Why do double bonds cause kinks in fatty acid chains?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












1












$begingroup$


Fatty acids can either be saturated or unsaturated. If they are saturated, they stack easily and form solids at room temperature. If they are unsaturated, however, double bonds are introduced, and these double bonds introduce kinks into the structure of the fatty acid molecule. In a different question on this site, it was suggested that the reason why double bonds cause kinks to form is that they interrupt the zig zag shape of the molecule.



However, what was left unexplained is how double bonds interrupt the zig zag shape. If we were dealing with a cis fatty acid, and both hydrogens were located on top, why would this lead to a kink?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    Fatty acids can either be saturated or unsaturated. If they are saturated, they stack easily and form solids at room temperature. If they are unsaturated, however, double bonds are introduced, and these double bonds introduce kinks into the structure of the fatty acid molecule. In a different question on this site, it was suggested that the reason why double bonds cause kinks to form is that they interrupt the zig zag shape of the molecule.



    However, what was left unexplained is how double bonds interrupt the zig zag shape. If we were dealing with a cis fatty acid, and both hydrogens were located on top, why would this lead to a kink?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      Fatty acids can either be saturated or unsaturated. If they are saturated, they stack easily and form solids at room temperature. If they are unsaturated, however, double bonds are introduced, and these double bonds introduce kinks into the structure of the fatty acid molecule. In a different question on this site, it was suggested that the reason why double bonds cause kinks to form is that they interrupt the zig zag shape of the molecule.



      However, what was left unexplained is how double bonds interrupt the zig zag shape. If we were dealing with a cis fatty acid, and both hydrogens were located on top, why would this lead to a kink?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Fatty acids can either be saturated or unsaturated. If they are saturated, they stack easily and form solids at room temperature. If they are unsaturated, however, double bonds are introduced, and these double bonds introduce kinks into the structure of the fatty acid molecule. In a different question on this site, it was suggested that the reason why double bonds cause kinks to form is that they interrupt the zig zag shape of the molecule.



      However, what was left unexplained is how double bonds interrupt the zig zag shape. If we were dealing with a cis fatty acid, and both hydrogens were located on top, why would this lead to a kink?







      organic-chemistry






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 3 at 20:36









      KorvexiusKorvexius

      154




      154




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Instead of zig-zag, zig-zag, zig-zag etc. it now goes zig-zag, zig, zig-zag, zig- etc (the bold zig is due to the cis double bond). So the direction of the alkyl chain on one side of the cis double bond is different from that of the alkyl chain on the other. You could partially correct for that "wrong turn" by rotating a single bond by $180^circ$, but that changes a staggered conformation into an eclipsed one.



          Here is a link to a 3D model: http://www.biotopics.co.uk/jsmol/fattyacids.html and a snapshot in case the link goes away:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Is there an extra zig because of the hydrogen on the next carbon occupying the region where the next carbon would have needed to go to form the next zag? (and if so, can you add it to your answer?)
            $endgroup$
            – Korvexius
            Feb 3 at 21:13











          • $begingroup$
            A cis-bond itself is a zig-zig (or U-shaped) while a trans-bond is zig-zag (just like a single bond in staggered antiperiplanar conformation). So yes, compared to the trans-bond you are swapping the single bonds to hydrogen and to the carbon on one side of the double bond.
            $endgroup$
            – Karsten Theis
            Feb 3 at 21:23










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "431"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108976%2fwhy-do-double-bonds-cause-kinks-in-fatty-acid-chains%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          Instead of zig-zag, zig-zag, zig-zag etc. it now goes zig-zag, zig, zig-zag, zig- etc (the bold zig is due to the cis double bond). So the direction of the alkyl chain on one side of the cis double bond is different from that of the alkyl chain on the other. You could partially correct for that "wrong turn" by rotating a single bond by $180^circ$, but that changes a staggered conformation into an eclipsed one.



          Here is a link to a 3D model: http://www.biotopics.co.uk/jsmol/fattyacids.html and a snapshot in case the link goes away:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Is there an extra zig because of the hydrogen on the next carbon occupying the region where the next carbon would have needed to go to form the next zag? (and if so, can you add it to your answer?)
            $endgroup$
            – Korvexius
            Feb 3 at 21:13











          • $begingroup$
            A cis-bond itself is a zig-zig (or U-shaped) while a trans-bond is zig-zag (just like a single bond in staggered antiperiplanar conformation). So yes, compared to the trans-bond you are swapping the single bonds to hydrogen and to the carbon on one side of the double bond.
            $endgroup$
            – Karsten Theis
            Feb 3 at 21:23















          3












          $begingroup$

          Instead of zig-zag, zig-zag, zig-zag etc. it now goes zig-zag, zig, zig-zag, zig- etc (the bold zig is due to the cis double bond). So the direction of the alkyl chain on one side of the cis double bond is different from that of the alkyl chain on the other. You could partially correct for that "wrong turn" by rotating a single bond by $180^circ$, but that changes a staggered conformation into an eclipsed one.



          Here is a link to a 3D model: http://www.biotopics.co.uk/jsmol/fattyacids.html and a snapshot in case the link goes away:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Is there an extra zig because of the hydrogen on the next carbon occupying the region where the next carbon would have needed to go to form the next zag? (and if so, can you add it to your answer?)
            $endgroup$
            – Korvexius
            Feb 3 at 21:13











          • $begingroup$
            A cis-bond itself is a zig-zig (or U-shaped) while a trans-bond is zig-zag (just like a single bond in staggered antiperiplanar conformation). So yes, compared to the trans-bond you are swapping the single bonds to hydrogen and to the carbon on one side of the double bond.
            $endgroup$
            – Karsten Theis
            Feb 3 at 21:23













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Instead of zig-zag, zig-zag, zig-zag etc. it now goes zig-zag, zig, zig-zag, zig- etc (the bold zig is due to the cis double bond). So the direction of the alkyl chain on one side of the cis double bond is different from that of the alkyl chain on the other. You could partially correct for that "wrong turn" by rotating a single bond by $180^circ$, but that changes a staggered conformation into an eclipsed one.



          Here is a link to a 3D model: http://www.biotopics.co.uk/jsmol/fattyacids.html and a snapshot in case the link goes away:



          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Instead of zig-zag, zig-zag, zig-zag etc. it now goes zig-zag, zig, zig-zag, zig- etc (the bold zig is due to the cis double bond). So the direction of the alkyl chain on one side of the cis double bond is different from that of the alkyl chain on the other. You could partially correct for that "wrong turn" by rotating a single bond by $180^circ$, but that changes a staggered conformation into an eclipsed one.



          Here is a link to a 3D model: http://www.biotopics.co.uk/jsmol/fattyacids.html and a snapshot in case the link goes away:



          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 3 at 21:10

























          answered Feb 3 at 21:03









          Karsten TheisKarsten Theis

          2,003324




          2,003324











          • $begingroup$
            Is there an extra zig because of the hydrogen on the next carbon occupying the region where the next carbon would have needed to go to form the next zag? (and if so, can you add it to your answer?)
            $endgroup$
            – Korvexius
            Feb 3 at 21:13











          • $begingroup$
            A cis-bond itself is a zig-zig (or U-shaped) while a trans-bond is zig-zag (just like a single bond in staggered antiperiplanar conformation). So yes, compared to the trans-bond you are swapping the single bonds to hydrogen and to the carbon on one side of the double bond.
            $endgroup$
            – Karsten Theis
            Feb 3 at 21:23
















          • $begingroup$
            Is there an extra zig because of the hydrogen on the next carbon occupying the region where the next carbon would have needed to go to form the next zag? (and if so, can you add it to your answer?)
            $endgroup$
            – Korvexius
            Feb 3 at 21:13











          • $begingroup$
            A cis-bond itself is a zig-zig (or U-shaped) while a trans-bond is zig-zag (just like a single bond in staggered antiperiplanar conformation). So yes, compared to the trans-bond you are swapping the single bonds to hydrogen and to the carbon on one side of the double bond.
            $endgroup$
            – Karsten Theis
            Feb 3 at 21:23















          $begingroup$
          Is there an extra zig because of the hydrogen on the next carbon occupying the region where the next carbon would have needed to go to form the next zag? (and if so, can you add it to your answer?)
          $endgroup$
          – Korvexius
          Feb 3 at 21:13





          $begingroup$
          Is there an extra zig because of the hydrogen on the next carbon occupying the region where the next carbon would have needed to go to form the next zag? (and if so, can you add it to your answer?)
          $endgroup$
          – Korvexius
          Feb 3 at 21:13













          $begingroup$
          A cis-bond itself is a zig-zig (or U-shaped) while a trans-bond is zig-zag (just like a single bond in staggered antiperiplanar conformation). So yes, compared to the trans-bond you are swapping the single bonds to hydrogen and to the carbon on one side of the double bond.
          $endgroup$
          – Karsten Theis
          Feb 3 at 21:23




          $begingroup$
          A cis-bond itself is a zig-zig (or U-shaped) while a trans-bond is zig-zag (just like a single bond in staggered antiperiplanar conformation). So yes, compared to the trans-bond you are swapping the single bonds to hydrogen and to the carbon on one side of the double bond.
          $endgroup$
          – Karsten Theis
          Feb 3 at 21:23

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108976%2fwhy-do-double-bonds-cause-kinks-in-fatty-acid-chains%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay