rsync: Why is “quick check” default but “--times” is not?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












3















rsync's manpage states:




Rsync finds files that need to be transferred using a "quick check" algorithm (by default) that looks for files that have changed in size or in last-modified time. Any changes in the other preserved attributes (as requested by options) are made on the destination file directly when the quick check indicates that the file's data does not need to be updated.




So for a file to be skipped the modification time has to be the same in source and destination. But since --times is off by default, the destination files will get the time of the sync as their modification time, causing them to be transferred over and over again.



Especially the fact that that paragraph says (emphasis mine):




... Any changes in the other preserved attributes ...




makes it appear (to me) as if the modification time was already a preserved attribute by default, but in my experiment I found otherwise.



What am I missing?










share|improve this question


























    3















    rsync's manpage states:




    Rsync finds files that need to be transferred using a "quick check" algorithm (by default) that looks for files that have changed in size or in last-modified time. Any changes in the other preserved attributes (as requested by options) are made on the destination file directly when the quick check indicates that the file's data does not need to be updated.




    So for a file to be skipped the modification time has to be the same in source and destination. But since --times is off by default, the destination files will get the time of the sync as their modification time, causing them to be transferred over and over again.



    Especially the fact that that paragraph says (emphasis mine):




    ... Any changes in the other preserved attributes ...




    makes it appear (to me) as if the modification time was already a preserved attribute by default, but in my experiment I found otherwise.



    What am I missing?










    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3








      rsync's manpage states:




      Rsync finds files that need to be transferred using a "quick check" algorithm (by default) that looks for files that have changed in size or in last-modified time. Any changes in the other preserved attributes (as requested by options) are made on the destination file directly when the quick check indicates that the file's data does not need to be updated.




      So for a file to be skipped the modification time has to be the same in source and destination. But since --times is off by default, the destination files will get the time of the sync as their modification time, causing them to be transferred over and over again.



      Especially the fact that that paragraph says (emphasis mine):




      ... Any changes in the other preserved attributes ...




      makes it appear (to me) as if the modification time was already a preserved attribute by default, but in my experiment I found otherwise.



      What am I missing?










      share|improve this question














      rsync's manpage states:




      Rsync finds files that need to be transferred using a "quick check" algorithm (by default) that looks for files that have changed in size or in last-modified time. Any changes in the other preserved attributes (as requested by options) are made on the destination file directly when the quick check indicates that the file's data does not need to be updated.




      So for a file to be skipped the modification time has to be the same in source and destination. But since --times is off by default, the destination files will get the time of the sync as their modification time, causing them to be transferred over and over again.



      Especially the fact that that paragraph says (emphasis mine):




      ... Any changes in the other preserved attributes ...




      makes it appear (to me) as if the modification time was already a preserved attribute by default, but in my experiment I found otherwise.



      What am I missing?







      rsync






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Jan 11 at 21:31









      AndreKRAndreKR

      373421




      373421




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          "(as requested by options)"



          Yes, the word "other" in the sentence makes your interpretation possible, but I think that the actual situation is that there are no preserved attributes by default, and that these need to be explicitly requested by options.



          rsync works very much like cp in this regard, which also does not preserve timestamps or ownerships on files by default. Both preserves permissions though.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Indeed, I cannot come up with a better default that would keep the similarity with cp.

            – AndreKR
            Jan 12 at 1:33











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494028%2frsync-why-is-quick-check-default-but-times-is-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          "(as requested by options)"



          Yes, the word "other" in the sentence makes your interpretation possible, but I think that the actual situation is that there are no preserved attributes by default, and that these need to be explicitly requested by options.



          rsync works very much like cp in this regard, which also does not preserve timestamps or ownerships on files by default. Both preserves permissions though.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Indeed, I cannot come up with a better default that would keep the similarity with cp.

            – AndreKR
            Jan 12 at 1:33
















          1














          "(as requested by options)"



          Yes, the word "other" in the sentence makes your interpretation possible, but I think that the actual situation is that there are no preserved attributes by default, and that these need to be explicitly requested by options.



          rsync works very much like cp in this regard, which also does not preserve timestamps or ownerships on files by default. Both preserves permissions though.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Indeed, I cannot come up with a better default that would keep the similarity with cp.

            – AndreKR
            Jan 12 at 1:33














          1












          1








          1







          "(as requested by options)"



          Yes, the word "other" in the sentence makes your interpretation possible, but I think that the actual situation is that there are no preserved attributes by default, and that these need to be explicitly requested by options.



          rsync works very much like cp in this regard, which also does not preserve timestamps or ownerships on files by default. Both preserves permissions though.






          share|improve this answer















          "(as requested by options)"



          Yes, the word "other" in the sentence makes your interpretation possible, but I think that the actual situation is that there are no preserved attributes by default, and that these need to be explicitly requested by options.



          rsync works very much like cp in this regard, which also does not preserve timestamps or ownerships on files by default. Both preserves permissions though.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Jan 11 at 22:01

























          answered Jan 11 at 21:55









          KusalanandaKusalananda

          127k16239393




          127k16239393












          • Indeed, I cannot come up with a better default that would keep the similarity with cp.

            – AndreKR
            Jan 12 at 1:33


















          • Indeed, I cannot come up with a better default that would keep the similarity with cp.

            – AndreKR
            Jan 12 at 1:33

















          Indeed, I cannot come up with a better default that would keep the similarity with cp.

          – AndreKR
          Jan 12 at 1:33






          Indeed, I cannot come up with a better default that would keep the similarity with cp.

          – AndreKR
          Jan 12 at 1:33


















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f494028%2frsync-why-is-quick-check-default-but-times-is-not%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay