equations with alignement and with centering between alignement

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












5














I have the following code:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
beginalign
&beginbmatrix
a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
endbmatrix &&=
beginbmatrix
cosalpha & sinalpha \
-sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
a_1,1 & a_1,2\
a_2,1 & a_2,2
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
cosalpha & -sinalpha \
sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
\
&textbfA' &&= textbfR^T &&cdot && textbfA &&cdot &&textbfR
endalign
enddocument


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here










share|improve this question























  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:49










  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:51










  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:00










  • Thank you all for comments and answers
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:29















5














I have the following code:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
beginalign
&beginbmatrix
a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
endbmatrix &&=
beginbmatrix
cosalpha & sinalpha \
-sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
a_1,1 & a_1,2\
a_2,1 & a_2,2
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
cosalpha & -sinalpha \
sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
\
&textbfA' &&= textbfR^T &&cdot && textbfA &&cdot &&textbfR
endalign
enddocument


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here










share|improve this question























  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:49










  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:51










  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:00










  • Thank you all for comments and answers
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:29













5












5








5


1





I have the following code:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
beginalign
&beginbmatrix
a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
endbmatrix &&=
beginbmatrix
cosalpha & sinalpha \
-sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
a_1,1 & a_1,2\
a_2,1 & a_2,2
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
cosalpha & -sinalpha \
sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
\
&textbfA' &&= textbfR^T &&cdot && textbfA &&cdot &&textbfR
endalign
enddocument


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here










share|improve this question















I have the following code:



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

begindocument
beginalign
&beginbmatrix
a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
endbmatrix &&=
beginbmatrix
cosalpha & sinalpha \
-sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
a_1,1 & a_1,2\
a_2,1 & a_2,2
endbmatrix
&&cdot
&&beginbmatrix
cosalpha & -sinalpha \
sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
\
&textbfA' &&= textbfR^T &&cdot && textbfA &&cdot &&textbfR
endalign
enddocument


It aligns indeed all the argument like this:



enter image description here



But I want to have all the argument centered between the separation as follow + without the equation numeration:



enter image description here







horizontal-alignment equations align






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 18 at 18:00

























asked Dec 18 at 17:43









ecjb

1156




1156











  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:49










  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:51










  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:00










  • Thank you all for comments and answers
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:29
















  • You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:49










  • And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...
    – Raven
    Dec 18 at 17:51










  • indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:00










  • Thank you all for comments and answers
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 18:29















You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters
– Raven
Dec 18 at 17:49




You can use underset in order to get some letters/words underneath the matrices but it doesn't quite give the desired result. And for the equal sign it won't even stay in the same line as the letters
– Raven
Dec 18 at 17:49












And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...
– Raven
Dec 18 at 17:51




And of course you can always do it the manual, dirty way: Prepending ~ until the desired space is reached - or simply using hspace. But that has to be adjusted every time the equation changes...
– Raven
Dec 18 at 17:51












indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code
– ecjb
Dec 18 at 18:00




indeed @Mico. I remove gather from the code
– ecjb
Dec 18 at 18:00












Thank you all for comments and answers
– ecjb
Dec 18 at 18:29




Thank you all for comments and answers
– ecjb
Dec 18 at 18:29










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >c< so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath,array

begindocument

beginequation*
beginarray @c *3 >c< @ c @
beginbmatrix
a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
endbmatrix
&=&
beginbmatrix
cosalpha & sinalpha \
-sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
&cdot&
beginbmatrix
a_1,1 & a_1,2\
a_2,1 & a_2,2
endbmatrix
&cdot&
beginbmatrix
cosalpha & -sinalpha \
sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix
\[2ex]
textbfA' &=& textbfR^T &cdot& textbfA &cdot &textbfR
endarray
endequation*

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of @c *3 >c< @ c @ ?
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 21:19










  • @ecjb @ means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *3... it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like = so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.
    – egreg
    Dec 18 at 21:21










  • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 21:25










  • @ecjb The *n(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >... and <... look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf
    – egreg
    Dec 18 at 21:31










  • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and ccccccc instead of @c *3 >c< @ c @ works also.
    – ecjb
    Dec 27 at 15:12


















5














Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



enter image description here



documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools % for 'bmatrix*' env.
begindocument
beginequation
underbracebeginbmatrix
a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA' =
underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
cosalpha & sinalpha \
-sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR^T
cdot
underbracebeginbmatrix
a_1,1 & a_1,2\
a_2,1 & a_2,2
endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA
cdot
underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
cosalpha & -sinalpha \
sinalpha & cosalpha \
endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR
endequation
enddocument





share|improve this answer




















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466403%2fequations-with-alignement-and-with-centering-between-alignement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >c< so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,array

    begindocument

    beginequation*
    beginarray @c *3 >c< @ c @
    beginbmatrix
    a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
    a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &=&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & sinalpha \
    -sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    a_1,1 & a_1,2\
    a_2,1 & a_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & -sinalpha \
    sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    \[2ex]
    textbfA' &=& textbfR^T &cdot& textbfA &cdot &textbfR
    endarray
    endequation*

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




















    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of @c *3 >c< @ c @ ?
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:19










    • @ecjb @ means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *3... it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like = so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:21










    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:25










    • @ecjb The *n(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >... and <... look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:31










    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and ccccccc instead of @c *3 >c< @ c @ works also.
      – ecjb
      Dec 27 at 15:12















    5














    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >c< so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,array

    begindocument

    beginequation*
    beginarray @c *3 >c< @ c @
    beginbmatrix
    a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
    a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &=&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & sinalpha \
    -sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    a_1,1 & a_1,2\
    a_2,1 & a_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & -sinalpha \
    sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    \[2ex]
    textbfA' &=& textbfR^T &cdot& textbfA &cdot &textbfR
    endarray
    endequation*

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




















    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of @c *3 >c< @ c @ ?
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:19










    • @ecjb @ means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *3... it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like = so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:21










    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:25










    • @ecjb The *n(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >... and <... look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:31










    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and ccccccc instead of @c *3 >c< @ c @ works also.
      – ecjb
      Dec 27 at 15:12













    5












    5








    5






    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >c< so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,array

    begindocument

    beginequation*
    beginarray @c *3 >c< @ c @
    beginbmatrix
    a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
    a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &=&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & sinalpha \
    -sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    a_1,1 & a_1,2\
    a_2,1 & a_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & -sinalpha \
    sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    \[2ex]
    textbfA' &=& textbfR^T &cdot& textbfA &cdot &textbfR
    endarray
    endequation*

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer












    A seven column array does the job. The columns for = and cdot are of type >c< so the spacing around the items is the expected one. The outer array has no intercolumn spaces.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath,array

    begindocument

    beginequation*
    beginarray @c *3 >c< @ c @
    beginbmatrix
    a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
    a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &=&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & sinalpha \
    -sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    a_1,1 & a_1,2\
    a_2,1 & a_2,2
    endbmatrix
    &cdot&
    beginbmatrix
    cosalpha & -sinalpha \
    sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix
    \[2ex]
    textbfA' &=& textbfR^T &cdot& textbfA &cdot &textbfR
    endarray
    endequation*

    enddocument


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Dec 18 at 18:18









    egreg

    708k8618823164




    708k8618823164











    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of @c *3 >c< @ c @ ?
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:19










    • @ecjb @ means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *3... it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like = so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:21










    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:25










    • @ecjb The *n(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >... and <... look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:31










    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and ccccccc instead of @c *3 >c< @ c @ works also.
      – ecjb
      Dec 27 at 15:12
















    • Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of @c *3 >c< @ c @ ?
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:19










    • @ecjb @ means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *3... it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like = so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:21










    • thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!
      – ecjb
      Dec 18 at 21:25










    • @ecjb The *n(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >... and <... look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf
      – egreg
      Dec 18 at 21:31










    • thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and ccccccc instead of @c *3 >c< @ c @ works also.
      – ecjb
      Dec 27 at 15:12















    Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of @c *3 >c< @ c @ ?
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 21:19




    Thank you again @egreg. Could you please the use of @c *3 >c< @ c @ ?
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 21:19












    @ecjb @ means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *3... it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like = so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.
    – egreg
    Dec 18 at 21:21




    @ecjb @ means “no intercolumn space at this point”. With *3... it is meant “repeat 3 times what comes in the second set of braces. As said in the answer, even numbered columns will be like = so the spacing around the sign are correctly handled.
    – egreg
    Dec 18 at 21:21












    thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 21:25




    thank you @egreg, as it is still a little dense for me, do you have a link for the documentation about that notation? Many thanks in advance!
    – ecjb
    Dec 18 at 21:25












    @ecjb The *n(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >... and <... look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf
    – egreg
    Dec 18 at 21:31




    @ecjb The *n(...} notation is documented in all main LaTeX manuals. For the prefixes and affixes >... and <... look at the manual of array: texdoc.net/texmf-dist/doc/latex/tools/array.pdf
    – egreg
    Dec 18 at 21:31












    thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and ccccccc instead of @c *3 >c< @ c @ works also.
    – ecjb
    Dec 27 at 15:12




    thank you again @egreg for the answer. I just tried the code again and ccccccc instead of @c *3 >c< @ c @ works also.
    – ecjb
    Dec 27 at 15:12











    5














    Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



    enter image description here



    documentclassarticle
    usepackagemathtools % for 'bmatrix*' env.
    begindocument
    beginequation
    underbracebeginbmatrix
    a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
    a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
    endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA' =
    underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
    cosalpha & sinalpha \
    -sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR^T
    cdot
    underbracebeginbmatrix
    a_1,1 & a_1,2\
    a_2,1 & a_2,2
    endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA
    cdot
    underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
    cosalpha & -sinalpha \
    sinalpha & cosalpha \
    endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR
    endequation
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer

























      5














      Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



      enter image description here



      documentclassarticle
      usepackagemathtools % for 'bmatrix*' env.
      begindocument
      beginequation
      underbracebeginbmatrix
      a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
      a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
      endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA' =
      underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
      cosalpha & sinalpha \
      -sinalpha & cosalpha \
      endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR^T
      cdot
      underbracebeginbmatrix
      a_1,1 & a_1,2\
      a_2,1 & a_2,2
      endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA
      cdot
      underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
      cosalpha & -sinalpha \
      sinalpha & cosalpha \
      endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR
      endequation
      enddocument





      share|improve this answer























        5












        5








        5






        Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagemathtools % for 'bmatrix*' env.
        begindocument
        beginequation
        underbracebeginbmatrix
        a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
        a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
        endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA' =
        underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
        cosalpha & sinalpha \
        -sinalpha & cosalpha \
        endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR^T
        cdot
        underbracebeginbmatrix
        a_1,1 & a_1,2\
        a_2,1 & a_2,2
        endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA
        cdot
        underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
        cosalpha & -sinalpha \
        sinalpha & cosalpha \
        endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR
        endequation
        enddocument





        share|improve this answer












        Here's a suggestion: Take a different approach to denoting what's A', A, R, R^T, by using underbrace directives. This should make it clear to even the most casual readers that they're not dealing with two separate equations.



        enter image description here



        documentclassarticle
        usepackagemathtools % for 'bmatrix*' env.
        begindocument
        beginequation
        underbracebeginbmatrix
        a'_1,1 & a'_1,2\
        a'_2,1 & a'_2,2
        endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA' =
        underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
        cosalpha & sinalpha \
        -sinalpha & cosalpha \
        endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR^T
        cdot
        underbracebeginbmatrix
        a_1,1 & a_1,2\
        a_2,1 & a_2,2
        endbmatrix_textstylemathbfA
        cdot
        underbracebeginbmatrix*[r]
        cosalpha & -sinalpha \
        sinalpha & cosalpha \
        endbmatrix*_textstylemathbfR
        endequation
        enddocument






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Dec 18 at 18:07









        Mico

        273k30369756




        273k30369756



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f466403%2fequations-with-alignement-and-with-centering-between-alignement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?