Why do I have duplicate bind mounts?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












0















I'm curious if someone could explain to me what causes the odd scenario where we have a duplicate mount that appears cyclical on Centos 7 when binding a nfs directory?



In our hosting environment we chroot our users and in order to provide case specific access to some users we bind mount into external nfs directory.



If we mount multiple times we always end up with two seemingly identical mounts to the target with the only difference being one appears to be cyclical pointing to itself(?).



Both are active and show the same content and it doesn't appear to be a "ghost" directory.



Info to replicate:



fstab entries:



www:/protected /protected nfs defaults,_netdev,rw,mountproto=tcp 0 0
/protected/dir1 /$accthome/dir1 none defaults,bind,x-systemd.requires=/protected 0 0


df output looks good pre and post mounting with a single entry



www:/protected/dir1 504G 104G 375G 22% /$accthome/dir1


findmnt and mount both show a single entry



├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


and



www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs


Run mount -a again and I end up with still a single df entry but duplicates in the findmnt and mount output. The only difference being in findmnt it looks to be a submount of the initial mount?



├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs
│ └─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


and



www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs
www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs









share|improve this question




























    0















    I'm curious if someone could explain to me what causes the odd scenario where we have a duplicate mount that appears cyclical on Centos 7 when binding a nfs directory?



    In our hosting environment we chroot our users and in order to provide case specific access to some users we bind mount into external nfs directory.



    If we mount multiple times we always end up with two seemingly identical mounts to the target with the only difference being one appears to be cyclical pointing to itself(?).



    Both are active and show the same content and it doesn't appear to be a "ghost" directory.



    Info to replicate:



    fstab entries:



    www:/protected /protected nfs defaults,_netdev,rw,mountproto=tcp 0 0
    /protected/dir1 /$accthome/dir1 none defaults,bind,x-systemd.requires=/protected 0 0


    df output looks good pre and post mounting with a single entry



    www:/protected/dir1 504G 104G 375G 22% /$accthome/dir1


    findmnt and mount both show a single entry



    ├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


    and



    www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs


    Run mount -a again and I end up with still a single df entry but duplicates in the findmnt and mount output. The only difference being in findmnt it looks to be a submount of the initial mount?



    ├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs
    │ └─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


    and



    www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs
    www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs









    share|improve this question


























      0












      0








      0








      I'm curious if someone could explain to me what causes the odd scenario where we have a duplicate mount that appears cyclical on Centos 7 when binding a nfs directory?



      In our hosting environment we chroot our users and in order to provide case specific access to some users we bind mount into external nfs directory.



      If we mount multiple times we always end up with two seemingly identical mounts to the target with the only difference being one appears to be cyclical pointing to itself(?).



      Both are active and show the same content and it doesn't appear to be a "ghost" directory.



      Info to replicate:



      fstab entries:



      www:/protected /protected nfs defaults,_netdev,rw,mountproto=tcp 0 0
      /protected/dir1 /$accthome/dir1 none defaults,bind,x-systemd.requires=/protected 0 0


      df output looks good pre and post mounting with a single entry



      www:/protected/dir1 504G 104G 375G 22% /$accthome/dir1


      findmnt and mount both show a single entry



      ├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


      and



      www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs


      Run mount -a again and I end up with still a single df entry but duplicates in the findmnt and mount output. The only difference being in findmnt it looks to be a submount of the initial mount?



      ├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs
      │ └─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


      and



      www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs
      www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs









      share|improve this question
















      I'm curious if someone could explain to me what causes the odd scenario where we have a duplicate mount that appears cyclical on Centos 7 when binding a nfs directory?



      In our hosting environment we chroot our users and in order to provide case specific access to some users we bind mount into external nfs directory.



      If we mount multiple times we always end up with two seemingly identical mounts to the target with the only difference being one appears to be cyclical pointing to itself(?).



      Both are active and show the same content and it doesn't appear to be a "ghost" directory.



      Info to replicate:



      fstab entries:



      www:/protected /protected nfs defaults,_netdev,rw,mountproto=tcp 0 0
      /protected/dir1 /$accthome/dir1 none defaults,bind,x-systemd.requires=/protected 0 0


      df output looks good pre and post mounting with a single entry



      www:/protected/dir1 504G 104G 375G 22% /$accthome/dir1


      findmnt and mount both show a single entry



      ├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


      and



      www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs


      Run mount -a again and I end up with still a single df entry but duplicates in the findmnt and mount output. The only difference being in findmnt it looks to be a submount of the initial mount?



      ├─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs
      │ └─/protected/dir1 www:/$accthome/dir1 nfs


      and



      www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs
      www:/protected/dir1 on $accthome/dir1 type nfs






      centos mount nfs bind






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jan 16 at 16:40







      Andrew

















      asked Jan 16 at 16:31









      AndrewAndrew

      1013




      1013




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494878%2fwhy-do-i-have-duplicate-bind-mounts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494878%2fwhy-do-i-have-duplicate-bind-mounts%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay