Writing over fractions
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
6
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
$dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightarc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
add a comment |
6
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
$dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightarc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 1:41
Why notoverbrace?
– Werner
Feb 4 at 2:14
add a comment |
6
6
6
1
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
$dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightarc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
I am trying to achieve this look:
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
begindocument
$dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightarc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
I don't need any color or font different from the defaults.
EDIT:
Well I and modified something which is scaling with the fractions which is great but I can't rotate the arc. How to rotate it? Picture above.
math-mode
math-mode
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
edited Feb 4 at 2:03
Simeon Simeonov
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
asked Feb 4 at 1:37
Simeon SimeonovSimeon Simeonov
3866
3866
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 1:41
Why notoverbrace?
– Werner
Feb 4 at 2:14
add a comment |
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 1:41
Why notoverbrace?
– Werner
Feb 4 at 2:14
1
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 1:41
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 1:41
Why not
overbrace?– Werner
Feb 4 at 2:14
Why not
overbrace?– Werner
Feb 4 at 2:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
8
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]%
mathop%
vtop
m@th
ialign%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle#1hfil$crcr
noalignkern3p@nointerlineskip%
upparenfillcrcr
%
%
newcommandupparenfill%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox$braceld$%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveChar[2]beginarray[b]@c@underparenonly#1\[1ex]#2endarray
begindocument
$stackAboveCharx-2dfrac2x+7x-4-stackAboveCharx-4dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx, you could just add a rotatebox to flip the parenthesis.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightrotatebox[origin=bottom]180arc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 2:05
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
Feb 4 at 2:17
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 11:39
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\[-0.5ex] arc#2endarray? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 14:48
Sorry for the late response, that's the right dimension i tested it and it looks perfectly. You are great.
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 9 at 16:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473265%2fwriting-over-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
8
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]%
mathop%
vtop
m@th
ialign%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle#1hfil$crcr
noalignkern3p@nointerlineskip%
upparenfillcrcr
%
%
newcommandupparenfill%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox$braceld$%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveChar[2]beginarray[b]@c@underparenonly#1\[1ex]#2endarray
begindocument
$stackAboveCharx-2dfrac2x+7x-4-stackAboveCharx-4dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx, you could just add a rotatebox to flip the parenthesis.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightrotatebox[origin=bottom]180arc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 2:05
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
Feb 4 at 2:17
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 11:39
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\[-0.5ex] arc#2endarray? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 14:48
Sorry for the late response, that's the right dimension i tested it and it looks perfectly. You are great.
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 9 at 16:15
add a comment |
8
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]%
mathop%
vtop
m@th
ialign%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle#1hfil$crcr
noalignkern3p@nointerlineskip%
upparenfillcrcr
%
%
newcommandupparenfill%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox$braceld$%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveChar[2]beginarray[b]@c@underparenonly#1\[1ex]#2endarray
begindocument
$stackAboveCharx-2dfrac2x+7x-4-stackAboveCharx-4dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx, you could just add a rotatebox to flip the parenthesis.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightrotatebox[origin=bottom]180arc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 2:05
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
Feb 4 at 2:17
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 11:39
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\[-0.5ex] arc#2endarray? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 14:48
Sorry for the late response, that's the right dimension i tested it and it looks perfectly. You are great.
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 9 at 16:15
add a comment |
8
8
8
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]%
mathop%
vtop
m@th
ialign%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle#1hfil$crcr
noalignkern3p@nointerlineskip%
upparenfillcrcr
%
%
newcommandupparenfill%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox$braceld$%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveChar[2]beginarray[b]@c@underparenonly#1\[1ex]#2endarray
begindocument
$stackAboveCharx-2dfrac2x+7x-4-stackAboveCharx-4dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx, you could just add a rotatebox to flip the parenthesis.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightrotatebox[origin=bottom]180arc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
Here is a proposal that marries your command with this answer by egreg.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
makeatletter% based on https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/260580/121799
newcommandunderparenonly[1]%
mathop%
vtop
m@th
ialign%
##crcr
$hfildisplaystyle#1hfil$crcr
noalignkern3p@nointerlineskip%
upparenfillcrcr
%
%
newcommandupparenfill%
$m@thsetboxz@hbox$braceld$%
braceluleadersvrule @heighthtz@ @depthz@hfillbraceru$%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveChar[2]beginarray[b]@c@underparenonly#1\[1ex]#2endarray
begindocument
$stackAboveCharx-2dfrac2x+7x-4-stackAboveCharx-4dfracx+4x-2$
enddocument
As for the code in your question: as you are already using graphicx, you could just add a rotatebox to flip the parenthesis.
documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx
makeatletter
DeclareFontFamilyUtipa
DeclareFontShapeUtipamn<->tipa10
newcommandarc@charusefontUtipamnsymbol62%
newcommandarc[1]mathpalettearc@arc#1
newcommandarc@arc[2]%
sbox0$m@th#1#2$%
vbox
hboxresizeboxwd0heightrotatebox[origin=bottom]180arc@char
nointerlineskip
box0
%
makeatother
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\ arc#2endarray
begindocument
% $dfrac2x+7x-4-dfracx+4x-2$
$dfracstackAboveArcx-22x+7x-4-dfracstackAboveArcx-4x+4x-2$
enddocument
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
edited Feb 4 at 2:16
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
answered Feb 4 at 1:52
marmotmarmot
103k4123234
103k4123234
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 2:05
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
Feb 4 at 2:17
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 11:39
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\[-0.5ex] arc#2endarray? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 14:48
Sorry for the late response, that's the right dimension i tested it and it looks perfectly. You are great.
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 9 at 16:15
add a comment |
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 2:05
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
Feb 4 at 2:17
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negativevspace?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 11:39
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\[-0.5ex] arc#2endarray? I.e. add some negative dimension like-0.5ex. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 14:48
Sorry for the late response, that's the right dimension i tested it and it looks perfectly. You are great.
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 9 at 16:15
1
1
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 2:05
It's working, but I need thin layer. I found something and updated my code, can you see it?
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 2:05
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
Feb 4 at 2:17
@SimeonSimeonov I rotated the parenthesis of your code. (Yet I must admit that I do not understand all details, not do I know whether or not there is a character code that avoids the rotation, yet since you are loading graphicx anyway that may be not so important.)
– marmot
Feb 4 at 2:17
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negative
vspace?– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 11:39
Nice. Is it possible to make the gap between the x - 2 and the arc smaller? Negative
vspace?– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 4 at 11:39
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\[-0.5ex] arc#2endarray? I.e. add some negative dimension like -0.5ex. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.– marmot
Feb 4 at 14:48
@SimeonSimeonov E.g.
newcommandstackAboveArc[2]beginarray[b]@c@#1\[-0.5ex] arc#2endarray? I.e. add some negative dimension like -0.5ex. If you tell me that's the right dimension, or which dimension you prefer, I will update the answer accordingly.– marmot
Feb 4 at 14:48
Sorry for the late response, that's the right dimension i tested it and it looks perfectly. You are great.
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 9 at 16:15
Sorry for the late response, that's the right dimension i tested it and it looks perfectly. You are great.
– Simeon Simeonov
Feb 9 at 16:15
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f473265%2fwriting-over-fractions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Here is a way to do that, I think. The perhaps most beautiful option might be this one, but this is opinion-based.
– marmot
Feb 4 at 1:41
Why not
overbrace?– Werner
Feb 4 at 2:14