaks an actual protocol as pointed out. Giving these commands a host and port, the only two inputs that they take and much the same as one would give telnet, is a "5 second" job, furthermore.

    – JdeBP
    Feb 11 at 5:37
















My concern here is that these solutions aren’t a 5 second check with a command line tool, which is the beauty of telnet.

– Andre M
Feb 10 at 23:01





My concern here is that these solutions aren’t a 5 second check with a command line tool, which is the beauty of telnet.

– Andre M
Feb 10 at 23:01













Clearly that is not the beauty of telnet, as telnet needs to be compiled/installed first on your system, as stated in the question. Then there's the well-known fact that telnet speaks an actual protocol as pointed out. Giving these commands a host and port, the only two inputs that they take and much the same as one would give telnet, is a "5 second" job, furthermore.

– JdeBP
Feb 11 at 5:37





Clearly that is not the beauty of telnet, as telnet needs to be compiled/installed first on your system, as stated in the question. Then there's the well-known fact that telnet speaks an actual protocol as pointed out. Giving these commands a host and port, the only two inputs that they take and much the same as one would give telnet, is a "5 second" job, furthermore.

– JdeBP
Feb 11 at 5:37











1














To solve this problem, I wrote a perl script:



#!/usr/bin/perl -w

# tries to connect to the given IP and port (tcp)

use strict;
use IO::Socket;

my $desthost = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";
my $destport = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";

gethostbyname($desthost) || die "Invalid host givenn";

my $handle = IO::Socket::INET->new(
PeerAddr => $desthost,
PeerPort => $destport,
Proto => 'tcp')
or die "can't connect to $desthost:$destport: $!n";
close $handle;
print "Success!n"


It simulates a telnet connection (see the hard-coded 'tcp') and allows you to enter a hostname and port; it reports back success or failure based on the remote side answering (listening) at that port.






share|improve this answer























  • Coding a solution isn’t practical and doesn’t really offer a quick solution. The key is really to be able to use something readily available with the minimum effort.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:02











  • It looks like it could become a one-liner quite easily.

    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Feb 11 at 0:38















1














To solve this problem, I wrote a perl script:



#!/usr/bin/perl -w

# tries to connect to the given IP and port (tcp)

use strict;
use IO::Socket;

my $desthost = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";
my $destport = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";

gethostbyname($desthost) || die "Invalid host givenn";

my $handle = IO::Socket::INET->new(
PeerAddr => $desthost,
PeerPort => $destport,
Proto => 'tcp')
or die "can't connect to $desthost:$destport: $!n";
close $handle;
print "Success!n"


It simulates a telnet connection (see the hard-coded 'tcp') and allows you to enter a hostname and port; it reports back success or failure based on the remote side answering (listening) at that port.






share|improve this answer























  • Coding a solution isn’t practical and doesn’t really offer a quick solution. The key is really to be able to use something readily available with the minimum effort.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:02











  • It looks like it could become a one-liner quite easily.

    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Feb 11 at 0:38













1












1








1







To solve this problem, I wrote a perl script:



#!/usr/bin/perl -w

# tries to connect to the given IP and port (tcp)

use strict;
use IO::Socket;

my $desthost = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";
my $destport = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";

gethostbyname($desthost) || die "Invalid host givenn";

my $handle = IO::Socket::INET->new(
PeerAddr => $desthost,
PeerPort => $destport,
Proto => 'tcp')
or die "can't connect to $desthost:$destport: $!n";
close $handle;
print "Success!n"


It simulates a telnet connection (see the hard-coded 'tcp') and allows you to enter a hostname and port; it reports back success or failure based on the remote side answering (listening) at that port.






share|improve this answer













To solve this problem, I wrote a perl script:



#!/usr/bin/perl -w

# tries to connect to the given IP and port (tcp)

use strict;
use IO::Socket;

my $desthost = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";
my $destport = shift or die "Usage: $0 host portn";

gethostbyname($desthost) || die "Invalid host givenn";

my $handle = IO::Socket::INET->new(
PeerAddr => $desthost,
PeerPort => $destport,
Proto => 'tcp')
or die "can't connect to $desthost:$destport: $!n";
close $handle;
print "Success!n"


It simulates a telnet connection (see the hard-coded 'tcp') and allows you to enter a hostname and port; it reports back success or failure based on the remote side answering (listening) at that port.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 9 at 23:42









Jeff SchallerJeff Schaller

42.9k1159137




42.9k1159137












  • Coding a solution isn’t practical and doesn’t really offer a quick solution. The key is really to be able to use something readily available with the minimum effort.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:02











  • It looks like it could become a one-liner quite easily.

    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Feb 11 at 0:38

















  • Coding a solution isn’t practical and doesn’t really offer a quick solution. The key is really to be able to use something readily available with the minimum effort.

    – Andre M
    Feb 10 at 23:02











  • It looks like it could become a one-liner quite easily.

    – Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
    Feb 11 at 0:38
















Coding a solution isn’t practical and doesn’t really offer a quick solution. The key is really to be able to use something readily available with the minimum effort.

– Andre M
Feb 10 at 23:02





Coding a solution isn’t practical and doesn’t really offer a quick solution. The key is really to be able to use something readily available with the minimum effort.

– Andre M
Feb 10 at 23:02













It looks like it could become a one-liner quite easily.

– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Feb 11 at 0:38





It looks like it could become a one-liner quite easily.

– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Feb 11 at 0:38

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499694%2fchecking-server-is-listening-without-telnet-from-cli%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?