reading TCP connection list from /proc

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2















I'm trying to implement code that enumerate all existing TCP connections per process (similar to netstat -lptn).
I prefer to implement it myself and not to rely on netstat.
In order to do that, I'm parsing data from /proc/<PID>/net/tcp.



I saw that a number of TCP connections are listed under /proc/<PID>/net/tcp but not listed by netstat -lptn command.



Can someone please explain why that happens?



For example I see that /proc/1/net/tcp and /proc/2/net/tcp have several TCP connections (tried on Ubuntu 16).
As I understand, /proc/1/net/tcp is related to the /sbin/init process which should not have any TCP connection.
The /proc/2/net/tcp is related to kthreadd which also should not have any TCP connection.










share|improve this question













migrated from serverfault.com Jan 31 at 11:29


This question came from our site for system and network administrators.






















    2















    I'm trying to implement code that enumerate all existing TCP connections per process (similar to netstat -lptn).
    I prefer to implement it myself and not to rely on netstat.
    In order to do that, I'm parsing data from /proc/<PID>/net/tcp.



    I saw that a number of TCP connections are listed under /proc/<PID>/net/tcp but not listed by netstat -lptn command.



    Can someone please explain why that happens?



    For example I see that /proc/1/net/tcp and /proc/2/net/tcp have several TCP connections (tried on Ubuntu 16).
    As I understand, /proc/1/net/tcp is related to the /sbin/init process which should not have any TCP connection.
    The /proc/2/net/tcp is related to kthreadd which also should not have any TCP connection.










    share|improve this question













    migrated from serverfault.com Jan 31 at 11:29


    This question came from our site for system and network administrators.




















      2












      2








      2








      I'm trying to implement code that enumerate all existing TCP connections per process (similar to netstat -lptn).
      I prefer to implement it myself and not to rely on netstat.
      In order to do that, I'm parsing data from /proc/<PID>/net/tcp.



      I saw that a number of TCP connections are listed under /proc/<PID>/net/tcp but not listed by netstat -lptn command.



      Can someone please explain why that happens?



      For example I see that /proc/1/net/tcp and /proc/2/net/tcp have several TCP connections (tried on Ubuntu 16).
      As I understand, /proc/1/net/tcp is related to the /sbin/init process which should not have any TCP connection.
      The /proc/2/net/tcp is related to kthreadd which also should not have any TCP connection.










      share|improve this question














      I'm trying to implement code that enumerate all existing TCP connections per process (similar to netstat -lptn).
      I prefer to implement it myself and not to rely on netstat.
      In order to do that, I'm parsing data from /proc/<PID>/net/tcp.



      I saw that a number of TCP connections are listed under /proc/<PID>/net/tcp but not listed by netstat -lptn command.



      Can someone please explain why that happens?



      For example I see that /proc/1/net/tcp and /proc/2/net/tcp have several TCP connections (tried on Ubuntu 16).
      As I understand, /proc/1/net/tcp is related to the /sbin/init process which should not have any TCP connection.
      The /proc/2/net/tcp is related to kthreadd which also should not have any TCP connection.







      linux networking netstat proc






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 16 at 7:07









      DimaDima

      1133




      1133




      migrated from serverfault.com Jan 31 at 11:29


      This question came from our site for system and network administrators.









      migrated from serverfault.com Jan 31 at 11:29


      This question came from our site for system and network administrators.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          There are many misunderstandings in your approach. I'll go over them one by one.



          1. Sockets are not associated with a specific process. When a socket is created its reference count is 1. But through different methods such as dup2, fork, and file descriptor passing it's possible to create many references to the same socket causing its reference count to increase. Some of these references can be from an open file descriptor table, which itself can be used by many threads. Those threads may belong to the same thread group (PID) or different thread groups. When you use the -p flag for netstat it will enumerate the sockets accessible to each process and try to find a process for each known socket. If there are multiple candidate processes, there is no guarantee that it shows the process you are interested in.


          2. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp does not only list sockets related to that process. It lists all TCPv4 sockets in the network namespace which that process belongs to. In the default configuration all processes on the system will belong to a single network namespace, so you'll see the same result with any PID. This also explains why a thread/process which doesn't use networking has contents in this file. Even if it doesn't use networking itself it still belongs to a network namespace in which other processes may use networking.


          3. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains both listening and connected sockets. When you pass -l to netstat it will show you only listening sockets. To match the output closer you'd need -a rather than -l.


          4. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains only TCPv4 sockets. You need to use /proc/<PID>/net/tcp6 as well to see all TCP sockets.

          If you are only interested in sockets in the same namespace as your own process you don't need to iterate through different PIDs. You can instead use /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 since /proc/net is a symlink to /proc/self/net.






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497912%2freading-tcp-connection-list-from-proc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            There are many misunderstandings in your approach. I'll go over them one by one.



            1. Sockets are not associated with a specific process. When a socket is created its reference count is 1. But through different methods such as dup2, fork, and file descriptor passing it's possible to create many references to the same socket causing its reference count to increase. Some of these references can be from an open file descriptor table, which itself can be used by many threads. Those threads may belong to the same thread group (PID) or different thread groups. When you use the -p flag for netstat it will enumerate the sockets accessible to each process and try to find a process for each known socket. If there are multiple candidate processes, there is no guarantee that it shows the process you are interested in.


            2. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp does not only list sockets related to that process. It lists all TCPv4 sockets in the network namespace which that process belongs to. In the default configuration all processes on the system will belong to a single network namespace, so you'll see the same result with any PID. This also explains why a thread/process which doesn't use networking has contents in this file. Even if it doesn't use networking itself it still belongs to a network namespace in which other processes may use networking.


            3. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains both listening and connected sockets. When you pass -l to netstat it will show you only listening sockets. To match the output closer you'd need -a rather than -l.


            4. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains only TCPv4 sockets. You need to use /proc/<PID>/net/tcp6 as well to see all TCP sockets.

            If you are only interested in sockets in the same namespace as your own process you don't need to iterate through different PIDs. You can instead use /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 since /proc/net is a symlink to /proc/self/net.






            share|improve this answer



























              5














              There are many misunderstandings in your approach. I'll go over them one by one.



              1. Sockets are not associated with a specific process. When a socket is created its reference count is 1. But through different methods such as dup2, fork, and file descriptor passing it's possible to create many references to the same socket causing its reference count to increase. Some of these references can be from an open file descriptor table, which itself can be used by many threads. Those threads may belong to the same thread group (PID) or different thread groups. When you use the -p flag for netstat it will enumerate the sockets accessible to each process and try to find a process for each known socket. If there are multiple candidate processes, there is no guarantee that it shows the process you are interested in.


              2. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp does not only list sockets related to that process. It lists all TCPv4 sockets in the network namespace which that process belongs to. In the default configuration all processes on the system will belong to a single network namespace, so you'll see the same result with any PID. This also explains why a thread/process which doesn't use networking has contents in this file. Even if it doesn't use networking itself it still belongs to a network namespace in which other processes may use networking.


              3. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains both listening and connected sockets. When you pass -l to netstat it will show you only listening sockets. To match the output closer you'd need -a rather than -l.


              4. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains only TCPv4 sockets. You need to use /proc/<PID>/net/tcp6 as well to see all TCP sockets.

              If you are only interested in sockets in the same namespace as your own process you don't need to iterate through different PIDs. You can instead use /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 since /proc/net is a symlink to /proc/self/net.






              share|improve this answer

























                5












                5








                5







                There are many misunderstandings in your approach. I'll go over them one by one.



                1. Sockets are not associated with a specific process. When a socket is created its reference count is 1. But through different methods such as dup2, fork, and file descriptor passing it's possible to create many references to the same socket causing its reference count to increase. Some of these references can be from an open file descriptor table, which itself can be used by many threads. Those threads may belong to the same thread group (PID) or different thread groups. When you use the -p flag for netstat it will enumerate the sockets accessible to each process and try to find a process for each known socket. If there are multiple candidate processes, there is no guarantee that it shows the process you are interested in.


                2. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp does not only list sockets related to that process. It lists all TCPv4 sockets in the network namespace which that process belongs to. In the default configuration all processes on the system will belong to a single network namespace, so you'll see the same result with any PID. This also explains why a thread/process which doesn't use networking has contents in this file. Even if it doesn't use networking itself it still belongs to a network namespace in which other processes may use networking.


                3. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains both listening and connected sockets. When you pass -l to netstat it will show you only listening sockets. To match the output closer you'd need -a rather than -l.


                4. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains only TCPv4 sockets. You need to use /proc/<PID>/net/tcp6 as well to see all TCP sockets.

                If you are only interested in sockets in the same namespace as your own process you don't need to iterate through different PIDs. You can instead use /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 since /proc/net is a symlink to /proc/self/net.






                share|improve this answer













                There are many misunderstandings in your approach. I'll go over them one by one.



                1. Sockets are not associated with a specific process. When a socket is created its reference count is 1. But through different methods such as dup2, fork, and file descriptor passing it's possible to create many references to the same socket causing its reference count to increase. Some of these references can be from an open file descriptor table, which itself can be used by many threads. Those threads may belong to the same thread group (PID) or different thread groups. When you use the -p flag for netstat it will enumerate the sockets accessible to each process and try to find a process for each known socket. If there are multiple candidate processes, there is no guarantee that it shows the process you are interested in.


                2. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp does not only list sockets related to that process. It lists all TCPv4 sockets in the network namespace which that process belongs to. In the default configuration all processes on the system will belong to a single network namespace, so you'll see the same result with any PID. This also explains why a thread/process which doesn't use networking has contents in this file. Even if it doesn't use networking itself it still belongs to a network namespace in which other processes may use networking.


                3. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains both listening and connected sockets. When you pass -l to netstat it will show you only listening sockets. To match the output closer you'd need -a rather than -l.


                4. /proc/<PID>/net/tcp contains only TCPv4 sockets. You need to use /proc/<PID>/net/tcp6 as well to see all TCP sockets.

                If you are only interested in sockets in the same namespace as your own process you don't need to iterate through different PIDs. You can instead use /proc/net/tcp and /proc/net/tcp6 since /proc/net is a symlink to /proc/self/net.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Jan 16 at 7:41









                kasperdkasperd

                2,45011127




                2,45011127



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497912%2freading-tcp-connection-list-from-proc%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown






                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Bahrain

                    Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay