Enumeration of lattice paths of a specific type

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












5












$begingroup$


One of the approaches to "Special" meanders led (in particular) to the following question:




What is the number $a_m,n(ell)$ of $ell$-step paths from $(1,1)$ to $(m,n)$ using the following four kinds of steps: $(i,j)mapsto$ $(i+1,j)$, $(i+1,j-1)$, $(i,j+1)$ or $(i-1,j+1)$ and with the restriction that $i$ and $j$ stay positive at each step?




The only thing I managed to find out is sort of a trivial reformulation of the definition: the polynomials
$$
P_ell(x,y):=sum_m,ngeqslant1a_m,n(ell)x^my^n
$$

satisfy a recurrence: since $P_ell(x,0)=P_ell(0,y)=0$, each $F_ell(x,y):=(x+y+x/y+y/x)P_ell(x,y)$ is a polynomial, and we have
$$
P_ell+1(x,y)=F_ell(x,y)-F_ell(x,0)-F_ell(0,y).
$$



In a way of example - here is the table of the $a_m,n(7)$:
$$
beginarraycccccccc
0 & 1 & 21 & 80 & 125 & 85 & 21 & 1 \
1 & 28 & 139 & 254 & 210 & 76 & 7 & 0 \
21 & 139 & 306 & 308 & 140 & 21 & 0 & 0 \
80 & 254 & 308 & 168 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
125 & 210 & 140 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
85 & 76 & 21 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
21 & 7 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
endarray
$$



As literature on the subject of lattice paths is way too vast for me to handle, this is mostly a reference request: I believe that working hardly enough I could find at least a generating function, but I also believe it must be done somewhere already.



In fact a more (or less?) specific question in this direction is whether there is some kind of searchable database of combinatorial objects where I could find such things.
There is a question Combinatorial Databases here on MO but I could not find anything about path enumeration in the answers. The closest I could get is the Dyck path enumeration on FindStat










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    5












    $begingroup$


    One of the approaches to "Special" meanders led (in particular) to the following question:




    What is the number $a_m,n(ell)$ of $ell$-step paths from $(1,1)$ to $(m,n)$ using the following four kinds of steps: $(i,j)mapsto$ $(i+1,j)$, $(i+1,j-1)$, $(i,j+1)$ or $(i-1,j+1)$ and with the restriction that $i$ and $j$ stay positive at each step?




    The only thing I managed to find out is sort of a trivial reformulation of the definition: the polynomials
    $$
    P_ell(x,y):=sum_m,ngeqslant1a_m,n(ell)x^my^n
    $$

    satisfy a recurrence: since $P_ell(x,0)=P_ell(0,y)=0$, each $F_ell(x,y):=(x+y+x/y+y/x)P_ell(x,y)$ is a polynomial, and we have
    $$
    P_ell+1(x,y)=F_ell(x,y)-F_ell(x,0)-F_ell(0,y).
    $$



    In a way of example - here is the table of the $a_m,n(7)$:
    $$
    beginarraycccccccc
    0 & 1 & 21 & 80 & 125 & 85 & 21 & 1 \
    1 & 28 & 139 & 254 & 210 & 76 & 7 & 0 \
    21 & 139 & 306 & 308 & 140 & 21 & 0 & 0 \
    80 & 254 & 308 & 168 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    125 & 210 & 140 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    85 & 76 & 21 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    21 & 7 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
    endarray
    $$



    As literature on the subject of lattice paths is way too vast for me to handle, this is mostly a reference request: I believe that working hardly enough I could find at least a generating function, but I also believe it must be done somewhere already.



    In fact a more (or less?) specific question in this direction is whether there is some kind of searchable database of combinatorial objects where I could find such things.
    There is a question Combinatorial Databases here on MO but I could not find anything about path enumeration in the answers. The closest I could get is the Dyck path enumeration on FindStat










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      One of the approaches to "Special" meanders led (in particular) to the following question:




      What is the number $a_m,n(ell)$ of $ell$-step paths from $(1,1)$ to $(m,n)$ using the following four kinds of steps: $(i,j)mapsto$ $(i+1,j)$, $(i+1,j-1)$, $(i,j+1)$ or $(i-1,j+1)$ and with the restriction that $i$ and $j$ stay positive at each step?




      The only thing I managed to find out is sort of a trivial reformulation of the definition: the polynomials
      $$
      P_ell(x,y):=sum_m,ngeqslant1a_m,n(ell)x^my^n
      $$

      satisfy a recurrence: since $P_ell(x,0)=P_ell(0,y)=0$, each $F_ell(x,y):=(x+y+x/y+y/x)P_ell(x,y)$ is a polynomial, and we have
      $$
      P_ell+1(x,y)=F_ell(x,y)-F_ell(x,0)-F_ell(0,y).
      $$



      In a way of example - here is the table of the $a_m,n(7)$:
      $$
      beginarraycccccccc
      0 & 1 & 21 & 80 & 125 & 85 & 21 & 1 \
      1 & 28 & 139 & 254 & 210 & 76 & 7 & 0 \
      21 & 139 & 306 & 308 & 140 & 21 & 0 & 0 \
      80 & 254 & 308 & 168 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      125 & 210 & 140 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      85 & 76 & 21 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      21 & 7 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      endarray
      $$



      As literature on the subject of lattice paths is way too vast for me to handle, this is mostly a reference request: I believe that working hardly enough I could find at least a generating function, but I also believe it must be done somewhere already.



      In fact a more (or less?) specific question in this direction is whether there is some kind of searchable database of combinatorial objects where I could find such things.
      There is a question Combinatorial Databases here on MO but I could not find anything about path enumeration in the answers. The closest I could get is the Dyck path enumeration on FindStat










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      One of the approaches to "Special" meanders led (in particular) to the following question:




      What is the number $a_m,n(ell)$ of $ell$-step paths from $(1,1)$ to $(m,n)$ using the following four kinds of steps: $(i,j)mapsto$ $(i+1,j)$, $(i+1,j-1)$, $(i,j+1)$ or $(i-1,j+1)$ and with the restriction that $i$ and $j$ stay positive at each step?




      The only thing I managed to find out is sort of a trivial reformulation of the definition: the polynomials
      $$
      P_ell(x,y):=sum_m,ngeqslant1a_m,n(ell)x^my^n
      $$

      satisfy a recurrence: since $P_ell(x,0)=P_ell(0,y)=0$, each $F_ell(x,y):=(x+y+x/y+y/x)P_ell(x,y)$ is a polynomial, and we have
      $$
      P_ell+1(x,y)=F_ell(x,y)-F_ell(x,0)-F_ell(0,y).
      $$



      In a way of example - here is the table of the $a_m,n(7)$:
      $$
      beginarraycccccccc
      0 & 1 & 21 & 80 & 125 & 85 & 21 & 1 \
      1 & 28 & 139 & 254 & 210 & 76 & 7 & 0 \
      21 & 139 & 306 & 308 & 140 & 21 & 0 & 0 \
      80 & 254 & 308 & 168 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      125 & 210 & 140 & 35 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      85 & 76 & 21 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      21 & 7 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \
      endarray
      $$



      As literature on the subject of lattice paths is way too vast for me to handle, this is mostly a reference request: I believe that working hardly enough I could find at least a generating function, but I also believe it must be done somewhere already.



      In fact a more (or less?) specific question in this direction is whether there is some kind of searchable database of combinatorial objects where I could find such things.
      There is a question Combinatorial Databases here on MO but I could not find anything about path enumeration in the answers. The closest I could get is the Dyck path enumeration on FindStat







      reference-request co.combinatorics enumerative-combinatorics recurrences






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 9 at 11:28







      მამუკა ჯიბლაძე

















      asked Jan 9 at 11:22









      მამუკა ჯიბლაძემამუკა ჯიბლაძე

      8,277345114




      8,277345114




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8












          $begingroup$

          It seems the first solution to this problem appeared in Theorem 4 of



          Raschel, Kilian, Counting walks in a quadrant: a unified approach via boundary value problems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14, No. 3, 749-777 (2012). ZBL1238.05014.



          Notice that the walk corresponds to the fourth singular walk of Figure 2. The kernel $K(x,y;z)$ of the walk is given by $$K(x,y;z) = x y z(x +x/y +y +y/x -1/z).$$
          Let $X_0(y) = X_0(y;z)$ (resp. $Y_0(x)=Y_0(x;z)$) be one of the solutions $x$ (resp. $y$) to $K(x,y;z) = 0$. Then Theorem 4 states that
          $$Q(x,y;z) = sum_m,ngeq 1 x^m-1y^n-1 sum_ellgeq 0 z^l a_m,n(ell) $$
          satisfies
          $$ Q(x,y;z) = frac1K(x,y;z)left(z x^2Q(x,0;z)+z y^2 Q(0,y;z)-xyright)$$
          with
          $$ Q(x,0;z) = frac1zx^2 sum_pgeq 0 Y_0 circ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z),left[ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z) - (X_0circ Y_0)^circ (p+1)(x;z) right].$$
          Here $f^circ p$ means $fcirc cdots circ f$ with $p$ occurrences of $f$. Notice that by symmetry $Q(0,y;z) = Q(y,0;z)$.



          A quick check with Mathematica reproduces the table for $ell=7$:



          k = x y z (x + x/y + y + y/x - 1/z);
          x0[y_] = x /. Solve[k == 0, x][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          y0[x_] = y /. Solve[k == 0, y][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          Series[SeriesCoefficient[1/k (Sum[y0[xp] (xp - x0[y0[xp]]) /.
          xp -> Nest[x0[y0[#]] &, x, p], p, 0, 2]
          // -x y + # + (# /. x -> y) &), z, 0, 7], x, 0, 7, y, 0, 7]


          yields the output



          $$left(y+21 y^2+80 y^3+125 y^4+85 y^5+21 y^6+y^7+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x
          left(1+28 y+139 y^2+254 y^3+210 y^4+76 y^5+7 y^6+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^2
          left(21+139 y+306 y^2+308 y^3+140 y^4+21 y^5+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^3
          left(80+254 y+308 y^2+168 y^3+35 y^4+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^4
          left(125+210 y+140 y^2+35 y^3+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^5 left(85+76 y+21
          y^2+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^6 left(21+7
          y+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^7+Oleft(x^8right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Great! But you mean the fourth one in Figure 2, not third, right?
            $endgroup$
            – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
            Jan 9 at 20:21










          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I've corrected it.
            $endgroup$
            – Timothy Budd
            Jan 9 at 20:32


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Bousquet-Melou's work might be pertinent. See
          https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06192
          Figure 4 there seems to be your lattice walk.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I meant for the answer above to be a comment. Sorry.
            $endgroup$
            – user61318
            Jan 9 at 13:48










          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "504"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f320457%2fenumeration-of-lattice-paths-of-a-specific-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          8












          $begingroup$

          It seems the first solution to this problem appeared in Theorem 4 of



          Raschel, Kilian, Counting walks in a quadrant: a unified approach via boundary value problems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14, No. 3, 749-777 (2012). ZBL1238.05014.



          Notice that the walk corresponds to the fourth singular walk of Figure 2. The kernel $K(x,y;z)$ of the walk is given by $$K(x,y;z) = x y z(x +x/y +y +y/x -1/z).$$
          Let $X_0(y) = X_0(y;z)$ (resp. $Y_0(x)=Y_0(x;z)$) be one of the solutions $x$ (resp. $y$) to $K(x,y;z) = 0$. Then Theorem 4 states that
          $$Q(x,y;z) = sum_m,ngeq 1 x^m-1y^n-1 sum_ellgeq 0 z^l a_m,n(ell) $$
          satisfies
          $$ Q(x,y;z) = frac1K(x,y;z)left(z x^2Q(x,0;z)+z y^2 Q(0,y;z)-xyright)$$
          with
          $$ Q(x,0;z) = frac1zx^2 sum_pgeq 0 Y_0 circ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z),left[ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z) - (X_0circ Y_0)^circ (p+1)(x;z) right].$$
          Here $f^circ p$ means $fcirc cdots circ f$ with $p$ occurrences of $f$. Notice that by symmetry $Q(0,y;z) = Q(y,0;z)$.



          A quick check with Mathematica reproduces the table for $ell=7$:



          k = x y z (x + x/y + y + y/x - 1/z);
          x0[y_] = x /. Solve[k == 0, x][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          y0[x_] = y /. Solve[k == 0, y][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          Series[SeriesCoefficient[1/k (Sum[y0[xp] (xp - x0[y0[xp]]) /.
          xp -> Nest[x0[y0[#]] &, x, p], p, 0, 2]
          // -x y + # + (# /. x -> y) &), z, 0, 7], x, 0, 7, y, 0, 7]


          yields the output



          $$left(y+21 y^2+80 y^3+125 y^4+85 y^5+21 y^6+y^7+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x
          left(1+28 y+139 y^2+254 y^3+210 y^4+76 y^5+7 y^6+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^2
          left(21+139 y+306 y^2+308 y^3+140 y^4+21 y^5+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^3
          left(80+254 y+308 y^2+168 y^3+35 y^4+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^4
          left(125+210 y+140 y^2+35 y^3+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^5 left(85+76 y+21
          y^2+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^6 left(21+7
          y+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^7+Oleft(x^8right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Great! But you mean the fourth one in Figure 2, not third, right?
            $endgroup$
            – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
            Jan 9 at 20:21










          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I've corrected it.
            $endgroup$
            – Timothy Budd
            Jan 9 at 20:32















          8












          $begingroup$

          It seems the first solution to this problem appeared in Theorem 4 of



          Raschel, Kilian, Counting walks in a quadrant: a unified approach via boundary value problems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14, No. 3, 749-777 (2012). ZBL1238.05014.



          Notice that the walk corresponds to the fourth singular walk of Figure 2. The kernel $K(x,y;z)$ of the walk is given by $$K(x,y;z) = x y z(x +x/y +y +y/x -1/z).$$
          Let $X_0(y) = X_0(y;z)$ (resp. $Y_0(x)=Y_0(x;z)$) be one of the solutions $x$ (resp. $y$) to $K(x,y;z) = 0$. Then Theorem 4 states that
          $$Q(x,y;z) = sum_m,ngeq 1 x^m-1y^n-1 sum_ellgeq 0 z^l a_m,n(ell) $$
          satisfies
          $$ Q(x,y;z) = frac1K(x,y;z)left(z x^2Q(x,0;z)+z y^2 Q(0,y;z)-xyright)$$
          with
          $$ Q(x,0;z) = frac1zx^2 sum_pgeq 0 Y_0 circ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z),left[ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z) - (X_0circ Y_0)^circ (p+1)(x;z) right].$$
          Here $f^circ p$ means $fcirc cdots circ f$ with $p$ occurrences of $f$. Notice that by symmetry $Q(0,y;z) = Q(y,0;z)$.



          A quick check with Mathematica reproduces the table for $ell=7$:



          k = x y z (x + x/y + y + y/x - 1/z);
          x0[y_] = x /. Solve[k == 0, x][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          y0[x_] = y /. Solve[k == 0, y][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          Series[SeriesCoefficient[1/k (Sum[y0[xp] (xp - x0[y0[xp]]) /.
          xp -> Nest[x0[y0[#]] &, x, p], p, 0, 2]
          // -x y + # + (# /. x -> y) &), z, 0, 7], x, 0, 7, y, 0, 7]


          yields the output



          $$left(y+21 y^2+80 y^3+125 y^4+85 y^5+21 y^6+y^7+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x
          left(1+28 y+139 y^2+254 y^3+210 y^4+76 y^5+7 y^6+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^2
          left(21+139 y+306 y^2+308 y^3+140 y^4+21 y^5+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^3
          left(80+254 y+308 y^2+168 y^3+35 y^4+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^4
          left(125+210 y+140 y^2+35 y^3+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^5 left(85+76 y+21
          y^2+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^6 left(21+7
          y+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^7+Oleft(x^8right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            Great! But you mean the fourth one in Figure 2, not third, right?
            $endgroup$
            – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
            Jan 9 at 20:21










          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I've corrected it.
            $endgroup$
            – Timothy Budd
            Jan 9 at 20:32













          8












          8








          8





          $begingroup$

          It seems the first solution to this problem appeared in Theorem 4 of



          Raschel, Kilian, Counting walks in a quadrant: a unified approach via boundary value problems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14, No. 3, 749-777 (2012). ZBL1238.05014.



          Notice that the walk corresponds to the fourth singular walk of Figure 2. The kernel $K(x,y;z)$ of the walk is given by $$K(x,y;z) = x y z(x +x/y +y +y/x -1/z).$$
          Let $X_0(y) = X_0(y;z)$ (resp. $Y_0(x)=Y_0(x;z)$) be one of the solutions $x$ (resp. $y$) to $K(x,y;z) = 0$. Then Theorem 4 states that
          $$Q(x,y;z) = sum_m,ngeq 1 x^m-1y^n-1 sum_ellgeq 0 z^l a_m,n(ell) $$
          satisfies
          $$ Q(x,y;z) = frac1K(x,y;z)left(z x^2Q(x,0;z)+z y^2 Q(0,y;z)-xyright)$$
          with
          $$ Q(x,0;z) = frac1zx^2 sum_pgeq 0 Y_0 circ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z),left[ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z) - (X_0circ Y_0)^circ (p+1)(x;z) right].$$
          Here $f^circ p$ means $fcirc cdots circ f$ with $p$ occurrences of $f$. Notice that by symmetry $Q(0,y;z) = Q(y,0;z)$.



          A quick check with Mathematica reproduces the table for $ell=7$:



          k = x y z (x + x/y + y + y/x - 1/z);
          x0[y_] = x /. Solve[k == 0, x][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          y0[x_] = y /. Solve[k == 0, y][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          Series[SeriesCoefficient[1/k (Sum[y0[xp] (xp - x0[y0[xp]]) /.
          xp -> Nest[x0[y0[#]] &, x, p], p, 0, 2]
          // -x y + # + (# /. x -> y) &), z, 0, 7], x, 0, 7, y, 0, 7]


          yields the output



          $$left(y+21 y^2+80 y^3+125 y^4+85 y^5+21 y^6+y^7+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x
          left(1+28 y+139 y^2+254 y^3+210 y^4+76 y^5+7 y^6+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^2
          left(21+139 y+306 y^2+308 y^3+140 y^4+21 y^5+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^3
          left(80+254 y+308 y^2+168 y^3+35 y^4+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^4
          left(125+210 y+140 y^2+35 y^3+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^5 left(85+76 y+21
          y^2+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^6 left(21+7
          y+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^7+Oleft(x^8right)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          It seems the first solution to this problem appeared in Theorem 4 of



          Raschel, Kilian, Counting walks in a quadrant: a unified approach via boundary value problems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 14, No. 3, 749-777 (2012). ZBL1238.05014.



          Notice that the walk corresponds to the fourth singular walk of Figure 2. The kernel $K(x,y;z)$ of the walk is given by $$K(x,y;z) = x y z(x +x/y +y +y/x -1/z).$$
          Let $X_0(y) = X_0(y;z)$ (resp. $Y_0(x)=Y_0(x;z)$) be one of the solutions $x$ (resp. $y$) to $K(x,y;z) = 0$. Then Theorem 4 states that
          $$Q(x,y;z) = sum_m,ngeq 1 x^m-1y^n-1 sum_ellgeq 0 z^l a_m,n(ell) $$
          satisfies
          $$ Q(x,y;z) = frac1K(x,y;z)left(z x^2Q(x,0;z)+z y^2 Q(0,y;z)-xyright)$$
          with
          $$ Q(x,0;z) = frac1zx^2 sum_pgeq 0 Y_0 circ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z),left[ (X_0circ Y_0)^circ p(x;z) - (X_0circ Y_0)^circ (p+1)(x;z) right].$$
          Here $f^circ p$ means $fcirc cdots circ f$ with $p$ occurrences of $f$. Notice that by symmetry $Q(0,y;z) = Q(y,0;z)$.



          A quick check with Mathematica reproduces the table for $ell=7$:



          k = x y z (x + x/y + y + y/x - 1/z);
          x0[y_] = x /. Solve[k == 0, x][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          y0[x_] = y /. Solve[k == 0, y][[1]] // FullSimplify[#, y > 0 && x > 0] &;
          Series[SeriesCoefficient[1/k (Sum[y0[xp] (xp - x0[y0[xp]]) /.
          xp -> Nest[x0[y0[#]] &, x, p], p, 0, 2]
          // -x y + # + (# /. x -> y) &), z, 0, 7], x, 0, 7, y, 0, 7]


          yields the output



          $$left(y+21 y^2+80 y^3+125 y^4+85 y^5+21 y^6+y^7+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x
          left(1+28 y+139 y^2+254 y^3+210 y^4+76 y^5+7 y^6+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^2
          left(21+139 y+306 y^2+308 y^3+140 y^4+21 y^5+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^3
          left(80+254 y+308 y^2+168 y^3+35 y^4+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^4
          left(125+210 y+140 y^2+35 y^3+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^5 left(85+76 y+21
          y^2+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^6 left(21+7
          y+Oleft(y^8right)right)+x^7+Oleft(x^8right)$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 9 at 20:31

























          answered Jan 9 at 16:40









          Timothy BuddTimothy Budd

          658512




          658512











          • $begingroup$
            Great! But you mean the fourth one in Figure 2, not third, right?
            $endgroup$
            – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
            Jan 9 at 20:21










          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I've corrected it.
            $endgroup$
            – Timothy Budd
            Jan 9 at 20:32
















          • $begingroup$
            Great! But you mean the fourth one in Figure 2, not third, right?
            $endgroup$
            – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
            Jan 9 at 20:21










          • $begingroup$
            Indeed, I've corrected it.
            $endgroup$
            – Timothy Budd
            Jan 9 at 20:32















          $begingroup$
          Great! But you mean the fourth one in Figure 2, not third, right?
          $endgroup$
          – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
          Jan 9 at 20:21




          $begingroup$
          Great! But you mean the fourth one in Figure 2, not third, right?
          $endgroup$
          – მამუკა ჯიბლაძე
          Jan 9 at 20:21












          $begingroup$
          Indeed, I've corrected it.
          $endgroup$
          – Timothy Budd
          Jan 9 at 20:32




          $begingroup$
          Indeed, I've corrected it.
          $endgroup$
          – Timothy Budd
          Jan 9 at 20:32











          1












          $begingroup$

          Bousquet-Melou's work might be pertinent. See
          https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06192
          Figure 4 there seems to be your lattice walk.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I meant for the answer above to be a comment. Sorry.
            $endgroup$
            – user61318
            Jan 9 at 13:48















          1












          $begingroup$

          Bousquet-Melou's work might be pertinent. See
          https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06192
          Figure 4 there seems to be your lattice walk.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I meant for the answer above to be a comment. Sorry.
            $endgroup$
            – user61318
            Jan 9 at 13:48













          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Bousquet-Melou's work might be pertinent. See
          https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06192
          Figure 4 there seems to be your lattice walk.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Bousquet-Melou's work might be pertinent. See
          https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.06192
          Figure 4 there seems to be your lattice walk.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 9 at 13:47









          user61318user61318

          12515




          12515











          • $begingroup$
            I meant for the answer above to be a comment. Sorry.
            $endgroup$
            – user61318
            Jan 9 at 13:48
















          • $begingroup$
            I meant for the answer above to be a comment. Sorry.
            $endgroup$
            – user61318
            Jan 9 at 13:48















          $begingroup$
          I meant for the answer above to be a comment. Sorry.
          $endgroup$
          – user61318
          Jan 9 at 13:48




          $begingroup$
          I meant for the answer above to be a comment. Sorry.
          $endgroup$
          – user61318
          Jan 9 at 13:48

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f320457%2fenumeration-of-lattice-paths-of-a-specific-type%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown






          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay